
Dreams cut short, Chinese students anxious and angry over ‘aggressive' US visa ban plans
Kiwi Zhang, a computer science student from China, was full of hope for his academic future in the United States – until his visa was revoked at the US border last week.
The first-year PhD student at a university in central US had just presented his research at a conference in Asia. He was returning to the US after a brief visit home when his American dream was abruptly cut short.
According to Zhang, he was detained at the border for 48 hours by US officials, who confiscated his phone and laptop, and searched his belongings. He said they questioned him about his ties to the Chinese Communist Party and meetings with friends while in China.
At the end of the interrogation, Zhang said he was deported and barred from the US for five years, on suspicion of having shared his research with the Chinese government – an allegation he denies. He is now back in China and mulling his next steps.
'I never imagined this could happen to me,' said Zhang, who – like everyone CNN spoke to for this story – asked to use a pseudonym out of fear of retaliation. 'I didn't know things would get this extreme after Donald Trump returned to office. His administration is jeopardizing my academic future, and I feel powerless to defend my rights.'
Now, many Chinese students studying in the US fear they could meet the same fate, after President Trump's administration vowed on Wednesday to 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.'
The announcement by Secretary of State Marco Rubio was brief and vaguely worded, but it sent shock waves through China, triggering widespread confusion, anxiety and fear among current and prospective students and their families, as well as strong opposition from Beijing.
Student chat groups lit up with messages of disbelief. Education consultants were flooded with panicked phone calls. Many students aired their frustration and anger on social media.
At a regular news conference Thursday, China's foreign ministry accused the Trump administration of using ideology and national security as a 'pretext' for the 'politically motivated and discriminatory' move.
Suddenly, hundreds of thousands of young Chinese minds, drawn by the prestige of a world-class education and the allure of the American dream, found themselves facing a stark reality: the future they had worked so hard for now hangs in the balance, held hostage by the whims of a US administration that increasingly views them – and their homeland – as a threat.
'What strikes me is how tiny individuals are in the tide of history – career plans can collapse overnight,' said Joyce, who received an offer from her dream school, Harvard, to pursue a master's degree in architecture.
Her visa from her undergraduate program in the US is still valid for another year, but she did not dare to return to China for the summer, worrying that she might be denied reentry at the US border.
'I can't help wishing I'd grown up in a golden age of US-China relations,' she said.
For decades, China's brightest minds have flocked to America, as their home country played catch-up with the world's leading superpower. Until last year, Chinese students made up the largest group of international students in the US, contributing significantly to the economy and helping America maintain its competitive edge in scientific research and technological innovation.
But as strategic rivalry between the two nations intensifies, mistrust has deepened. Both sides have ramped up national security measures and grown more protective of their advanced technologies – particularly in sensitive sectors with military implications.
During his first term in 2020, Trump introduced a ban that effectively denied US visas to graduates in the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields from Chinese universities believed to be linked to the military. Within just three months, more than 1,000 Chinese nationals had their visas revoked, and the order remained in place under former President Joe Biden.
It's unclear how quickly or widely the new revocations will be carried out. But the fear is palpable in CNN's interviews with Chinese students. Studying in a country that has long held itself up as a beacon of freedom, many were too afraid to speak openly under their real names – a fear all too familiar to those back in China.
They include David Yang, whose heart sank when he saw Rubio's announcement. 'This is just too surreal,' said the second-year PhD student in theoretical chemistry at a top university in the Midwestern US.
'When the news broke, some classmates said they were working on their final assignments but completely lost the motivation to continue. I felt the same way,' he said.
In recent weeks, Yang has found it nearly impossible to focus on his research, simulating how molecules interact with each other in the human body. Instead, he's been glued to the news, anxiously tracking Trump's escalating war on elite universities and international students, trying to gauge whether he might land in the crossfire.
Last week, the Trump administration barred Harvard University from enrolling international students, accusing the prestigious institution of 'coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party,' among other allegations.
