Alert on Giant African Snail infestation in Alappuzha district
Officials said here on Wednesday that with the onset of the monsoon, the widespread presence of African Snail has been observed in various parts of the district. The KCPM has urged both farmers and the public to remain vigilant against the pest, which damages crops. Since the secretions of African snails might contain parasites capable of causing diseases in humans, it is essential to handle and control them with extreme caution. 'Effective eradication is possible only through coordinated, community-based control measures,' the KCPM said in a statement.
Given that the nematodes found in the secretions of African snails have the potential to cause encephalitis in humans, the KCPM emphasised that large-scale awareness campaigns and control measures should be launched under local self-government institutions, the Agriculture and Health departments, and other relevant agencies.
African snails attack a variety of agricultural crops, including banana, tuber crops, ginger, turmeric, papaya, citrus fruits, and leafy vegetables, causing significant crop damage. They cause the most destruction to banana leaves. According to officials, the snails have a very high reproductive capacity.
'Both male and female reproductive organs are present in a single individual. On average, one snail can lay up to 900 eggs, of which about 90% will hatch. Under favourable conditions, they can live for seven to ten years, during which their population multiplies rapidly,' the statement added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Ancient proteins could transform palaeontology
ANCIENT PROTEINS nestled in fossils contain troves of information about long-dead creatures. However, like all ancient molecules, proteins degrade. Until recently the oldest proteins recovered for reliable, in-depth analysis were around 4m years old. But two separate studies published in Nature on July 9th, one by researchers at Harvard University and the Smithsonian Institution and another led by researchers at the University of Copenhagen, have recovered ancient proteins, some of which could be up to 29m years old. The discoveries should help palaeontologists investigate the behaviour, diet and evolution of animals long thought too old to be studied with molecular tools. Both research teams recovered the ancient proteins from tooth enamel, the hardest substance in vertebrates' bodies, in fossils they assessed to be many millions of years old. They first ground the enamel to a powder and then applied a chemical solution to draw out the proteins. To confirm that the proteins were not the result of modern contamination, they identified chemical damage to the proteins accrued over time, a process called diagenesis. The amount of damage lined up with what they would expect for fossils of that age. The team from Harvard and the Smithsonian Institution focused on the enamel of big African animals, such as elephants, in Kenya's Turkana Basin, which were between 1.5m and 29m years old (although they have high confidence only in fossils up to the age of 18m). Finding old proteins in one of the warmest places on Earth, where biological molecules easily break down, suggested that even older proteins could be recovered in better conditions. The researchers from Copenhagen confirmed this suspicion. In the Haughton Crater in the much colder climes of the Canadian Arctic, they managed to extract protein sequences from the tooth of a 24m-year-old rhinocerotid, a squat, single-horned mammal in the rhinoceros family. Having recovered the proteins, the two teams were able to compare their sequen-ces against databases of known protein sequences from other species. This allowed them to place the extinct species on the tree of life. For example, the Harvard study suggests that an 18m-year-old creature in the Anthracotheriidae family is probably the ancestor of modern hippos, whereas the close relatives of a rhino-like animal called Arsinoitherium, thought to be 29m years old, are all extinct. Enrico Cappellini, who was part of the Copenhagen study, says that the new discoveries expand the timeline of proteins available for analysis ten-fold compared with ancient DNA (aDNA), which lasts about 1m years. That means palaeontologists can now understand the evolution of organisms that are too old for other ancient molecular analysis. Future analyses of carbon and nitrogen isotopes within the preserved proteins could also offer insights into the diet, environment and migratory behaviour of extinct species. There are tantalising hints that scientists may have even older proteins to discover. Back in 2009, researchers from North Carolina State University retrieved fragments of collagen protein from the fossil of an 80m-year-old duck-billed dinosaur called Brachylophosaurus canadensis. Although the collagen had degraded into small bits, they were able to confirm that it was of a specific kind now only found in birds. Better preserved proteins yet to be found might be able to reveal even more. Commenting on the Copenhagen findings, Matthew Collins, a palaeoproteomics expert at the University of Cambridge who was not part of either study, says the results are 'spectacular if true' and that they could transform interpretation of fossil records. Because some proteins in tooth enamel vary between the sexes, they could help determine the sex of some fossils, which can otherwise be tricky. Placing species on the tree of life could also clear up long-running evolutionary disputes, such as the debate over the true ancestry of horses. Whereas aDNA took palaeontologists into the distant past, it seems ancient proteins could take them further still. Curious about the world? To enjoy our mind-expanding science coverage, sign up to Simply Science, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
Eliminating this one food for just 9 days can reduce fatty liver and reverse damage, as per US research findings
