logo
U.S. Announces Exit From UNESCO—Here's What It Means for Travelers

U.S. Announces Exit From UNESCO—Here's What It Means for Travelers

On July 22, the U.S. Department of State announced it would withdraw from UNESCO.
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization—founded after World War II with the goal of 'promoting peace through its cooperative endeavors"—has since built an invaluable database of cultural and natural landmarks, many of which are among the world's most iconic travel destinations.
Now, the U.S. involvement in funding, selecting, and supporting these endeavors is going to come to an end. Secretary of State Tammy Bruce said the decision to withdraw was made because continued involvement 'is not in the national interest of the United States.'
'UNESCO works to advance divisive social and cultural causes and maintains an outsized focus on the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, a globalist, ideological agenda for international development at odds with our America First foreign policy,' Bruce said in the official statement.
This isn't the first time the U.S. has parted ways with the organization. The Trump administration withdreaw in 2018, and the country only rejoined in 2023 under former President Joe Biden. Before that, U.S. funding halted under former President Barack Obama in 2011 and the country full withdrew once before, in 1984 under former President Ronald Reagan.
While this latest departure isn't without precedent, it could still lead to ripple effects for travelers. Here's what to know:
The withdrawal will take effect on Dec. 31, 2026. Until then, the U.S. remains a full participating member of the organization.
UNESCO includes 194 member states (nations), each contributing financially and appointing national representatives. The organization collectively sets global standards and leads initiatives focused on the preservation of history, culture, education, and the environment.
There are 26 World Heritage Sites and 28 biosphere reserves in the US. In the world, there are 1,248 sites across 170 countries. U.S. sites include landmarks like Yosemite National Park, Yellowstone National Park, and Everglades, as well as Independence Hall in Philadelphia, San Antonio Missions in Texas, and the Statue of Liberty.
As one of the largest member states of the organization, the U.S. supplied significant funding for UNESCO projects, including the world heritage sites. In response to the withdrawal announcement, UNESCO Director-General Audrey Azoulay said they "deeply regret" the Trump administration's decision to withdraw, but affirmed the organization's commitment to its mission.
'However regrettable, this announcement was anticipated, and UNESCO has prepared for it,' Azoulay said. While the organization used to heavily rely on funding from the U.S., it has since 'undertaken major structural reforms and diversified our funding sources,' according to Azoulay.
While there still might be some changes, UNESCO does not anticipate reducing staff or operations at this time, which means that for now, you can continue planning travel to UNESCO sites as usual.
As for whether or not Americans have anything to worry about when they visit UNESCO sites, Azoulay said that the policy of an open door for everyone will continue. 'UNESCO's purpose is to welcome all the nations of the world, and the United States of America is and will always be welcome.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Democrats face Republican deadline to stop standoff or face consequences
Texas Democrats face Republican deadline to stop standoff or face consequences

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Democrats face Republican deadline to stop standoff or face consequences

