Single-sex toilets row: 'We shouldn't have had to fight for the law to be followed'
Parents who fought for single-sex toilets to be provided in state schools across Scotland have said the win is 'bittersweet' after a judge ruled in their favour.
Leigh Hurley and Sean Stratford launched a legal challenge against Scottish Borders Council after it installed gender neutral lavatories at Earlston Primary School in 2023.
Before launching the legal challenge, Ms Hurley and Mr Stratford said their concerns were dismissed.
Leigh told STV News: 'We were treated as if we were the imbeciles and to go away, and we were going against the grain, that all schools in Scotland were doing this.'
The parents, whose child attended the school, complained to the council over gender neutral toilets, the punishment of children who 'misgender' others and trans children participating in sports day.
All three issues were initially rejected, however, the lawyer representing them, Rosie Walker, lodged a petition for review in January.
Their case against Borders Council reached the Court of Session in Edinburgh, where a judge ruled that state schools in Scotland must provide single-sex toilets for pupils.
It follows a Supreme Court ruling last week on the definition of 'woman' in the Equality Act and the legal protection of single-sex spaces.
Ms Hurley and Mr Stratford, who have since removed their child from the school, said the ruling was 'bittersweet'.
'It's bittersweet for us really, because we shouldn't have had to ever go to a judicial review,' Leigh said.
Scottish Borders Council has 'accepted and acknowledged' that it should provide single-sex toilets at Earlston Primary School.
Prior to the hearing the local authority conceded it was wrong, and did not defend its case in court.
However, the council rejects the parents' claims they were ignored.
The local authority has also agreed to 'revisit and reconsider' the other complaints made.
Leigh said: 'I don't need an apology, we haven't changed any laws, just do what you were supposed to do in the beginning.'
Sean added: 'I think that's the amazing thing about the decision yesterday, the law was there the whole time.
'What really makes me frustrated and angry, is we told them this when it was a building site, they could've addressed it then but they dismissed us like we were the idiots,' he said.
The Scottish Government said it would 'carefully consider' the implications of the ruling.
A spokesperson said: 'Local authorities have statutory responsibility for the school estate, including provision of toilets.
'The Scottish Government is committed to ensuring that our Transgender Guidance for Schools remains up to date and fit for purpose. As with any significant legal or policy developments, we will consider whether the guidance requires to be updated to reflect upon these. The social justice secretary and health secretary will both meet tomorrow with the EHRC whose forthcoming guidance on this issue will be a significant factor in how we proceed.'
'We had already said we would consult on updating the School Premises Regulations, and considering recent court decisions will be part of that process.'
A Scottish Borders Council spokesperson said: 'Prior to the hearing, SBC had accepted and acknowledged the decision that was being sought was correct and therefore did not seek to defend this in court.
'Moving forward, SBC will revisit and reconsider the complaint and respond in due course.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
John Swinney looks to the past as he plans for the future
Just to impress how important the First Minister's speech was on Monday, introducing him, Kate Forbes told the great and the good of Scottish public life—squeezed into Glasgow University's Imaging Centre of Excellence—that her boss was about to make a 'landmark speech.' On Sunday, the Scottish Government told journalists it was a 'major speech,' while the previous day, John Swinney's official spokesman described it as a 'keynote event.' Was it really that big a deal? Well, it might be—if it works. Read more from Unspun: The SNP leader told us the status quo is no longer sustainable—that demographic pressures, fiscal constraints, climate change and rising demand are leaving public services straining at the seams. He said bold, collective action was needed—that there had to be a fundamental shift in how public services are designed and delivered. Central to this transformation, Mr Swinney said, were four key elements: 'empowerment, integration, efficiency and prevention.' They were, the First Minister reminded us, the four principles of the Christie Commission. Fifteen years ago, you might remember, the Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services in Scotland, chaired by Dr Campbell Christie, was tasked by Mr Swinney with examining the long-term challenges facing public services—including budget pressures, demographic change, rising demand and persistent inequalities. The Commission's report—let's call it a landmark report—called for community-driven, preventative and collaborative approaches to address these systemic challenges. Key recommendations included prioritising prevention to reduce long-term costs, enhancing performance through technology, and closer working across sectors. Sign up to Scotland's top politics newsletter and get it directly to your inbox. Perhaps the biggest example of post-Christie reform was replacing the country's eight police forces with one. Mr Swinney pointed to it on Monday as a success: 'The creation of a single Scottish Police service has led to over £200 million in savings over legacy arrangements, while crime has continued to fall to near record low levels.' But it's fair to say, progress has been uneven at best. (Image: Damian Shields) Tickets for Unspun Live at the Edinburgh Fringe are available now — click here to book your place. In a 2021 blog post looking at Christie ten years on, Audit Scotland said there had been a 'major implementation gap between policy ambitions and delivery on the ground.' They gave a number of examples, including the paltry progress on closing the poverty-related attainment gap. Dr Christie was quite clear that one of the biggest stumbling blocks to reform was that 'institutions and structures resist change, especially radical change.' Is that still true? In his speech, Mr Swinney told the public sector leaders he wanted them to leave with a clear sense of his ambition and commitment 'to this national project of renewal.' 'I want you to feel enthused, but more importantly empowered. This will only happen if we, if you, make it happen. 'People often tell me that they feel as though they do not have permission to deliver the change in their organisation that they know is needed. Well today, let's give each other that permission.' John Swinney's right that the Christie principles are more relevant than ever, and maybe with modern tools, like AI, the implementation gap can be overcome. What was interesting was how receptive the audience was to the First Minister's message—but also how sceptical they were that he could deliver it, that, as one questioner put it, the lofty goals would "bump into reality." A landmark speech? Perhaps. Now he just needs to stick the landing.
