Black entrepreneurs: powering Africa's equitable industrial revolution
In a world grappling with inequality and climate crises, Africa's inclusive model could light the way—not just for the continent, but for all.
Image: File
Africa faces a stark paradox.
With youth unemployment soaring—50% in South Africa alone—and a population projected to double to 2.5 billion by 2050, the continent teeters on the edge of crisis or transformation.
Can black-owned enterprises, long stifled by systemic exclusion, ignite an industrial revolution that marries growth with equity? The evidence says yes.
From Nigeria's fintech pioneers to South Africa's green energy innovators, black entrepreneurs are forging a path defined by local ingenuity and sustainable impact.
Yet, their potential remains throttled by structural barriers.
This piece dissects the problem, uncovers root causes and charts a pragmatic course forward—because Africa's future demands nothing less.
'Africa's future lies in the hands of its entrepreneurs, who turn challenges into opportunities for inclusive growth,' says Akinwumi Adesina, President of the African Development Bank.
That vision is unfolding now. Black-owned businesses are not waiting for permission to reshape Africa's economy. They're driving it:
Nigeria: Paystack and Flutterwave, black-founded fintechs, process over $10 billion annually, digitizing commerce for millions.
• Kenya: Twiga Foods links 100,000 smallholder farmers to markets, slashing food waste by 30% and lifting incomes.
• Ghana: PEG Africa's 100,000+ solar installations by 2022 have electrified rural homes, creating 1,000 jobs.
• South Africa: Kiara Health, a 100% black-owned pharmaceutical firm, employs 200+ and produces affordable medicines, tackling healthcare gaps.
In South Africa, black industrialists generated R80 billion in 2023, yet their footprint is dwarfed by opportunity: black ownership in manufacturing and energy languishes at 8.5%. Continent-wide, SMEs—many black-led— fuel 80% of jobs but just 20% of GDP. This mismatch screams inefficiency. Scaling these enterprises could turbocharge growth, but only if we address the chokeholds.
The barriers are not accidents—they're legacies.
In South Africa, Black Economic Empowerment policies limp along, with black ownership in key sectors stuck below 10%.
Capital is a choke point: black entrepreneurs secure just 15% of venture funding compared to white peers, with Ghanaian SMEs 30% less likely to get loans and Nigerian firms crippled by 20% interest rates. Infrastructure is another shackle. Rural Kenyan firms spend 15% of revenue on generators due to erratic power.
In South Africa, shoddy transport networks strand township businesses. A 2022 study pegs infrastructure deficits as slashing SME productivity by 40% across sub-Saharan Africa.
These burdens hit black entrepreneurs hardest. Africa's industrial lag mirrors past upheavals. Britain's Industrial Revolution churned out wealth but starved workers until cooperatives and reforms—like the 1844 Rochdale Pioneers—shared the gains. Japan's postwar boom hinged on inclusive policies—small business support and rural investment—that turned scarcity into strength.
Contrast this with Africa's extractive colonial model, where resources flowed out and locals were left sidelined.
Today's black-owned firms flip that script. South Africa's Bio2Watt biogas plant, black-led, powers 4.5 MW and funnels 20% of profits into local schools. Kenya's Lake Turkana Wind project ties community benefits to its 310 MW output.
Globally, Chile's indigenous mining co-ops channel wealth locally. These aren't anomalies—they're principles: inclusion drives resilience.
Africa's industrial leap must embed this lesson, or risk repeating history's mistakes. Black entrepreneurs wield technology as a battering ram. Nigeria's fintech duo, Paystack and Flutterwave, globalize SMEs.
Twiga Foods' digital platform cuts agricultural losses by 25%. PEG Africa's solar grid lights up Ghana's fringes. In South Africa, Bio2Watt's green energy model hints at a 2-million-job renewable sector by 2030.
Take Thandiwe Nkosi of Kiara Health. With a modest loan, she launched a pharmaceutical firm in 2010. Against funding rejections and regulatory mazes, she built a 200-strong team producing vital medicines—proof of what's possible when talent meets tenacity.
