
Bird flu, feared as a possible pandemic, poses growing risk to people as pathogen spreads, scientists warn
Bird flu has been circling the globe for decades. So the discovery in 2024 that the deadly pathogen had jumped from a wild bird to a cow came as a shock to virus watchers. Now, in just over a year, the virus has ripped through America's dairy herds and poultry flocks. It has jumped to other mammals – including humans. Seventy Americans have caught the virus,
one has died
. Long feared as a possible pandemic, doctors and veterinarians fighting the virus told us Biden's government was slow to act; while the Trump administration has now laid off more than a hundred key scientists – all as the virus keeps spreading.
Dr. Kay Russo: At present, we're given a stick, and they put a blindfold on us, and we're sent into a gunfight and we're losing. We are losing.
Veterinarian Dr. Kay Russo told us we are running out of time to stop bird flu. She was called in when the virus H5N1 hit this dairy herd in Colorado last summer. It cost the farm about $400,000 to treat its sick cattle – most recovered. But as an added precaution, we suited up to ensure we didn't bring anything onto the farm ourselves.
Bill Whitaker: There's no front or back.
Dr. Kay Russo: There's no front or back. It's high fashion.
Bill Whitaker: It's real high fashion.
It's not clear how bird flu is spread from cow to cow, but milking equipment is a prime suspect. The virus is thought to linger on the auto-milker waiting for the next cow. Workers here in milking parlors have also fallen sick.
Bill Whitaker: So what concerns you the most?
Dr. Kay Russo: The pandemic potential for a virus like this one. And you know that is the worst case scenario, right? And ultimately one we want to avoid. I can't say that that's gonna happen but we don't want to play with fire.
It
started in Texas
. In early 2024, cows were suffering from a mysterious disease: their fevers spiked, their milk dried up, they were coughing, drooling, lethargic. Soon there were more sick cattle in neighboring states. Kay Russo joined a conference call of worried vets to try to figure it out.
Dr. Kay Russo: I started asking questions. "What are the birds doing on the farm?" And one of the veterinarians replied, "well, they're all dead."
Bill Whitaker: So they're seeing dead birds on the farms –
Dr. Kay Russo: Yep. Yep. You know we started to see the cats that were demonstrating neurologic symptoms. And--and more alarmingly the workers were complaining of flu-like symptoms.
Tests confirmed Russo's worst fears: H5N1 had jumped to cattle for the first time. In past outbreaks, bird flu has often been deadly in people.
Dr. Kay Russo: If you look at cases worldwide of H5 influenza, the mortality rate's fifty per cent. And so we're all kind of you know, talking to each other. What does this mean? And that was a scary space to be in.
Despite the urgency, Russo and other vets told us the Biden administration was slow to act. It was a month before the U.S. Department of Agriculture required cows to be tested before interstate travel, and 10 months before a raw milk testing program was launched. Today, some states test weekly, some hardly at all.
Bill Whitaker: Do we have enough information about how this virus is spreading?
Dr. Kay Russo: I would say today, no. And that comes down to boots on the ground where you have a strike force that comes in the middle of an outbreak and--and just starts collecting data.
Russo told us at the moment the virus has the upper hand.
Dr. Kay Russo: I think it's a numbers game, and the more we let it move unchecked, the more likely we're gonna have even a bigger mess on our hands.
Poultry farmers have had to kill tens of millions of birds – removing them with trailers – and driving
egg prices
sky high. Now, a new strain of bird flu has been discovered in cattle. It has led to more severe disease in some people.
Dr. Kamran Khan: This is a threat that is very significant and very real. And I recognize also this is a moment where it's easy to sound like an alarmist. What I'm here to tell you is this is a very serious threat to humanity. And the longer we let this persist, the greater the risks are going to be.
Dr. Kamran Khan is an infectious disease physician in Toronto. His company, BlueDot, was among the first to flag the virus in China that became the COVID pandemic. Khan told us bird flu is just as concerning. He showed us how fast the virus has spread among dairy cattle.
Bill Whitaker: This seems like almost a wildfire to me.
Dr. Kamran Khan: Yeah, absolutely.
Now add in poultry outbreaks.
Bill Whitaker: So this is virtually the whole country?
Dr. Kamran Khan: Pretty much.
Next, Dr. Kamran Khan showed us a map of all the confirmed human cases of bird flu in the last five years. Most have been in Asia – until now.
