US House Republicans seek to kill EV tax credit, loan program
Republicans in the
US House of Representatives
on Monday proposed killing the electric vehicle tax credit and repealing fuel efficiency rules designed to prod automakers into building more
zero-emission vehicles
as part of a broad-based tax reform bill.
The proposal, which is set for a House Ways and Means Committee hearing on Tuesday, would repeal a $7,500 new-vehicle tax credit and a $4,000 used-vehicle credit on Dec. 31, although it would maintain the new-vehicle credit for an additional year for automakers that have not yet sold 200,000 EVs.
The president of the
Electric Drive Transportation Association
, Genevieve Cullen, criticized the proposal, saying that plans "to abandon US leadership in energy innovation by gutting federal investment in electrification are catastrophically short-sighted."
The proposal, she said, would deliver "an enormous market advantage" to competitors like China and threaten US manufacturing and jobs.
The US Treasury in 2024 awarded more than $2 billion in point-of-sale rebates for EVs.
The proposal leaves in place a key
battery production tax credit
for automakers and battery makers, but a new provision would bar the credit for vehicles produced with components made by some Chinese companies or under a license agreement with Chinese firms.
The provision, which would take effect in 2027, could bar credits for cars powered by Chinese battery technology licensed by American companies such as Ford Motor or Tesla .
House Republicans also propose to kill a loan program that supports the manufacture of certain advanced technology vehicles. It would rescind any unobligated funding and rescind corporate average fuel economy standards and greenhouse gas emission rules for 2027 and beyond. That portion will be taken up by the Energy and Commerce Committee.
Among outstanding loans finalized in President Joe Biden's last weeks in office are $9.63 billion to a joint venture of Ford Motor and South Korean battery maker SK On for construction of three battery manufacturing plants in Tennessee and Kentucky; $7.54 billion to a joint venture of Chrysler-parent Stellantis and Samsung SDI for two EV lithium-ion battery plants in Indiana; and $6.57 billion to Rivian for a plant in Georgia to begin building smaller, less expensive EVs in 2028.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
32 minutes ago
- Mint
Czech Leader Calls on Trump to Give Europe More Time to Rearm
Czech President Petr Pavel called on the US to give Europe more time and realistic goals to take care of the continent's security and contain an increasingly aggressive Russia. European nations can't secure a lasting peace in Ukraine without American help and President Donald Trump is right to demand that they significantly ramp up defense spending, said Pavel, a former top-ranking NATO general. But it would take years to replace some protections now provided by Washington, he told Bloomberg Television in an interview in his office in Prague. 'The US will try to exert pressure on Europeans to do it faster,' said Pavel, who will represent the Czech Republic at a June 24-25 NATO summit in The Hague. 'Let's create enough pressure on Europeans, but let's not push them over the cliff.' Pavel's plea comes two weeks before the leaders of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are expected to agree to spend at least 5% of GDP on defense — a win for Trump, who has long pushed for Europe to invest more in its security. The goal for The Hague summit and beyond is to 'keep the Americans engaged' in the region, according to the Czech head of state. He expressed optimism that allies would agree on higher military investments and the US would uphold NATO's Article 5, the collective defense clause that commits members to protect each other. 'I believe that it is achievable that we will stay united,' the Czech president said. 'European allies would welcome a much stronger expression that Russia is, and will be at least in the short term, our biggest security challenge.' Pavel, 63, said the summit declaration will be 'extremely short' and likely refrain from earlier pledges of financial and military support for Ukraine, as well as the prospect of the country joining the alliance. Bloomberg News reported on Tuesday, citing a preliminary draft, that the one-page declaration focuses solely on defense spending. It's a sharp departure from last year's statement that ran more than 5,000 words and included a pledge of long-term security assistance for Ukraine. Pavel said he was disappointed by the reluctance of Trump to show more strength and to clearly designate Russia as the aggressor and Ukraine as the victim. The Czech president added that Europe needed the US to step up pressure on the Kremlin through economic sanctions, diplomatic isolation and military deterrence. 'We clearly see that Donald Trump leaves the door open for future relations, mostly economic relations, with Russia,' said Pavel. 