
'We were lovers who lost each other after escaping Auschwitz - we met up decades later'
Jerzy Bielecki, a Polish Catholic, and Cyla Cybulska, a Jew from eastern Poland whose entire family was murdered by the Nazis, worked together in the camp's grain silo.
'Amidst the horrors of the death camp, men and women were actually forbidden to speak to one another,' says historian Dr Kate Vigurs. 'But there were instances where they would come together on work details or brush up against one another within prison life.
'As in the case of Jerzy and Cyla, they met one another on a work detail. She caught his eye and the two instantly fell in love.'
When Cyla witnessed an SS guard shoot her best friend dead, Jerzy knew they had to escape in order to survive.
Slowly, he gathered all the pieces of a German guard's uniform and a security pass, determined to smuggle Cyla out too.
Then in May 1944, with the plan ready, Cyla stopped arriving for work. Jerzy was petrified she'd been taken to the punishment block – or executed. But after several desperate weeks, a noted smuggled from Cyla confirmed she was alive and had been transferred to the camp laundry.
Jerzy quickly put his plan in motion. On July 20 1944, he passed a note back to Cyla, telling her to be ready for a guard to take her for interrogation. The next day, a 'guard' arrived at the laundry. To Cyla's astonishment, it was Jerzy dressed in the stolen German uniform.
'They managed to walk through the camp, out the main entrance and out onto the road, essentially to freedom,' says Dr Vigurs. 'And they just kept walking.'
They walked for nine days through Nazi-occupied Poland, outwitting the death squads sent to find them, until they reached the home of one of Jerzy's uncles. There, they parted, advised that they were in greater danger of being caught if they stayed together.
Jerzy hid with the Polish resistance, and Cyla was taken in by a local family, with the young sweethearts vowing to reunite when war was over.
But each later believed the other had died. Cyla moved to America, eventually marrying and having a daughter. Jerzy stayed in Poland also marrying and having a family.
Then in 1982, Cyla, then a widow, told a friend of her incredible escape. The friend recalled a Polish man named Jerzy on TV recounting his own remarkable escape. He was alive and working as a school principal in Poland.
The pair reunited in 1983, when Cyla flew back to Poland to find the man who had rescued her 39 years earlier, visiting places linked to their escape.
Their remarkable story did not end with a romantic reunion, with Jerzy devoted to his wife and children, its huge significance remains.
'This couple have become known as the lovers of Auschwitz,' says Dr Vigurs. 'If it hadn't been for their love for one another inside the camp, perhaps they would never have escaped. They might not even have survived. So their love made sure that they got out of the camp, and that they lived a very full and long life.'
Hidden death camp
Sobibor, a Nazi death camp in a remote part of eastern Poland, is less known than others like Auschwitz – because almost no-one who went there survived to recount the atrocities that took place.
'This camp existed solely for the extermination of Jewish people,' says historian Mat McLachlan. 'They were sent there on trains, and fairly swiftly killed thereafter.'
Of the thousands sent to Sobibor, just 50 or so survived. Among them was Alexander Pechersky, a Ukrainian Jew who fought for the Red Army before his capture in 1941.
After harrowing experiences in other camps, Pechersky was transferred to Sobibor along with 100 other Soviet Jewish POWs in September 1943. Forced into labour at the camp, fear loomed large that if he grew too weak to carry on, he faced certain death.
Desperate to survive he masterminded a mass escape. Within weeks of his arrival at Sobibor, his plot sprang into action, on October 14 1943.
Prisoners lured a senior Nazi to the camp's tailor shop with a pretence of fitting him for a suit. Moments later, he was axed to death in the prison workshop. Over the coming hours, 10 more guards were quietly killed and their uniforms stolen, as Pechersky planned to lead an attack on the SS soldiers guarding the main gate.
When a German soldier started shooting elsewhere in the camp, the prisoners were shocked into action and their fightback began ahead of schedule.
