
Senior Labour figures call for review of Chinese investment in UK infrastructure
Senior Labour figures have urged the government to review Chinese investment in UK infrastructure in the wake of theBritish Steel crisis, warning that a rapprochement with Beijing could risk national security.
Government officials insisted on Monday the country remained open to funding from Chinese companies even after a dramatic weekend which saw ministers wrest control of the Scunthorpe steel making plant from the Chinese owners Jingye.
Both Downing Street and the Treasury said they believed the row over the Scunthorpe plant to be an isolated commercial dispute, even though the business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, has not ruled out deliberate Chinese sabotage.
But ministers are now coming under mounting pressure to reconsider their drive to secure further infrastructure investment from China, including from members of their own party.
Helena Kennedy, the Labour peer and co-chair of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac), said: 'There should be an urgent security review of all those Chinese companies operating within our infrastructure which could pose a threat to our national interests – and maybe not just confined to China.'
She added: 'This fiasco shows the risks, but there are also many which affect our digital infrastructure and technological progress – and our very intelligence arrangements.'
Liam Byrne, the Labour MP who chairs the business select committee, said: 'We must now be fiercely vigilant about just who is granted the keys to the industries and infrastructure that keep our nation moving.
'Not every investor comes with goodwill in their heart, and not every cheque is written with our interests in mind. Economic security can no longer be an afterthought because some now investing in Britain are seeking more than profit from our nation – they are seeking power over our nation.'
One Labour frontbencher added: 'Serious supply chain analysis, driven by security, is still lacking. We don't do it enough or clearly enough and it should be the guiding analysis that drives our industrial strategy.'
George Magnus, an associate at the China Centre at Oxford University, added: 'We should be running the rule much more carefully over any inward investment coming from China.'
The warnings come despite the government's attempts to smooth over any friction with Beijing over what has happened at Scunthorpe in the last week.
Downing Street on Monday said Jingye, the Beijing-based steel making conglomerate, had not 'acted in good faith' after it emerged the company had been negotiating over a government bailout while also trying to sell raw supplies destined for the plant.
That revelation prompted the government to pass an emergency law over the weekend to give ministers the power to interfere in how the company is run, a power they have now used to pay for the raw supplies in question.
Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, said during a visit to Scunthorpe on Monday: 'We've got the raw materials, they've been paid for, and we're confident that the furnaces will continue to fire.'
Despite government anger over Jingye's actions, however, both 10 and the Treasury said they believed this to have been a one-off issue with a private company rather than a sign of the broader risks of Chinese infrastructure investment.
A spokesperson for the prime minister said: 'We're not aware of any deliberate acts of sabotage. But as the business sector, and I think the industry minister, said over the weekend, in the talks that we were engaging with the Chinese owners, it became clear that they wanted to shut the blast furnaces.
'Obviously this relates to a commercial Chinese company, rather than a state-owned company.'
James Murray, the Treasury minister, echoed that message, telling Times Radio: 'We are open to [Chinese] investment, whilst being also open-eyed about saying that when there's foreign involvement in critical infrastructure, whatever country that comes from, we need to make sure there is a high level of scrutiny.'
He added: 'I think it's important to make clear that the actions of Jingye, of one company, don't speak to the actions of all Chinese companies.'
The government has made a major push to secure Chinese investment in key parts of British infrastructure, with the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, and the energy secretary Ed Miliband both having made high-profile visits to China in recent months.
Chinese investors already hold stakes in British water companies, airports and energy infrastructure, while the proposed nuclear power plant at Bradwell B in Essex is being developed in part by China General Nuclear Power.
Douglas Alexander, the trade minister, has spent the last few days in China and Hong Kong, though British officials would not say whether he discussed the situation at Scunthorpe.
