logo
Nick Offerman Says ‘Parks and Recreation' Cast ‘Heartbroken' at Co-Star's Murder

Nick Offerman Says ‘Parks and Recreation' Cast ‘Heartbroken' at Co-Star's Murder

Yahoo2 days ago

Nick Offerman has revealed how his Parks and Recreation castmates are helping each other deal with the violent death of co-star Jonathan Joss.
Joss played Chief Ken Hotate in the NBC comedy alongside Offerman, Chris Pratt, Amy Poehler, Aubrey Plaza, Rashida Jones, Adam Scott, and others. The 59-year-old was gunned on Sunday down by a neighbor, Sigfredo Ceja Alvarez, in San Antonio, Texas.
Tristan Kern de Gonzales, Joss's bereaved husband, posted a statement to his Facebook page on Monday where he alleged that Joss was 'murdered by someone who could not stand the sight of two men loving each other.'
Offerman, who played Ron Swanson on Parks and Recreation, told People the tragedy had united the cast of the show that ran for seven seasons, including a reunion episode in 2020.
'The cast has been texting together about it all day and we're just heartbroken,' Offerman said. 'Jonathan was such a sweet guy and we loved having him as our Chief Ken Hotate. A terrible tragedy.'
Joss appeared on Parks and Recreation for five years, and was the voice of John Redcorn in animated Fox hit King of the Hill.
Gonzales said that he and Joss had gone back to their home on Sunday to collect mail, only to find 'the skull of one of our dogs and its harness placed in clear view'.
The distressed couple were 'yelling and crying' after seeing the remains when Gonzales said a man allegedly approached them, shouted homophobic abuse, and shot Jess.
Alvarez, 56, was taken into police custody shortly after the shooting and charged with murder. His bond has been set at $200,000.
In a statement to the Daily Beast, the San Antonio Police Department said that their investigation 'found no evidence whatsoever to indicate that the Mr. Joss's murder was related to his sexual orientation.'
'We take such allegations very seriously and have thoroughly reviewed all available information. Should any new evidence come to light, we will charge the suspect accordingly,' they added.
Gonzales and Joss were married on Valentine's Day this year. Gonzales said Joss gave him 'more love in our time together than most people ever get.'
.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cuomo — and attacks against ex-gov — takes center stage in rowdy NYC Democratic mayoral debate
Cuomo — and attacks against ex-gov — takes center stage in rowdy NYC Democratic mayoral debate

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cuomo — and attacks against ex-gov — takes center stage in rowdy NYC Democratic mayoral debate

Ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo was at the center of a pile-on during a rowdy mayoral debate Wednesday night — as flailing Democratic candidates seized their first chance to attack the primary's frontrunner in a public forum. Cuomo literally stood mid-stage between the other eight candidates, who repeatedly pelted the thrice-elected Democrat — with COVID nursing home deaths and his checkered record leading the Empire State hijacking much of the NBC-Politico debate. 'The people who don't feel safe are young women, mothers and grandmothers around Andrew Cuomo,' shot the Rev. Michael Blake, a former Obama administration official, who scathingly evoked the sexual harassment accusations that led to the former governor's resignation. 'That's the greatest threat to public safety in New York City.' An often-heated Cuomo responded to the attacks, as well as pointed questions by debate moderators, with barbs of his own and conspicuous dodges for the chaotic more than two hours. He directed fire of his own at the candidates closest to him in the polls: Democratic socialist Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani and City Comptroller Brad Lander. Cuomo, 67, cast Mamdani's plan to offer $10 billion of freebies for hardworking New Yorkers as not rooted in 'reality.' He also argued that Mamdani, a 33-year-old who was elected to the state Legislature in 2021, lacked the experience to stand up to a hostile President Trump, if elected mayor. 'Donald Trump would go through Mr. Mamdani like a hot knife through butter,' Cuomo said. 'He has been in government for 27 minutes' Mamdani, who is rising to within single digits of Cuomo in the polls, hammered the longtime politician as not being on the side of working-class New Yorkers. The Democratic Socialists of America lawmaker skewered Cuomo's super PAC, Fix The City, for cashing in on a $1 million donation from the popular app DoorDash — for which the former governor's top-ranking aide Melissa DeRosa's father works as a lobbyist. He landed some big haymakers against Cuomo, but also peppered his answers with little jabs. When asked his biggest regret, Mamdani was harsh — and stayed on point with attacking Cuomo. 'As a Democrat, one of my regrets is having trusted the leaders within our own party leaders like Andrew Cuomo, because what we've seen is that kind of leadership has delivered us to this point where we are under attack by an affordability crisis on the inside and a Trump administration,' he said. Cuomo at one point quipped that Trump 'gets sued 10 times before he gets out of bed in the morning.' 'Kind of like you,' Mamdani shot back. Lander, for his part, subtly swiped Cuomo in nearly every answer — calling him as corrupt as Trump. Cuomo went scorched earth at Lander, who is polling at third place. He accused Lander of corruptly approving $500,000 in contracts associated with his wife — a charge the comptroller called a lie. Cuomo managed to attack all of his opponents in one fell swoop by calling out their past support for the 'Defund the Police' movement. 'We wouldn't need more police if we didn't defund them in the first place,' Cuomo said. But when it came time to answer for his own record, Cuomo seemingly couldn't find the words. Asked about the controversial state bail reforms that he signed into law in 2019, Cuomo chose to use his 30 seconds to attack Lander — prompting the moderators to warn him he was running out of time to answer. He also got heated — and raised his voice — as he insisted nursing home deaths were not undercounted in New York during the COVID-19 pandemic, though they were. 'It's very, it's very clear that's the Trump line, the MAGA line,' claimed Cuomo, who is facing a Department of Justice probe for allegedly lying to Congress about his handling of COVID nursing home deaths. The crowded dais provided little oxygen to the struggling candidates, who for months now have struggled to topple Cuomo atop the polls or match the momentum of the socialist Mamdani. Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and state Sen. Zellnor Myrie were two of the few able to cut through the often chaotic barrage of attacks on the ex-governor, with Big Apple politicos saying the pair came across as authentic politicians with concrete agendas. Hedge fund manager and longshot candidate Whitney Tilson went after Mamdani several times, dredging up a past X post that called the NYPD 'wicked & corrupt.' Political consultant and lobbyist Yvette Buckner said voters will likely be left wanting to hear more. 'There were some missed opportunities on the top issues of public safety and affordability and the question of the 'biggest regret' for candidates, which is something New Yorkers would want to hear more about, especially from the front runner,' she added. But Blake, a former state Assembly member, proved to be the breakout star of what will be his first and final debate, repeatedly hitting Cuomo — including over a racially tinged comment from decades ago. Democratic operative Ken Frydman, though, dashed Blake's hopes, saying, 'Cuomo will get more of the black vote than he will.' 'No one knows who he is.' — Additional reporting by Carl Campanile

Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.
Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is it time to talk impeachment? Given Trump's actions, it may be overdue.

