logo
Walter Sofronoff fights against corruption findings during inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's prosecution

Walter Sofronoff fights against corruption findings during inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's prosecution

Lawyers have rejected suggestions a corrupt motive could've driven a former judge to prematurely send out copies of a report into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann to journalists, arguing 'at worst' it was an 'erroneous attempt' to ensure accuracy in public discourse.
Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC led the 2023 board of inquiry into Mr Lehrmann's prosecution over the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins.
A subsequent investigation into Mr Sofronoff's conduct during that inquiry, in particular his decision to send a copy of the board's report to two journalists – ABC's Elizabeth Byrne and The Australian's Janet Albrechtsen – prior to its official release by the ACT government, was launched by the ACT Integrity Commission.
The commission in March found Mr Sofronoff had engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct'; however, he is seeking to have the commission's Operation Juno report overturned by the Federal Court.
Barrister Adam Pomerenke SC argued there was 'overwhelming evidence' Mr Sofronoff genuinely believed he was acting in the good of the public to ensure accurate media reporting by sending out the report to the journalists – an essential part of his role investigating a matter of public interest.
Therefore, his conduct couldn't amount to having a corrupt, dishonest, or malicious motive, regardless of whether reasonable people disagreed with Mr Sofronoff's views.
'In my respectful submission those views of Mr Soffronoff are not rationally capable of amounting to a corrupt dishonest or malicious motive,' Mr Pomerenke told the court.
'A person can be wrong without being negligent, much less corrupt, dishonest or malicious.'
He said even if Mr Sofronoff was 'wrong', he genuinely and honestly held his view.
'At worst, it could be characterised as an erroneous attempt to ensure accuracy and transparency in public discourse, and an attempt at accuracy and transparency in public discourse cannot rationally, in my respectful submission, be described as corrupt,' Mr Pomerenke said.
'Even if one vehemently disagrees with what Mr Soffronoff did, that statute does not authorise a misuse of language by describing it as corrupt.'
This fell under Mr Sofronoff's sixth ground of appeal, which claims the commission's finding that his conduct was a 'breach of public trust' is affected by jurisdictional error.
Further, Mr Pomerenke argued an
error by the commission
in finding Mr Sofronoff had engaged in contempt was a 'serious offence against the administration of justice' and cannot be 'disentangled' from the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct.
He also claimed the Juno report couldn't be 'saved by reconstruction'.
'Our submission is given this entanglement, the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct is affected by jurisdictional error because its material …(there's a) realistic possibility that the conclusion could have been different if the respondent had not wrongly found that Mr Sofronoff could have committed a serious offence of contempt,' Mr Pomerenke said.
'And as I say if this is the right … serious corrupt conduct cannot stand.'
Turning to the other grounds of appeal, he claimed if any of the first 11 grounds were established, they couldn't be 'disentangled' from the 12th ground relating to the finding of corrupt conduct itself, as each error was 'bound up in the rolled up conclusion of serious corrupt conduct'.
'Your Honour can't have regard to one error in isolation,' Mr Pomerenke said.
'Each additional error we establish beyond the concession in ground two fortifies that conclusion that … there was jurisdictional error, entitling Mr Sofronoff to relief.'
He also argued there was a 'basic misuse of language' and a 'distortion' of the concept of corruption by the commission in interpreting 'integrity' as meaning soundness or efficacy as distinct from probity of government or public administration.
'In our respectful submission that's not correct: it seriously dilutes and distorts the very notion of corruption, which has probity at its heart,' Mr Pomeranke said.
'On the respondent's approach, it can include findings in its reports which stigmatise conduct as corrupt even though it is disconnected from probity in government or public administration.'
Documents filed by the retired judge's legal team claim that Mr Sofronoff was given the ability to do 'whatever (he) considers necessary or convenient for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry' as head of the inquiry, and he considered it necessary or convenient to engage with journalists 'for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry'.
The documents also claim Mr Sofronoff's actions were 'incapable of amounting to corrupt conduct' and the findings were 'seriously illogical, irrational and/or unreasonable'.
The Federal Court has found that Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities.
A criminal trial was aborted due to juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped.
Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greens co-founder Drew Hutton says ‘transgender cult' has taken over the party and anyone who speaks out is being 'purged'
Greens co-founder Drew Hutton says ‘transgender cult' has taken over the party and anyone who speaks out is being 'purged'