Dr. Kamran Khan: What you start to see around 2024 is you start to see a case in Texas, and then you start to see this sudden, rapid increase in cases across the country.
Bill Whitaker: All over the place.
Dr. Kamran Khan: What's happening here is wild birds have infected cows, who have then infected other cows, who have then infected humans. And so there's this complex web of all of these different animal species now passing the virus in different directions.
Bill Whitaker: Is this one of those things you have never seen before?
Dr. Kamran Khan: The world has never seen this kind of situation and it's showing us that the virus is capable of adaption. If you allow it, it will just get better and better at infecting other mammals, including potentially humans.
Most of the confirmed cases in the U.S. have been farmworkers. Most had mild symptoms. The one person who died had underlying health conditions. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say the virus still poses a low risk to the general public. But Khan told us many cases are going undetected.
Bill Whitaker: Why do you say that?
Dr. Kamran Khan: So in a recent study of dairy workers their blood was tested for antibodies to H5N1, not looking for the virus, but looking for the immune system's memory of this virus. And it turns out that 7 per cent of them, one out of roughly every 15 workers actually had antibodies to H5N1.
Bill Whitaker: People are not generally getting very sick from this. So what's the reason for all the alarm?
Dr. Kamran Khan: Influenza is a particularly formidable virus. It is constantly changing. And the more that we allow it to evolve and adapt by infecting people, I mean, this is kinda Darwinian evolution here, right? It can change in ways that actually make it even more deadly, or more easily transmissible, or even resist against some of the antiviral medications that we have.
Khan told us every new infection increases the odds bird flu could lead to severe disease – as we saw during COVID. In North America, six people now have ended up in the hospital with bird flu. More worrying, five people had no known exposure to sick animals.
One girl in Mexico died
two weeks ago.
Dr. Kamran Khan: We are really at risk of this virus evolving into one that has pandemic potential. And the reality is none of us know whether this is next week, or next year, or never. I don't think it's never. But it may be here far sooner than any of us would like.
Many scientists told us vaccines could be our best defense. There is a vaccine for bird flu, but it has not been licensed by the Food and Drug Administration. Moderna has a new one – but the Trump administration has paused its final funding. There are vaccines for poultry too – but they haven't been used because many of America's trading partners will not import vaccinated birds. A glimmer of hope: the USDA's milk testing program.
Dr. Keith Poulsen: This is repurposed from COVID testing from three or four years ago.
Dr. Keith Poulsen is director of the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Lab, part of the USDA's plan to test raw milk for H5N1. Pasteurization kills the virus, but raw milk can be loaded with it.
Bill Whitaker: Is this where you would identify the virus?
Dr. Keith Poulsen: Yeah. It can detect even just one positive cow in a group of a thousand.
Forty-five states are now doing some form of testing. Poulsen told us it's helped to slow the spread of the virus in some states.
Bill Whitaker: When you see the outbreak curve level off or start to decline, do you go like "Whew. We dodged one?"
Dr. Keith Poulsen: I don't think we go "whew" until we're deactivated, our lab. We're still in outbreak response mode. And while we may have fewer detections, we know that there are still viruses circulating based on all the data from the virologists that's we're talking to. And we want to make sure that we catch it fast.
The CDC is trying to ramp up its testing. But there's another problem: almost half of farmworkers are undocumented and may be reluctant to be tested.
Dr. Angela Rasmussen: If we're not testing people, if we're not looking for people who might get it, if we're not looking for evidence of an early cluster of human-to-human transmission, then we're going to miss it.
Dr. Angela Rasmussen is an American virologist working in Canada. Rasmussen told us it's not just the number of human cases that is alarming, but that the virus is jumping to more mammals. Every new spillover gives the virus another chance to evolve and potentially spread person to person.
Bill Whitaker: So we are now seeing the virus has spread from birds to cattle, and now to foxes, goats, pigs, rats, cats, raccoons–
Dr. Angela Rasmussen: The fact that this virus can infect so many different types of mammals is a huge concern in terms of its ability to infect people.
Bill Whitaker: One of your colleagues told us that if this should spiral into a pandemic, this flu could make Covid look like a walk in the park.
Dr. Angela Rasmussen: I agree.
Bill Whitaker: You're scaring me.
Dr. Angela Rasmussen: I'm scared about it myself. I don't sleep very much these days, Bill.
Rasmussen was among the scientists given expert briefings by the Biden administration in 2024. She told us Biden's team miscalculated the threat at first.