STV News
5 hours ago
- STV News
Scottish Government urged to ignore ‘hysteria' around Loch Lomond proposals
The developer behind controversial plans to build on the banks of Loch Lomond has urged the Scottish Government to ignore the 'hysteria' from opponents. Lomond Banks – owned by theme park operator Flamingo Land – has proposed to build a multi-million-pound mega-park. It includes plans for a water park, two hotels, 104 wooden lodges, spa, cafes, shops, restaurants, brewery and more in Balloch, West Dunbartonshire. In May, the Scottish Government Reporter approved the plans – allowing them to go on to the next stage of planning and development – despite opposition from the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority itself and more than 150,000 people who joined the Save Loch Lomond campaign. The Scottish Government initially said it had 'no intention' of stepping in to re-evaluate that approval, but Scottish ministers U-turned last week, once again putting the Flamingo Land plans in doubt. On Monday, speaking for the first time since that decision, Lomond Banks development director Jim Paterson said the firm was 'extremely disappointed'. 'We have engaged with the planning process in good faith, following every regulation and expectation set by the National Park and Scotland's new national planning framework,' he said. 'The land in question has been allocated for sustainable tourism development for decades, a fact acknowledged by the DPEA (Planning and Environmental Appeals Division) reporter. 'To have this long-established planning context disregarded at the 11th hour raises serious questions not only about the integrity and consistency of the Scottish planning system, but also about Scotland as an investment destination.' 'That's why Mr Paterson called on ministers to back the Flamingo Land proposals. 'We now call on all ministers, especially the planning minister, to uphold the integrity of the planning system,' he said. 'This process must remain impartial and evidence-led, not subjected to political opportunism or pressure campaigns built on misinformation. The rules must apply fairly and equally to all, or public trust in the system will be irreparably damaged.' Mr Paterson added: 'We urge the Scottish Government to see through the hysteria and consider not just the facts of this proposal, but the precedent it sets for all future investment in Scotland.' Mr Paterson accused opponents of the development – spearheaded by Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer – of a 'sensationalist and misleading campaign' full of 'mistruths and inaccuracies'. More than 150,000 people signed a petition to halt the plans, and 50,000 wrote to the Scottish Government to intervene, but Mr Paterson claimed the project has 'strong local support'. 'Anyone genuinely interested in the views of the Scottish people need only look at the widespread positive engagement on social media and elsewhere, reflecting a clear desire for sustainable, year-round economic activity and job creation,' he said. Public finance minister Ivan McKee said last week the government would recall the plans for the Flamingo Land resort, saying it raises issues of national significance due to its impact on the national park area. Over 150,000 people objected to the development through a petition launched by the Scottish Greens. The final outcome will be now be decided by Scottish ministers. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Sky News
5 hours ago
- Sky News
First Minister John Swinney says winter fuel payment in Scotland 'will not be less than UK benefit'
Winter fuel payments for pensioners in Scotland will be no less than those being paid south of the border by the UK government, John Swinney has confirmed. The first minister made the announcement on Monday in light of Chancellor Rachel Reeves's partial U-turn last week. Mr Swinney said: "I am very happy to confirm that no pensioner in Scotland will receive less than they would under the new UK scheme. "Details will be set out in due course by my government, but the Scottish government will always seek what is best for Scotland's pensioners." It comes after the Labour government backtracked on its controversial cut to the once universal benefit. Pensioners in England and Wales who earn under £35,000 will now receive £200 for those aged up to 79 and £300 for those aged over 80. The Scottish government, which was forced to delay plans for a new universal benefit following Westminster's decision last summer, had already partially U-turned. Under the devolved proposal, all pensioners north of the border were told they would receive at least £100 in 2025/26. Those in receipt of pension credit or other benefits were promised either £203 or £305, depending on their age. 3:44 While speaking to journalists, Mr Swinney said the change in policy from the UK government would increase Holyrood's funding by around £120m. In a statement, the first minister said: "The winter fuel payment kept some of the most vulnerable in society warm in winter - it was always the right thing to do but it was also the smart thing to do. "Smart because it kept people out of hospital, in their own home. It kept them warm and well. And then it was gone. "To be quite blunt about it, I don't believe cutting this winter lifeline was ever going to save a penny because making millions of pensioners poorer makes them also colder and makes them also sicker and that in turn puts up the bill for our social services and our NHS. "It is an almost textbook definition of a false economy." Scottish Tory MSP Liz Smith accused the SNP of following Labour's "shameful" lead when the universal payment was scrapped last year. She added: "And, like Keir Starmer, the nationalists have been forced into a humiliating U-turn because of the huge public backlash. "If cutting fuel payments to pensioners was the false economy John Swinney now claims it was, why did he copy Labour by ditching it in Scotland? "Labour and the SNP created huge anxiety, uncertainty and financial hardship for pensioners up and down the country and that betrayal will not be forgiven or forgotten."