'The uprising was incredibly violent,' says Mat McLachlan. 'The prisoners took the opportunity to overwhelm the guards, and most of the guards were killed with axes. It would have been an absolutely horrific environment.
'Once the uprising had been discovered, the guards opened fire and prisoners were fleeing in all directions, people getting shot on the wire, more guards were being killed. It was just absolutely overwhelming violence in the camp.'
But 300 men, women and children escaped, chased by guards with guns and dogs. Within days, 100 had been found and executed, with others starving and wandering in the forest.
A small number – including Pechersky – evaded capture and survived the war. The Ukrainian hero was sent back to the front before being wounded in battle and invalided out of the Red Army in 1944. He died in 1990.
Dr Kate Vigurs says: 'The legacy of the Sobibor uprising is incredibly important… It shows that the Jews did resist, that there was fighting back against the Holocaust and against the prison system. They didn't just willingly go to their deaths, as has so often been said. It showed a real determination for survival.'
The brutalities of Auschwitz
More than a million people were slaughtered in Auschwitz, 90% of them Jews.
That tally may have been even higher without the astonishing actions of two men who managed to escape and reveal to the world the true horrors Hitler and his henchmen had unleashed there.
Rudolph Vrba, born Walter Rosenburg, was 17 when he arrived at the camp in June 1942. Within days he witnessed the hanging of two prisoners who had tried to escape.
But the guards' brutality made him more determined to escape. For 10 nightmarish months, the young Slovakian was forced to clear wagons of bodies at the railway station, rifling through the personal possessions of the dead.
Malnourished and traumatised, even battling typhus, Vrba made a mental record of what he saw – the number of train arrivals, wagons and prisoners.
In early 1944, Vrba and fellow inmate Alfred Wetzler, a friend from his hometown, learned the Nazis were preparing for the arrival of Hungary's entire Jewish population - meaning certain death for thousands of men, women and children.
So they hatched a plan to escape, determined to expose the atrocities of Auschwitz to the world.
On April 7, 1944, the men climbed into a space inside a woodpile. Hidden, they pushed oil-soaked tobacco into the gaps to deter the sniffer dogs hunting them with the German guards.
For three days they lay in silence in the dark and cold, without food or drink.
Historian Mat McLachlan says: 'At one stage, they could hear a couple of German guards nearby conducting the search, musing as to whether the woodpile would be a good hiding place. The German guards actually began removing wood from the pile. But fortunately there was a commotion elsewhere in the camp and the guards ran off.'
Incredibly, by disturbing so much of the wood, the guards had made it easier for Vrba and Wetzler to push their way free.
Soon, under the cover of darkness, they crawled to a nearby forest – where they began their treacherous 130km journey through Nazi-occupied Poland towards the Slovakian border.
Mat McLachlan says: 'The penalty for assisting Jews and escaped prisoners in Poland was death. Yet, a local lady took them in and provided them with shelter and clothing.'
But the danger kept on coming. Travelling onward, the pair were spotted by a Nazi patrol, shot at and chased by tracker dogs - escaping by plunging into a river. Finally, 14 days after evading their captors, they made it to the safety of Slovakia on April 21.
There they wrote the earthshattering Vrba-Weltzer Report containing horrifying details about the true nature of Auschwitz, its gas chambers and crematoria.
Mat McLachlan says: 'Finally, the rest of the world understood the depth of the horror in the German camps.'
On July 6 1944, 90 days after the daring escape, Hungarian Regent Miklos Horthy abandoned plans to send more Jews to Auschwitz.
Dr Vigurs says: 'Most of the Jews in the Hungarian suburbs had already been deported straight into Birkenau and murdered straight away, but there were still 200,000 Jews within Budapest, and this report stopped their deportation.'
The Vrba-Wetzler Report would later be used as evidence at the Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunals of 1946.
VE Day 80 on Sky HISTORY marks 80 years since the end of World War 2 with a selection of curated documentaries throughout April and May
Greatest Escapes of WWII will premiere on Tuesday 29th April at 9pm

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
William and his family will live in Forest Lodge even when he is King, reveals REBECCA ENGLISH. So what will become of Buckingham Palace?