Her story isn't unique; it's a signal.
Dreams need scaffolding. Here's how to build it:
• Capital: Launch a pan-African VC fund for black-owned SMEs, backed by equity guarantees to de-risk investment.
• Skills: Seed township incubators for tech and green industry training.
• Zones: Supercharge SEZs with tax breaks for black-led firms in pharma and renewables.
• Ownership: Mandate 51% black stakes in strategic sectors—wealth must stay local.
• Trade: Use AfCFTA to catapult black firms into regional supply chains.
Picture this: by 2040, township micro-factories churn out solar panels, owned by the workers who run them. A KwaZulu-Natal steel co-op funds roads; a Ghanaian textile hub thrives on artisan equity.
Black-led innovation doesn't just grow GDP—it redefines it, cutting urban sprawl and positioning Africa as the world's ethical production hub. In a world grappling with inequality and climate crises, Africa's inclusive model could light the way—not just for the continent, but for all. But physics needs force.
Africa's governments, banks and citizens must dismantle the barriers—capital scarcity, skills gaps, infrastructure rot—that choke this future.
Black entrepreneurs have lit the spark.
Policymakers, investors, citizens—will you fan it into a blaze or let it flicker out?
Nomvula Mabuza is a Risk Governance and Compliance Specialist with extensive experience in strategic risk and industrial operations. She is an MBA candidate at Henley Business School, South Africa.
Nomvula Zeldah Mabuza is a Risk Governance and Compliance Specialist with extensive experience in strategic risk and industrial operations. She holds a Diploma in Business Management (Accounting) from Brunel University, UK, and is an MBA candidate at Henley Business School, South Africa.
Image: Supplied
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Ayo fined over breach of listing rules
JSE has fined the company R500 000. JSE-listed Ayo Technology Solutions has been fined R500 000 for not releasing a Sens announcement with full details of a share buyback after agreeing to a settlement agreement with the parties on 23 March 2023. On Thursday, the JSE said in a Sens update that the fine is wholly suspended for five years, provided the technology company is not found to be in breach of similar provisions of the listings requirements during the suspension period. Read: Ayo suspended from JSE This comes after Ayo announced that its parent company, Sekunjalo Investment Holdings, led by controversial businessman Iqbal Survé, planned to buy out minority shareholders before the company delisted. In the Sens, Ayo said Sekunjalo will acquire the offer shares, a maximum of 155 331 790 shares, for which valid acceptances are received prior to the closing date of the offer, for a total offer consideration of R80 772 531. Read: Iqbal Survé's R50bn grand plan for Ayo [Apr 2019] In February 2025, the JSE suspended trading in Ayo shares for failing to publish its annual report for the year to August 2024. 'I believe we have done everything within our power to ensure compliance with the listings requirements, however, the release of our results is contingent on the external quality reviewer, the independence and process of which we respect,' said Ayo CEO Amit Makan in a statement. Read: Ayo shareholders agree to repay R619m to PIC [Jun 2024] For this new offence, the JSE says the company was found to be in breach of paragraph 11.25 of the listings requirements, and the purpose of these requirements is to ensure that a repurchase of shares by a company from specifically named parties is conducted transparently and fairly. The stock exchange says this rule highlights the need to keep investors informed by sharing important updates on Sens, especially when it could impact investment decisions or share value. Read: Ayo shareholders agree to repay R619m to PIC 'The JSE finds it unacceptable that Ayo failed to immediately inform shareholders that it had agreed to repurchase its shares from the parties as part of the settlement agreement.' The company's shares have dropped to 40c, down 99% from the peak of R45 in 2017. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.


