Video of Antarctic sea floor damage by anchors a warning to tourism sector
The footage revealed a sea floor scoured of life with "deep grooves" that suggested damage by anchor chains.
"You could clearly see this delineation between where there was abundant marine life and where the chain and anchor had disrupted the sea floor," Mr Mulrennan said.
It is the first video evidence of environmental damage in the sensitive polar region, Mr Mulrennan and colleagues report today in the Frontiers in Conservation Science.
An estimated 4,000 species live on the Antarctic sea floor, with around 90 per cent unique to the southern continent's waters.
Mr Mulrennan said most visitors might go there for the penguins, seals and whales, but the region's biodiversity was more like an iceberg.
"Almost all of it is underwater," he said.
"[The] animals that are there are very vulnerable. Some grow to extreme years of age including giant volcano sponges, which we found right next to the anchor damage."
Mr Mulrennan, a marine scientist and founder of not-for-profit conservation group Kolossal, was on a tourist ship visiting Antarctica in 2023 when he took the footage.
Concerned about what he saw, he contacted marine geophysicist and anchor chain damage researcher Sally Watson from the New Zealand National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research.
Dr Watson confirmed the linear grooves and harsh gouges, recorded in the popular destination Yankee Harbour next to an Antarctic island, were consistent with damage caused by anchors and their chains.
Mr Mulrennan and Dr Watson said the findings raised concerns about anchoring by research and fishing vessels, as well as a growing tourism industry in Antarctica.
They said more regulation and collecting of anchoring data was needed ahead of a projected quadrupling of tourists to 452,000 people a year visiting Antarctica by 2033–34.
Anchors can be metres wide, and crush the living things they land on, but it's the chain connecting the anchor to the ship that often does the most damage as it drags laterally across the sea bed.
Many Antarctic seabed animals grow slowly in the same place over centuries, making them vulnerable to chains.
Dr Watson said anchor chains probably had the second biggest impact to the sea floor after trawling by commercial fishers.
Research into anchor impacts is growing in places such as the Great Barrier Reef and other tropical reef environments but Dr Watson said there was a "big gaping hole" in Antarctica.
Mr Mulrennan surveyed 36 sites around the Antarctic Peninsula, and anchoring damage was only found at the Yankee Harbour site.
Dr Watson wasn't able to access voluntary anchoring data kept by the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators (IAATO), so she used ship tracking data to estimate anchoring activity instead.
Eight vessels likely used their anchors in Yankee Harbour during the month Mr Mulrennan surveyed the area.
Dr Watson estimated a minimum of 1,600 metres of seabed would be affected if each vessel anchored in water 30–40 metres deep.
This figure does not consider the damage from the chain dragging side to side if the ships moved.
Social scientist Elizabeth Leane of the University of Tasmania, who was not involved with the study, said there were sites more popular than Yankee Harbour that hadn't been surveyed.
Professor Leane, whose work focuses on Antarctic tourism, noted Cuverville Island and Neko Harbour received more visits than Yankee Harbour.
Lisa Kelley, the executive director of IAATO, said the group welcomed "research into all forms of human activity in Antarctica".
"We acknowledge that this study represents a snapshot in time," Ms Kelley said."The insights provided will be shared with IAATO's relevant committees and working groups to support our ongoing commitment to safe and environmentally responsible operations in the Antarctic region."
Greg Mortimer, who founded the Antarctic tour company Aurora Expeditions, said operators had become more aware of potential damage caused by anchors since the 2000s.
He said tourist ships were able to visit Antarctica based on their impacts being less than minor or transitory.
"If that's not the case, further action is needed," Mr Mortimer said.
He said the "missing link" was knowing how much damage was being done and its significance.
Dr Watson said collecting more data on anchoring, as well as surveys of marine life, will be crucial to planning sea-floor-safe Antarctic tourism.
Mr Mulrennan said ships at times already operated safely in Antarctica without using an anchor.
When sea ice is high, vessels cannot get to water shallow enough to drop anchor and rely on dynamic positioning systems — where a vessel uses its own propulsion — to stay put.
Dr Watson said she recognised it wasn't possible to get rid of anchoring entirely.
