
Lawmakers who tried to visit ‘Alligator Alcatraz' amid humanitarian concerns were denied entry
Florida lawmakers worried about 'humanitarian concerns' were denied entry into the new detention center dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' Thursday, just hours after the arrival of its first group of detainees.
'They stopped us pretty immediately,' said Florida state Rep. Anna Eskamani, one of the five Democratic state lawmakers who attempted to visit the facility and inspect its grounds following reports of flooding and other issues.
The lawmakers were stopped by law enforcement officers from multiple Florida agencies and later, a general counsel from the Florida Division of Emergency Management cited a 'safety concern' for the denial without offering specific details, Eskamani said.
'If it's unsafe for us, how is it safe for the detainees?' Eskamani said she asked the attorney.
The group's request to see the outer perimeter of the tent facility was also denied, Eskamani said.
The lawmakers said in a joint statement that Florida law allows state legislators to 'have full access to inspect any state-operated facility.' They referenced two Florida statutes: one gives members of the legislature authority to visit all state correctional institutions 'at their pleasure' and another allows them to visit county and municipal detention facilities.
'This is a blatant abuse of power and an attempt to conceal human rights violations from the public eye,' the group said.
CNN has reached out to the Florida Division of Emergency Management for comment.
The incident is one of a spate of recent tense encounters involving lawmakers at immigration detention centers. Last month, Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver was indicted on federal charges alleging she impeded and interfered with immigration officers outside a Newark, New Jersey, detention center as she and other Democratic lawmakers tried to visit the facility in May. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested at the scene after he tried to join the lawmakers inside the facility.
Detainees have arrived at the facility in the middle of the Florida Everglades, the state emergency management agency said Thursday, following reports of flooding earlier this week. Prior to trying to enter the facility, the lawmakers noted there have been reports of extreme heat, structural issues, environmental threats and human rights violations that 'demand immediate oversight.'
'What's happening here is un-American,' the group of state lawmakers said in a joint news release before going to the facility Thursday. 'What we're witnessing isn't about security or solving problems—it's about inhumane political theater that endangers real people.'
President Donald Trump toured the facility Tuesday and shortly after, summer storms amid the region's hurricane season brought flooding, adding to a list of concerns about the facility's readiness to house migrants.
Wires were seen submerged in pooling water across the floor and high winds made the floor and walls of the facility's tents tremble, reporter video from CNN affiliate Spectrum News 13 showed. A combination of weather observations and estimates from radar indicate that anywhere from around 0.4 to 1.5 inches of rain fell at the facility in less than two hours on Tuesday, according to CNN Weather.
Later that night, 'vendors went back and tightened any seams at the base of the structures that allowed water intrusion during the heavy storm, which was minimal,' Stephanie Hartman, a spokesperson for the Florida Division of Emergency Management, told CNN in a separate request for information about the flooding.
But more rainfall could be on the horizon amid the region's hurricane season and the chance for storms in the forecast every day in the next week, according to CNN Weather.
It's unclear how many detainees are currently being housed at the compound as of Thursday, but it has the capacity to hold 3,000 people, with room for more, Kevin Guthrie, executive director of the Florida Division of Emergency Management, said in a roundtable Tuesday alongside Trump.
Beds are seen inside a migrant detention center dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz" in Ochopee, Florida, on July 1.
DHS says it isn't directly involved with the facility
The US Department of Homeland Security said it has not been directly involved in 'Alligator Alcatraz,' according to a federal court filing submitted Wednesday, a move distancing the Trump administration from the makeshift detention facility.
'DHS has not implemented, authorized, directed, or funded Florida's temporary detention center,' the court filing reads.
Thomas Giles, the interim assistant director for Enforcement and Removal Field Operations at ICE, said in a declaration that ICE's role 'has been limited to touring the facility to ensure compliance with ICE detention standards, and meeting with officials from the State of Florida to discuss operational matters.'
The agency made the declaration as part of a federal lawsuit filed by two environmental groups seeking to stop the use of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport as a site to house undocumented detainees. The groups allege the 'reckless plan' will put at risk the ecologically sensitive Everglades wetland.
In the court filing, DHS argued the facility is built and run solely by the state of Florida.
The state can detain undocumented people at the facility under the 287(g) program, which allows ICE to authorize state and local law enforcement officers to perform specific immigration enforcement duties under ICE's supervision, Giles said in the court filing.
'The ultimate decision of who to detain at the TNT Detention Facility belongs to Florida,' he said.