Dr. Angela Rasmussen: It was some gambling and some wishful thinking. Thinking this isn't actually gonna be that big of a deal. And it turns out it was a very big deal.
Bill Whitaker: Has the Trump Administration gotten its arms around this problem?
Dr. Angela Rasmussen: No, I would say is the short answer. But the other-- the longer answer is that I don't actually entirely know what is –what is going on.
Bill Whitaker: Why is that?
Dr. Angela Rasmussen: Many of the people who were working on this, at least at CDC, have--have been fired from the federal government. So the influenza division at CDC has been decimated, and in fact, there is a communications ban that has been put on these federal workers.
Bill Whitaker: -- what do you think of that?
Dr. Angela Rasmussen: I think it's insane, actually, that I have to have conversations on encrypted messaging apps with my colleagues, who I would normally just send emails to.
Hundreds of federal scientists and health workers who track bird flu have been
laid off
. Some may be rehired. The CDC declined to answer our questions, saying it continues to respond to the H5N1 bird flu outbreak. Colorado vet Kay Russo – and others – told us they feel stymied: the current distrust of science and vaccines is hurting their fight to try to prevent the next pandemic.
Dr. Kay Russo: I would scorch the earth if this ends up in children deaths. And so as a mother, as a veterinarian, as a scientist, I'm just asking you, trust us, because I will do everything in my power and there's plenty of folks behind me that will do the same, to keep this from getting to that point.
Produced by Heather Abbott. Associate producer, Matthew Riley. Broadcast associate, Mariah Johnson. Edited by Warren Lustig.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
38 minutes ago
- Axios
Starbucks taps into health trends with protein coffee test
LAS VEGAS — Starbucks is tapping into the growing demand for protein-packed drinks as consumers seek to boost their intake for health and wellness. Why it matters: The world's largest coffee chain unveiled Tuesday that it is testing protein in its cold foam as part of its "Back to Starbucks" plan. CEO Brian Niccol is trying to reverse a decline in foot traffic and sales by returning to its roots. The big picture: Protein is hot and having a moment beyond social media influencers sharing order hacks. Restaurant brands like Dutch Bros Coffee and Smoothie King have added more protein to their products to cater to changing consumer appetites. Eating a high-protein diet is important to maintain muscle for people taking appetite-suppressing injectable treatments like Ozempic and Wegovy, research shows. Nearly 18 million Americans are expected to be taking versions of GLP-1 drugs by 2029, according to investment bank UBS. Zoom in: Niccol told Axios in an interview Tuesday that the protein cold foam being tested is for a number of different consumer groups including 20-year-old males, 50-year-old females and people taking GLP-1s. "I was watching people coming to our stores, they would get three shots of espresso over ice," Niccol said. "And in some cases, they pull their own protein powder out of their bag, or in other cases, they have a protein drink, like a Fair Life and they'd pour that into their drink." "I'm like, well, wait a second, we can make this experience better for them," he said. "The good news is now I think we're right on trend, and we can do it I think arguably better than anybody else." Flashback: Starbucks had protein smoothies in the past and launched its Vivanno shakes in 2008. They were discontinued in 2018. The company also launched a protein drink in the U.K. last year. The intrigue: Starbucks said the protein powder should be able to be added to any of its cold foam flavors. What's next: Starbucks is testing protein cold foam in five locations in the U.S. under its Starting Five model.