"I want to be really clear about the difference between anchoring when you have a storm, and you're trying to protect the people and ship, compared to cruising up to a harbour and dropping anchor willy-nilly," she said.
In areas of high destruction, Mr Mulrennan suggested operators could agree on "parking lot areas" where all visiting ships anchor or that moorings be created in high traffic zones.
Parking lots were a "sound idea" according to Mr Mortimer, who said most ships anchored in the same place anyway.
However, he believes moorings would be vulnerable to Antarctica's extreme weather and iceberg damage.
Professor Leane said she was hopeful tour operators would take the research on board and come up with solutions.
"[Tourist operators] don't want a damaged environment as people are increasingly interested in seeing the undersea environment," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
21 hours ago
- News.com.au
Seals sing 'otherworldly' songs structured like nursery rhymes
When male leopard seals dive down into icy Antarctic waters, they sing songs structured like nursery rhymes in performances that can last up to 13 hours, scientists said Thursday. The Australian-led team of researchers compared the complexity of the songs composed by the big blubbery mammals to those of other animals -- as well as human musicians like the Beatles and Mozart. Lucinda Chambers, a bioacoustics PhD student at Australia's University of New South Wales, told AFP that people are often surprised when they hear the "otherworldly" hoots and trills sung by leopard seals. "It kind of sounds like sound effects from an '80s sci-fi" movie, said the lead author of a new study in the journal Scientific Reports. During the spring breeding season, male leopard seals dive underwater and perform their songs for two minutes before returning to the surface for air. They then repeat this performance for up to 13 hours a day, according to the study. The researchers determined that all leopard seals share the same set of five "notes" which are impossible to distinguish between individuals. However each seal arranges these notes in a unique way to compose their own personal song. "We theorise that they're using that structure as a way to broadcast their individual identity, kind of like shouting their name out into the void," Chambers said. The researchers believe the males use these songs to woo potential female mates -- and ward off rivals. - 'Songbirds of the ocean' - The team studied recordings of 26 seals captured by study co-author Tracey Rogers off the coast of Eastern Antarctica throughout the 1990s. "They're like the songbirds of the Southern Ocean," Rogers, who is also from the University of New South Wales, said in a statement. "During the breeding season, if you drop a hydrophone into the water anywhere in the region, you'll hear them singing." The team analysed how random the seals' sequences of notes were, finding that their songs were less predictable than the calls of humpback whales or the whistles of dolphins. But they were still more predictable than the more complex music of the Beatles or Mozart. "They fall into the ballpark of human nursery rhymes," Chambers said. This made sense, because the songs need to be simple enough so that each seal can remember their composition to perform it every day, she explained. She compared it to how "nursery rhymes have to be predictable enough that a child can memorise them". But each seal song also needs to be unpredictable enough to stand out from those of the other males. Leopard seals, which are the apex predator in Antarctic waters, swim alone and cover vast distances. They likely evolved their particular kind of song so that their message travels long distances, the researchers theorised. Varying pitch or frequency might not travel as far in their environment, Chambers said. Female seals also sing sometimes, though the scientists do not know why. Chambers suggested it could be to teach their pups how to sing -- exactly how this talent is passed down is also a mystery. But she added that this behaviour has never been observed in the wild. The females could also just be communicating with each other, she said. dl/ach
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
NZ 'ULEB' wood heaters emit a fraction of the pollution of standard models. Why aren't they in Australia?