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Greens co-founder Drew Hutton says ‘transgender cult' has taken over the party and anyone who speaks out is being 'purged'

A Greens co-founder has hit out at party leader Larissa Waters for failing to stand up to the 'transgender and queer cult' that has taken over the party. Lifelong environmental activist Drew Hutton has taken to the pages of The Australian to warn that the party he helped create risks going the way of the Australian Democrats if 'purges' are allowed to continue. Mr Hutton played a crucial role in the formation of the Queensland Greens before co-founding the Australian Greens with former leader Bob Brown in the early 1990s. However Mr Hutton was suspended from the party's Queensland branch in 2023, and has since been expelled, after he refused to delete a social media post criticising the expulsion of a Victorian Greens member who had expressed dissenting views on the trans rights debate. 'The fact is that the Greens in a number of states have been taken over by a cult - a transgender and queer cult - that has come to control key decision-making positions in the party, such as disciplinary and preselection committees and administrative positions, that give them enormous power, and they use this to influence preselections and expel those who disagree with them,' Mr Hutton writes. 'Consequently, Greens politicians tread very lightly when it comes to policy areas such as gender for fear of losing preselection.' Mr Hutton declared he had become a "victim of this cult", deriding the party's decisive actions. 'I was expelled from the party, not because I made statements that opposed key beliefs of the Greens but because I refused to censor comments on a couple of Facebook posts that asserted that men were biological males and women were biological females," he said. He said 'cult position' inside the Greens is that people are whatever gender they define themselves as, and anyone who disagreed 'must be expelled' and cancelled. 'I was, therefore, told I had to censor all such comments from my Facebook posts. I refused on free speech grounds and so my membership was suspended, and then I was expelled when I continued to refuse,' he said The environmental activist has called out party leadership for failing to address the problem, stating Senator Waters – who he has long supported – 'should have intervened at the start to stop my expulsion" but had instead 'ducked for cover' in the hope the situation would blow over. But Senator Waters has defended the expulsion, stating it was made independently 'via the governance processes established by the membership' and that 'nobody is above the rules". Mr Hutton said there were at least 40 members of the Greens who had either been expelled or otherwise forced out of the party over gender related issues, a situation he described as 'a purge of 'green' Greens'. 'Many of those expelled have been great environmental campaigners with decades of loyal service to the party,' Mr Hutton said. Among those forced out of the party are 55-year-old Gail Hamilton, who has run for office as a Greens candidate three times since joining in 2000. 'I was expelled for arguing that it was appropriate for the principal of a girls' school to not enrol boys who identify as girls… I also objected to our MPs calling women 'uterus ­havers' and 'menstruators' on the basis that it is dehumanising,' Ms Hamilton told The Australian. The former Greens members said the expulsion process was 'like a kangaroo court' where she was not even given the 'space to defend myself'. Another was 70-year-old Cheryl Hercus, a proud lesbian who was forced out of the Victorian Greens for sharing articles that were critical of gender identity theory on social media. 'It just became obvious to me that the whole of the party had been captured by this ideology and to try and fight it from within was just huge,' she told The Australian. Ms Hercus said she resigned her membership before being expelled. According to Mr Hutton, failing to confront the 'cult' that had taken over the party would lead to half the Greens' supporter base abandoning the party. 'About half are young, relatively poor and likely to look favourably on candidates with radical identity politics. The other half are a little older, a little more prosperous, and have more liberal humanitarian than radical identity views,' he said of the Greens target voters. 'The other half are a little older, a little more prosperous, and have more liberal humanitarian than radical identity views. 'The former will possibly stick with the Greens despite their authoritarianism; the latter will probably desert them and give their votes to one or another of the major parties or, more likely, the teal independents. 'The result will be that the Greens will find their base vote is diminished and find it very difficult to win seats."

Jet crashes into school in Bangladesh, killing at least 20
Jet crashes into school in Bangladesh, killing at least 20

AU Financial Review

time7 hours ago

  • AU Financial Review

Jet crashes into school in Bangladesh, killing at least 20

Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke says the joint statement, signed by Australia and 24 other countries, calling for an end to the war in Gaza, is the government's strongest yet. 'What we've been making sure of is that whenever we make a statement of this nature that we're bringing as many other countries along with us at the same time,' Burke told the ABC. 'On our own, Australia's not a loud voice or a decisive voice, on the other side of the world, but when you can make a statement together with so many other significant powers, then, you know, we're all hoping that there'll be something that will break this.' He described the recent deaths of Palestinians in Gaza as indefensible. 'We've seen too many images of children being killed, of horrific slaughter, of churches being bombed. The images that we've seen have been pretty clear that so much of this is indefensible, and as that statement referred to, you know, aid being drip-fed in. 'None of this changes the fact that the hostages need to be released. Of course that needs to happen. But what we are watching on the other side of the world is indefensible. The hostages still need to be released, but the war needs to end.