Daily Maverick
17 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Nigeria slaps Meta with $290m in fines for invasive practices
Found guilty of data sharing and other invasive practices, the parent company of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram was issued with a $290-million penalty. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, was recently hit with three fines totalling more than $290-million in Nigeria. The fines were imposed by Nigeria's Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, the Nigerian Data Protection Commission and the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria. Meta was accused of invasive practices against data subjects and consumers in Nigeria. The company denied the allegations and has challenged the fines in court. What are the violations for which Meta has been fined? The trouble began on 4 January 2021 when WhatsApp updated its privacy policy to introduce mandatory data-sharing with Facebook (now Meta) and its subsidiaries. The main change allowed WhatsApp to share user business interaction data with Facebook for marketing and advertising purposes. The updated policy did not include an opt-out provision. It was a 'take it or leave it' policy. In other words, if users did not consent to the updated terms, they would no longer be able to use WhatsApp. This triggered a Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission investigation into Meta, conducted jointly with the Nigeria Data Protection Commission. The probe was conducted from May 2021 to December 2023. Meta has allegedly not complied with the Nigeria Data Protection Commission, and failed to appoint a Data Protection Compliance Organisation. That's an entity licensed to assist data controllers and processors in achieving compliance with Nigeria's data protection regulations. It has not submitted its mandatory Nigeria Data Protection Regulation reports for two consecutive years. Nigeria is the most populous country on the continent, with about 236 million people. It has about 107 million internet users. The most used social media platforms at the end of 2024 were WhatsApp, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram and Telegram. Meta owns WhatsApp, Facebook and Instagram and has threatened to pull Facebook and Instagram services from the country. The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has said quitting Nigeria won't absolve Meta of its liability. Facebook has about 51.2 million users in Nigeria, while Instagram has about 12.6 million. What have regulators found against Meta? The investigation uncovered several violations. These included: Unauthorised data sharing: Meta was found to have shared Nigerian users' personal data without their consent. This included cross-border transfers and storage, violating the Nigeria Data Protection Commission and the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act. Discriminatory practices: Meta allegedly treated Nigerian users differently from those in other jurisdictions with similar regulations. Meta offers stronger privacy protections in the European Union because of the General Data Protection Regulation. Nigerian regulators have highlighted this double standard. Denial of data self-determination: The company was accused of denying Nigerian users the right to control how their data is used, compelling them to accept exploitative privacy policies. Abuse of market dominance: The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission said the company abused its dominant market position to enforce unfair privacy policies. Tying and bundling: Meta was found to have engaged in tying and bundling practices, which are considered anti-competitive. Tying occurs when a company requires customers to buy a secondary product or service as a condition of buying a primary product or service. For example, if Meta required users to accept Facebook's terms and automatically enrol in WhatsApp or Instagram services (or allow data sharing across them) to use Facebook, then that could be considered tying. This is because it can limit consumer choice, stifle competition and force people to accept products or terms they don't want. Bundling occurs when a company sells multiple products or services together as a package, or makes it difficult to buy them separately. For example, Meta might bundle multiple services such as Facebook, Instagram and Messenger in such a way that users must accept a single privacy policy that covers all, even if they only use one service. This can shut out smaller competitors and prevent users from choosing alternatives. After remediation efforts failed, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission issued its final order in July 2024. It imposed a $220-million fine along with penalties from other agencies, bringing the total to $290-million. In addition to the fine, the commission has ordered Meta to comply with Nigerian laws and cease practices it described as the 'exploitation' of Nigerian consumers. After completing its inquiry, the agency shared its findings with Meta. The company proposed a 'remedy package'. But the commission rejected this as inadequate. What made Meta vulnerable to such fines? Meta has failed to localise its data practices. It appears dismissive of Nigerian sovereignty and regulatory authority. For example, Meta has been transferring Nigerian users' data overseas without protecting them as required by Nigeria. Meta's annual revenue in Nigeria is between $200-million and $300-million. But many Nigerians in the diaspora use Facebook and Instagram to communicate with people inside the country. Revenue from those users is likely to raise the figure considerably. The company has faced similar