Simple solution could save tree Aussie council claims is 'serious risk to public'
An Australian council has slapped a notice on a towering gum tree, informing residents of its intention to cut it down. Like other local governments around the country, Sydney's Inner West Council intends to plant replacement trees when the yellow bloodwood is gone, but a leading planning expert warns this seemingly sensible solution often contains one key flaw.
"Sadly, it takes decades for trees to grow big enough to provide habitat," Professor Sarah Bekessy said.
Bekessy is a professor of sustainability and urban planning at RMIT and a lead councillor at the Biodiversity Council, and she's been working with colleagues to find "clever ways" of maintaining old trees in urban environments.
The problem of managing large trees in suburban areas is confounding councils around Australia, and often the simplest solution is to get a quote from an arborist and chop it down. But as Waverley and Randwick councils in Sydney's east recently discovered, chopping down beloved street trees often infuriates the residents they're charged with servicing.
The tree the Inner West Council wants to cut down is located in Leichhardt on a street dominated by mid-story natives, making the large eucalypt an anomaly. Photos indicate it is surrounded by a footpath and road with no shrubs or grasses underneath, meaning locals are likely to walk underneath it.
Social media has been running hot with debate about the Leichhardt tree. One said the eucalypt was simply "existing" and the plan to cut it down was "nonsense". Other residents agreed with council, with one declaring it looked "way too big for the street and pavement".
"If a qualified arborist said it's unsafe and then council ignored this advice, then there'd be some explaining to do," another added.
The notice on the tree indicates the decision was made because it's damaging infrastructure and dropping limbs. When Yahoo News asked for more information, council responded with a short statement explaining it was a danger to the public.
"This tree is being removed due to safety concerns. Between 2019 and 2024, the tree has dropped three limbs and poses a serious risk to the public," it said. "To balance the need to uphold safety and increasing the canopy, the Inner West continues to plant more than 1,000 trees each year."
While Bekessy doesn't want to dismiss the danger the tree could pose, she notes in many situations there are simple, low-cost solutions to keeping the public and vehicles out of harm's way.
"No one wants to be bumped on the head by a branch, but one of the things that we've been doing with councils is planting out underneath trees," she said.
"A prickly mid-story of plants happens to be absolutely fabulous habitat for birds and insects. But it also makes it very unlikely that someone's going to want to sit there or park a car there."
🐨 Calls to release documents behind helicopter shooting of koalas
🛳️ Travellers almost kill 'world's oldest animals' during luxury cruise ship tour
📸 Photos reveal details of 'secret' koala colony discovered in impenetrable forest
A similar solution was suggested after US-tech company Honeywell said it needed to cut down a 400-year-old tree because of the danger it posed to people walking to the building recently constructed next door. It ultimately found a way to save the tree.
Whether Inner West Council explored this option remains a mystery, as it did not respond directly to questions from Yahoo about this matter. And it's possible local authorities have no choice but to remove the tree.
It's also unclear whether it has investigated what sorts of wildlife will lose their habitat when it is felled, or what species of replacement trees will take its place.
Speaking generally about mature trees, Bekessy said they "punch above their weight" when it comes to providing health and wellbeing benefits to residents.
"It's time we started seeing green infrastructure as legitimate infrastructure. Sometimes it needs to be managed so it's not damaging other infrastructure, but we can't trade them off each other. We need to work out better designs to enable both to exist," she said.
