Major mobile brand is shutting down after 15 years – users warned to take action NOW as urgent deadline nears
A HUGE mobile brand is preparing to shut down for good at the end of June.
Users now have less than 30 days to take action if they want to receive the very last update for their phones.
1
LG announced in 2021 that it was closing its smartphone division.
Its first Android phone was released more than 15 years ago - although LG's roots in mobile go back even further.
LG once held the crown as the world's third-bestselling mobile brand.
But the South Korean tech giant struggled to keep up as new rivals emerged including Oppo and Xiaomi, as well as long-established competitors like Samsung.
Despite the closure, the company continued to push out important Android updates to existing users.
Bosses committed to do it for three years.
But that time is now up with the last update due to come out on June 30, marking the very end for LG's mobile business.
Affected users will no longer be able to download or install Android updates after that date, making their device more susceptible to cyber attacks.
"We would like to extend our heartfelt gratitude towards our customers who have loved and supported LG Electronics mobile products," LG said.
"After the termination date, you will no longer be able to use the software upgrade services.
"If you wish to use the services, we strongly recommend upgrading your software before June 30, 2025.
"Furthermore, as we will no longer provide application updates, you will not be able to download default applications deleted upon initialization."
The company's last phone product was the LG Wing 5G which featured a unique two display design with one that swivels.
LG's final nail in the coffin also spells the end for the LG Bridge, a piece of software allowing mobile users to update via their PC instead.
People have reacted with sadness at the final curtain call for LG's mobile devices.
"The loss of HTC and LG phones really stagnated the market," one user wrote on Reddit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
24 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs. S25 Edge: The ULTIMATE Speed Battle!
When comparing flagship smartphones, the iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge emerge as two of the most advanced options available. Each device caters to distinct user preferences, offering unique strengths in design, performance, and usability. The Galaxy S25 Edge emphasizes speed and innovation, while the iPhone 16 Pro Max focuses on delivering a refined and consistent user experience. Below is a detailed breakdown of how these two devices stack up across key features in a new video from Nick Ackerman. Watch this video on YouTube. Design and Build The Galaxy S25 Edge stands out with its ultra-thin and lightweight design, redefining portability in the smartphone market. Despite its slim profile, it incorporates effective heat management, making sure the device remains comfortable to use even during extended sessions. This makes it an excellent choice for users who prioritize sleekness and mobility. In contrast, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a more substantial build, emphasizing durability and robustness. Its slightly bulkier design accommodates a larger battery, which translates to longer usage times. For users who value sturdiness and extended battery life, the iPhone's design is a clear winner. Both devices showcase premium craftsmanship, but their appeal depends on whether you prioritize portability or endurance. Performance Performance is a critical factor for any flagship device, and here the Galaxy S25 Edge takes the lead with its faster app launch speeds and superior multitasking capabilities. The device's snappy interface and responsiveness are particularly noticeable during demanding tasks, making it a favorite among power users. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max offers a different kind of performance advantage. Its smooth animations and optimized app performance create a polished and seamless user experience. While the Galaxy S25 Edge excels in raw speed, the iPhone prioritizes fluidity and consistency, which many users find more intuitive for everyday use. Both devices deliver exceptional performance, but their strengths cater to different user needs. Display and Software The iPhone 16 Pro Max features a ProMotion display with adaptive refresh rates, offering a visually smooth experience during scrolling, video playback, and gaming. This technology enhances usability and provides a refined visual experience, making it ideal for users who value visual precision and fluidity. In comparison, the Galaxy S25 Edge delivers a faster and more responsive user interface, appealing to those who prioritize speed and efficiency. However, its rapid transitions and animations may feel overwhelming to users accustomed to a more measured pace. Both devices feature high-quality displays, but the choice between them depends on whether you prioritize visual refinement or interface responsiveness. Unlocking and Biometrics Biometric security is another area where these devices differ significantly. The iPhone 16 Pro Max relies on Face ID, a secure and seamlessly integrated system that works intuitively with its swipe-to-unlock functionality. This system is reliable and easy to use for most users. The Galaxy S25 Edge, however, offers greater versatility with both in-display fingerprint scanning and face unlock. These options provide faster access and cater to users who prefer having multiple unlocking methods. While both systems are effective, the Galaxy S25 Edge's variety may appeal to those who value flexibility and convenience. Gaming and Graphics For gaming enthusiasts, the