New York City board denies Mayor Adams $3M in matching campaign funds
Aug. 6 (UPI) -- New York City's Campaign Finance Board denied Mayor Eric Adams' request for more than $3 million in matching campaign funds after concluding his campaign provided "incomplete and misleading information."
The city's CFB on Wednesday morning denied Adams' request for matching public campaign funds due to his campaign not submitting the paperwork required and because board members think Adams broke federal corruption laws.
"The board finds the campaign has provided incomplete and misleading information to the CFB and has impeded CFB staff's ability to complete its investigation," board chairman Frederick Schaffer said during the CFB's Wednesday morning meeting.
"With respect to the second ground, the board's conclusion is based upon its review of all of the available evidence, including, but not limited to, its own independent investigation," Schaffer added.
He said the board has an "ongoing" investigation into the Adams campaign but did not explain what made the campaign's responses unacceptable.
The board has denied Adams' requests for matching campaign funds since December 2024 because of his federal indictment on corruption charges that since have been dropped.
Adams' campaign spokesman Todd Shapiro called the board's decision "vague and unsubstantiated" and said the campaign might seek legal remedies to obtain matching funds, the New York Daily News reported.
"Mayor Adams has always run campaigns with the highest standards of integrity, transparency and adherence to the law, spanning nearly 40 years of public service and political leadership," Shapiro said,
"At no point has this campaign attempted to mislead, withhold or obstruct the work of the CFB," Shapiro continued.
"In fact, our team has cooperated fully, responding in good faith to every request and submitted the required documentation in a timely manner," he added.
Before Wednesday morning's meeting, Adams' campaign chairman, Frank Carone, expressed confidence that the board would approve the matching funds, the Daily News reported.
He said the campaign had responded to the board's requests for documentation and a federal judge in July ruled the federal indictment of Adams no longer qualifies as grounds for denial because the Department of Justice dropped the case.
The indictment accused Adams of campaign finance fraud and accepting illegal contributions from Turkish nationals.
The Trump administration dropped the case, which it said was politically motivated.
Adams seeks re-election as an independent candidate for the crowded New York City mayoral race that includes Democratic Party nominee Zohran Mamdani, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa.
Sliwa is the GOP's nominee, while Cuomo is running as an independent after losing the Democratic Party's primary election against Mamdani.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vox
an hour ago
- Vox
The jobs report is a big deal. Trump's response is an even bigger one.
President Donald Trump told officials to fire Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, hours after a report showed US job growth cooled sharply over the last three months. Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty Images On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics released a jobs report that upended the narrative pundits, journalists, government officials, and the White House had been repeating for months: The economy is doing just fine. The numbers showed that the US economy added a modest 73,000 jobs in July, several thousand under what economists had forecasted. But the real surprise came in the revisions to data from May and June, which found the country added 258,000 fewer jobs than initially reported. President Donald Trump was outraged by the revisions, calling the data 'a scam.' And he directed his anger towards BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' But Trump wasn't the only one who appeared to be stunned by the latest jobs report. Kimberly Adams, senior Washington correspondent for Marketplace and the host of the Marketplace podcast Make Me Smart, told Vox that everyone in her business is getting whiplash. 'We were doing all of these stories about why is the economy so resilient? Why isn't anybody reacting to tariffs?' Adams said. 'And then this week we're all talking about, my gosh, are we heading into stagflation and recession?' Adams explained that the reason it seems like experts got it wrong is because a lot of the economic data in the United States relies on lagging indicators like the unemployment rate. Below is an excerpt of Adams's conversation with Today, Explained host Sean Rameswaram, edited for length and clarity. There's much more in the full podcast, so listen to Today, Explained wherever you get podcasts, including Apple Podcasts, Pandora, and Spotify. Why did the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics make up the statistics? The head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics did not make up the labor statistics. It's literally shooting the messenger. The president of the United States was complaining on Truth Social and elsewhere that the reason for firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics has to do with the number and the scale of revisions. The jobs numbers came in lower than expected last week, and they indicate that there's not the