Although a federal court has since blocked the move, the State Department soon followed with a diplomatic cable instructing US embassies and consulates worldwide to halt new student visa appointments.
As Yang scrolled through the headlines, periods of anxiety would suddenly hit, and he found himself compulsively refreshing news sites over and over.
'I felt sad, lost and helpless. It's been incredibly stressful,' he said. 'The constant policy changes bring so much uncertainty into our lives. It really impacts productivity and, over time, takes a toll on your mental health – and for me, it already has.'
Worried about his visa, Yang is planning on canceling his trip home this winter. His major could well fall under what Rubio called 'critical fields' and – like millions of Chinese students – he's a member of the Communist Youth League, a youth branch of the 99-million-strong Communist Party for those aged between 14 and 28.
In China, most students are Youth League members by the time they finish high school, or have party members among family and friends – thanks to the party's ubiquity across government and business, as well as cultural and social sectors.
'The vast majority of people in China have some connection to the Communist Party – so this is essentially the same as condemning all Chinese students with a single stroke,' Yang said.
Zhang, the student whose visa was revoked at the border, said US officials asked whether anyone in his family was a member of the Communist Party. He told them both of his parents were. They then questioned him about his own affiliation with the Communist Youth League, he said.
'I said I've never had any connection with them. The Communist Youth League charges us seven or eight yuan (about $1) a year, but there are no activities at all. But the officials said: 'You are lying.' I honestly didn't know what to say. I could only sit there, stunned,' Zhang said.
Facing potential deportation in the middle of their hard-won education, some Chinese students are considering other options.
Ella Liu, a math undergraduate at the University of Michigan, is visiting family in the southern city of Guangzhou before her summer research project in the US starts next month.
'Me and my parents are all praying that I won't be banned from entering the country in June,' she said.
Liu was drawn to the US by its academic freedom and resources. But if the hardline visa policy continues, she might consider transferring to another university in Europe or Hong Kong.
'I am very determined to study mathematics and there are also many excellent math resources in other countries, such as in France,' she said.
Like many Chinese students, Liu comes from a middle-class family. Her parents saved for years for her to attend college in the US, where tuition and living costs can run to more than $80,000 – much more than getting a degree in Europe or Asia.
Some Chinese students are already looking elsewhere. In recent years, the number of Chinese students in the US has steadily declined from a peak in the 2019-2020 school year – a drop that coincides with the Covid-19 pandemic but also increasing friction between the two governments.
Nelson Urena Jr., co-founder and director of college counseling at an education management firm in Shanghai, said that for years many Chinese families saw American universities as the 'gold standard' for college education.
Since around 2018, however, he has noticed more interest from students and parents alike in universities in the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia, as well as the semi-autonomous Chinese city of Hong Kong.
'A lot of families were concerned legitimately about their children's safety, and then also just the rhetoric of, you know, whether they're welcome in the US,' he said, citing issues such as gun violence and racist hostility or even violence against Asian people.
'More recently, I think people are starting to see the growing disconnect between the US and China, and feeling like maybe things are going to be more difficult for them – from getting the visa to making payments for tuitions.'
Rubio's announcement Wednesday also vowed to 'revise visa criteria to enhance scrutiny of all future visa applications' from China, including Hong Kong.
Since then, Urena has been inundated by phone calls from anxious students preparing to start their college education in the US. But he didn't have a ready response for them.
'It's just a lot of uncertainty right now. The students are trying to figure out what to do…The options are very limited at this point – Do they do a gap year? Do they go to university elsewhere? Do they have to go back to the application process?' he said.
Nevertheless, for some Chinese parents, the allure of American higher education has not worn off.
Arno Huang, a 56-year-old businessman from China's coastal Fujian province, still wants to send his kids to the US for graduate schools after they finish undergraduate studies in Hong Kong.
