logo
East Ayrshire councillors reject ‘very British' daily flag raising

East Ayrshire councillors reject ‘very British' daily flag raising

The National27-06-2025
Conservative councillor Neill Watts had proposed flying the three flags every day at the London Road HQ in Kilmarnock, describing it as 'a very British way of expressing joy and pride' and 'a symbol of unity.'
His motion suggested that these flags be flown daily except when a different flag is more appropriate for special occasions.
However, the proposal was met with strong opposition, particularly from Labour group leader councillor Barry Douglas, who questioned both the practicality and its similarity to moves at Reform UK run councils in England.
READ MORE: Neil Oliver quietly dropped from Glasgow tour buses after years of backlash
He challenged the resource implications, asking whether flags would be installed at all council buildings, how much that would cost, and who would be tasked with raising and lowering the flags.
'There's a cost involved in all of that,' Douglas said. 'Raising and lowering flags takes staff. Are council officers to stop their duties to do this every day?'
He also took issue with Watts' description of the Conservatives as 'Scotland's strongest unionist party,' suggesting the recent general election results told a different story. 'Are we really talking about community cohesion,' he asked, 'or making a political point around the flag?'
Labour councillor Peter Mabon also opposed the move, stating that while flags were appropriate on special days, raising them daily would eat into officer time.
He said: 'We're talking about 200-plus hours every year in all weathers to raise and lower flags. Our officers have enough to do.'
Barry Douglas (Image: LDR) SNP council leader Douglas Reid also opposed the motion, expressing support for the current approach. 'We've got a policy that's lasted before my time as leader. Raising flags for special occasions, like Ukraine or Rainbow Flag (for Pride), makes it meaningful. Changing that sends the wrong message.'
Conservative councillor John McFadzean argued the proposal was modest in scale. 'For all the time it would take to hook on one flag and wind it up, there's not a huge implication. Civic pride helps lift morale.'
Douglas responded by drawing parallels with Reform UK-run councils in England, where flag-related motions have gained traction.
He acknowledged Watts' claim that he had been approached by Reform but had declined. 'Maybe he wants to tell the chamber something today. It is a big issue for Reform, but why is it such a big issue for him?'
Chief governance officer David Mitchell then intervened to clarify that there is no East Ayrshire Council flag. 'There has never been a council flag and we certainly don't have one at the moment.'
Watts denied any political motive, explaining his motion was based on personal observation.
'I would be more than happy just to have a flag – it doesn't matter whether it's the Saltire, it doesn't matter whether it's the flag of the United Kingdom,
'I just think that we should have at least a flag at this building as a mark of respect to our communities.'
He also reiterated his Conservative affiliation and rejected any association with Reform. 'I certainly am a Conservative and I am nowhere near Reform in that respect.'
In the end, councillors voted overwhelmingly to maintain the current flag policy, with 24 voting in favour of an amendment to retain existing arrangements and just four supporting the motion.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Andy Burnham has become Labour's king over the water
Andy Burnham has become Labour's king over the water

New Statesman​

time42 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Andy Burnham has become Labour's king over the water

Photo by Wiktor Szymanowicz/Getty For Labour, this has been an uneasy summer. Average support for the party has reached a new low of 21 per cent, a fall almost unprecedented for a one-year government. Reform, which has led every poll since May, is insurgent on the right; a new party is gestating on the left. Should one be needed, the Tories offer a preview of how quickly 'midterm blues' can become an existential crisis. In these grim times, MPs cast around for signs of life in the Labour family. Away from Westminster, their eyes are drawn to Manchester. In an era when incumbents are defined by their unpopularity, one figure stands apart from this trend: Andy Burnham. It's easy to dismiss the twice-defeated leadership candidate (and plenty still do). But after eight years running Greater Manchester, Burnham is the only senior Labour politician with a positive net approval rating (+7) and the public's preferred choice to succeed Keir Starmer as leader. Among party members, the group who would determine the outcome, his ratings are positively North Korean: a favourability rating of +78 (in a new LabourList poll). Burnham has done little to discourage speculation about his future. Back in June, as I reported at the time, he made what amounted to a leadership pitch at Compass's conference, offering a 'popular left programme' of economic and constitutional radicalism: the reversal of local authority cuts, higher wealth taxes and proportional representation. It's one that some MPs – plenty of them former Burnham critics – are increasingly attracted by. 'He's the only possible front-runner not tainted by being part of this government,' remarks one influential backbencher. 'Andy says he has changed. Personally, I believe him.' Another senior figure suggested: 'There are many more than 80 MPs who would nominate him.' Neal Lawson, the head of Compass, which is repositioning itself as the leader of Labour's soft left, comments: 'Burnham is proving himself to be popular in the party and is seen to have the character and politics to win the country. I meet a lot of people in Labour increasingly willing this to happen.' But is there a way? Speculation over Burnham's imminent return is an old Westminster sport and there's been plenty of it in recent weeks. The Manchester mayor's route back, Labour figures observe, could lie in a by-election in Gorton and Denton, the north-west seat currently held by his former campaign manager Andrew Gwynne, who lost the Labour whip over offensive WhatsApp messages (those close to Burnham dismiss the Gorton and Denton rumours as the 'usual summer silly season'). Starmer loyalists, however, suggest that a National Executive Committee broadly aligned to the leadership could bar the mayor's path. For now, Burnham fills the same political role that Boris Johnson did under David Cameron: an alternative leader who is popular among both party and country and who routinely dissents on matters of national policy. Just as Johnson held up London as a model for the UK, so Burnham does the same with Greater Manchester – the region which has enjoyed faster productivity growth than any other since 2004. Should Labour's woes continue to deepen, it's a pitch that will only receive more attention. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: What JD Vance was really doing in Britain this week] Related