Downing Street said Alexander did raise the case of Wera Hobhouse, the Liberal Democrat MP who was denied entry to Hong Kong last week. But while Alexander expressed 'deep concern' over the incident, the Hong Kong administration later put out a statement defending the decision, saying: 'It is the duty of immigration officer to ask questions to ascertain that there is no doubt about the purpose of any visit.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Statesman
10 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Lords seek mercy
Photo by Ben Stansall/AFP Zero noblesse oblige from Conservatives in the Lords where the employment bill is being held hostage in a Tory rearguard battle to save crusty hereditaries from the chop. Chief class warrior is the former Tory Central Office apparatchik Lord Nicky True, who, with his desperate band, is frustrating the bill in an effort to force Baroness Angela Smith to reprieve entitled sons, grandsons, great-grandsons, etc from history's dustbin. However, Labour's Leader of the Lords is determined to deliver manifesto commitments. The new Bishop of Coventry, Sophie Jelley, has become collateral damage due to True's tactics. Smith proposed lifting a convention barring freshly created peers from taking the ermine on Wednesdays to accommodate Jelley and several others. True demurred, so the bish must wait as he sends the Church of England – once the Tory party at prayer – to, er, Coventry. Exactly where does Tory-turned-Reform poster girl Andrea Jenkyns live? She made her home in West Yorkshire as Conservative MP for Morley and Outwood and vowed to move 'full time' to Greater Lincolnshire now she's mayor for the hard-right party. The striped wallpaper and pictures on a 5 June interview from home for GB News captioned 'Lincolnshire' were remarkably similar to a 29 December appearance from Wakefield. Hmmm. Called out on this remarkable coincidence, Reform admitted the Lincolnshire location was a mistake and Jenkyns has yet to move. Hoist on her own decor. Cabinet comrades are growing impressed by water-boss basher Steve Reed. One admirer admitted they'd initially thought the Environment Secretary post was a speedy trip to the back benches. Bit of a wind-up merchant is Reed. Colleagues recall Tory oppo, Vicky Atkins, Sunak's last health secretary, accusing the government of spending more than the entire Defra budget surrendering the Chagos Islands. 'If the shadow secretary of state really cared about value for money,' shot back Reed, 'she would not have wasted £500,000 on relocating her office in the Department of Health.' Atkins was subsequently observed running through the lobby after Reed. 'It wasn't half a million,' she wailed, 'it was £300,000.' That's OK, then. Unable to get to Durham for the Aslef train drivers' conference, Heidi Alexander sent a video instead. The Transport Secretary stressed the value of strong ties between Labour and the unions. She emphasised the importance of those links by sending retirement best wishes to Aslef's general secretary, Mick Whelan. Awks. Comrade Mick has up to 18 months in office remaining. Talk about coming off the rails. Reactionary tractor boy Rupert Lowe, sitting as a Great Yarmouth indy since Reform ploughed him up, drove into a Westminster Hall trap set by the Brummie independent Muslim MP Ayoub Khan. Fulminating against halal meat, the farmer was asked if he felt the same way about kosher food. Lowe briefly answered yes, before resuming the tirade against halal. Our listening leftie Jewish snout whispered that the motormouth had instantly uprooted the hard right's bid to woo Jewish voters. Nearly a year on, and Portcullis House remains an obstacle course for Stroud newbie Simon Opher. The 2024 Labour arrivée was seen stuck in a glass revolving door. Opher's surprised guest alerted security to rescue the trapped member. Passing a fellow MP moments later, Opher giggled: 'That keeps happening to me.' Just four more years then to perfect using a door. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe An unlikely pairing sighted in Portcullis House: Tim Farron and the ex-England footballer Graeme Le Saux. The Lib Dem is a fan of the player's old club, Blackburn Rovers, and the duo met at a Football Foundation dinner. Could Le Saux, teased at Chelsea for reading the Guardian and visiting museums, join the Lib Dem team? Business Secretary Jonny 'three trade deals' Reynolds revealed they aren't easy to make. Inviting Indian negotiators to the Serpentine in Hyde Park backfired when they were late on a sweltering London day and his officials had to eat all the melting ice creams bought for visitors. During a call with US counterpart Howard Lutnick while driving through Woodhead Pass in the Pennines, phone reception was so patchy a sweating Reynolds worried he'd accidentally 'sell the fucking NHS because of Britain's telecommunications infrastructure' during a faltering conversation. Upgrading rural comms is personal. Hacks pondered whether Kemi Badenoch is beaten down after she skulked in the background then left immediately following a short speech at the launch of radio host Iain Dale's latest Thatcher tribute. She was in a fluster at PMQs after Keir Starmer asserted new scanners had been installed at two hospitals in her Essex constituency. Badenoch insisted there was only one hospital. Subsequently cited Broomfield Hospital and Saffron Walden Community Hospital, her mouthpiece insisted the latter didn't count. Or perhaps they couldn't count to two. Snout line: Got a story? Write to tips@ [See also: The race to succeed Sadiq Khan] Related


Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ange's rant on Tory asylum hotels is lost in translation
Such is the misery of living in Labour's Britain that many upper-income voters are fleeing abroad – including Keir Starmer. He couldn't join PMQs this week because an envelope was being opened in Canada. In keeping with our immigration system, one missing PM was replaced by several foreigners – a parliamentary delegation from Tajikistan – who followed a translation via headphones. They appeared confused – and no wonder! Standing in for our roving PM was Angela Rayner, adopting the elbow-on-the-table stance of a barmaid ejecting a drunk, and lisping with fury. 'Quite fwankly, Mr Speaker,' she likes to say, 'it'sss the Toriesss wot should apologiiise!' Labour MPs love it. The delegation looked bewildered. 'I believe she is angry,' said the translator, 'and she says the opposition are doing a bad job of running the country'. It must confuse visitors further that Ange still refers to Yvette Cooper as 'the shadow home secretary'. Rayner was sparring with Chris Philp – the real home secretary – who said he'd met victims of the grooming scandal and wanted to relay their concerns about the proposed national inquiry. Ange accused him of playing party politics (a good chance for her to play party politics) and things descended fast into a Rovers Return ding-dong about illegal immigration. Chris said Ange had 'some brass neck'. Ange calculated the cost of Tory asylum hotels at '£1 million a day, spived up the wall'. Chris cried, 'Goodness me, she's got a cheek' – grabbed his coat and flounced out the pub. The Tajiks waited patiently for a translation of 'spived', no doubt in vain. I imagined Frank Muir on Call My Bluff explaining, 'It's a portmanteau of spiv and spaff, and can mean waste or...' – and then I came to. Sarah Champion was speaking. Labour's admirable crusader against child abuse accidentally called the Speaker a 'deputy speaker', apologised and explained that there were 'too many deputies in the place today' ('ha, ha!') and she had lost track due to the 'point-scoring that's going on… on ALL sides' ('mumble, mumble'). The Government reacted as if slapped in the face. Ange was visibly stung. But it was a point well made. Grooming is a thing of evil; Westminster ought to be able to discuss it soberly. Yet MPs cannot resist turning it into an election broadcast. Otherwise, PMQs was the usual hot air: you didn't miss much, Sir Keir. MPs reminded us it was Grenfell week, Windrush week and refugees week. Edward Leigh, though anti-Tehran, asked if Britain could do more to stop settlements on the West Bank. Daisy Cooper of the Lib Dems – unusually, not dressed for the gym – urged the Government not to 'blindly follow' the US into war with Iran. This is unlikely as Iran is just out of the reach of our combined military force of five soldiers and a pedalo, while what remains of the RAF will be escorting the PM to a philatelist convention in Manila. He's got to be careful. With his domestic agenda crumbling and his MPs rebelling, the PM is exposed to the threat of a soft-Left rebellion. He might return to No 10 in a year's time to find Ange has moved in and changed the locks.