'The US represents one of the most civilized, developed, and open places for humanity. Although US-China relations are currently strained, smart people still recognize this fact,' said Huang.
Having kids studying in the US gives a family 'face,' he said, using a common Chinese phrase to refer to good reputation or social standing. 'Once their child is in the US, they can proudly tell others, 'Look how successful my son is!''
Zichen Wang, a research fellow at the Center for China and Globalization, a non-government think tank in Beijing, lamented a seemingly bygone era, when Chinese officials, entrepreneurs and scientists alike were trained in the US – especially those who played key roles during China's reform and opening-up era that began in 1978.
'When they returned to China, they brought back not only professional knowledge and credentials, but also a deep respect and admiration for America as an open and inclusive society,' he said.
'I believe many Chinese people see what makes America great not merely as its economic or military strength, but its openness – its world-class universities, its confidence in the marketplace of ideas, and its ability to attract top global talent,' Wang added.
'That, at least in my view, is what many people around the world truly admire about the United States.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
36 minutes ago
- Fox News
DOUG SCHOEN: I'm a Harvard grad. Here's my take what Trump's doing right and wrong
The ongoing fight between the Trump administration and Harvard University has – unfortunately – taken on a life of its own. I say unfortunately, not because I believe the reforms President Donald Trump is demanding are wholly out of bounds – they are not, by any means. Rather, I say this because, as an alum of both Harvard undergrad and law school – and a longtime donor – the rampant antisemitism on campus, as well as the university's imperiousness, I cannot fault the White House for acting. Indeed, there is a legitimate argument to be made that Harvard must be reined in. That being said, there are concerns unique to Harvard that separate it from other universities. These concerns range from its handling of antisemitism, its silencing of voices who do not conform to far-left orthodoxy, as well as who it has hired. Notably, the concerns surrounding Harvard did not originate with its handling of antisemitism in the wake of Hamas' October 7th attack on Israel. It has long been the epicenter of Diversity, Education, and Inclusion (DEI) efforts in the U.S., to the point where the Supreme Court was forced to strike down its admissions criteria for being unfair to Asian students in June 2023. And yet, within just the past month, two serious incidents underscore how much further Harvard has to go in order to reform and redeem itself. First, the Harvard Law Review awarded a $65,000 grant to Ibraham Bharmal, after the Harvard Law School student was charged with assaulting an Israeli student, an incident caught on video. In effect, Harvard not only tolerated Bharmal's antisemitism, but rewarded it with a taxpayer-funded grant after he assaulted another student solely because of his nationality and Jewish identity. Second, Harvard recently revoked the tenure of Francesca Gino, a professor of business administration - who ironically is "well known for studying honesty" as Pilar Arias noted – after a four-year long fight over Gino's repeated falsification of data. To be clear, this is not to say that I agree with every action Trump has taken against Harvard. For example, blanket bans on accepting foreign students is excessive, but vetting their social media is inherently reasonable. Universities routinely do this for American students; thus it stands to reason Harvard should have the same – or even stricter – policy for foreigners. To that end, Harvard professor Steven Pinker recently published a piece in the New York Times which does a tremendous job at capturing the issues Harvard must address and the best ways to do so. Pinker, who makes his frustration towards the school's handling of antisemitism, free speech, hiring practices, and more very clear, makes one more key point: while Harvard has its "serious ailments," the reaction must also be calibrated. In other words, while Harvard should not have unfettered access to billions of dollars of taxpayer money, there is a real risk that across-the-board cuts harm America's scientific prowess without producing the – very necessary – reforms Trump is demanding. There is ample opportunity for a more targeted approach that can force Harvard to make these necessary changes without destroying the school's leadership in many vital fields. For instance, grants to social sciences can be canceled without touching money that funds medical or scientific research into cancer or other diseases. And while I agree with Pinker on that and other points he makes, perhaps the most important thing he points out is that the only thing thus far that has spurred Harvard to take any steps towards change has been Trump. As Pinker puts it, "The uncomfortable fact is that many of these reforms followed Mr. Trump's inauguration and overlap with his demands." Of course, it should not take the President of the United States to bring American universities inline with their own codes of conduct. Nor should it take the power of the White House to force Harvard to crackdown on the scourge of antisemitism and anti-American extremism that has overrun its campus. And yet, this is where we now find ourselves. It is my hope, as an alum, and as an American, that the Trump administration and Harvard come to a solution whereby the university realizes it cannot continue to permit – or reward – students who so blatantly violate the code of conduct, either of the university or of the United States.