Almost exactly 85 years ago, German bombs struck Buckingham Palace. As the Queen Mother stood among the rubble and debris, she memorably remarked that she could finally 'look the East End in the face'. It became a point of national pride that she and her husband, King George VI, refused to leave their London residence during the Second World War. Yet, almost nine decades on from those devastating raids, the landmark faces an even more uncertain future – as a palace without a king. With the news that the Prince and Princess of Wales plan to move to a new 'forever home' – Forest Lodge in Windsor Great Park – the spotlight is being shone on the Royal Family 's huge portfolio of properties, and the ever-dwindling number of tenants to occupy them. The Daily Mail has been told that it is William's 'intention' to remain in their new Grade II-listed property even after he accedes to the throne. 'This is for the long term and it's their intention to stay in Forest Lodge once he becomes king,' a source said. Understandably this has prompted serious questions in royal circles about the long-term viability of both Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle, as well as other private royal estates such as Sandringham in Norfolk and Balmoral in the Scottish Highlands, which the prince is eventually set to inherit. Locals say the eight-bedroom Forest Lodge is a definite 'step up' from the family's current four-bedroom home, Adelaide Cottage, where they have lived since 2022 (after deciding to leave London and move to Berkshire while their children were still young). Once described as a 'very substantial house in one of the loveliest parts of the country', the Georgian mansion dates back to the 1770s. The three-storey home boasts elaborate plaster cornices and ceiling decoration, exquisite marble fireplaces and a half-barrel-vaulted ceiling. It also has six bathrooms, a long gallery and a tennis court, which will doubtless suit the sporty Princess of Wales. Since the lodge was acquired by the Crown in 1829, a number of equerries, private secretaries and other royal staff have lived there. It underwent a £1.5 million refurbishment in 2001 so that it could be rented out commercially. Although well beyond the means of most families, Forest Lodge is certainly not grand – particularly when it comes to an heir to the throne. William's decision to live there shows his determination to adopt a more 'relatable' way of living, in comparison with Prince Andrew's vast 30-room Royal Lodge just a short drive away in the Great Park, or Prince Edward's Bagshot Park, which is said to boast between 50 and 120 rooms. The Waleses will pay a market rent for Forest Lodge, which is never publicly disclosed for commercial reasons. (The freehold is owned by the Crown Estate which also owns the freehold to Prince Andrew's home.) Plans have already been approved by the local council for a limited amount of internal and external renovations, which William and Catherine are funding themselves. Building works have already begun, with the family hoping to move in by the end of the year. Sources close to the couple stress their initial decision to up-sticks from their apartment at Kensington Palace to Adelaide Cottage in 2022 was 'designed to test a new location and see if it worked for them as a family' – and it very much has. Currently, all three children attend Lambrook School, a short drive away in Bracknell, and are said to be 'thriving' in the new environment. William and Catherine remain determined to be as hands-on as possible with their children while continuing to work as senior members of the Royal Family. Living in Windsor, insiders say, offers them the opportunity to do just that. 'They want to continue to do the school run, even if they are king and queen,' adds a source. Friends also say the move to Forest Lodge will allow the family to start a new chapter after a 'challenging' few years which have seen both the Princess of Wales and King Charles diagnosed with cancer. While Catherine is now in remission, a source says of the move: 'It's a fresh start for them after three really tough years. 'They are looking forward to creating many happy memories in their new home and leaving some of the unhappier ones behind.' There will be no live-in staff, butlers or valets for the Waleses at Forest Lodge – an illustration of just how fiercely they guard their privacy. The same applies currently at Adelaide Cottage. However, there are 'five or six' two- and three-bedroom cottages – currently occupied by estate staff – just a few hundred yards away from the Waleses' new home. Locals understand these will be occupied by the family's security detail, housekeeper and nanny after they move in. Extra security will also be needed as Forest Lodge is outside Windsor Castle's 'ring of steel'. One local tells me: 'The lodge is on a private road, close to a little village with a shop, a post office and a tea shop, which is mainly used by staff. 