
Trump says it will be ‘rough situation' if Putin does not agree peace plan
He said it would be a 'rough situation' if Mr Putin failed to agree peace terms but stressed that Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky had to show flexibility, including giving up hopes of getting Crimea back or joining Nato.
The US president's comments came as Sir Keir Starmer held talks with members of the 'coalition of the willing', the nations prepared to contribute to guaranteeing Ukraine's security if a deal to end the Russian invasion can be reached.
The Prime Minister and Mr Zelensky were among European leaders who travelled to Washington on Monday for talks at the White House.
Those discussions have paved the way for a potential meeting between Mr Zelensky and Mr Putin for the first time since the Russian leader invaded his neighbour in 2022.
Mr Trump told Fox News: 'I hope President Putin is going to be good and if he's not, that's going to be a rough situation.
'And I hope that Zelensky, President Zelensky, will do what he has to do. He has to show some flexibility.'
The UK and France have pledged to commit forces to Ukraine to deter Mr Putin from launching a fresh assault on his neighbour if a deal is done to end the war.
Mr Trump said they were 'willing to put people on the ground', and added: 'We're willing to help them with things, especially probably if you could talk about by air, because there's nobody has the kind of stuff we have.'
But he suggested that Mr Putin was unlikely to launch another invasion as he was 'tired of it' after three years of war.
'We are going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks, that I can tell you,' Mr Trump said, acknowledging that it was 'possible he doesn't want to make a deal'.
Sir Keir said work with the US on what the security guarantees would entail could start as soon as Tuesday.
He said there was a 'real significant breakthrough when it comes to security guarantees, because we're now going to be working with the US on those security guarantees'.
Sir Keir told the BBC that teams from both sides of the Atlantic were starting 'the detailed work on that'.
The Prime Minister co-chaired a call on Tuesday morning of the so-called 'coalition of the willing', the group of nations he has been leading with France's President Emmanuel Macron.
Mr Trump spoke directly to Mr Putin to begin planning a meeting between the Russian leader and Mr Zelensky while hosting the gathering on Monday, which will then be followed by a three-way meeting involving himself.
The US president said Moscow will 'accept' multinational efforts to guarantee Ukraine's security.
Mr Zelensky, meanwhile, said he was 'ready' for bilateral and trilateral meetings.
But he told reporters following the White House meeting that if Russia does 'not demonstrate a will to meet, then we will ask the United States to act accordingly'.
Nato secretary general Mark Rutte said the US and Europe would 'do more' on tariffs and sanctions against Russia if the country 'is not playing ball' on direct talks with Ukraine, in comments to Fox News.
Sir Keir described the talks as 'good and constructive' and said there was a 'real sense of unity' between the European leaders, Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky.
He said Mr Trump's plans to arrange the bilateral and trilateral meetings showed a recognition that Ukraine must be involved in talks.
'That is a recognition of the principle that on some of these issues, whether it's territory or the exchange of prisoners, or the very serious issue of the return of children, that is something where Ukraine must be at the table,' the Prime Minister said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Poland scrambles war planes as Russia unleashes hypersonic missile barrage and strikes Ukrainian city near NATO border - as Kremlin calls West's peace talks 'a road to no-where'
Poland said on Thursday that warplanes have been scrambled to protect its airspace as Russia staged its biggest hypersonic missile barrage on Ukraine since Putin met Trump last Friday. The Operational Command of the Polish Armed Forces said on X: 'In connection with the activity of long-range aviation of the Russian Federation, conducting strikes on Ukrainian territory... aircraft of the Polish Air Force and allied aviation are operating in Polish airspace.' Russian attacks on western Ukraine killed one person and wounded multiple others, officials in the country said Thursday as diplomatic efforts to end the three-year war grind on. Moscow and Kyiv have kept up their aerial attacks on each other as world leaders including US President Donald Trump push for a ceasefire. 'One person was killed and two were wounded as a result of the combined UAV and cruise missile strike in Lviv,' said Maksym Kozytskyi, head of the regional military administration. 'Dozens of residential buildings were damaged,' he added in a Telegram post. Russian fire also wounded 12 people in the city of Mukachevo, near the border with Hungary and Slovakia, the city council said. 'Five patients are being treated in the hospital, and one more was transferred to the regional hospital,' the council wrote on Facebook. In Lutsk, Mayor Igor Polishchuk reported 'an enemy attack that was conducted by UAVs and missiles'. 'As of this moment there are no injuries or fatalities,' he said. Meanwhile, Russia's defence ministry said it destroyed '49 Ukrainian aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles' across multiple regions. The ministry did not detail any casualties or damage. The latest cross-border fire follows Trump's flurry of diplomacy this month aimed at ending the war. The US president


Reuters
12 minutes ago
- Reuters
Poland says its airspace was not violated during Russian strikes on Ukraine
WARSAW, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Poland said operations by Polish and allied aircraft on Thursday related to Russian strikes on Ukraine had concluded and that no violations of Polish airspace were observed. "Due to the reduction in the level of threat from missile strikes by Russian aviation on Ukrainian territory, the operations of Polish and allied aviation in Polish airspace have been concluded," the Operational Command of the Polish Armed Forces said on X. A combined Russian drone and missile attack on Ukraine's western city of Lviv killed one person and wounded two more, Lviv regional governor said on Thursday.