Bloomberg
36 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Rubio's Student Visa Pause Makes No Sense — and Does Real Harm
This is a season of anxiety for international students in the US, who find themselves demonized by the Trump administration as it devises new ways to limit their numbers. The latest tactic came in a diplomatic cable from Secretary of State Marco Rubio to US embassies and consulates abroad, ordering a halt to the student visa interviews necessary to enter the country.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Europeans Are Talking About These Major Current Events That Are Barely Making Headlines In The US, And It's Illuminating To Step Outside Our US Bubble For A Sec
With so much domestic news flooding our feeds daily, it's easy to lose sight of the important events unfolding beyond the US borders. To help broaden our perspective, I've been compiling roundups of key European (and global) stories that locals felt Americans were overlooking. Given the positive response, I'm back with yet another follow-up — once again curating the top headlines myself and adding context on why they're significant. So, without further ado, here's a snapshot of some of the most impactful stories currently shaping Europe: of Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD fell 8.6% on Monday after the company announced major price cuts on 22 electric and hybrid models. The discounts — ranging from 10% to 34% — sparked fears of a renewed price war in China's crowded EV market. The stock slipped another 4% in Hong Kong on Tuesday. Despite the pullback, BYD shares remain up over 50% this year. Meanwhile, the company outsold Tesla in Europe for the first time last month. Why it matters: BYD's fast-growing global presence and undercutting of Tesla — particularly in Europe — highlight rising competition in the EV sector. While BYD doesn't sell cars in the US, its dominance abroad is reshaping the global market, pressuring American automakers to innovate faster and lower costs. Its investment in AI driving systems and vertical integration (including battery manufacturing) could also set new industry benchmarks. Source: BYD stock plunges following deep price cuts as EV sales surpass Tesla in Europe [Euronews] lower house of parliament has passed a bill to legalize assisted dying for adults with incurable illnesses — a landmark move that would allow people to take lethal medication under strict conditions. The vote (305 in favor, 199 against) sends the bill to the Senate, though a final decision could take months amid France's complex legislative process. The law would permit those suffering from untreatable pain to end their lives voluntarily, with oversight from medical professionals. Patients must be over 18, either citizens or residents of France, and deemed to be making the request of their own free will. While widely supported by the public, the bill has drawn criticism from religious leaders and end-of-life activists alike — the former warning of moral risks, the latter frustrated by delays. Why it matters: France's step toward legalizing assisted dying signals a profound cultural and ethical shift in one of Europe's most influential democracies. Though polls show widespread public backing, the proposal reopens long-standing tensions around bodily autonomy, the role of the state in life-and-death decisions, and how societies treat the terminally ill. The measure is framed as both a compassionate option and a safeguard-filled process, yet it has sparked fears — especially among religious communities — that the vulnerable could feel coerced. With other European nations already permitting assisted dying, France's decision will likely influence regional debates and heighten pressure on holdout countries like the UK. President Macron's openness to a referendum if Parliament stalls shows just how politically and emotionally charged the issue remains. Source: France's National Assembly adopts bill to legalise assisted dying on first reading [Euronews] Police in Liverpool swiftly released details about the suspect arrested after a car plowed into a crowd during a Premier League winners parade. The man was identified as a 53-year-old white British local. This early disclosure was unusual given UK legal restrictions on naming suspects but was intended to counter rampant misinformation and conspiracy theories spreading online, particularly after last year's Southport attack, where false claims about the suspect's identity fueled unrest. Experts praised the police for proactively filling information gaps to prevent harmful rumors and online disinformation from escalating into real-world violence. While such transparency is not always possible, this case highlights the importance of timely communication in today's fast-moving digital information environment. Why it