A new generation of low-emission wood heaters that can produce a fraction of the particulate pollution of current models could save lives by improving air quality, according to researchers. But while the heaters have been on sale in New Zealand for more than a decade, and Australian clean air groups have called for their widespread adoption, they might not be widely available here for many years. Updating pollution standards that would effectively make all new heaters sold in Australia low-emission would take up to 10 years, according to Tim Cannon, chair of a Standards Australia pollution committee. Mr Cannon is also head of the lobby group the Australian Home Heating Association — but he said decisions on pollution standards were voted on by all members of the committee, which includes a range of perspectives. He told the ABC he was unconvinced by recent peer-reviewed modelling that showed long-term exposure to wood-heater smoke was responsible for more than 700 premature deaths every year around the country. But, Mr Cannon said, the committee would consider tightening pollution standards, although he was concerned that doing this too rapidly could "decimate" the industry. "You can't just roll out changes [to wood heaters] overnight," he said. However, Australian researchers studying the effectiveness of low-emission burners said the introduction of new low-emission heaters "could be done very rapidly" based on the NZ experience. So what are ultra-low emission wood heaters and what impact have they had to pollution levels in New Zealand? Ultra-low emission burners (ULEBs) cost the same and look much like traditional wood heaters, but include various technologies to improve combustion, convert more of the fuel to heat, and ultimately reduce particulate emissions. They were introduced into New Zealand following the introduction of tougher standards, and are now undergoing testing at the University of Tasmania. Testing has shown ULEBs are the only kind of heater that could meet more stringent emissions standards. John Todd, a wood-heater expert taking part in the testing, said NZ wood-heater manufacturers were forced to innovate and develop ULEB designs after parts of the country introduced tight emissions controls a decade ago. "They said they could never build heaters that could meet [ULEB emission standards] and they now have 30‒40 models that do." The heaters have made a significant difference to the air quality of Christchurch, where the local council ran a phase-out scheme for traditional wood heaters. Dr Todd said testing of ULEB designs on Australian hardwoods showed the heaters could emit just 10 per cent of the particulate matter (specifically particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometres or less, known as PM2.5) generated by wood heaters complying with current Australian standards. Fay Johnston, director of the University of Tasmania's Centre for Safe Air, said Australia could follow NZ's lead with ULEBs, along with other measures such as a phase-out of wood heaters in general in urban and high-density areas. "There's really no reason not to adopt it and drive the same innovation and have far less-polluting heaters available for Australians," Professor Johnston, who led the testing, said. The decision around how dirty wood heaters sold in Australia may be is largely governed by wood-heater pollution standards set by Standards Australia's "CS-062" technical committee, a group of 20 members made up mostly from industry and government. Over the past 30 years, the committee has tightened its pollution standards, so heaters emit much less particulate matter (at least on paper) than previous designs. Despite the change, however, air quality in areas with high wood-heater use isn't falling. There are opposing arguments for why this is happening. Mr Cannon said most wood heaters being used were old and built before the current tight standards. But others, including wood-heater emissions experts such as Dr Todd, said the laboratory protocol used to test heater emissions for compliance with the Australian standards did not reflect how Australians actually used these heaters at home. As a result, Dr Todd said, new wood heaters were up to 10 times more polluting than the standards suggested. "No-one operates heaters the way they're being tested," he said. "The standard assumes everyone is going to operate their heater in the best way possible." Professor Johnston agreed. She and others have called on the Standards Australia wood heater committee to change its compliance testing protocol, which would effectively tighten pollution standards for wood heaters. Professor Johnston said a draft real-world testing protocol would be submitted to the standards committee by the end of the year. "In my view, it's a long overdue [change]. We know we can get better and we haven't done it." Mr Cannon told the ABC he was interested in the emissions research underway at the University of Tasmania, but was reluctant to tighten standards too fast. Committee decisions are made on the basis of consensus, through voting in a formal ballot. Mr Cannon told the ABC the industry was under attack from "health groups" such as the Centre for Safe Air. He said reducing wood-heater emissions was politically necessary "to keep … those types of clean air scientists at bay. The Australian Home Heating Association campaigns against local councils and state and territory governments phasing out wood-heaters via, for instance, newspaper ads and targeted social media campaigns. "It would take five years' worth of research and then it might be five years before [ULEBs] becomes mandated in certain areas," Mr Cannon said. "So it could be, at best, 10 years away." Mr Cannon also said that while he was not convinced by the modelled health impacts of wood-heater smoke, he wanted to accommodate critics in order to avoid a "blanket ban on wood heaters". "What I think and what [I do] representing our industry are not necessarily aligned," he said. "We want to see the longevity of our industry. We