Galaxy S25 Edge is a standout performer. Its multi-core processing power and advanced 3D graphics capabilities make it ideal for resource-intensive games. The device handles demanding titles with ease, delivering a smooth and immersive gaming experience. The iPhone 16 Pro Max, while slightly behind in multi-core performance, excels in single-core tasks and game launch speeds. Both devices maintain similar temperatures during extended gaming sessions, making sure comfort for users. Ultimately, the Galaxy S25 Edge is better suited for hardcore gamers, while the iPhone offers reliable performance for casual gaming. Camera Performance The iPhone 16 Pro Max excels in everyday photography, offering fast camera launch speeds and a responsive shutter. Its camera system is optimized for social media, making sure consistent results across platforms. This makes it a dependable choice for users who frequently capture spontaneous moments. The Galaxy S25 Edge, equipped with a 200MP main sensor, shines in capturing fine details and high-resolution images. However, its zoom capabilities fall short compared to Samsung's Ultra models. While both devices deliver impressive results, the iPhone's consistency and ease of use give it a slight edge for most users. Battery Life Battery life is a crucial consideration, and the iPhone 16 Pro Max outperforms the Galaxy S25 Edge in this area. Its larger battery capacity ensures longer usage times, making it a reliable choice for users with demanding schedules. The Galaxy S25 Edge, while capable of lasting a full day with moderate use, sacrifices battery capacity for its thin and lightweight design. This trade-off may appeal to users who prioritize portability, but those seeking endurance and reliability will find the iPhone more dependable. Future Implications The Galaxy S25 Edge's innovative design sets a new benchmark for smartphone portability. Its ultra-thin profile has sparked speculation about future trends, including the possibility of an 'iPhone Air' model. As manufacturers continue to push the boundaries of design and performance, devices like the Galaxy S25 Edge pave the way for thinner and more efficient smartphones. Meanwhile, the iPhone 16 Pro Max reinforces Apple's commitment to delivering a polished and consistent user experience, emphasizing durability, battery life, and ecosystem integration. These qualities ensure its relevance in a market increasingly focused on balancing innovation with practicality. Final Thoughts The iPhone 16 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Edge represent two distinct approaches to smartphone design and functionality. The Galaxy S25 Edge impresses with its ultra-thin design, faster app launches, and superior gaming performance, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize speed and portability. On the other hand, the iPhone 16 Pro Max delivers a refined and consistent experience, excelling in battery life, camera functionality, and ecosystem integration. Ultimately, the choice between these devices depends on your priorities. Whether you value innovative design or reliability and durability, both smartphones offer compelling features tailored to different user needs. Here are more detailed guides and articles that you may find helpful on iPhone 16 Pro Max. Source & Image Credit: Nick Ackerman Filed Under: Android News, Apple iPhone, Guides Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
India services sector growth steady in May as demand remains strong, PMI shows
BENGALURU, June 4 (Reuters) - India's dominant services sector maintained its robust growth in May, fueled by strong export demand and record hiring, although price pressures intensified, a survey showed on Wednesday. The HSBC India Services Purchasing Managers' Index (INPMIS=ECI), opens new tab, compiled by S&P Global, stood at 58.8 in May, marginally up from April's 58.7 but lower than a preliminary reading of 61.2. It has been above the 50-mark separating growth from contraction for nearly four years. New business - a key gauge for demand - expanded at a sharp pace in May, largely aligned with growth rates seen from February through April. Companies attributed this sustained momentum to advertising efforts, positive demand trends and repeat business from existing clients. This healthy demand environment was particularly evident in international markets, with companies reporting one of the strongest increases in export orders in the survey's over a decade history. To accommodate the ongoing expansion, service providers ramped up hiring at the fastest rate since the survey began in 2005, with nearly 16% of respondents increasing staff numbers. That, however, contributed to rising cost pressures. Both input costs and output charges increased at faster rates in May, edging above historical averages. Companies reported higher expenses for cooking oil, materials, meat and overtime payments, leading to the strongest input price inflation since January. Growing price pressures could test monetary policy decisions for the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), which has cut the repo rate by 50 basis points this year as inflation remains below its 4.0% target. The RBI is expected to cut rates by another 25 bps to 5.75% on Friday, according to a Reuters poll. Despite cost challenges, business confidence recovered from April's 23-month low, with companies expressing optimism about future growth based on their expanded workforces, larger client bases and ongoing marketing initiatives. Meanwhile, the HSBC India Composite PMI Output Index, which includes both manufacturing and services, eased slightly to 59.3 in May from 59.7 in April but indicated continued strong expansion in private sector activity.