In the few months since Donald Trump returned to the presidency, he has issued so many executive orders and pronouncements on domestic and foreign policy that he may have overwhelmed our intellectual and emotional energy to fully appreciate their impact. Whether or not you approve of the direction he wants to take the country, he took office after being duly elected. Many of his initiatives are within his authority. Generally speaking, Trump has the right to indulge his ideological obsessions and advance policies that benefit the economic class that 'brung him to the dance.' But, what of those executive orders that exceed the limited authority proscribed for the presidency — powers meant to be shared with other branches of government, or those that defy Supreme Court interpretations of the Constitution? Say goodbye to democracy — and our freedoms — if we ignore James Madison's warning in the Federalist Papers No. 47 that "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny." On Jan. 20, 2025, Trump took the Presidential Oath of Office to 'faithfully execute the Office of President' and 'preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." Yet just three months later, when asked if he agreed with Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statement that every person in the United States is entitled to due process, Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker that he's not so sure. 'I don't know. I'm not a lawyer.' The Constitution states that 'no person' shall be 'deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.' It says 'person,' not 'citizen.' Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court has held that everyone in this country have certain basic rights. When Welker reminded the president of this constitutionally guaranteed right, Trump complained that this only slows him down: 'I was elected to get them the hell out of here, and the courts are holding me from doing it.' This helps explain why democracy requires an independent judiciary — to check the actions of the executive (from local police to presidents) to ensure that government allegations of wrongdoing are accurate and mistakes are not made. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the recent high-profile example, is Salvadoran, married to an American citizen with three American-born children who has lived in U.S. since 2011. He was granted protected status by an immigration judge in 2019. Nevertheless he was detained by ICE in March and deported to El Salvador without a hearing. The Trump administration originally acknowledged that he was mistakenly deported, and a federal judge ordered that he be returned to the U.S. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld this directive. As of this writing the Trump administration has done nothing to facilitate his return. The President even quipped that he could do so, but he will not. The government now asserts that Abrego Garcia's deportation wasn't a mistake, claiming he is a member of the Salvadoran gang MS-13, but declines to provide evidence supporting the claim. As if to emphasize contempt for constitutional rights, deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller recently said that the Trump administration was considering suspending Habeas Corpus to block an immigrant's right to challenge their detention before being deported. There are other examples of presidential defiance of the law, such as the illegal impoundment of congressionally authorized appropriations and constitutional freedoms. So, it is time to insert the 'I' word (impeachment) into civic conversations. I am not naïve: impeachment is neither imminent nor likely — for now. The disgrace of this period, as future historians will note, is that whether the President has intimidated Congress into silence or they applaud his overly expansive use of power, the legislative branch has abandoned its oversight responsibility. For now, Congress is content to look the other way. Nevertheless, we must begin to insert 'impeachable offenses' into civic conversations. If we don't, we will be complicit in accepting that the aberrant behavior of this President is the new normal for the evaluation of future presidents. Howard L. Simon served as executive director of the ACLU of Florida from 1997-2018. He resides in Gainesville and is president of Clean Okeechobee Waters Foundation, Inc. This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Talk of impeachment hasn't come up. How long can that last? | Opinion

Oregon track star wages legal battle against trans athlete policy after medal ceremony protest
Oregon track star wages legal battle against trans athlete policy after medal ceremony protest

New York Post

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Oregon track star wages legal battle against trans athlete policy after medal ceremony protest

An Oregon high school track star is speaking out after refusing to stand on the podium with a transgender athlete, saying her protest was about fairness – not hate. 'I just didn't think that it's fair to biological females to allow and encourage biological males to compete among us, not only for myself and the other girl that stepped down, but the girl who should have been on the podium and the girl who didn't even get to go to state because she was beaten by a biological male at districts,' athlete Alexa Anderson said on 'Fox & Friends.' Advertisement 'It is not about hate or transphobia at all. It's about protecting women's rights and their right to fair and equal competition within sports.' Anderson and another athlete named Reese Eckard, who finished in third and fourth place in the Oregon State Athletic Association's Girls High Jump finale, respectively, stood behind the podium during the ceremony because they refused to stand next to the transgender student, Liaa Rose, who placed fifth, according to the New York Post. An official behind the event allegedly told those protesting to 'step aside' and 'get out' of the photos. 3 Reese Eckard and Alexa Anderson protest the girls' high jump medal ceremony at the Oregon State high school championships at Hayward Field on May 31, 2025. America First Policy Institute Advertisement 3 Alexa Anderson speaks out on her legal battle during a recent interview with 'Fox and Friends.' 'I was very shocked and kind of stressed with all the eyes and attention on us, so I complied with what he said, but I am a little bit frustrated that people were angry with us rather than supportive of our movement,' Anderson continued. During the 'Fox & Friends' appearance, Anderson's attorney Jessica Steinmann spelled out the legal action currently in motion, sharing that America First Policy Institute filed a complaint with the US Department of Education to request that they investigate the Oregon Department of Education. 'The law that was meant to protect our girls, Title IX, is now being weaponized against them. On top of that, they are now being sidelined and there's clear First Amendment issues as well,' she shared. Advertisement 3 Eckard and Anderson refused to share the podium with transgender athlete Liaa Rose who tied for fifth in the event. @LaLONeill/X Steinmann said female athletes today are losing medal access, scholarships and economic opportunities to biological males allegedly stealing their thunder. The incident came on the heels of a controversy in neighboring California, where trans athlete AB Hernandez won two state titles against female competitors.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store