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
One thing a $100 million Powerball win could buy you that's better than holidays, homes, and cars
Like drinking wine or watching TV, gambling on the lottery is probably a waste of time and money. But an important thing tickets buy most of us is a chance to dream about how a win could change your life. There is $100 million up for grabs in this evening's Powerball draw. The haul the winner will take home is so enormous you could retire, buy a couple of houses, a yacht, take a holiday, and still have plenty to spare. So at the risk of sounding preachy, tonight's draw is probably a good opportunity to think about one important thing — helping others. With $100 million, you could probably buy a parcel of land to prevent the extinction of an entire species, send aid overseas and save human lives, house hundreds of homeless in Australia, or set up a trust to provide long-term support to your charity of choice. There is often little information available about what happens to lottery winners, as they're generally encouraged to stay anonymous in Australia. Related: $100 million Powerball winner reveals how her life has changed A 2024 report created by The Lott, found that 5 per cent of Australian winners didn't tell anyone about their win. Roughly 40 per cent told their immediate family, and 34 per cent told only their partner. Around 40 per cent said they'd helped family and friends, but only 13 per cent said they'd given to charity. Over 50 per cent said they'd invest money in their future, 35 per cent said they'd bought a new car, and seven per cent paid off the mortgages of friends or family. A Sydney mum who won $107 million in 2019 continued working as a nurse. And while she spent money on holidays and nice wine, she also became focused on creating 'a legacy' and supporting charities in ways she couldn't before. 'Paying it forward is really important to us because if you change one person's life, you have the potential to change the whole community,' the anonymous woman said in a 2021 interview with The Lottery Corporation. 'We have already made some really important donations, and we're always thinking a lot about what we want to support next.' When the wins have been smaller, there's been more of a focus on directly helping relatives or friends. A woman from Sydney's western suburbs won over $620,000 in Lotto last Saturday and committed to buying her granddaughter a new car. In April this year, a Melbourne man who won $1.2 million said he'd give $1,000 to friends who needed help, and $100,00 to his daughter. In Victoria, back in 2021, a Whittlesea man committed to donating much of his $670,000 TattsLotto prize to charity. And a Kew grandfather said he'd donate to the Children's Hospital after winning over $830,000. While these are all happy stories, over in the United States where winners often don't have the option to stay anonymous, things don't always work out well. 😳 Lottery worker reveals one thing winner won't believe 🌏 Incredible 'life-changing' $70 million lottery call 😴 Dad claims $60m Powerball jackpot after 'vivid' dream about winning Florida man Abraham Shakespeare won the US $30 million ($46 million) state lottery jackpot in 2006. The labourer famously gave away much of his fortune after being hit up by friends and family in need of cash. 'I'd have been better off broke," he reportedly said. When he disappeared in 2009, family and friends hoped he'd fled overseas. But instead, sadly he was found dead, and his financial advisor was later convicted of murdering him. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
$100 million Powerball winner reveals how her life has changed: 'If only we knew'
Australians taking part in Thursday's incredible $100 million Powerball prize stand a chance to share the title of Australia's third-biggest lottery winner ever. Just six people know what it's like to win the $100 million prize across the country, but that all could change come this Thursday at 7.30pm AEST. At 5.47pm on the day of the last $100 million draw, back in November 2024, ticket sales peaked, with 6,415 entries sold in just one minute. The Lott expects a similar frenzy to take place in just a little over 48 hours, as anticipation builds for the draw. In February last year, a Queensland woman took home half of the record-breaking $200 million Powerball draw. Reflecting on her win more than a year on, the lucky winner has revealed she's since embraced a sea change, relocating from the suburb of Hawthorne in Brisbane to a serene coastal home. "I often speak with my partner about the version of us from last year to now, and if only we knew what was to come," she said. "On a day-to-day basis, not a huge amount has changed. I still get up for the 6am gym session, and the dog still needs to be walked and fed. The longer-term vision we have for our life is slowly coming together." The Lott's Anna Hobdell said the woman is a part of an exclusive group of six Aussies who know what it's like to win a Powerball prize of $100 million or more. While it's easy to get swept up in the excitement, if you're thinking about taking a swing, the chances of you actually pocketing the big Oz Lotto jackpot are incredibly slim. According to The Lott