matters: The police's decision to release suspect details quickly reflects a growing challenge for law enforcement navigating the complex interplay between transparency, public safety, and the rapid spread of misinformation on social media. In a digital age where rumors can quickly spark unrest, timely communication aims to undercut conspiracy theories before they take hold. This case underscores broader questions about balancing legal protections, privacy, and the need to maintain social trust in moments of crisis — issues that resonate across democratic societies confronting the impact of online disinformation. Source: Experts praise police for swift release of details about Liverpool crash suspect [Euronews] Chancellor Friedrich Merz issued unusually strong criticism of Israel's military offensive in the Gaza Strip, questioning the justification for the harm inflicted on civilians amid the fight against Hamas terrorism. Merz acknowledged Germany's historic commitment to Israel's security, but emphasized that crossing certain humanitarian boundaries must be addressed publicly. His remarks signal a possible shift in Germany's traditionally cautious stance toward Israel, especially as humanitarian groups warn of starvation in Gaza due to an ongoing aid blockade. Merz plans to discuss the offensive with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, underscoring Germany's desire to remain an ally while expressing limits to what can be tolerated. Meanwhile, voices within Germany's governing coalition are calling to halt weapons exports to Israel and rethink the country's "reason of state" on Israel's security. Why it matters: Merz's criticism marks a rare public departure from Germany's historically unwavering support for Israel, reflecting growing unease about the humanitarian impact of the Gaza offensive and Germany's role in the conflict. The shift highlights a broader debate within Germany about balancing moral obligations stemming from its Nazi past with contemporary human rights concerns and international law. As other Western allies — including the UK, France, and Canada — express similar worries, Germany's evolving position signals changing dynamics in European support for Israel amid one of the region's most contentious conflicts. This debate also underscores how historical legacies shape diplomatic responses differently, influencing how democracies navigate the tension between defending allies and upholding international humanitarian standards. Source: Germany's Merz blasts Israeli offensive in Gaza [Politico] Related: "I Am So Torn With What You Are Doing" — 11 Posts From MAGA Business Owners Who Are So Close To Getting It Charles III gave a rare royal speech from Canada's Parliament, stressing Canadian sovereignty during "dangerous and uncertain" times. While only briefly mentioning US President Donald Trump, whose trade war and border pressures loom large, Charles underscored cooperation and mutual respect between the two countries. He highlighted Canada's plans to strengthen its armed forces, enhance border security to combat fentanyl trafficking, balance immigration, and address domestic issues like housing and energy projects. The speech also reaffirmed commitments to Indigenous reconciliation. Royal historian Justin Vovk noted the speech balanced diplomatic tone with a firm assertion of Canada's independent identity on the global stage. Why it matters: This speech signals Canada's determination to protect its sovereignty amid rising US trade tensions without escalating conflict. Charles's endorsement of Canada's government policies sends a powerful message that Canada will assert its national interests while maintaining important alliances. The address marks a rare direct intervention by a British monarch in Canadian parliamentary proceedings, highlighting the ongoing evolution of Canada's identity as a sovereign nation navigating complex geopolitical challenges. It also sets a tone of cautious cooperation with the US despite strained relations under Trump's administration. Source: Key takeaways from King Charles's 'Speech from the Throne' in Canada [Al Jazeera] ministers convened in Brussels for a hearing on Hungary's rule of law under Article 7 of the EU treaty, amid mounting concerns over recent legislative moves by Viktor Orbán's government. Hungary's draft "Transparency of Public Life" law — which critics say grants sweeping powers to limit press freedom and civil society — and the ban on the Budapest Pride march — which allows fines and AI-based identification of participants — have drawn strong rebuke from 20 member states. These countries issued a joint declaration condemning the ban as a violation of EU fundamental values and calling for its reversal, warning that failure to comply could trigger full use of the EU's rule of law enforcement