'It's about as isolated as you can get there, so you can see the attraction for them. 'It's situated in a huge private chunk of Windsor Great Park and the children can go out cycling for miles and not come anywhere near any of the local residents. 'There's a nearby fishing lake that's open only to staff, but that's it. It's also a lot closer – probably a 15-minute drive – to their current school.' The only concern for locals, I am told, is what will happen to their Christmas tree shop each year. 'It's run by the royal estate and is hugely popular,' says one local source. 'Thousands of people from the area come to buy home-grown Windsor trees each year over a glass of mulled wine. 'But it means people will be driving past their front door all day over the festive season and people think it will have to be moved. Generally, though, I think most are excited to see their new neighbours.' Interestingly, it seems the couple will continue to work out of Kensington Palace where their Royal Foundation and Catherine's Centre for Early Childhood are based, along with their household staff and press office. They will also retain their existing 20-room residence, Apartment 1A, at Kensington Palace, and Anmer Hall, their Norfolk retreat. However there are likely to be growing questions over the viability of their London base – not least because the Kensington apartment was refurbished in 2014 at a cost of £4.5 million to the public purse and is now used barely a handful of times a year. Might the Waleses be persuaded to use a suite of rooms in Buckingham Palace instead, allowing the Kensington apartment to be rented out commercially? It might make sense, say some. As for Windsor Castle, which was once earmarked for William and Catherine by the late Queen, the prospect of a full or even part-time royal resident after Charles also looks unlikely. But that is less concerning to many than the future of Buckingham Palace, the sovereign's official London residence, not least because £369 million of public funds is currently being invested in a top-to-toe refurbishment – including a complete redecoration of the late Queen's suite of rooms. At present, no members of the Royal Family reside at the Palace due to this mammoth ten-year re-servicing programme, which is required to bring the crumbling royal residence up to scratch. There is no doubt the works were overdue and badly needed. The Palace's pre-war electrics were verging on dangerous for such an historic building. But, without a king in situ – or even in proximity – will people really feel this is justified? One of the biggest attractions of Buckingham Palace, whether you are visiting it as a head of state, one of the 50,000 guests who attend garden parties, receptions and functions held there each year or even just as a paying punter in the summer months, is that it is the living, breathing heart of the institution. Will it have the same attraction as the nation's most-gilded museum when there is no monarch in residence? Palace aides have always carefully insisted that Charles 'intends' to take up residence in 'Monarchy HQ', as Buckingham Palace is dubbed. However, others think that is unlikely now he and the Queen are well established in the more private and homely surrounds of neighbouring Clarence House. It's worth noting that the building works are not due to be concluded until 2027, when King Charles will be 78 and William 45. A well-placed source tells me that William will be taking an even more 'pragmatic' approach to Buckingham Palace in the future, stressing that Forest Lodge will be his family's only 'long-term' home. To all intents and purposes, then, he will be the first monarch since medieval times not to live in a castle or a palace. Like his father, William is keen to open Buckingham Palace to a greater number of tourists each year than at present. This would generate funds for its future upkeep while lessening pressure on the public purse. The Prince of Wales also wants to see the amount of official entertaining that goes on at the Palace expanded, possibly even using it for government and charitable events. While Sandringham and Balmoral are very much private royal estates with no public funding, it seems that they, too, could undergo a subtle change of status, and be opened to visitors on more days than in the past. All of these are clearly sensible ideas. And yet concerns remain – particularly when it comes to Buckingham Palace. Those I have spoken to are choosing their words carefully, knowing how important it has been to William to ensure that family – rightly – comes first. As one insider says: 'The late Queen said she had to be seen to be believed. I just hope that the Prince of Wales can find the right balance between raising his family away from the public glare at Windsor with the presence required of him as a future, and eventual, head of state.'