themselves, the chances of winning division one in Oz Lotto, based on one standard game, are a vanishingly small 1 in 62,891,499. The chances of scoring a Powerball jackpot are 1 in 134,490,400. Powerball $100m draw: You're more likely to be crushed by a meteorite than win Young Aussie set for $100 million Oz Lotto jackpot moment What really happens when you score the Division One jackpot We often hear in the news that meteorites fly by earth, sometimes coming a little too close for comfort. If a decent-sized one were to make an impact, however, it could have catastrophic consequences. As it turns out, the odds of you dying from a local meteorite, asteroid or comet impact are one in 1.6 million, according to National Geographic — MUCH more likely than a Powerball win. Tickets for Powerball draw 1517 on Thursday can be purchased at any licensed lottery outlet, online from or via The Lott mobile app. If gambling is a problem for you go to Gambling Help Online or call 1800 858 858. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Simple solution could save tree Aussie council claims is 'serious risk to public'
An Australian council has slapped a notice on a towering gum tree, informing residents of its intention to cut it down. Like other local governments around the country, Sydney's Inner West Council intends to plant replacement trees when the yellow bloodwood is gone, but a leading planning expert warns this seemingly sensible solution often contains one key flaw. "Sadly, it takes decades for trees to grow big enough to provide habitat," Professor Sarah Bekessy said. Bekessy is a professor of sustainability and urban planning at RMIT and a lead councillor at the Biodiversity Council, and she's been working with colleagues to find "clever ways" of maintaining old trees in urban environments. The problem of managing large trees in suburban areas is confounding councils around Australia, and often the simplest solution is to get a quote from an arborist and chop it down. But as Waverley and Randwick councils in Sydney's east recently discovered, chopping down beloved street trees often infuriates the residents they're charged with servicing. The tree the Inner West Council wants to cut down is located in Leichhardt on a street dominated by mid-story natives, making the large eucalypt an anomaly. Photos indicate it is surrounded by a footpath and road with no shrubs or grasses underneath, meaning locals are likely to walk underneath it. Social media has been running hot with debate about the Leichhardt tree. One said the eucalypt was simply "existing" and the plan to cut it down was "nonsense". Other residents agreed with council, with one declaring it looked "way too big for the street and pavement". "If a qualified arborist said it's unsafe and then council ignored this advice, then there'd be some explaining to do," another added. The notice on the tree indicates the decision was made because it's damaging infrastructure and dropping limbs. When Yahoo News asked for more information, council responded with a short statement explaining it was a danger to the public. "This tree is being removed due to safety concerns. Between 2019 and 2024, the tree has dropped three limbs and poses a serious risk to the public," it said. "To balance the need to uphold safety and increasing the canopy, the Inner West continues to plant more than 1,000 trees each year." While Bekessy doesn't want to dismiss the danger the tree could pose, she notes in many situations there are simple, low-cost solutions to keeping the public and vehicles out of harm's way. "No one wants to be bumped on the head by a branch, but one of the things that we've been doing with councils is planting out underneath trees," she said. "A prickly mid-story of plants happens to be absolutely fabulous habitat for birds and insects. But it also makes it very unlikely that someone's going to want to sit there or park a car there." 🐨 Calls to release documents behind helicopter shooting of koalas 🛳️ Travellers almost kill 'world's oldest animals' during luxury cruise ship tour 📸 Photos reveal details of 'secret' koala colony discovered in impenetrable forest A similar solution was suggested after US-tech company Honeywell said it needed to cut down a 400-year-old tree because of the danger it posed to people walking to the building recently constructed next door. It ultimately found a way to save the tree. Whether Inner West Council explored this option remains a mystery, as it did not respond directly to questions from Yahoo about this matter. And it's possible local authorities have no choice but to remove the tree. It's also unclear whether it has investigated what sorts of wildlife will lose their habitat when it is felled, or what species of replacement trees will take its place. Speaking generally about mature trees, Bekessy said they "punch above their weight" when it comes to providing health and wellbeing benefits to residents. "It's time we started seeing green infrastructure as legitimate infrastructure. Sometimes it needs to be managed so it's not damaging other infrastructure, but we can't trade them off each other. We need to work out better designs to enable both to exist," she said. Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