Politico
38 minutes ago
- Politico
There's one vice RFK Jr. isn't talking about
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made it his mission to remind Americans that they need to get off the couch and lay off the junk food. But there's one vice he's not talking about: smoking. That's troubled anti-smoking activists, researchers who focus on the diseases tobacco causes and Democrats in Congress who point out that smoking, despite a marked decline in recent years, still leads to more preventable deaths than anything else. Even so, Kennedy didn't mention the health impacts of smoking once in last month's Make America Healthy Again report assessing the biggest threats to Americans' health. That marks a turning point from the priorities of public health officials going back decades, including the Biden administration's, which targeted smoking as part of a moonshot plan to halve cancer death rates. Anti-tobacco advocates fear deemphasizing the dangers of tobacco could slow or even halt progress in driving down smoking rates. 'Attempting to combat chronic disease without tobacco control is like attempting a triathlon without a bicycle,' said Brian King, whom Kennedy pushed out of his job as the Food and Drug Administration's top tobacco regulator in April. 'You're destined for failure before leaving the starting line.' Since President Donald Trump's inauguration, his health agencies appear to have shelved two moves King planned to combat smoking, banning the last remaining legal cigarette flavoring, menthol, and requiring companies to reduce the amount of nicotine in their products. Nicotine is what makes cigarettes addictive. But an HHS spokesperson said the department 'remains steadfast in its mission to protect and promote public health,' adding that the MAHA report is not an 'exhaustive inventory of every HHS program or public health challenge.' 'HHS agencies continue to carry out their responsibilities, including work on tobacco control, with the highest level of integrity and commitment to the American public,' the spokesperson said. A sustained public health campaign to educate Americans about smoking's risks over decades has driven a huge decrease in use. In the 1960s, more than 4 in 10 adults smoked cigarettes. Now it's fewer than 1 in 8. And the public health success among kids is even starker. Fewer than 1 in 26 now smoke cigarettes, according to an analysis of federal data. The negative health impacts of tobacco use are well-studied and vast. For years it has been the top preventable cause of death in the United States, contributing to cancer, heart disease and stroke. But when Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) quizzed Kennedy about that during a budget hearing last month, asking him to name the 'No. 1 cause of preventable death in America today,' Kennedy was stumped. 'I'm not sure what you're talking about,' he said. Kennedy's apparent lack of interest in combating smoking — the word 'tobacco' appears in the MAHA report only within the context of his concerns about food marketing while 'smoking' and 'cigarettes' are never mentioned — also suggests this Trump administration won't be like the first. Then, Trump's FDA commissioner, Scott Gottlieb, put the menthol ban and the limits on nicotine on the table, drawing applause from anti-smoking activists. Congress permitted the agency to make those moves in a 2009 law. That law banned flavorings except menthol — which is a cash cow for Marlboro cigarette maker Philip Morris, whose support helped get the law passed — but gave the FDA the power to decide whether to ban it. It also gave the agency the power to force cigarette companies to reduce nicotine levels. The Obama administration didn't do so. President Joe Biden proposed limiting nicotine levels after the 2024 election but never finalized the rule. A Biden plan to ban menthol cigarettes in 2022 was also not finalized. Menthol is popular among Black smokers and some Democrats feared a ban could alienate crucial voters in a presidential election year. Jerome Adams, who was surgeon general during the first Trump term, said he wants Kennedy to prioritize the tobacco regulations laid out in Gottlieb's tobacco regulation plan — an effort he said would benefit youth and marginalized communities that are disproportionately impacted by menthol cigarettes. 'These proposed regulations align with the MAHA movement's focus on preventing chronic diseases,' Adams said. The tobacco industry spent heavily on Trump's 2024 campaign — and already has a lot to show for it. Trump pledged to 'save' vaping on his social media site, Truth Social, in September after meeting with Vapor Technology Association Executive Director Tony Abboud. The Trump administration pushed King — whom the tobacco industry had criticized for years — out of his job leading the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Job dismissals led by Trump's Department of Government Efficiency also gutted the CDC Office on Smoking and Health, which oversees federal smoking cessation programs and studies. The Trump administration also slashed funds the National Institutes of Health disburses to research facilities, which scientists say could imperil tobacco smoking studies. Asked about the industry's contributions to the Trump campaign, White House spokesperson Kush Desai wrote in an email, 'the only special interest guiding the Administration's decision-making is the best interest of the American people.' Tobacco-control advocates say Trump's early moves could undermine the country's progress diminishing smoking and the diseases it causes. 'These levels are decreasing because we have made such a commitment over the past few decades to enact things to work to get these levels down,' said Catharine Young, a Biden administration official who worked on his cancer moonshot initiative. 'But if you stop that or if you don't increase that effort, they're not going to continue to go down. They're either going to flat line, or they're going to start rising again.' Both Democratic and Republican administrations have hesitated to use all the regulatory authorities the 2009 law granted them. After Gottlieb resigned in March 2019, the agency's efforts to advance his 2017 tobacco plan were snuffed out. 