logo
Government must bring clarity on policy to hit housing targets

Government must bring clarity on policy to hit housing targets

Irish Times4 days ago

The Government was elected only six months ago but is already running out of time to address the
housing crisis
within the lifetime of this parliament. That housing was and remains a crucial voter issue is not in doubt. Nor are the concerns of developers and investors who stand ready to assist the Government's ambition for residential delivery targets. The next three months will be critical to answering these concerns so that these housing targets have a chance of being met by 2030.
Apartment construction slowing
Despite the acute demand for new homes, it is startling how the delivery of housing has actually slowed within the last year. New dwelling completions nationally fell by nearly 7 per cent in 2024. In the case of Dublin apartment construction – despite the range of State-supported housing initiatives and the active capital of approved housing bodies (AHBs) – the number of apartment units completed last year dropped by 27 per cent from 2023. This slowdown will continue in 2025, where CBRE estimates a further 20 per cent decline. Beyond 2025 the pipeline (particularly for private apartments as opposed to social and affordable) will slow even more materially.
Policy change that can improve viability
New apartment development has been challenging since 2022, when construction costs and financing costs increased following the outbreak of the war in Ukraine. However, from a policy perspective, little has changed since then to encourage new construction in the sector. In fact, policy change has contributed to the problem.
In December 2021, the then government introduced restrictive rental policies that regulate annual rent increases to the lesser of inflation or 2 per cent. Such restrictions may sound reasonable but rent-control policies have a poor track record in delivering a vibrant rental sector anywhere in the world, and the net result is less supply. Instead, it creates a market of insiders – the community of renters who benefit from the controls – and outsiders – potential renters that cannot access any product. At the time of writing, the results of a recent review of this regulation by The Housing Agency have yet to be published. We expect that investment and development in the sector will remain stagnant until there is some clarity on the future of this policy.
READ MORE
The VAT payable on the sale of a completed development is where there is more potential for change that could support apartment viability. In fact, we believe that of all the options available to Government, an adjustment to VAT could have the single most positive impact on improving viability. At present, a VAT payment of 13.5 per cent of the sale price is due on the disposal of a private rented sector (PRS) development (timing dependent). This, in many instances, is eroding overall development margins and thereby making many projects unviable. Decreasing this rate to at least 9 per cent would improve viability materially and would clearly help increase apartment supply. It would also increase the exchequer return from this segment of the market through both additional VAT and stamp duty because at present virtually no such sales are completing and the sector is essentially stagnant. The UK treats VAT on new development much differently. A look at their rental market would be worthwhile for our policymakers.
Myles Clarke is managing director of CBRE Ireland
Social and affordable housing provision
The range of schemes introduced since the launch of Housing for All in 2021 to support the provision of social and affordable housing has been positive and has certainly helped to slowly turn a corner on that tenure in the market. It is estimated that up to 50 per cent of new-dwelling completions last year had some sort of State support (either financed by or acquired by State entities). The
Land Development Agency
(LDA) has become increasingly active, and the number of large-scale residential projects being initiated around the country is at least somewhat encouraging.
However, some of these policy initiatives clearly haven't worked. A recent release of data by the
Department of Housing
showed no private sector take-up of funding for the Secure Tenancy Affordable Rental (Star) scheme – an affordable rental funding mechanism to support new development. The private development community clearly had an appetite to engage with this initiative, but to date, of the €750 million allocated to the scheme, just €185.3 million has been taken up, with the only party to engage being the LDA.
Uisce Éireann's call for action
Planning, infrastructure and utilities remain key challenges to significantly scaling up residential development across the country. In May, the CBRE planning advisory team hosted some of the key figures in infrastructure and utilities provision in Ireland for a panel discussion focused on 'accelerating housing delivery'. Key utilities for housing, such as wastewater treatment and access to the electricity grid, need to be scaled up to match housing delivery targets. Indeed,
Uisce Éireann
sent a detailed document to the Government last week, highlighting that the scale of the task in front of them is 'immense' and suggesting a number of planning, legal, regulatory and consenting issues that should be addressed, including fast-tracking decisions by An Bord Pleanála on strategic projects and asking for the expansion of exempt development provisions.
[
Fixing 'known' water system issues will take until 2050 and cost up to €60bn, says Uisce Éireann
Opens in new window
]
The urgency of this call to action from one of the country's most important utility providers should serve as another wake-up call to policymakers about the need for immediate action.
Time for effective action
The good news is that, overall, Ireland remains an attractive destination for investors to commit funds to support the Government's policy goals. Nowhere else in the OECD offers the consistent positive growth dynamics of Ireland combined with a stable political landscape and a strong state balance sheet buffered by the fiscal surplus of recent years. However, investors prize policy stability and predictability when committing capital to an economy for the long term. Their experience of recent unexpected policy actions in Ireland aimed at countering short-term political pressures raises question marks over the reliability of the Government's intentions to address the housing crisis. Investors are committing capital to support the buildout of rental sectors in cities across Europe but can't commit in a meaningful way to Ireland's PRS sector as long as these rental controls remain in place.
Time is not on our side. The lag between effective policy action by the Government and activating all the legs of housing development – land acquisition, planning, securing finance and critical service connections – means it takes three to four years to turn a plan into new housing units. The Government won a clear mandate to deliver on Ireland's housing challenge, and it is imperative to bring policy clarity to investors and developers alike, who stand ready to commit – before it's too late.
Myles Clarke is managing director of CBRE Ireland