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump cornered as China weaponises its rare-earths dominance
When or if Donald Trump gets on the phone with Xi Jinping, the tone between the two men is likely to be frosty. The US and China have in recent days both accused each other of violating their fragile, three-week-old trade truce. The two presidents are expected to speak this week in an effort to rescue the deal. But Trump has a tough pill to swallow: it is his arch-rival who looks to have the better negotiating hand. China's near-total dominance of the world's supply of rare-earth metals – which are used in the manufacture of everything from cars and computer chips to F-35 fighter jets and nuclear-powered submarines – means Xi can squeeze the US where it hurts. 'Critical minerals are one of the most important bargaining chips for China in its negotiations with Washington. China will really hold on to this, as a significant point of leverage,' says Matilda Buchan, a senior analyst at Asia House, a London think tank. Beijing's willingness to weaponise the rare-earths supply chain is so potent a threat to the US economy and military that it has already pushed the White House into de-escalating its planned trade war with China. After Trump's April 2 'liberation day' announcement raised tariffs on US imports from China to an eventual peak of 145pc, Beijing's retaliation included a ban on exports to the US of magnet alloys containing key rare-earth materials. The impact was quickly felt. On May 9, some of the biggest carmakers in the US – including General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen and Hyundai – wrote to the White House warning that unless China's export ban was lifted, they would soon have to start cutting back production. That same day, Trump told his Truth Social followers that he was ready to make big concessions to get a deal with China. Negotiations in Geneva took place over the ensuing weekend, and the tariffs came tumbling down. It emerged, more quietly, in subsequent days that China would allow rare-earths exports to the US to resume. 'Major disruption' Last Friday, though, Trump was back on Truth Social claiming that China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US'. Jamieson Greer, the president's trade envoy, told CNBC that Beijing was 'slow-rolling' its issuance of licences to export products containing rare earths. 'We haven't seen the flow of some of those critical minerals as they were supposed to be doing,' he said. The question is whether China is actively frustrating the deal, as some White House officials reportedly suspect, or whether the explanation is more mundane: not a grand conspiracy but simply a system coming to grips with new red tape. Back in April, Beijing did not just slap a ban on exports, it built a new bureaucratic structure to underpin future rare-earths trade. China-based companies wanting to export metal alloys containing more than a trace of seven key rare earths – samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, yttrium and scandium – now need to apply for a licence from the commerce ministry. It was not initially clear which shipments would be caught by the new rules, and there was plenty of precautionary laboratory testing, even of exports that were below the rare-earth content threshold. 'What initially looked like an almost total freezing of exports from China was really just a response to this need for testing of all the material, and of any material which contained more than 0.1pc of any of these elements,' says David Merriman, the research director at Project Blue, a critical minerals analysis and advisory firm. Project Blue's analysis suggests the application process is taking about 45 days, which may explain why exports to the US have been slower than expected. By mid-May, six large companies had received export licences, and at least another three were in the process of doing so. 'We are seeing some approvals come through, certainly slower than industry would like,' Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, told Bloomberg this week. 'Some of the delay is related to China working through their new system to approve exports, not that they are not allowing exports.' As part of the Geneva trade deal between the US and China, the commerce ministry has taken 28 US businesses off its export-control blacklist. But exports will still have to be approved on a shipment-by-shipment basis, and none is so far bound for the US. Volkswagen's European operations appear to have been an early beneficiary of an export licence, but not in sufficient quantities to ease supply concerns. 'There are a few approvals coming through, but they are far from being sufficient to prevent imminent production halts,' Jens Eskelund, the president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, told the New York Times. 'We are still facing a major disruption of supply chains.' Trump cornered The threat of factory production lines grinding to a halt highlights the immense power of China in this crucial market, and the power of its hand in negotiations. China's mines churn out about 61pc of the world's rare earths, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). Chinese refiners and manufacturers also hoover up most of the rare earths from elsewhere, processing 92pc of the world's supply. It is refining that is key, as this is the process that turns the material into a usable product. The country has a particular stranglehold on the manufacture of magnet alloys containing rare earths, which have near-ubiquitous application in computing, vehicular and electrical systems. 'Particularly as you move further down the supply chain, from mined products towards downstream highly engineered products, China's market share only grows,' Merriman says. 'Its grip only gets tighter.' Rare earths are used in very small quantities, which means it has long been uneconomic for most countries to mine or refine them – most, that is, except China, where the industry is under state control. The US has been spearheading sporadic efforts to restart rare-earths production and magnet manufacture either at home or in friendlier countries. But these efforts are yet to bear real fruit. The IEA estimates that a decade from now, China will still account for 85pc of refined rare-earths output. This leaves Trump cornered. He has been talking up the prospects of Ukraine and Greenland as alternatives, but his presidency will be long gone before either of those becomes a realistic option. Tariffs are no use here either. His only weapon is semiconductors. Over the past month, the US has been gradually tightening controls over China-bound exports of chips and associated software, particularly those used in artificial intelligence. The chips squeeze is partly motivated by the White House's long-term strategic desire to retain technological supremacy over China. But it also has some immediate tactical trade leverage – as Howard Lutnick, the US commerce secretary, admitted on Sunday. '[We are] taking certain actions to show them [the Chinese] what it feels like on the other side of that [export ban] equation,' he told Fox News. This has riled Beijing. 'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the Chinese commerce industry said in a statement on Monday. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus.' Despite the war of words, Lutnick claimed he was confident that Trump would 'work it out' with Xi. Perhaps his confidence is well-founded. With the US and Chinese tech and manufacturing industries hanging in the balance, a deal looks essential for both sides.