People commonly hear warnings about the negative impact of sugary drinks together with processed foods. Scientific studies demonstrate that fructose added to beverages and snacks, creates serious health threats. The sugar causes harm to your liver cells, which could result in serious medical conditions. However, there is good news now! Research reveals that eliminating added fructose for nine days will start to repair damaged liver tissue. Let's dig deeper.... How sugar harms your liver The liver develops fat deposits from fructose consumption which results in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) ranks as the leading liver disease among contemporary adults, and impacts approximately 30% of people living in developed nations. NAFLD exists in 90 percent of obese individuals and people with diabetes. Fructose differs from glucose, because it undergoes liver processing to become fat. The presence of liver fat leads to inflammation and causes damage to liver cells, which results in impaired liver operation. The condition results in both insulin resistance and increased risks of developing diabetes and heart disease, and various metabolic disorders. What do studies say Scientists at Touro University and the University of California, San Francisco conducted groundbreaking research with obese Latino and African-American youths who consumed high-fructose diets. The scientists exchanged fructose-rich foods with glucose-rich foods while maintaining the same daily calorie intake. A short period of nine days led to a significant 20% reduction in liver fat, according to MRI results and an enhancement of insulin sensitivity. The participants experienced liver benefits without significant weight changes because their body weight decreased by less than 1%, so the effects were directly related to fructose reduction. Research findings show that NAFLD in its early stages does not need to be permanent, because dietary modifications can reverse the condition within a short period. The culprit? Fructose High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) found in sodas and processed foods, has led to the increased presence of fructose in modern diets. Research demonstrates that eating large amounts of fructose creates two major health issues, which include fatty liver disease and obesity. The human body processes fructose from processed foods and drinks differently than natural sugars found in whole fruits, because these products contain fewer beneficial compounds such as fiber and antioxidants. The excessive amount of fructose consumption causes liver damage through fat accumulation and metabolic disturbances. Quitting processed sugar When people replace sugary beverages and processed foods with starches and natural foods containing whole sugars, their livers become healthier while decreasing their chances of diabetes and heart disease. Simple dietary changes according to the Touro-UCSF study demonstrate that they can effectively fight against increasing health issues. Practical steps to protect your liver Replace all sugary drinks and sodas with water, herbal tea or natural water infused with fruits. Look for processed foods which contain high-fructose corn syrup and added sugars by checking labels to avoid them in snacks and cereals and sauces. Eat whole foods that contain natural sugars with fiber content, instead of processed foods. Home cooking allows you to maintain control over ingredients and sugar content. Limit your consumption of 100% fruit juices, because their fructose content remains high despite the lack of added sugars. Consult your doctor: If you have obesity, diabetes, or suspect fatty liver disease, seek medical advice early. Sodas and processed foods contain sugar that functions as a hazardous substance, which causes harm to liver tissue and metabolic wellness. Reducing your fructose consumption for a short period allows you to establish both protective measures, and reverse existing liver damage which supports future health. References: UCSF News - Switching Sugar for Starch Leads to Less Fatty Liver in Kids: PMC Article - Effects of Dietary Fructose Restriction on Liver Fat: PMC Article - Effect of a High-Fructose Weight-Maintaining Diet on Liver: UCSF News - Obese Children's Health Rapidly Improves With Sugar Reduction: - Fructose restriction study:
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Should you use a standing desk?
THE HUMAN body evolved to forage and hunt on the African savannahs, not to sit in a cubicle all day. The risks associated with sitting—from increased blood sugar levels to greater odds of dying from cancer—lead many health authorities to warn against spending too much time doing so. The sit-to-stand desk is a popular way of helping people get upright. But how effective is it? Several arguments are made in its favour. As standing makes the heart work harder than sitting does, proponents say it improves cardiovascular health, enhances attention and reduces fatigue. Physiotherapists claim that standing also improves posture, reducing lower back pain. What's more, some studies suggest that standing workers report lower stress and greater happiness than sitters do. Dozens of studies have been run on the potential health effects of sit-stand desks. A recent review, led by María Eugenia Visier-Alfonso at University of Castilla-La Mancha in Spain and published in BMC Public Health in May, selected 17 for examination. Dr Visier-Alfonso limited her analysis to those that looked mainly at university students. Of the four studies that looked at mental health, three confirmed that sit-stand desk use reduced anxiety and improved mood. Of the four on back pain, however, only one revealed significant pain reduction among sit-stand desk users compared with control groups. The one study Dr Visier-Alfonso found that looked at the cardiovascular and metabolic benefits of sit-stand desks suggested that they do result in users having lower blood pressure. (The remainder mostly looked at academic outcomes, which were mixed.) Studies conducted on more varied groups reach different conclusions. A general review of over 50 papers on sit-stand desk use, led by April Chambers at the University of Pittsburgh and published in Applied Ergonomics in 2019, found only weak evidence that their use improves cardiovascular health. The heart rates of sit-stand desk users were 7.5-13.7 beats per minute faster on average than those of people at ordinary desks, indicating that they might be working harder. But the studies that examined the question found no notable differences in blood pressure or VO2 (the efficiency with which the body transports oxygen to the muscles). Analysis of other health-related biomarkers, like glucose, insulin and cholesterol, were also no different in most studies. This suggested that the desks were not providing metabolic benefits that might, say, stave off diseases like type II diabetes. Improvements in levels of energy and attention among those who used sit-stand desks were similarly difficult to spot. What's more, Dr Chambers found no evidence that their use influenced mood. However, notable benefits did emerge in the area of lower-back pain. Of 17 papers that studied this question, eight revealed evidence that giving participants the option to stand significantly reduced their lower-back pain (the remaining nine showed no clear effect). This suggests that standing may help some people with this condition, an effect that may be more noticeable among people past university age. So what is the aching desk jockey to do? Both reviews agree that no significant harm is associated with the use of sit-stand desks. And although some of the differences between their conclusions may be down to chance or sample size, it is also possible that different benefits accrue to users of different ages.