New Statesman
24 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Would embracing Rejoin save Labour?
Illustration by Gary Waters / Ikon Images Would a pledge to rejoin the EU rescue Labour at the polls? Don't be silly. Labour's low popularity is a consequence of the following: voters' looser loyalty to parties; the government's similarity to the one voters booted out with gusto last year; and little relief from a still-present crisis in the cost of living. Immigration dominates the discourse right now, but the signal is the high cost of living. Not only is this pulling Labour back, it's driving Reform ahead. There are suggestions, though the government has not announced anything, that the party could rejuvenate its base by promising to rejoin the European Union. But to think making such a pledge or even reopening the debate – and the wounds – would achieve this rings hollow. I get it. Such a pledge could, in theory, rally and unite the most Remain-minded. Labour is currently leaking almost one in ten supporters to the Liberal Democrats. And Remain voters did plump for Keir Starmer's party last year. And Rejoin is the plurality option right now. But Remain-minded voters are not single-minded in their politics. Ukip was the harbinger of the EU referendum, though Ukip primarily got its votes, not for bashing the Brussels Bureaucracy, but for anticipating the country on immigration and filling that 'sod the lot of 'em', anti-mainstream party vacancy left by the Lib Dems when they joined the coalition government. To Britain's Remain voters, it's not Rejoin or nothing. At best, a pledge would rouse some shifting to the Lib Dems, or lead to indifference. It would be a gain of a few hundred thousand votes – a few percentage points in the opinion polls. Also, a vow to rejoin can't be done in isolation. It won't come without consequences. It would incur a sacrifice in air-time on something else. And I don't just mean time on the TV. I mean time spent developing what limited impressions voters have of the Labour Party and its government. The promise, and its media coverage, would indicate Labour was shifting its priorities, was playing a tune that voters do not want to hear. There would be gross gains for Labour in putting Rejoin on the ballot. But there would be net losses at the ballot box. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Rejoin may be the preference of the median Briton. But it's not the priority of the median Briton. An effective campaign understands when to go in hard on its comfort issues. Rejoin is a comfort issue. This is no time for comfort issues. At a moment when the cost of living is the highest priority, Rejoin is not relevant to the needs of those who need Labour most. It is not yet totally associated with the cost of living – as seen above, in the data point that shows those 'just about managing' are most against returning to the EU. Because many Britons have moved on from the Leave/Remain divide, including Reform voters who do not rank defending Brexit highly as a motivating issue, the optics of the 'usual suspects' arguing for the 'usual solutions' suggests why voter cynicism is as great – if not greater – than in the immediate aftermath of the MPs' expenses scandal. July polling by BMG suggests that, when asked if they preferred to rejoin or stay out, most want in. That includes almost a fifth of Reform voters. And a quarter of Labour supporters who want to stay out. If Labour was to reopen the wounds of 2016 it would threaten the shaky, now hollowed, but nonetheless victorious coalition that gave it the benefit of the doubt in 2024. I was in Brussels in June, speaking about the future of UK-EU relations and public opinion, on both sides of the Channel. On the (delayed) flight over, I was having a muse. Do these Brussels bigwigs want to know whether the UK's voters are clamouring to Rejoin? I prepared some notes. But during the sessions nothing about it came up. I asked the thinkers in the room why Brussels isn't interested in whether Britons want to come back? The truth was this: in their eyes, it's not going to happen. Not for this generation of politicians or thinkers. Trading experts are resigned to the status quo. Academics in the know are resigned to it. They all know Rejoin is not on the agenda. Unravelling the new relationship after unravelling EU membership is not for one-term parties. Only when there is a cross-party consensus on the issue will the serious players take Rejoin seriously. We are nowhere near that. Putting Rejoin on the ballot is the stuff of unserious people. It's something for another decade. [See also: The Epping ruling deepens Labour's immigration nightmare] Related