Texas Democrats on Friday are gearing up for another day defying Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and the state GOP as they try to move forward with controversial redistricting. The Texas House is set to meet as Republican legislators say that Friday is the deadline for Democratic legislators who've fled the state to return or face consequences. House Republicans will try to vote on GOP-proposed new congressional maps that would give Republicans more seats in Congress -- potentially allowing the GOP to keep control of the U.S. House of Representatives in Washington. Abbott has also requested the Texas Supreme Court to remove Democratic state Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House minority leader, from office over the Democrats' defiance. The court gave Wu until 6 p.m. ET Friday to respond to the governor's case. Wu told ABC News Thursday that he believes his caucus will hold out on Friday and once again deny the legislature a quorum, though he said they would be willing to come back to Austin if state Republicans promise to focus solely on other issues before the special session, including flood mitigation and disaster preparedness. Democrats who have fled the state appear likely to stay away until Aug. 19, the end of the special session, meaning there will be not be enough lawmakers present for the Texas House to conduct business. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton told Fox News on Friday that he is willing to take other Democrats to court if they don't return. MORE: Texas governor orders police to find and arrest Democrats who fled over redistricting "If they show up today, we're all happy, we can get our business done, and everybody is good. If they do not show up, we will be in an Illinois courtroom ... [trying] to get them back to the state of Texas, hold them in contempt, and if they refuse to come, hopefully put them in jail," he said. He shrugged off concerns that the optics of arresting Democrats would give them a public opinion win. "I think in Texas -- I don't know what it's like in other states, but I do know in Texas, people expect their representatives to go to work," Paxton said. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows targeted the wallets of the absent members in an effort to draw them back. On Thursday, he sent a memo to all members and their staff requiring that any member who is absent from the special session to break quorum must collect their monthly check in person. Direct deposits were suspended for those skipping out until the House reaches quorum, according to memo. Abbott has called for the Democrats' arrest, and Republican Sen. John Cornyn has called on the FBI to track down those elected officials. The governor said in a podcast released Friday that he was willing to go further than creating more than five new seats the GOP could flip if the Democrats continued to block. "We may make it six or seven or eight new seats we're going to be adding on the Republican side," he said during an interview on the podcast "Ruthless." MORE: GOP's Texas map has Austin residents sharing district with rural Texans 300 miles away In the meantime, the Texas Democrats have fled to various blue states, including Illinois and California. California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is slated to hold a news conference with those Democrats Friday afternoon, along with Rep. Nancy Pelosi and California state Democrats to show their support. "The governor and state leaders have floated a potential statewide ballot measure that would reaffirm California's commitment to national independent redistricting and allow voters to temporarily adjust the state's congressional map only if Texas or other GOP-led states manipulate theirs," Newsom's office said in a statement. California Democrats are preparing to respond to Texas Republicans' proposed new congressional districts by possibly targeting five GOP-held districts in the Golden State, sources recently confirmed to ABC station KGO-TV. But the office of the California Secretary of State told ABC News that if legislators don't move fast, it becomes nearly impossible for the state to run a statewide election that meets federal standards. ABC station KGO-TV's Monica Madden contributed to this report.

Kristi Noem Slams South Park's ‘Petty' Portrayal of Her: ‘It's So Lazy to Make Fun of Women for How They Look'
Kristi Noem Slams South Park's ‘Petty' Portrayal of Her: ‘It's So Lazy to Make Fun of Women for How They Look'

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kristi Noem Slams South Park's ‘Petty' Portrayal of Her: ‘It's So Lazy to Make Fun of Women for How They Look'

No surprise here: Kristi Noem isn't thrilled with her unflattering portrayal on the most recent episode of South Park. The United States Secretary of Homeland Security called in to Glenn Beck's radio show on Thursday to share her thoughts on the Aug. 6 episode, in which an animated Noem recruited mild-mannered elementary school guidance counselor Mr. Mackey into joining ICE. More from TVLine South Park Savages ICE and Kristi Noem, Sends Trump to Mar-a-Lago - Read Recap South Park Premiere Delivers 6 Million Viewers, Best 18-49 Share Since 1999 Save the Dates: South Park Sets Return, Kelly Clarkson's NBC Series and More In addition to being ruthlessly racist, South Park's version of Noem had a penchant for shooting puppies — a nod to Noem's real-life memoir, in which she recalled killing her young dog Cricket after he was deemed too 'aggressive.' The show also gave Noem a melting face, which required an entire team to reapply each time it fell off. 'It never ends, but it's so lazy to constantly make fun of women for how they look,' Noem said to Beck. 'It's always the liberals and the extremists who do that. If they wanted to criticize my job, go ahead and do that, but clearly they can't. They just pick something petty like that.' Despite her strong opinions, Noem claims that she didn't watch the episode, as she was otherwise occupied 'going over budget numbers and stuff.' One person who likely did watch this week's South Park was Vice President JD Vance, who responded to his own portrayal by posting 'Well, I've made it' on X. The episode reimagined Mar-a-Lago as a Fantasy Island-esque retreat, with President Donald Trump as Mr. Roarke and Vance as Tattoo. Noem's displeasure with South Park comes two weeks after the White House released a statement regarding Trump's portrayal in the season premiere. 'The Left's hypocrisy truly has no end,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in response to Trump's portrayal as a whiny-voiced, flappy-headed, Satan-loving, small-membered dictator. 'For years, they have come after South Park for what they labeled as 'offense' content, but suddenly they are praising the show,' the statement continued. 'Just like the creators of South Park, the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows. This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention. President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history — and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.' What did you think of South Park's portrayal of Noem? And what are your thoughts on Season 27 so far? Drop 'em in a comment below. An A-to-Z List of 300+ Scripted Series View ListBest of TVLine 'Missing' Shows, Found! Get the Latest on Ahsoka, Monarch, P-Valley, Sugar, Anansi Boys and 25+ Others Yellowjackets Mysteries: An Up-to-Date List of the Series' Biggest Questions (and Answers?) The Emmys' Most Memorable Moments: Laughter, Tears, Historical Wins, 'The Big One' and More