could just push back [against critics], but that's going to get us nowhere. "We have to try to be friends." Health groups are calling for a general wood heater ban in urban and high-density areas. Asthma Australia CEO Kate Miranda said the non-profit wanted a "phased transition away from wood-fire heaters in favour of cleaner and healthier heating alternatives" such as reverse-cycle air conditioners. "There is no safe level of exposure [to wood smoke] and even small amounts can cause health effects and trigger asthma symptoms." Professor Johnston said wood heaters had a role in "low-density rural areas" where the smoke could not affect large populations or neighbours, but should be banned in urban areas "where you have to buy firewood". "We live in a highly fire-prone country. We need to manage our fuel loads," she said. If you do have a wood heater, here are some tips to reduce, but not eliminate, smoke:
ABC News
4 days ago
- ABC News
Russian and Chinese plans for Antarctic expansion spark alarm
Experts warn Russia and China's plans to expand their presence in Antarctica may be linked to mining or military ambitions that are at odds with the nature reserve's peaceful governing principles. Australia was among 58 signatories to the Antarctic Treaty, which covers activity in the region, which met behind closed doors in Milan in June and July. Earlier this year, China announced plans to build a sixth permanent research station in Antarctica, while Russia is reopening and upgrading stations, as well as building a new runway for long-haul aircraft. The two countries have also been accused of undermining conservation efforts by blocking new protections for marine areas. Some experts have raised concerns the infrastructure and logistical expansions could be underpinned by non-scientific motivations. Bill Muntean represented the United States at the 2023 meeting and is now a non-resident senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a policy research not-for-profit organisation based in Washington DC. "There are significant questions and concerns over activities in the oceans off Antarctica," he said. "What are Russia and China doing with their scientific explorations?" The Antarctic Treaty, which came into effect in 1961, prohibits military activity on the continent, and promotes scientific research. China and Russia are both signatories. Compounding the two nuclear-armed superpowers' expansion blueprint is the fact the White House has announced deep cuts to its Antarctic funding, totalling about $US60 million ($91.9 million). Jeffrey McGee, an expert in the treaty from the University of Tasmania, said Russia, China and the US were "big players" in Antarctica. "This pullback of funding from the United States means Australia has to be ready to step up, in terms of maintaining and increasing our scientific and logistics presence," Professor McGee said. "We need to make sure that we maintain and grow our influence in the region to protect that national interest." Professor McGee said some scientific equipment that had been installed on Antarctica could have dual uses. "What we are talking about here are infrared telescopes, GPS and ground-station receivers that can communicate with satellites," he said. "More and more of that equipment has been put into Antarctic research stations. "That gives rise to the possibility of that equipment having a dual purpose, in the sense that it can be used for scientific uses, but it can also interface with military and surveillance satellites, upload and download information or be involved in military command control communication systems." Increasing a strategic footprint in Antarctica could allow nations to secure future access to natural resources, strengthen geopolitical influence, and have a greater say in shaping the continent's future rules. Antarctica offers untapped potential and global leverage when it comes to science and security, as data from research stations that collect scientific data can also be used for military or intelligence purposes. Building outposts also gives countries a physical and technological presence that could be repurposed in the future. A report by the UK parliament's Environmental Audit Committee released last month highlighted how Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine deepened the geopolitical rift among signatories to the Antarctic Treaty. It questioned the purpose of Russia's seismic surveys in Antarctica, suggesting they could be about identifying natural resources. "Geopolitical tension and the prospect of potential mineral reserves are straining peace and environmental protection in Antarctica," the report found. "Antarctica's potential reserves of oil, coal and iron ore present a risk of future conflicts." The committee's chair, Tobi Perkins, told the ABC that Russia and China's expansion in Antarctica needed to be watched closely. "At this stage we don't know exactly what we should be worried about, but in the absence of dialogue and clarity and transparency, the Antarctic Treaty partners must maintain robust oversight," the MP said. While Russia and China's expansion plans are within the rights of the Antarctic Treaty, Mr Muntean says he wants the number of inspections of bases on the continent to increase. Under the treaty, countries are encouraged to hold each other to account over compliance issues. For example, Australia has conducted inspections in Antarctica for more than 60 years, including at bases operated by China, Russia and Moscow's puppet state, Belarus. "One can speculate on any number of things that can be happening in Antarctica," Mr Muntean said. "There hasn't been evidence of commercial mining that I've seen, just a lot of concern that the scientific activity could eventually lead to commercial mining. "But if there are any questions about what is down there for military equipment, personnel or reconnaissance, we need to check it out. "Shine the flashlight underneath the bed — is that a teddy bear or is it some scary monster? We've got the flashlight. Use it."