same kind of robust labor market that we thought we'd had over the last couple of months. But what drew even more attention were the revisions to the numbers from previous months. And they were pretty drastic revisions that shocked a lot of people. These revisions tell us that the labor market we thought we had the last few months — that seemed to be pretty resilient against the tariffs and other changes President Trump and his administration were making in the economy — it wasn't actually as resilient as we thought. I should say: Labor market numbers get revised all the time. GDP numbers get revised all the time to pick whatever economic indicator you want. But these revisions in particular were, a) really large, and b) just fundamentally changed the story of what the labor market looked like over the last couple of months. So not only did the numbers tell us that there was less hiring than we thought there was, it also told us that the labor market itself shrank, that there was a lower labor force participation rate. A lot of people are blaming that on the crackdown on immigration. The report also told us that if it weren't for job growth in the tariff-resilient health care sector, we would have had almost no job growth at all. But now that Donald Trump has fired the commissioner in charge of these job report numbers, the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, it'll all be okay again by the next jobs report in September? We all win? I imagine that may be what the president wants to believe, that the numbers will be a bit more appealing. Almost all of the economists I talk to say that there's no reason whatsoever to believe that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is manipulating the numbers or that the numbers are rigged, as the president said. There's been a huge backlash to this firing from the community of people that follow this stuff very closely. And putting in someone who might be a little bit more amenable to the president's narrative around economic data has the potential to undermine economic data in the United States and make it less trustworthy — both for businesses here in the US, as well as in the global economy. And why does that matter? I mean, for people who don't pay attention to these numbers, why does trustworthy data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics matter to this country and to the world? Because lots of different businesses and countries and even individuals use this data to make decisions about how they're going to manage their money, how they're going to manage their businesses, and how they're going to plan for the future. So, for example, if you know that the unemployment rate is 4.2 percent, which is what the numbers came in at last week, you can say that's a pretty low unemployment rate. And that means that most of the people out there who want jobs have jobs. And if we're going to hire, we're going to need to position ourselves well in the market to compete with the relatively few workers who are out there looking for a job. This gets into one of the main reasons that this is on the agenda for a lot of folks, which is the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve has two mandates: full employment and stable prices. Full employment basically means as near as you can get to it, low unemployment rates. Stable prices equates to a more or less 2 percent inflation rate. We are still trending a little bit above 2 percent inflation, but when the Fed met last week, which was before these jobs numbers came out, the unemployment situation looked pretty good. So they didn't have much of an incentive to do anything about interest rates, because inflation was still running a bit high. Unemployment looked fine, so no big deal. So let's leave interest rates until inflation cools down a bit more. If the Fed had the information on Wednesday that they ended up getting on Friday, would that have changed their decision? Maybe. The last time you were on this show, you were here to talk about the Fed. It has sounded for weeks now like Trump has been itching to fire Jerome Powell, the head of the Fed. Who he hired! Who he hired, thank you. He didn't end up firing Powell, but then he fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Are the economists you're talking to afraid that this might not be the end of Trump getting rid of people who seem to disagree with his imaginary vision of what the numbers should be? You're absolutely right. This is definitely creating an environment where folks are worried that even if people at the Bureau of Labor Statistics (or any other federal statistical agencies) are still putting their heads down, doing the work, and churning out the data without fear or favor — if they release a report that the president doesn't like, they might lose their job. Even if they still do the work, other people and other entities might look at it and say, well, can it really be true? Look at a country like China, which releases economic data about the performance of its economy all the time. And you'll always hear folks say, take it with a grain of salt because the Chinese Communist Party likes to mess with the numbers. That means lots of folks have to jump through all of these additional hoops to try to figure out what's actually going on in the Chinese economy. China is one of the biggest economies in the world. What happens if we end up in the same boat?