3 things you need to know about Trump's nominee for the Fed
3 things you need to know about Trump's nominee for the Fed

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 things you need to know about Trump's nominee for the Fed

President Donald Trump's nominee to the Federal Reserve Board has implications for the central bank's monetary policy decisions. The president nominated Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran to the Fed to replace Fed governor Adriana Kugler, who is stepping down Friday. Miran will hold that seat for a few months until the Jan. 31 term expires while the president looks for a different candidate to nominate for a full 14-year term as Fed governor. But how will the nomination impact the central bank and the decisions it makes on setting interest rates? Here are three things you need to know about Miran's views and what they could mean for the Fed. Miran wants lower interest rates Miran, who criticized the Fed last fall for cutting rates, warning that lower rates could perpetuate inflation further, is now in favor of cutting rates. Miran, who holds a PhD in economics from Harvard University, believes that the Trump administration's policies, from immigration to trade and deregulation, which he has helped create, are disinflationary. This contrasts with many on the Fed who believe the president's tariffs could lead to higher inflation. If the Senate were to confirm Miran in time for the Sept. 16-17 policy meeting and the full committee is not convinced to lower rates at that time, Miran would likely dissent in favor of cutting rates. That would mark three on the committee who could dissent: Fed governors Chris Waller and Michelle Bowman both dissented at the July policy meeting, preferring to lower rates by 25 basis points. Read more: How the Fed rate decision affects your bank accounts, loans, credit cards, and investments Miran's 'Mar-a-Lago Accord' favors a weaker dollar Miran favors a weaker dollar as a way to offset higher inflation from tariffs while also increasing exports, narrowing the trade deficit, and boosting growth. He is the author of what he dubbed the "Mar-a-Lago Accord," a reference to the 1985 Plaza Accord that succeeded in depreciating the dollar's value. The Mar-a-Lago Accord seeks to devalue the dollar while retaining the greenback as the world's reserve currency. As one who favors a weaker dollar, Miran favors lower interest rates, which could lead to a weaker dollar if US rates are lower than the interest rates of other central banks around the world. The president has pushed for a 3 percentage point drop in the Fed's benchmark policy rate. Investors will watch for how much Miran will push for the policy rate to drop if confirmed. Miran wants a less independent Fed Miran has advocated for major changes to the Fed. In a paper co-authored in 2024 with the now chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Miran called for an overhaul of the central bank by Congress that would give the White House more control over firing Fed governors, as well as not allowing Fed governors to serve in the executive branch for four years following their term as governor. He also argued for subjecting the Fed's independent budget to congressional appropriations. The proposals for allowing the president to dismiss Fed officials at will have stirred fears that the move could politicize the central bank and push the Fed to make policy according to the whims of the political cycle and not the economic cycle. Read more: How jobs, inflation, and the Fed are all related Still, as only one governor on the Fed, and possibly a temporary one, Miran himself isn't expected to tip the scales all that much. Any major changes to the structure of the central bank would have to come from Congress, and there's still a 19-member committee that will make decisions on rates led by Fed Chair Jerome Powell, who, like the majority of the Fed, remains in a "wait-and-see" mode for the impact of tariffs on inflation. Jennifer Schonberger is a veteran financial journalist covering markets, the economy, and investing. At Yahoo Finance she covers the Federal Reserve, Congress, the White House, the Treasury, the SEC, the economy, cryptocurrencies, and the intersection of Washington policy with finance. Follow her on X @Jenniferisms and on Instagram. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store