sanctions for data violations worldwide, including a $1.4-billion fine in Texas and a $1.3-billion fine in Europe. It has also been penalised in India, South Korea and Australia. What are the implications of the fines? Meta now faces heightened scrutiny from Nigerian regulators. It will have to adhere to local data protection and consumer rights laws. This includes appointing a Data Protection Compliance Organisation and submitting audit reports as stipulated by the Nigerian Data Protection Regulation. The fines and regulatory measures may also compel Meta to reassess its operations in Nigeria. It might adjust its services to align with local laws. Meta has also been ordered by the courts to reimburse the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission $35,000 for the cost of the investigation. And it has been told to take the following measures: Reinstate the rights of Nigerian users to determine the control and use of their data without losing functionality or deleting the application; Set its privacy policy to comply with data protection laws in Nigeria; Stop sharing WhatsApp users' information with other Facebook companies and third parties until users have actively consented to this; Revert to the data sharing practices adopted in 2016, including establishing an opt-in screen; Terminate the tying and transfer of data without consent; and Add a visible link on its platforms for Nigerian users, leading to educational content about the risks of manipulative and unfair data practices. These videos will be developed in collaboration with approved NGOs and academic institutions. Other social media entities operating in Nigeria will be watching closely to see what is required. How dependent is Nigeria on these social media platforms? Many Nigerian businesses and entrepreneurs use Facebook and Instagram for marketing, customer engagement and sales. The platforms offer cost-effective advertising and direct communication channels with many customers. These platforms also provide valuable analytics on customer behaviour, content performance and demographics. Businesses use these services to refine their marketing strategies and make data-driven decisions. Content creators in Nigeria use Facebook and Instagram to build audiences, monetise content and collaborate with brands. The African creator industry, valued at £2.4-billion in 2024, is expected to continue to grow significantly. The music genre Afrobeats has also gained popularity across Nigeria and globally with the assistance of these platforms. Nigeria's ecosystem of homegrown and African social media platforms is growing, offering local alternatives to global giants such as Facebook and Instagram. While none match their scale, platforms including Crowwe, ChatAfrik and Nairaland are making strides in content sharing, chat, forums and business promotion. The information and communications technology sector contributed about 20% to Nigeria's real gross domestic product in the second quarter of 2024. The rapid expansion of the digital technology industry in recent years highlights its strong potential to stimulate economic growth. Nigeria's digital economy has also seen significant growth because of increased internet access and mobile usage. DM First published by The Conversation. Tolu Olarewaju is an economist and lecturer in management at Keele University. Jagannadha Pawan Tamvada is a professor of entrepreneurship at Kingston University.


The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Water shortages in Brits to soon be a thing of the past
The Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation, David Mahlobo Image via Instagram: david_mahlobo Home » Water shortages in Brits to soon be a thing of the past The Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation, David Mahlobo Image via Instagram: david_mahlobo On 5 June 2025, the Deputy Minister of Water and Sanitation, David Mahlobo will conduct an oversight visit to the Brits Water Treatment Works. Brits WTW falls under the Madibeng Local Municipality, where Mahlobo will be assessing the progress made on upgrading the facility. 'The deputy minister will be accompanied by the MEC for Cooperative Governance, Human Settlements and Traditional Affairs, Gaoage Oageng Molapisi', said Water Department spokesperson, Wisane Mavasa. The executive mayor of Madibeng Municipality, Douglas Maimane, will also be in attendance. He will be flanked by traditional leaders and other dignitaries at the event said Mavasa. 'The upgrade project of Brits Water Treatment Works is worth more than R80 million fundedby the Department of Water and Sanitation through its Regional Bulk Infrastructure Grant,' said Mavasa. The grant is implemented by Magalies Water Board. Once the project is completed, it will benefit over 75 373 households in the Brits area and surroundings. Mavasa believes this will be a welcomed relief since Brits and other areas nearby are constantly affected by water shortages. According to Mavasa, the project is practically completed. However she cautioned that there are final touches being made on the civil, mechanical and electrical works elements. In order for the upgrades to be successful, all the elements need to be completed said Mavasa. 'As of this month, civil engineering works are at 97%, mechanical engineering at 89%, while electrical engineering works stand at 70%,' she continued. The overall completion of the upgrading project is expected to be completed at the end of August 2025. The water department said this is the deadline they are working towards. Today Mahlobo will be assessing if this goal is attainable. IS YOUR AREA AFFECTED BY WATER SHORTAGES? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.