Despite distancing itself from the facility, DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs, Tricia McLaughlin said authorities will 'expand facilities and bed space in just days, thanks to our partnership with Florida.'
As part of the lawsuit, the Department of Justice defended the development of the facility, saying that delaying its construction 'would imperil critical immigration enforcement efforts and endanger detainees in overcrowded detention facilities.'
DHS said the state has not received or applied for federal funds related to the detention center.
But a declaration submitted by a Federal Emergency Management Agency official as part of the lawsuit noted a $600 million detention support grant program has been established to help the state with immigration detention. Once the program is finalized, the Florida Division of Emergency Management can apply for federal funds for the state's detention facilities.
On Thursday, the US military also said it would send about 200 Marines to Florida to assist ICE as part of a broader push to deploy active-duty troops to assist with deportations.
A statement from US Northern Command didn't say where in Florida the Marines would be sent, or whether they will support 'Alligator Alcatraz,' but noted they would 'perform strictly non-law enforcement duties within ICE facilities.'
Detention center is 'as safe and secure as you can be,' governor says
Nestled in the middle of Florida's humid, subtropical wetland ecosystem, 'Alligator Alcatraz' was transformed from a training and transition airport to a temporary tent city for migrants.
The expected cost to run the detention center for one year is $450 million, a DHS official told CNN, adding that Florida will front the costs of the facility and then 'submit reimbursement requests' through FEMA and DHS.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said the facility is necessary to alleviate burdens on the state's law enforcement agencies and jails, and touted it for being designed to be 'completely self-contained' – which has prompted local immigration rights advocates to accuse his administration of creating a facility 'engineered to enact suffering.'
Related article
Trump's visit to a migrant camp called 'Alligator Alcatraz' stirs dark echoes
'Clearly from a security perspective, if someone escapes, there's a lot of alligators you're going to have to contend (with),' DeSantis said last week. 'No one is going anywhere once you do that. It's as safe and secure as you can be.'
Migrants will be housed in repurposed FEMA trailers and 'soft-sided temporary facilities,' a DHS official told CNN.
The same tents are often used to house those displaced by natural disasters, like hurricanes, DeSantis' office said. They likely will provide the only shelter from Mother Nature as summer in South Florida proves to be the region's wettest season, in part due to the tropical activity of hurricane season and daily thunderstorms.
State officials said they are developing evacuation plans for the facility in the event of severe weather.
CNN's Shania Shelton, Chelsea Bailey and Luke Snyder contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Attorney General William Barr Says He Didn't See Trump Implicated In Epstein Files
WASHINGTON — Former Attorney General William Barr told lawmakers on Monday that President Donald Trump isn't implicated in the government's investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Barr sat for an hourslong deposition after receiving a subpoena from the House Oversight Committee last month amid a furor over the Trump administration's refusal to release its files from its investigation of Epstein's crimes. 'What Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list. He didn't know anything about a client list,' House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) told reporters outside the deposition room. High-profile Trump supporters, including top officials in his administration, have previously speculated that the government has a list of Epstein's clients that hasn't seen the light of day because powerful people whose names appear on the list have conspired to keep the material hidden. Trump's current attorney general, Pam Bondi, said earlier this year that she had the client list literally sitting on her desk. In July, however, the Justice Department said there was no client list, no conspiracy to hide incriminating material and no reason to release any further information about the Epstein case. Related: Trump was friends with Epstein for years, and his name is reportedly mentioned repeatedly in the government's Epstein files, but Barr said that if there was anything truly damaging, it would have come out already. 'He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out,' Comer said Monday. Related: Barr was attorney general when Epstein died in prison in 2019 after being arrested and charged with sex trafficking of minors. Epstein had previously been arrested in 2006, but struck a sweetheart deal with federal prosecutors to avoid federal charges. The Justice Department then indicted him in 2019 after the scale of his crimes came to wider attention. The following year, the department issued a memo criticizing its prior refusal to prosecute Epstein. Related: Comer's committee issued subpoenas for Barr and other former attorneys general as part of a batch also targeting former first couple Bill and Hillary Clinton. The subpoenas were approved on a bipartisan basis last month during a surprising subcommittee vote. House Democrats said Barr's testimony on Monday left them with more questions about the Trump administration's refusal this year to release its files from the case. Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) said it appeared Republicans conducted the deposition in a half-hearted manner. 'The question is if they are truly invested in doing what's right and making sure that there's real transparency for the American people,' Crockett told reporters. 'Right now, it doesn't seem like that. It seems like they are going through the motions, and they want people to believe that they are digging in. But at the end of the day, I don't think that we've learned anything through the Republican questioning.' Related: Comer said his committee's Epstein investigation was bipartisan and that he wished Democrats wouldn't 'politicize' things. He also said he believed his subpoena for the actual Epstein files would be successful. 'I'm under the impression that they're gathering all these documents, and that's what the subpoena called for,' Comer said. 'And I think the administration knows this is what Congress wants, Republicans and Democrats. And I think President Trump has said clearly [that] he wants to release all the documents. So we're going to get the documents.' Related... Trump Administration Ignores Chuck Schumer's Deadline For Epstein Files Epstein Accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell's Grand Jury Records To Remain Sealed Trump's Sleight-Of-Hand On The Jeffrey Epstein Scandal
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Swalwell's 2026 Playbook: Subpoenas For Trump, Statehood For D.C., And A Side Of Shade
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) said Democrats would use subpoena power to target President Donald Trump and his administration if the party wins control of the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2026 elections. In a video clip posted on X, Swalwell criticized Trump's call to send federal law enforcement and military forces to Washington, D.C., to address violent crime. 'We find D.C. under the control of a wannabe aspiring dictator,' he said. In the same clip, Swalwell added: 'If we take back the House, we will send subpoenas to the Trump administration to make sure that we hold them accountable for their crimes.' Trump has denied all allegations, calling the New York prosecution and other criminal cases politically motivated. Several of his court cases remain active. Swalwell also revisited efforts to grant Washington, D.C., statehood. He highlighted a 2021 bill introduced by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) that garnered 202 cosponsors but stalled in the Senate due to filibuster resistance from both Republicans and some Democrats. Supporters say statehood would grant the city's residents full voting rights in Congress. Opponents argue it would require a constitutional amendment and could shift the political balance in the federal district.
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MSNBC Name Change Mercilessly Mocked as ‘One of the Worst Branding Disasters in Media History'
"MSNBC's horrible rebrand is going to bring Americans together again," one social media user jokes Versant's Monday announcement that MSNBC will be rebranded as MS NOW (My Source News Opinion World) has generated comparisons online to Warner Bros. Discovery's multiple HBO name changes in recent years and has been met with widespread derision. The rebrand comes as parent company Comcast plans to spin off its cable news channels into a new company called Versant. When that plan was originally announced, there were concerns that MSNBC's separation from NBCUniversal would result in it losing its easily identifiable name. More from TheWrap MSNBC Name Change Mercilessly Mocked as 'One of the Worst Branding Disasters in Media History' Spike Lee's Colin Kaepernick Docuseries Scrapped at ESPN Due to 'Creative Differences' David Geffen Responds to Ex-Husband's 'Ludicrous and Contrived' Lawsuit: 'Petty Gossip and Salacious Lies' State Department Papers Found on Alaska Hotel Printer Include Sensitive Details of Trump's Summit With Putin Those concerns were temporarily dispelled when Versant's prospective CEO Mark Lazarus told staffers in January that they did not have to worry about the network changing its name. Now, not only is MSNBC rebranding, but its name change also brings with it a new logo that does not feature the NBC Peacock logo that has long helped identify the network as part of the NBCUniversal family. 'This name further underscores our mission: to serve as your destination for breaking news and thoughtful analysis and remain the home for the perspectives that you've relied on for nearly 30 years,' the network wrote in an official statement shared Monday morning. 'For our viewers who have watched us for decades, it may be hard to imagine this network by any other name,' the statement continued. 'We understand. But our promise to you remains as it always has. You know who we are, and what we do.' Social media users were swift to express their displeasure with the change. One user on X called it 'one of the worst branding disasters in media history' and wrote that the new MS NOW logo 'looks like it belongs on a discount computer from 1998.' Another user vowed that, much like how they refused to call HBO Max just 'Max' after it was temporarily rebranded, they will 'never call [MSNBC] the new name.' 'This rebrand leaves me a little speechless,' a different user also admitted on X, while another user joked that 'MSNBC's horrible rebrand is going to bring Americans together again.' You can check out some of the morning's social media reactions yourself below. The post MSNBC Name Change Mercilessly Mocked as 'One of the Worst Branding Disasters in Media History' appeared first on TheWrap. Solve the daily Crossword