'I have some suspicion that he doesn't fully grasp what Russia and Russians are about.' Russia has stepped up drone and missile strikes that earlier this week hit civilian targets in Kyiv and the Black Sea city of Odesa. While Russia and Ukraine have agreed on major prisoner swaps, peace talks have stalled. Trump has so far held off from imposing new sanctions to force the Kremlin to agree to a ceasefire. Pavel has been among the staunchest supporters of Ukraine, urging allies to step up weapons supplies and giving Kyiv a pathway to European Union and NATO membership. The Czech Republic has also been coordinating international donations of heavy ammunition, and has backed a plan for NATO members to increase defense and security-related spending to 5% of GDP. But after more than three years of war, allies are increasingly realizing Ukraine is unlikely to meet all its military goals, according to Pavel, who became Czech president in 2023 after serving as chairman of the NATO Military Committee. 'Part of the territory will be for some time, temporarily, occupied by Russia, and that there will be necessary concessions to be made by Ukraine,' he said. 'We should all collectively strive for the best possible result.' Sill, Pavel said, the West must keep arming Ukraine to prevent Russia from declaring victory and feeling rewarded for its aggression. 'I believe NATO is and will be a cornerstone of European security,' said Pavel. 'We have to coordinate very closely with the US because it is also in their interest not to let Russia prevail in this conflict.' With assistance from Chad Thomas. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trade deal lacks fine print, raising doubts over US-China truce: Shaun Rein
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel "You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade agreement," says Shaun Rein, China Market Research is a great and big question. Trump is saying the deal has been signed and he has been talking about that the Chinese are going to send rare earths and magnets in advance to whatever the United States needs because what you have seen in the last month is the lack of rare earths that were exported to the United States has really crippled the American economy You can have companies, the big automakers like Ford and GM are rumoured to say, we need to relocate our manufacturing to China, so we can get access to rare earths despite the heavy tariffs that they would then incur by going into the United States. But here is the thing, China's media has been a lot more circumspect with the details of this so-called trade has said the rumour is that they will give maybe export licenses to rare earths on a six-month trial basis to American companies. So, basically Trump is exaggerating the win in his mind and China is being a lot more honest probably saying well we do not have all the details ironed out, we want to come to an agreement but quite frankly China has the upper hand in the trade war with the United States right that the United States makes except for semiconductors, the Chinese can buy elsewhere. So, instead of buying American beef, they are buying Australian beef; instead of buying American oil, they are buying Canadian oil; instead of buying American soybeans, they are buying Brazilian soybeans. So, what you have seen is that there is a total shift in trade patterns and a total shift in power and China is at the top of the triangle, the top of the pyramid right now in terms of buying goods and trading goods from other countries. We are seeing a shift in world order right I mean that that is not true. I mean, Chinese equity markets are up 15-16% since the start of the year while the S&P 500 is only up about 2%. So, it is quite clear that the Chinese Hong Kong equity markets are outperforming the United States right the equity markets also do not necessarily reflect the economy. So, what you are seeing right now is Abigail Johnson, who is the head of Fidelity , the rumour is today that her private investment house is going to be selling 40 Chinese tech companies that they have long held because they are worried about the regulatory and I have been talking with a lot of mutual funds, I have been talking with a lot of LPs like pension funds and endowments and they are getting huge pressure from not just Trump , but previously under the Biden regime to derisk by not investing in Chinese equities, so that does not mean the economy is bad, that just means more oppression and bullying from the United States because they are trying to really contain China's economic might have happened eight years ago and that might have worked eight years ago. But the big problem is the United States has gone after Europe. The United States has gone after Canada. You even hear Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Commerce , criticised India last week and said, why is India buying Russian weapons, they should be buying American the reality is the United States under Trump and Biden has been bullying people all around the world. And I think at some point the global south or I prefer to call it the global majority is saying you know what, let us