mechanisms. Hungary's EU minister dismissed the criticism as political hysteria. After seven years of ongoing discussions, EU ministers signaled growing frustrations and potential escalatory measures, but sanctions are unlikely without majority support. Why it matters: The dispute over Hungary's rule of law and LGBTQ+ rights highlights a deeper tension within the EU about balancing national sovereignty with shared democratic principles. As Hungary pushes legislation seen as curbing freedoms and targeting marginalized communities, the EU faces a test of its ability to enforce fundamental values without fracturing its unity. This ongoing standoff reflects wider challenges democracies confront when political leaders adopt increasingly authoritarian measures under the guise of legal reforms, raising urgent questions about the future cohesion and identity of the European project. Source: EU countries 'losing patience' as Hungary grilled on Pride march and rule of law [Euronews] than 800 UK lawyers, judges, and academics have called on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to impose sanctions on Israel over its actions in Gaza, accusing Israel of serious violations of international law, including war crimes and a risk of genocide. The open letter demands urgent British action to secure an immediate, unconditional ceasefire and unimpeded humanitarian aid to Palestinians. It also urges the UK to enforce International Criminal Court arrest warrants against Israeli leaders and reconsider trade ties with Israel. Signatories warn that Israel's ongoing breaches threaten the future of international law and risk unleashing global anarchy. With Gaza's death toll surpassing 54,000, the letter frames the UK's response as critical to upholding the rule of law and preventing further destruction. Why it matters: This unprecedented call from the UK's legal community highlights growing international pressure on Western governments to hold Israel accountable amid escalating violence in Gaza. It underscores the tension between diplomatic alliances and legal, moral responsibilities to prevent war crimes and protect civilians. How the UK responds could influence global efforts to uphold international law and shape future sanctions or interventions. The letter also signals a broader concern about the erosion of international legal norms, warning that ignoring such breaches risks destabilizing global order and enabling impunity for state actions worldwide. Source: More than 800 lawyers, judges call for UK sanctions on Israel over Gaza war [Al Jazeera] Related: 18 Major Global Events That American Media Is Ignoring Right Now, And Why They Actually Matter To Us new Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced that Western allies, including Germany, the US, the UK, and France, have lifted range restrictions on weapons supplied to Ukraine. This means Kyiv can now target Russian military positions deep inside Russian territory using long-range missiles, such as the US-made ATACMS and UK's Storm Shadow. Germany had previously resisted sending long-range cruise missiles like the Taurus, but Merz's statement signals a more hawkish stance. Russia condemned the move, warning it undermines peace talks and risks escalating the conflict. The announcement comes amid intensified Russian attacks and ongoing challenges to negotiate a ceasefire. Why it matters: Removing range restrictions on weapons supplied to Ukraine signals a significant escalation in Western support and a tougher stance against Russian aggression. What was once a cautious approach has shifted toward empowering Kyiv to target military positions deep inside Russia — an option previously off-limits due to fears of widening the conflict. This change heightens tensions and complicates prospects for a ceasefire, as Russia views it as a direct threat to its security and sovereignty. The move reflects broader challenges democracies face in balancing military aid with diplomatic efforts, testing how far they are willing to go to uphold international order without triggering wider confrontation. Ultimately, this decision shapes the trajectory of a conflict with profound regional and global consequences. Source: US, Europe lift 'range restrictions' on Ukraine missiles: Why it matters [Al Jazeera] European Commission has launched formal investigations into four major adult websites — Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos — over suspected breaches of the EU's Digital Safety Act (DSA). The probe focuses on whether these platforms have failed to implement effective age verification measures and risk assessments to protect minors from accessing explicit content. While Stripchat has been removed from the list due to insufficient user numbers, the others remain under scrutiny for lacking adequate safeguards. The commission