'With his resignation, we lost the champion for the 2017 plan, and some months after he resigned, I was literally ordered by political appointees at FDA to stop talking publicly about menthol and nicotine,' said Mitch Zeller, who led the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products before King. Ultimately, Zeller wasn't able to implement a menthol ban or nicotine limits during any of the three administrations he served. During Biden's administration, then-FDA Commissioner Robert Califf enlisted allies outside the government to lobby the White House after agency efforts to ban menthol cigarettes were held up at the Office of Management and Budget. But the final rule was not published before Biden left office. 'They caved to political pressure from cigarette companies,' Zeller said. The FDA estimated the plan to limit nicotine levels in cigarettes proposed during the Biden administration would avert 4.3 million deaths and prevent 48 million youth and young adults from starting habitual cigarette smoking by the end of the century if implemented. And banning menthol cigarettes in the U.S. would cut 324,000 to 654,000 smoking-attributable deaths by 2060, according to modeling studies cited in the 2022 proposal. Luis Pinto, a spokesperson for Reynolds American, the maker of Lucky Strike, Camel and Newport cigarettes, said the company has not yet met with Trump's FDA commissioner, Marty Makary. Pinto said the company is opposed to a menthol cigarette ban because it believes there are 'more effective and sustainable ways to help adult smokers transition away from combustible cigarettes.' 'Rather than setting a nicotine standard, the focus should be on expanding access to a diverse and innovative portfolio of potentially reduced-risk products,' Pinto said. 'Tobacco harm reduction, not prohibition, is the most effective path forward in reducing the health impacts of smoking.' On Capitol Hill, Kennedy has rarely discussed tobacco despite his focus on preventing chronic disease, disappointing lawmakers like Durbin, the second ranking Democrat in the Senate. In an interview with POLITICO, Durbin emphasized the tobacco industry is still a threat to public health, especially as it markets more novel forms of nicotine exposure like vaping, which has become popular among younger Americans. 'The tobacco companies have not given up. Their basic approach is to addict children to their product, and so now they're using vaping and [other] devices to get … high schoolers in America addicted to forms of nicotine,' Durbin said, referring to Gottlieb as a hero. 'I just don't think you can credibly say you're addressing public health in America and ignore tobacco and vaping.' King, who's now with the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, an anti-smoking group, is still hoping to convince Trump officials that going after tobacco needs to be part of the MAHA agenda. And he says he sees hope in the FDA's crackdown on illegal e-cigarettes, which he interprets as a sign the government is looking to snuff out unapproved vaping products. 'We have seen the decimation of tobacco control infrastructure,' King said. 'It's important you have the resources and the people.'


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Biden's COVID czar hammers RFK Jr. over vaccine panel overhaul
Former White House COVID-19 response coordinator Ashish Jha, who served under President Biden, criticized the decision by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to fire all 17 experts on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) vaccine panel. Kennedy announced the decision in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal Monday, saying, 'A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science.' But in an interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, Jha pushed back against Kennedy's reasoning. 'Look what he said in his op-ed was a series of nonsense about a group of individuals, experts…who shape what vaccines, if any, are going to be available to the American people,' Jha said in the interview. 'So obviously this is very concerning,' he continued. 'We'll have to see who he appoints next. But this is a step in the wrong direction.' Jha said he is concerned about what the move foretells about the secretary's agenda on vaccines. Jha pointed to what he characterized as a lackluster response from the secretary to 'the worst measles outbreak of the last 25 years.' He also expressed concern about Kennedy raising questions about vaccines causing autism, which Jha dismissed and said was 'settled science.' 'Then you put this in the middle of all of that,' Jha said, referring to the vaccine panel sweep, 'and what you have is a pretty clear picture that what Secretary Kennedy is trying to do is make sure that vaccines are not readily available to Americans, not just for kids, for the elderly.' 'He could go pretty far with this move, and I really am worried about where we're headed,' Jha continued. He said he's particularly concerned about the effect Kennedy's move will have on kids and whether they will continue having access to certain vaccines in the future. 'Kids rely on vaccines. I'm worried about whether the next generation of kids are going to have access to polio vaccines and measles vaccines. That's where we're heading. That's what we have to push back against.' Kennedy said in his op-ed that he was removing every member of the panel to give the Trump administration an opportunity to appoint its own members. Kennedy has long accused ACIP members of having conflicts of interest, sparking concern among vaccine advocates that he would seek to install members who are far more skeptical of approving new vaccines. But Jha pushed back against criticism that the panel was all Biden-appointed experts, saying, 'When the Biden administration came in, almost all of the appointees had come from the first Trump administration.' 'That was fine because they were good people,' he said. 'They were experts. Right now, it's the same thing. The people he is firing are experts — like a nurse in Illinois who spent her entire career getting kids vaccinated, cancer doctors from Memorial Sloan Kettering — like these are really good people.' 'And generally, CDC has not worried about when were they appointed. The question is, are they good and are they conflict free.'