logo
Religious orders will be ‘held accountable' for sex abuse crimes in schools

Religious orders will be ‘held accountable' for sex abuse crimes in schools

BreakingNews.ie08-07-2025
Institutions and religious orders involved in historical sex abuse in schools will be 'held accountable' for the 'awful' crimes, the education minister has vowed.
The Government approved the establishment of a commission of investigation into allegations of historical sex abuse in schools across the country.
Advertisement
Mr Justice Michael McGrath will chair the commission.
Minister for Education Helen McEntee, who outlined the details of the commission of investigation, said that any redress scheme would have to be funded by the religious orders and organisations.
Minister McEntee announces establishment of Commission of Investigation into historical sexual abuse in schools and appointment of Chair
https://t.co/5ehqxKOA2f
— Department of Education and Youth (@Education_Ire)
July 8, 2025
Speaking at Government Buildings on Tuesday, Ms McEntee said that more works needed to be done to establish exactly what is owned and in the possession of the religious orders.
The scoping inquiry found some 2,395 allegations of sexual abuse in day and boarding schools run by religious orders, involving 884 alleged abusers in 308 schools across the country, between 1927 and 2013.
Advertisement
Most of the allegations were reported from the records of some 42 religious orders.
The commission will examine the handling of allegations, suspicions and concerns of sex abuse in schools, failure to treat concerns, causes and responsibility for such failure, failure to prevent harm, and the concealment of child sex abuse.
Ms McEntee said work is ongoing around how such a redress scheme would work, but said that it must be funded by religious orders and any other school organisations 'involved in these awful crimes'.
The Fine Gael minister said it will take five years to complete, at a cost of tens of millions of euros.
Advertisement
She said the Government was examining a number of ways to make this happen, including making legislative change.
Ms McEntee said that any steps to secure or maximise payment for a redress scheme is being worked on by the Attorney General
'It is important to stress that the preferred outcome here is that religious institutions and organisations would come forward,' she added.
'The commission will be separated into two parts, but they will happen in tandem.
Advertisement
'The first will be the investigation, and the intention is that the chair will be supported by two commissioners.
'One commissioner which will look at the investigation into handling of sexual abuse claims in religious schools.
'The second commissioner will start work on the investigation into sexual abuse in schools that were non-religious run schools.
'The third commissioner will then focus solely on the survivor engagement forum.
Advertisement
'The forum itself will be non-adversarial.
'There will be no cross examination.
'It will be anonymised, and it will mean that every single person who wishes to come forward to tell their story, to tell what happened to them, in that non-adversarial way that they would be able to do so, and it will allow all survivors to do this.'
She added: 'The work that is happening in parallel is further examination of the religious orders, what funds they have, what assets they have, what levers may be used by government to ensure that funding is provided by those religious groups and orders.
'It's only after that that obviously a decision would have to be taken on a redress scheme.
'So while it's happening in parallel, it's not the establishment of a redress scheme, it's for the work that is needed, but I'm really clear those who are responsible should be held accountable, and that includes financially, but there is a body of work still needed.
'There are a number of different measures that we're working on at the moment. Some would require legislative change.
'Some of those would relate to limitations for civil claims, the statute of limitations that obviously applies to individuals who are taking cases.'
Ms McEntee said that a clear five-year time line has been set out to ensure that it is not an 'open-ended scheme'.
'The chair, accompanied by additional commissioners and a support team will be in place by October 1, and they have been given a five-year time limit to complete this work,' the minister added.
'Importantly, and very clearly outlined in the terms of reference is that no later than two years into their work, the chair must provide a report to the minister of the day, outlining whether or not the work of the commission of investigation is on track to be completed within the five years.
'If it is not, there is a very clear obligation to redefine the scope or the work that is being done to make sure that this is done on time.
'I am absolutely committed and determined in supporting what will be an independent commission of investigation, but supporting their work that this is done on time, that survivors do not have to wait, that this does not go on indefinitely, and that importantly, the terms of reference would set out how we investigate the handling of what happened in schools who was responsible, where abuses were raised, where concerns were raised, what happened then, that that can be identified.
'But if we are not on track, if the chair feels that there are changes that need to be made, that will have to be outlined very clearly in a note to the minister no later than two years.'
If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can call the national 24-hour Rape Crisis Helpline at 1800-77 8888, access text service and webchat options at drcc.ie/services/helpline/ or visit Rape Crisis Help.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Swinney to press Trump on Scotch whisky tariffs exemption
Swinney to press Trump on Scotch whisky tariffs exemption

The Independent

time17 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Swinney to press Trump on Scotch whisky tariffs exemption