aims to ensure the online environment is safer for children and is developing an age-verification app to support this effort. Why it matters: This investigation highlights growing efforts across the EU to hold online platforms accountable for protecting young users from harmful content. With children spending increasing time online, establishing robust safeguards against early exposure to adult material is seen as critical for their mental and physical well-being. The DSA's enforcement represents a broader push toward greater digital responsibility and regulation, setting new standards for how platforms must balance accessibility with safety. These developments reflect global challenges in regulating internet content and safeguarding vulnerable populations in an era of rapid technological change. Source: European Union investigates four major porn sites under bloc's digital rules on child protection [AP News] former president Ilir Meta has been formally charged with corruption, money laundering, tax evasion, and concealing assets. The charges come from SPAK, a special anti-corruption body backed by the EU and US. Meta, who was arrested last October, denies wrongdoing and claims the case is politically motivated, calling SPAK a tool of Prime Minister Edi Rama. Meta's ex-wife, a former party leader, and two others also face charges. If convicted, Meta could face up to 12 years in prison. Once one of the country's most powerful politicians, Meta is accused of abusing his position for personal gain and failing to disclose hundreds of thousands in US lobbying expenses. Why it matters: Meta's indictment marks a high-profile test of Albania's fragile rule-of-law reforms as it seeks EU membership. Corruption has long undermined trust in Albanian institutions, but SPAK's pursuit of elite figures — now including two former presidents — signals a shift. For a country trying to shed its post-communist legacy, the willingness to prosecute a political heavyweight like Meta could redefine the boundaries of accountability and transparency in the Balkans. Source: Albanian ex-President Ilir Meta charged with corruption and money laundering [AP News] Georgescu, a far-right Romanian populist who shocked the country by leading the first round of last year's presidential election, has announced he's withdrawing from political life. Though he didn't win the presidency — and was ultimately barred from the election's rerun after allegations of campaign violations and Russian interference — his rise unsettled Romania's political establishment. Georgescu, who praised fascist-era leaders and questioned Ukraine's legitimacy, remains under criminal investigation for incitement and ties to fascist ideologies. Once backed by prominent nationalist figures including Elon Musk and US Vice President JD Vance, he now says the "sovereignist movement has come to a close." Why it matters: Georgescu's rise and fall highlight the vulnerabilities facing even NATO and EU democracies amid viral populism and foreign interference. His campaign — driven by online fervor, zero disclosed spending, and messaging sympathetic to Putin — gained traction in a country once viewed as firmly pro-Western. That American leaders backed him despite his extremist ties and alleged Russian support reveals deepening ideological fractures within democratic alliances. At stake is not just Romania's political future, but a broader reckoning with how democracies confront populist disruption and election meddling. Source: Far-right candidate Calin Georgescu, who upended Romanian presidential race, withdraws from politics [AP News] Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders, long known for his anti-Islam and anti-migration rhetoric, has unveiled a sweeping 10-point plan to drastically reduce immigration in the Netherlands. His proposals include deploying the military to secure borders, blocking all asylum claims, halting family reunifications for refugees, and deporting migrants convicted of certain crimes. Wilders' Party for Freedom won the largest share of seats in the 2023 Dutch election, but has struggled to push through its hardline agenda as part of a fragile four-party coalition. Now, Wilders is threatening to pull his party from the Cabinet if tougher migration controls aren't adopted. Why it matters: The Netherlands — known for its liberal values and internationalism — is now governed by a coalition that includes a far-right party with explicit goals to roll back asylum protections and exit parts of European law. Wilders' ultimatum underscores a broader shift in European politics, where far-right parties are moving from the fringes to the center of power. As the EU contends with increasing migration pressures and rising populism, the Dutch case could become a bellwether for how mainstream institutions either resist or