Police launch major crime review of Nuked Blood Scandal evidence
Police launch major crime review of Nuked Blood Scandal evidence

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Police launch major crime review of Nuked Blood Scandal evidence

Top cops say they are taking allegations of a criminal over-up by the British state "very seriously" and have launched a review of the Nuked Blood evidence Police have launched a major crime review to assess evidence of a state cover-up about human radiation experiments on troops. ‌ Officers say they are taking "very seriously" allegations that officials at the Ministry of Defence may have hidden a blood testing programme that took place during nuclear weapon trials in the Cold War. ‌ Parliament and the courts have repeatedly been told no monitoring of troops took place. Details of blood and urine testing, and chest x-rays, have subsequently been found on a secret database at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, locked from view on the grounds of national security. ‌ News of the review comes after the Mirror revealed the names of Boris Johnson, Keir Starmer, and serving government officials had been handed to police as potential witnesses. Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS said: "Veterans have been waiting 70 years to be taken seriously, and it is a relief to know these issues are being looked into at long last. What we need now is a thorough police investigation to expose the MoD's institutional rot to the light." The Nuked Blood Scandal blew open after the Mirror uncovered a 1958 memo discussing the "gross irregularities" found in blood tests of Group Captain Terry Gledhill, who flew through the mushroom clouds. The data collected by weapons scientists was later found to be missing from his medical files. A complaint was made to the Met Police in May, with a 500-page dossier of evidence. The Met refused to investigate, saying it was the jurisdiction of Thames Valley Police, which oversees the county of Berkshire where the AWE is based. Victims Commissioner Baroness Newlove intervened to urged a decision in veterans' interests, as campaigners felt the scandal's connections to government and Whitehall made it the Met's responsibility. ‌ Chief Constable Jason Hogg of Thames Valley Police said: "Given the extent and complexity of the material within the dossier, and the seriousness and complexities of the crimes alleged against a range of bodies and individuals, TVP is undertaking a thorough review to assess for the crimes that may need to be investigated and where the ownership of an investigation should most appropriately sit. "Please be assured that TVP is taking this very seriously and that momentum is not being lost; we have our highly experienced head of TVP's Major Crime Review Team personally undertaking the review, reporting into one of my assistant chief constables. This is critical groundwork for circumstances of such significance and scale." He said the force was liaising with the Met "to ensure that, for the victims' sake, the decision on ownership and set-up by policing of any required criminal investigation ensures that it is conducted in the most effective way." It comes as the Lib Dems have urged Labour and the Tories to confirm they will co-operate with any investigation. Defence spokesman Helen Maguire said: "As MPs, we owe it to our veterans to assist them in their pursuit of justice, and do whatever it takes to uncover the truth. As more and more of our nuclear test veterans pass away each week, I urge anyone with information to come forward, and the government must go further and faster in their efforts for the veterans." A ministerial review of the files is underway and the first part of the AWE database is due to be declassified later this year. The government says the criminal allegations are false and there is no evidence to support them.

The five-figure windfall families could get if Labour change key benefit
The five-figure windfall families could get if Labour change key benefit

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

The five-figure windfall families could get if Labour change key benefit

Tens of thousands of families with multiple children could receive thousands of pounds more in annual payments if the two-child benefit cap is abolished. Official figures show over 70,000 households, including 71,580 families with five or more children, would be entitled to over £18,000 a year, with some gaining over £20,000. The cap, introduced under Conservative welfare reforms, blocks parents from claiming £292.81 a month for a third or subsequent child born after April 2017. Labour MPs are pressing Sir Keir Starmer to scrap the cap, arguing it punishes children in poverty, with estimates suggesting it could lift half a million children out of hardship. Conservatives defend the cap as fair to taxpayers, preventing benefit packages from exceeding the minimum wage, while its abolition would cost the Prime Minister around £3.5 billion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store