The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Echoes of Brexit as Starmer is pressed to seize initiative on human rights
Can a lefty human rights lawyer be the one to take on Britain's uneasy relationship with the European convention on human rights (ECHR)? It is the most unlikely of causes for Keir Starmer. But there is a growing feeling in government that he should seize the initiative. It will not just be a renegotiation in Europe, which ministers fear would echo the failed EU one attempted by David Cameron, but unilateral reform in the way the fundamental rights in the convention can be applied. It is fraught with complication and risk and no one knows that better than the prime minister. Starmer is steeped in the language and history of the Strasbourg court. Allies say he can – and does – reel off the most important cases and precedents from memory. The first time Starmer wrote for the Guardian was in 2009 on the fundamental importance of human rights, saying that to dismiss them was to 'lose all notion of justice and surrender to the sometimes understandable but always inappropriate yearning solely for retribution'. But it is from this position that those in government – and a growing number of Labour MPs – believe there is an opportunity to lance the boil of the far-right argument to leave the convention altogether. 'Under this government the question of whether to stay in the ECHR is settled, it's not even a question,' one senior government minister said. 'But this is not the EU – it's not about in or out – it's about whether we can use our national sovereignty to address what is a legitimate concern from the public to how this law is being applied in order to preserve what are really fundamental human rights laws which we all believe in.' The rightwing press have made a bogeyman of the ECHR – making wildly misleading accusations of it being responsible for allowing criminals to stay in Britain because their children don't like foreign chicken nuggets. It is the bete noire of Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, and leaving the ECHR was the platform for his Conservative leadership attempt. It looks almost certain to be adopted as a policy by Kemi Badenoch. Nigel Farage said it would be his first act to leave, if he were PM. But a growing number of Labour MPs say that although much of the criticism of the ECHR is hyped-up nonsense that falls apart when details of the cases are revealed, some of the commentary is valid. Many are in Reform-facing seats and want the government to seize the issue and act decisively. The two key aspects of the convention that have caused the most controversy are article 8, which includes privacy and right to family life; and article 3, freedom from torture and degrading treatment. The Home Office is undertaking reviews of both – and how courts apply them. ITV's investigation this week is an obvious illustration; two fugitives wanted for murder and child rape, one of whom has offended again in Britain, cannot be deported because of overcrowded conditions in Brazilian prisons. In a joint article responding to the ITV investigation, two of the most vocal Labour MPs of the 2024 intake – Jake Richards and Dan Tomlinson – said the government needed to neutralise the calls from the Tories and Reform to leave the ECHR. To do that, it should 'offer serious and practical changes to see off this threat and deliver for the British people'. Many more MPs say they believe there are examples the world over of voters reacting violently against international law and treaties because of their perceived anti-democratic inflexibility, which they believe stops them getting the changes they vote for. The way to stop this growing backlash happening in Britain, they say, is to show that change can happen without throwing away decades of long-fought-for human rights. The attorney general, Richard Hermer, a veteran human rights lawyer like Starmer, whose legal career has made him a big target for the right, has hinted he is in agreement. His view will be essential to the path Starmer takes. 'British leadership to strengthen and reform the international rules-based system is both the right thing to do and the only truly realistic choice,' he said in a recent speech. Senior government figures say there may be a path for a bill that sets out the principles on how the ECHR can be applied going forward, shaped by modern circumstances. But there is a strong feeling that seeking European-wide agreement to change the ECHR is a non-starter – it would take too long, be too tortuous, and give the impression the UK is going 'cap in hand' to Strasbourg to ask for permission to change things. It is true that nation states, including France, have begun to vary their interpretations of those laws, especially article 8. Some cabinet minsters believe that the change can come through guidance, especially to the first-tier immigration tribunal, about how to apply the law. But MPs in favour of change would like to see the government seize the cause more robustly and publicly than that, which is why they favour legislation. 'There have been too many occasions where the centre left haven't seized a cause that could turn very ugly and found a way to respond to public concern in a way that is progressive,' one said. The challenge is how to land that message of a third way, instead of the binary choice the populist right will present between leave or remain. That will feel queasily familiar to veterans of the Brexit years – Starmer again is among them.