absorb nationalist demands — reshaping the continent's political landscape in the process. Source: Anti-Islam lawmaker Geert Wilders unveils a 10-point plan to slash migration in the Netherlands [AP News] Olmert, Israel's former prime minister and a longtime figure in the country's political establishment, has accused the Israeli government of committing war crimes in Gaza. In a striking op-ed, Olmert denounced the ongoing military campaign as "a war without purpose" and described its toll on civilians as "monstrous." While once a defender of Israel's wartime conduct, Olmert now says the scale and intent of recent operations — marked by indiscriminate killing and a lack of clear objectives — cross a moral and legal line. His comments, echoed by a former army deputy chief, have drawn fierce backlash from the current government, including accusations of treason. Why it matters: Public criticism of Israel's Gaza offensive from within its own top leadership ranks — especially a former prime minister from the ruling party — marks a rare and consequential rupture. As international scrutiny of the war grows, Olmert's shift from staunch defender to vocal dissenter could lend weight to legal and diplomatic efforts to hold Israel accountable. His comments also expose a deepening rift in Israeli society over the war's purpose and conduct, complicating both the government's narrative and its legitimacy on the global stage. Source: Former Israeli PM Ehud Olmert says his country is committing war crimes [The Guardian] major mafia syndicates — including the Sicilian Cosa Nostra, Naples' Camorra, and Calabria's 'Ndrangheta — are increasingly setting aside turf wars to collaborate on drug trafficking, prostitution, money laundering, and infiltration of public works projects, according to the country's annual anti-mafia report. These once-feuding groups are leveraging encrypted technologies and global financial networks, such as Chinese underground banking systems, to coordinate operations and avoid detection. Authorities also warn that mafia organizations are exploiting Italy's EU-funded Recovery Fund projects, the planned bridge linking Sicily to the mainland, and preparations for the 2026 Winter Olympics. Why it matters: This quiet but strategic shift among Italy's most powerful criminal networks reflects how organized crime is adapting to globalization and the digital age. By prioritizing collaboration over conflict, these groups are embedding themselves deeper into both licit and illicit economies, from major construction projects to international finance. The implications go beyond Italy: it's a warning about how transnational criminal syndicates can evolve to undermine democratic infrastructure under the radar, often beyond the scope of conventional law enforcement. Source: Italy's mafia abandoning rivalries to join forces, report says [Reuters] President Emmanuel Macron has denied reports of a domestic dispute after a viral video showed his wife, Brigitte Macron, appearing to push him as they disembarked a plane in Vietnam. The brief clip, captured by a press photographer, sparked widespread speculation, fueled further by Russian state media and French far-right accounts framing the moment as evidence of tension. Macron dismissed the incident as playful banter between the couple, emphasizing that such moments of joking are common for them. The episode reflects how easily lighthearted interactions can be weaponized amid broader geopolitical and domestic tensions, especially with Russia's ongoing efforts to sow discord in Western democracies. Why it matters: This episode shows how easily simple, everyday moments involving public leaders can be turned into political drama or propaganda. When a brief, playful interaction between Macron and his wife is spun into a story of conflict, it reveals how foreign media and political groups exploit such clips to push their own agendas. This matters because it can distract from real issues and feed distrust in leaders at a time when clear communication is essential. It also reflects the broader challenge of navigating misinformation and the impact it has on how people see their governments and public figures. Source: Emmanuel Macron says video of wife pushing him shows them 'joking around' [The Guardian] Were any of these stories new to you? Share your reactions and thoughts in the comments below. And while you're at it, let me know what regions or topics should we explore next! Also in In the News: An Ad Against Far-Right Voters Is Going Viral For Being Both Terrifying And (Kinda) Accurate Also in In the News: Miss USA's 2024 "National Costume" Has Been Revealed, And It's Obviously An Interesting Choice Also in In the News: One Body Language Expert Spotted Something Very Telling When Donald Trump "Held His Own Hand" At His Recent Press Conference