Glasgow Times
2 days ago
- Glasgow Times
Last surviving Second World War Victoria Cross recipient dies aged 105
Flight Lieutenant John Cruickshank, from Aberdeen, received the VC for bravery during an attack on an enemy submarine that left him seriously injured. A total of 181 people received Britain's highest military decoration for their actions during the war. The RAF captain's family told the BBC he died last week and that a funeral would be held in private, the news outlet reported on Saturday. John Cruickshank in uniform (MOD/PA) Flt Lt Cruickshank was the captain of a Catalina flying boat with 210 Squadron, flying submarine-hunting missions from RAF Sullom Voe, in the Shetland Islands, Scotland. On July 17 1944, aged 24, he was sent on a patrol to protect the British Home Fleet as it returned from an attack on the German battleship Tirpitz. A U-boat was spotted on the surface near Norway and the aircraft he was captaining and piloting launched an offensive. The first bombs failed to release but Flt Lt Cruickshank turned the plane to face enemy fire and attack again. He dropped depth charges during the second attempt, sinking the U-boat. Flt Lt Cruickshank sustained 72 injuries including two to his lungs and 10 to his lower limbs during the assault. The navigator was killed, three other crew members were severely injured, and the badly damaged aircraft was filled with fumes from exploding shells. John Cruickshank beside a Eurofighter at RAF Fairford's International Air Tattoo (David Jones/PA) After the victory, Flt Lt Cruickshank left the cockpit but refused painkillers and continued to advise his second pilot who had taken control. The surviving crew members spent five and a half hours flying back to Sullom Voe. Despite losing consciousness multiple times during their return, he assisted the second pilot with the landing which took an hour. In 2013, Flt Lt Cruickshank said: 'It was just normal, we were trained to do the job and that was it. 'I wouldn't like to say I'm the only one that has an amazing story, there are plenty of other stories coming from that time. 'It wasn't that wonderful in those days, I can tell you that. We could only think in those days there were better days to come.' After the war ended Flt Lt Cruickshank returned to his career in banking.


South Wales Guardian
2 days ago
- South Wales Guardian
Last surviving Second World War Victoria Cross recipient dies aged 105
Flight Lieutenant John Cruickshank, from Aberdeen, received the VC for bravery during an attack on an enemy submarine that left him seriously injured. A total of 181 people received Britain's highest military decoration for their actions during the war. The RAF captain's family told the BBC he died last week and that a funeral would be held in private, the news outlet reported on Saturday. Flt Lt Cruickshank was the captain of a Catalina flying boat with 210 Squadron, flying submarine-hunting missions from RAF Sullom Voe, in the Shetland Islands, Scotland. On July 17 1944, aged 24, he was sent on a patrol to protect the British Home Fleet as it returned from an attack on the German battleship Tirpitz. A U-boat was spotted on the surface near Norway and the aircraft he was captaining and piloting launched an offensive. The first bombs failed to release but Flt Lt Cruickshank turned the plane to face enemy fire and attack again. He dropped depth charges during the second attempt, sinking the U-boat. Flt Lt Cruickshank sustained 72 injuries including two to his lungs and 10 to his lower limbs during the assault. The navigator was killed, three other crew members were severely injured, and the badly damaged aircraft was filled with fumes from exploding shells. After the victory, Flt Lt Cruickshank left the cockpit but refused painkillers and continued to advise his second pilot who had taken control. The surviving crew members spent five and a half hours flying back to Sullom Voe. Despite losing consciousness multiple times during their return, he assisted the second pilot with the landing which took an hour. In 2013, Flt Lt Cruickshank said: 'It was just normal, we were trained to do the job and that was it. 'I wouldn't like to say I'm the only one that has an amazing story, there are plenty of other stories coming from that time. 'It wasn't that wonderful in those days, I can tell you that. We could only think in those days there were better days to come.' After the war ended Flt Lt Cruickshank returned to his career in banking.