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Kremlin agrees to Putin-Trump meeting in comings days
President Donald J. Trump shakes hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin on June 28, 2019, in Osaka, Japan. The Kremlin said Thursday that the pair plan to meet in the coming days. White House Photo by Shealah Craighead/UPI | License Photo Aug. 7 (UPI) -- The Kremlin announced Thursday that a meeting between President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump will be held in the coming days, as the American leader has been pushing for trilateral cease-fire talks between Moscow and Kyiv. Yuri Ushakov, foreign affairs advisor to Putin, made the announcement to reporters, stating a venue has also been decided upon, in principle, for the Trump-Putin summit, but that it will be announced later, Russia's state-run TASS news agency reported. The meeting will mark the first face-to-face conversation between the world leaders since they spoke on the sidelines of a G20 Summit in Osaka, Japan, in 2019. The pair also held a summit in Helsinki in 2018. Since then, their conversations have been via telephone or through envoys. On Wednesday, Trump said he was working to schedule a trilateral meeting between himself, Putin and President Volodymyr Zelensky to end Russia's war in Ukraine. His special envoy, Steve Witkoff, had met with Putin on Wednesday, and Trump described their meeting as "highly productive" in a post on his Truth Social platform. "Great progress made," the U.S. leader said. Trump has been seeking a cease-fire since his inauguration in January. During his campaign, the American leader repeatedly said he could end the war within 24 hours of returning to office. Amid his second term, the United States, once Ukraine's most ardent supporter, drastically shifted its policies, stating Kyiv would have to give up land to Russia in a cease-fire while pulling back on its military commitments to the besieged ally, demanding that others, especially Europe, it's largest backer, due more. However, Trump's tone has changed slightly as the war has dragged on, and he has begun to direct his ire at Putin for the lack of a cease-fire agreement. Early last month, he lifted a pause he had placed on U.S. military aid transfers to Ukraine. The announcement of the agreement comes a day after The New York Times reported that Trump intends to meet with Putin next week, followed by a meeting with him, Putin and Zelensky sometime after that. Zelensky has been vocal about his willingness for cease-fire talks, and early Thursday said on X that a meeting between the world leaders "can lead to a truly lasting peace." "We in Ukraine have repeatedly said that finding real solutions can be truly effective at the level of leaders," he said in the statement. "Ukraine has never wanted war and will work toward peace as productively as possible. The main thing is for Russia, which started this war, to take real steps to end its aggression." The war between Ukraine and Russia began with a Kremlin invasion on Feb. 24, 2022. Russia also annexed Crimea in February 2014.
UPI
5 hours ago
- UPI
Trump's sweeping new tariffs take effect
President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, August 6, 2025, just hours before his new sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries would take effect. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo Aug. 7 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs on dozens of nations went into effect early Thursday following months of delays and threats from the American leader. "IT"S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW LOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA," Trump said on his Truth Social platform announcing the levies were now in effect. The American president has long relied on tariffs as a punishment, a negotiating tool and a measure to right what he views as negative trade imbalances that the United States has with other countries. He has described these deficits as an "unusual and extraordinary threat" to the United States' national security and economy. Under the executive order he signed last week, most countries' imports to the United States will be subjected to a baseline 10% tariff, which went into effect at midnight Wednesday. Other governments, such as South Korea, the European Union, Britain and Japan, will have more complicated and different tariff rates as they rushed to make deals with the Trump administration ahead of last month's deadline. Brazil, for instance is facing a total 50% tariff after Trump slapped a 40% levy against it over the prosecution of his ally, former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro. He also raised tariffs to 50% on India on Wednesday over the country's continued purchase of Russian oil. Canada, the United States' closest partner, was hit with a 35% tariff, up from 25%. On Wednesday, Trump also announced he would be imposing a 100% tariff on semiconductor chips. According to the nonpartisan Yale Budget Lab think tank, U.S. consumers will face an overall average effective tariff rate of 17.3% -- the highest since 1935, during the Great Depression. The think tanks states that the average per-household income loss will be $2,400 this year. Textiles and clothing will be disproportionally affected by the tariffs, with consumers expected to face 40% higher costs for shoes and 38% higher prices for apparel. Meanwhile, the nonpartisan Tax Foundation states that Trump's tariffs could raise $2.1 trillion in revenue over the next 10 years, but will reduce total revenue raised by $1.6 trillion and reduce GDP by 0.8%. Despite what analysts say, the Trump administration has been bullish on the tariffs, saying they will generate billions for the United States. During a press conference at the White House with Apple CEO Tim Cook on Wednesday, Trump said, "I think we'll be taking in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariffs." "We have a great country. We have a country that is going to be very rich. It's a country that we're very proud of, but it's going to be very rich," Trump said. Trump initially announced the so-called reciprocal tariffs in April but then paused them for all countries but China for 90 days to allow time for the governments to hash out deals with the United States. In July, he delayed them again until Aug. 1. Then a day before the tariffs were to go into effect, he pushed their deadline a week.