Sky News host Peta Credlin accuses Anthony Albanese of being 'scared of a face-off' with US President Donald Trump
Sky News host Peta Credlin accuses Anthony Albanese of being 'scared of a face-off' with US President Donald Trump

Sky News AU

time9 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Sky News host Peta Credlin accuses Anthony Albanese of being 'scared of a face-off' with US President Donald Trump

Sky News host Peta Credlin has accused Anthony Albanese of being "scared of a face-off" with President Donald Trump, as the Prime Minister flags he will seek to secure talks with the United States leader on the sidelines of an upcoming leaders' summit. Mr Albanese has returned to Canberra ahead of the official opening of the 48th parliament this week following his six-day visit to China where met with President Xi Jinping. The Prime Minister has told The Australian he now has his sights set on nailing down a long-awaited face-to-face talk with President Trump, amid claims the US-Australia relationship is on rocky ground. Mr Albanese hinted a meeting with President Trump would likely take place an at upcoming leaders' forum - such as the Quad meeting in India later this year. "There'll be multiple meetings between now and the end of the year. Australia and the US are both members of a range of international gatherings," Mr Albanese told the publication. During her editorial on Monday night, Credlin savaged the idea of a meeting with the US President taking place on the periphery of an international event rather than in Washington DC. "The PM is still insisting that he'll meet Donald Trump on the sidelines of some other meeting rather than meet him at the White House," the Sky News host said. "So after, what, a six-day visit to China he's hoping for ... six minutes in a corridor or in the bathroom at some international talk fest? "Honestly, that shows a weak PM who's scared of a face-off with a US President accustomed to speaking his mind. "A PM who hopes if he does it this way, he perhaps can avoid media scrutiny of what's said in the room." Mr Albanese is set to travel to various high-level summits in 2025 including the UN General Assembly in New York in September, which has been perceived as another opportunity for the Prime Minister to meet with President Trump. The two leaders had planned to hold talks at the G7 Summit in Canada in June, but the President abruptly left the forum to return to Washington amid escalating tensions in the Middle East. Mr Albanese copped heat for his move to prioritise a second official visit to China before he books in a face-to-face meeting with President Trump in the United States. Former home affairs boss Mike Pezzullo recently suggested Mr Albanese should have even cut his China visit short to fly past the US to see the President on his journey back to Australia. Mr Albanese was also accused of indulging in the optics of his China trip, which included visiting a panda breeding centre and hiking The Great Wall, rather than pressing President Xi on more serious foreign policy issues. However, the Prime Minister told The Australian his decision to walk The Great Wall of China and tour a panda centre came down to him wanting to show "respect". Regarding his US counterpart, Mr Albanese said he would demonstrate his respect in other ways such as by "engaging in a clear, forward manner, saying what we can do, what we can't do". "It's the way that I engage and build relationships," he said. The Prime Minister stressed the United States is Australia's "most important alliance", but noted the Trump administration's "America First" policy has led to a different position on tariffs. "So part of engaging is recognising that and dealing with it in our national interest, in the best way we can," Mr Albanese said. However, Credlin claimed the issues around the Australia-US alliance have been triggered by the Albanese government's "obvious discomfort with the Trump administration". "Plainly, Anthony Albanese, full of his Beijing bravado, thinks he can remake the US alliance despite what the ANZUS Treaty might say on the matter," she said. The Sky News host continued: "If that includes that we can't increase defence spending much beyond two per cent of GDP, well then our alliance with the US is on life-support at best." Earlier this year, the United States called on Australia to boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, with the level currently sitting at two per cent. In 1951, Australia also signed the ANZUS Treaty, a security pact with New Zealand and the United States, which focuses on the Pacific region. In terms of the AUKUS submarine deal, there are concerns the pact could be under threat as it undergoes a under review by the Pentagon. Credlin called on Liberal Party to step up and press the government on national security, as well as other domestic issues including the childcare crisis and debate on net zero. "The best way for the Libs to regain their standing with voters is for them to give the Australian people that they're not getting from the current government," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store