Scotland's First Minister has vowed to press President Donald Trump to exempt Scotch whisky from US trade tariffs. John Swinney said the 'uniqueness' of whisky made in Scotland justified the exemption from the 10% tariff applied on UK exports into the US. The First Minister, who is due to hold talks with Mr Trump during his ongoing visit to Scotland, said the tariffs were currently costing the local whisky industry £4 million a week. 'Tariffs are very important for the Scottish economy and obviously scotch whisky is a unique product,' he told BBC Breakfast. 'It can only be produced in Scotland. It's not a product that can be produced in any other part of the world. So there's a uniqueness about that, which I think means there is a case for it to be taken out of the tariffs arrangement that is now in place. 'Obviously the trade deal with the United States provides a degree of stability for economic connections with the United States, but the application of tariffs is increasing the costs for the Scotch whisky industry. 'So one of my objectives will be to make the case to President Trump that Scotch whisky should be exempted from those tariffs. 'It's a product that is uniquely produced in Scotland, and it's a product that is much welcomed and supported within the United States. And I think there's a really good case for exempting Scotch whisky, and this is an opportunity that I have to put that case to President Trump on behalf of the Scotch whisky industry, which is a significant part of the Scottish economy. 'And the tariffs just now are costing the industry about £4 million each week, so it's a very significant burden on the industry. It would help growth and development within the Scottish economy if we could secure that deal. And, obviously, I'll be using every opportunity I have to try to put that across to President Trump.' Mr Trump's five-day visit to Scotland is largely a private one that has seen the president play golf at his course at Turnberry in Ayrshire ahead of opening a new course at his property in Aberdeenshire on Tuesday. Mr Swinney said the final cost of the policing the visit has yet to be worked out. 'Obviously, we're working very closely with Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority about the arrangements for this visit,' he said. 'The security arrangements have gone well since President Trump arrived on Friday, and that's as it should be, because we've got an obligation to make sure that when we have major international visitors, when they come to Scotland, that they are protected and able to go about their activities. Pressed to reveal the bill, Mr Swinney added: 'All of that will be worked out and we'll address that with Police Scotland and the Scottish Police Authority, and we're talking to the United Kingdom government about these questions, but it's important that we have a secure policing operation. 'It's also important that members of the public who wish to express their point of view, who want to protest about the visit or about other issues, are able to go about their exercise of their democratic right to protest. That's exactly what they've been able to do since Friday, and that's the way it should be.'

Sir Keir's wife punting at Ascot while government threaten to destroy racing – it's D-Day and we need a leader
Sir Keir's wife punting at Ascot while government threaten to destroy racing – it's D-Day and we need a leader

The Sun

time18 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Sir Keir's wife punting at Ascot while government threaten to destroy racing – it's D-Day and we need a leader

IT'S apparently D-Day for British Racing in what appears to be a Brexit moment for the sport as its major power forces respond to proposals for radical change without really knowing what they are getting themselves into. Sound familiar? 1 This is all to do with whether Labour peer Lord Allen is thrust into the position of BHA chairman. Should he come or will he go now? That depends on how much everyone clashes! Those considering Lord Allen's many demands - in order for him to take up the role - include the Racecourse Association, Racehorse Owners' Association, Thoroughbred Breeders' Association and Licensed personnel. Lord Allen has basically said take my ideas or leave them and I won't bother with you all. He doesn't need the money and he's not a massive horse racing fan. As has so often been the case with those in charge at the BHA, it appears he's not too fussed about it. We have got used to leaders coming, messing up a few things, and going in a fanfare of what a marvelous job they have done. On ITV Racing's Opening Show on Saturday I asked four questions about Lord Allen and his objectives, and what help he might be. Usually when I do that my phone goes mad with people answering my observations and putting me right. On this occasion it was silent. Lord Allen and racing appear in favour of an independent BHA Board. Indeed this seems to be an absolute necessity. But no one has said who would be on it? I can't see how you could ever have one. Someone please explain. Who are you going to have - who is independent? Secondly, in recent days the Jockey Club and Ascot have come out insisting Lord Allen must be appointed. Have they done this knowing he won't join the BHA or he will? If you know he's not going to be on board then it would look as though you wanted to do the right thing for the sport but others stopped you. In some eyes that would give an organisation credit. Equally if he did become BHA chairman you will have Lord Allen's backing. It's clever if you think about it. And trust me, behind the scenes, whatever anyone says, this is about individuals rather than the good of the sport. It always will be and anyone who kids themselves otherwise is delusional. If Lord Allen is the savior, why is racing in turmoil about a current new tax on the sport? What is Lord Allen doing about it? Has he talked to Sir Keir Starmer? Again silence. And finally once again, how is it with all the people in horse racing we have who love the game - from the King and Queen down - no one seems to get through to Sir Keir that he might be on the verge of destroying British Racing? Sir Keir's wife, Victoria, was at Ascot on Saturday for the King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes. It seems quite bizarre to me when you think what Government is threatening to do. Answers on a postcard please. By the way, enjoy Glorious Goodwood. All the best coverage in The Sun! Commercial content notice: Taking one of the offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. You should be aware brands pay fees to appear in the highest placements on the page. 18+. T&Cs apply. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who:

US-EU trade deal criticised by German business leaders and French minister
US-EU trade deal criticised by German business leaders and French minister

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

US-EU trade deal criticised by German business leaders and French minister

The US-EU trade deal clinched in a ballroom at Donald Trump's golf resort in Scotland on Sunday has been criticised by business leaders in Germany and by a French government minister. The deal, which will impose 15% tariffs on almost all European exports to the US including cars, ends the threat of a punitive 30% import duties being imposed on Trump's 1 August deadline for a deal, but it is a world apart from the zero-zero import and export tariff the EU offered initially. It also means European exporters to the US will face more then triple the average 4.8% tariff they now pay, with negotiations to continue on steel which is still facing a 50% tariff, aviation, and a question mark over future barriers to pharmaceutical exports. The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, rapidly hailed the deal, saying it avoided 'needless escalation in transatlantic trade relations' and averted a potentially damaging trade war. But German exporters were less enthusiastic. The powerful BDI federation of industrial groups said the accord would have 'considerable negative repercussions', while the country's VCI chemical trade association said the accord left rates 'too high'. It is also clear that the US tariff of 15% on automotive products will place a burden on German automotive companies in the midst of their transformation, hitting sales and profits. The president of the car industry federation VDA, Hildegard Müller, said it was 'fundamentally positive' that a framework deal was agreed but warned of huge costs to come. European stock markets rallied at the start of trading on Monday, amid relief that a deal had been reached. Germany's Dax jumped by 0.86%, and France's Cac 40 index rose by 1.1%. Ireland, one of the EU's top exporters to the US, said on Sunday it welcomed the deal for bringing 'a measure of much-needed certainty', but that it 'regrets' the baseline tariff, in a statement by its deputy prime minister, Simon Harris. France's minister for Europe, Benjamin Haddad, said on Monday that the agreement would provide 'temporary stability … but it is unbalanced'. The German bank Berenberg said the deal brought the 'crippling uncertainty' to an end but said it was a victory for Trump. 'It is great to have a deal. In two major respects, however, the outcome remains much worse than the situation before Trump started his new round of trade wars early this year,' said Holger Schmieding, Berenberg's chief economist. 'The extra US tariffs will hurt both the US and the EU. For Europe, the damage is mostly frontloaded,' Schmieding said in a note to clients on Monday morning. 'The deal is asymmetric. The US gets away with a substantial increase in its tariffs on imports from the EU and has secured further EU concessions to boot. In his apparent zero-sum mentality, Trump can claim that as a 'win' for him,' Schmieding added. The Italian bank UniCredit also said Trump had got the better out of the EU. 'Is this a good deal for the EU? Probably not. The outcome is heavily asymmetrical, and it leaves US tariffs on imported EU goods at much higher levels than EU tariffs on imports from the US,' UniCredit said in a note to clients. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion 'Fifteen per cent is not to be underestimated, but it is the best we could get,' the European Commision president, Ursula von der Leyen, acknowledged. Initially the EU had tried to hardball the US by threatening but pausing €21bn (£18bn) worth of retaliatory measures in April, and adding another list of €73bn worth of US imports that would be taxed earlier this month. But it pivoted to a quick UK-style deal after the Nato summit in June, swapping a comprehensive trade deal for security and defence promises from Trump. By contrast, China, which threatened the US with a cascade of punitive tariffs, is still negotiating with Trump, who over the weekend froze technology transfer restrictions to create space for a deal with Beijing. Berenberg said the deal would impact the German economy, but the decline in growth would be offset by the Bundestag's recent growth stimulus package, it added. The EU had pushed for a compromise on steel that could allow a certain quota into the US before tariffs would apply. Trump appeared to rule that out, saying steel was 'staying the way it is', but von der Leyen insisted later that 'tariffs will be cut and a quota system will be put in place' for steel. He also ruled out a carve-out for pharmaceuticals but later von der Leyen said the 15% tariff would apply to EU medicine exports and that any other tariffs were up to the US president. The EU is now subject to a 25% levy on cars, 50% on steel and aluminium, and an across-the-board tariff of 10%, which Washington had threatened to increase to 30% in a no-deal scenario. The bloc had been pushing hard for tariff carve-outs for critical industries from aircraft to spirits, and its car industry, crucial for France and Germany, is already reeling from the levies imposed so far.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store