not deal with all the drama, let us not deal with weaponization of the US dollar, weaponization of technology and let us move closer towards China where we have a lot more stable relations with Australia for instance, Australian dollar has strengthened in the last couple weeks because basically Australia is a proxy for China. Australia's economy does well when China's economy does well, whether it be buying iron ore, whether it be buying tourists going to Australia to buy products, so that is why the Aussie has strengthened and the US dollar is weakened. Now when it comes to liquidity and volume going back towards China, we are still at a very initial of the global funds only have about 25% of their holdings exposed to China. I recommend retail investors to have 15% to 20% because of the volatility and the regulatory we are seeing in my conversations with institutional investors like hedge funds that they want to come back into China, but they have not come back yet. Now, that gives a great opportunity for speculators and people who have a high-risk appetite to trade in front of the institutional personally, I am getting more exposure to Hong Kong equities the last six months because I am trying to front run what the hedge funds are doing because they still have not quite gotten into the markets yet and they will in the next three to six months because they have to make the business case, China is outperforming the S&P the United States needs a deal. Frankly, China controls about 30-35% of global manufacturing. So, America might have the money, they might have the capital, but they need to buy the products from China. At the end of the day, China makes not just rare earths, about 90% of refined rare earths, but they also make most of the ibuprofen, most of the of the antibiotics in the world comes from China. So, at the end of the day, that is real leverage. So, for instance in 2017, 18% of Chinese exports went to the US, that number is down to 14%. China on the other hand has shifted and exports to Asean, has gone up to 16%.So, basically, it is a game of chicken right now. China's economy is hurting, do not get me wrong. There are about 15 million people who are involved in the export sector. You have seen that the CPI index has dropped about 0.1%. So, we are dealing with the D-word, the economy in China is not booming, but China is not going to blink. They have the resolve to push hard back against Trump and Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick because at the end of the day, the Americans need to buy from China. They cannot buy antibiotics from any other country in the world except for a little bit from India.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
US on edge as Iran ‘readies' itself for possible Israeli strike; troops, staff pulled from Middle East
The United States is on a high alert over anticipation that Israeli forces would carry out an attack against Iran's nuclear program, authorising some of its troops and embassy staff members to leave the Middle East. Earlier, Iran has threatened to strike American bases and military assets if its attacked over its nuclear program. The State Department said on Thursday that the decision to shrink staff in Iraq was 'based on our latest analysis.' As Iran issued a threat, Iran's Defense Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said in televised remarks, 'I sincerely hope it won't come to that and that the talks reach a resolution. But if they don't, and conflict is imposed on us, the other side will undoubtedly suffer greater losses. We will target all US bases in host countries without hesitation.' There have also been reports that Israel was readying itself to launch an operation into Iran. Amid those reports, Islamic Republic of Iran, on the social media platform 'X', declared, 'We are Ready.' Earlier in the day, Donald Trump had also mentioned that he was not confident of a deal with Iran. 'I'm less confident now than I would have been a couple of months ago. Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made,' he said. 'US military personnel are being moved out (of some countries of the Middle East) because it could be a dangerous place and we will see what have given notice to move out,' Donald Trump said. Earlier in the day, the UK Navy issued a rare warning to mariners that higher tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping, including through the Strait of Hormuz. Shipping has often been risky in the Middle East, but UKMTO, which acts as a liaison between the navy and commercial shipping, rarely puts out general warnings such as this one. 'UKMTO has been made aware of increased tensions within the region which could lead to an escalation of military activity having a direct impact on mariners,' the advisory said. 'Vessels are advised to transit the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman and Straits of Hormuz with caution.' Hormuz is the world's most important oil chokepoint and Iran has frequently threatened to close it during times of geopolitical strife. However, it has never done so.