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt moves to change Rent Pressure Zones system
Govt moves to change Rent Pressure Zones system

RTÉ News​

time10 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Govt moves to change Rent Pressure Zones system

The Government is moving towards changing the current Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs) system ahead of a crunch Cabinet meeting on the matter next Tuesday. Intensive discussions have already taken place on this politically sensitive issue between the Taoiseach, the Tánaiste and a number of ministers. Further talks are set to take place on Monday night in advance of the Cabinet meeting on Tuesday morning. The current legislation on RPZs caps annual rent increases at 2% or at the rate of inflation, whichever is lower. However, it will lapse at the end of December and the Government is now likely to begin preparing new legislation which will change the present system. This will, the Government believes, "give certainty to the market". The Taoiseach has consistently stated that a stable climate has to be created to incentivise developers to invest in the domestic rental market. Senior figures in the coalition believe that "doing nothing" is not an option and if the RPZs legislation is allowed to lapse, then it would be a return to market rents for tenants. To avoid this, new legislation will be brought before the Oireachtas. The Housing Commission last year recommended "reference rents" which would tie rates to local homes of a similar quality. However, opposition parties have warned that any move to abolish the "modest protections" provided by the RPZs will be strongly resisted.

The Irish economy grew by 22% over the past year. Yes, you read that right
The Irish economy grew by 22% over the past year. Yes, you read that right

Irish Times

time14 hours ago

  • Irish Times

The Irish economy grew by 22% over the past year. Yes, you read that right

Ireland's economic data was always going to be a bit special at the start of this year. But Thursday's figures were mind-bending. It is impossible to overstate the extent to which we now stand out in international comparisons. And this is not just a curiosity – it matters. The economy, as measured by gross domestic product (GDP) , was 22 per cent larger in the first quarter of 2025 than one year earlier, according to the latest estimates from the Central Statistics Office . Think about it. The figures suggest that for every €1 of activity last year, there was €1.22 in 2025. Even comparing GDP in the first quarter of this year with the last quarter of 2024, there is a rise of close to 10 per cent – this is roughly the extent of growth across the euro zone over the past decade. Of course this bonkers data is not real, in the sense that it does not reflect what is happening in the underlying economy in which we all live. How could it? As has been long discussed the headline economic data is entirely distorted by the activities and tax planning of a small number of very big US tech and pharma companies. From time to time, this has created huge distortions in the figures. A decade ago, top US economist Paul Krugman famously described a 26 per cent GDP growth rate reported for the Irish economy (later revised up to over 30 per cent) as 'leprechaun' economics . At the time the figures were distorted by massive tax-driven investments by the companies concerned, including Apple, essentially a manoeuvre by the companies involved to try to keep their tax bills down as international rules changed. READ MORE Now, as one observer put it, we are seeing another 'Krugman' moment. This time the reasons are different. Big pharma companies have been rushing product over to the US to try to get drugs and key ingredients into the market before Donald Trump announces tariffs on the sector. This has led to a surge in exports, feeding into the GDP data. Many of these are manufactured here – and some are made elsewhere but organised by Irish subsidiaries and so also show up in our figures. And so we see a massive surge in Irish GDP in the first quarter of this year. A big – temporary – decline in pharma exports in GDP will follow at some stage, as the firms involved must now have massive stocks jammed into every free warehouse in the US. Much will depend on how the tariffs story plays out. [ Welcome (back) to the era of Leprechaun economics Opens in new window ] Whether Krugman renews his leprechaun offensive or not, let's not pretend this won't be noticed. Ireland's GDP data is not some irrelevance in a quirky economic corner. The amounts of money being moved through Ireland are now enormous. Daniel Kral, chief economist at Oxford Economics , calculates that Ireland – which accounts for 4 per cent of the euro zone economy – accounted for half its total growth over the past year. Analysts have taken to looking at the figures 'excluding Ireland'. How do we pull back from all of this to judge the underlying health of the economy? Total demand in the domestic economy – adjusted by the CSO to remove the multinational factors - rose just 1 per cent over the year. But we need to look under the surface here, too. Consumer spending, a good measure of how we feel, was up by a decent 2.5 per cent. But the overall figure was dragged down by a fall in business investment, presumably reflecting the international uncertainty. So households continued to spend in the first part of the year, but businesses are taking a wait-and-see approach to big capital spending. This is likely to be reflected in the jobs market as the year goes on – and here AI is also changing the game in many sectors. Consumers may get more cautious too. Uncertainty is starting to slow the economy and this is a trend we need to watch as the year goes on. The piece of data that seemed a bit out of line this week was a 30 per cent fall in corporation tax in May compared with the same month last year. This was affected by the comparison with a strong May last year – which the Department of Finance suggests was boosted by once-off factors. Two of our biggest taxpayers, Pfizer and Microsoft – pay significant amounts of tax that month. But the key early indicator for most of the big companies is June – and what happens here will give a good pointer for the year as a whole. The figures do underline one point. It is our huge reliance on the opaque affairs of four or five massive companies – and our exposure to the sectors they operate in, their own performance and complex decisions on how their tax structures are set up. Our latest bout of data exceptionalism again puts Ireland in the spotlight, when it would have been better to keep the head down. It underlines the outsize take Ireland is getting from pharma and tech activity in the EU – both contentious points in the White House. Notably, the US added Ireland to an economic watch list this week, based on the size of our trade surplus. We are very much on the radar in Washington. Our corporate tax take and manufacturing base are looked on enviously not only from the US , but from elsewhere in Europe. [ 'No long-term commitments to anything' – Ireland's economy is experiencing a silent slowdown Opens in new window ] The advance shipping of products again focuses attention on the scale of activity and tax planning in Ireland by big pharma companies. And this causes a rollercoaster of cyclical activity. But what really counts is longer-term, structural issues. Will these pharma giants decide over time – and it would take years – to relocate some of their production to the US? Will their profits and thus tax payments here be hit by Trump's policies? Or will they – or some of the tech giants – alter their corporate structures so that they pay significantly less tax here? It comes down to whether Trump's policies change the way the economic and corporate world operates fundamentally, a fair bit or not much at all. As Ireland benefits from the current system so much, the more it changes, the more risks there are for us. The coming months will tell a lot.

Nine-figure payouts to Ryanair and Starbucks CEOs are controversial, but Michael O'Leary can point to results
Nine-figure payouts to Ryanair and Starbucks CEOs are controversial, but Michael O'Leary can point to results

Irish Times

time15 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Nine-figure payouts to Ryanair and Starbucks CEOs are controversial, but Michael O'Leary can point to results

Michael O'Leary has hit his target. Ryanair 's share price stayed above €21 for 28 days, earning him a €125 million bonus if he stays until 2028. The deal has its critics. 'Morally questionable,' said Luke Hildyard of the High Pay Centre, a UK think tank. Others argue such payouts reward luck more than leadership, with cheap oil, index inclusion and billions in share buybacks all helping lift Ryanair's stock. O'Leary might counter that Ryanair shares have more than doubled since the deal was struck in 2019, comfortably outperforming rival airlines. Contrast that with Starbucks , where Brian Niccol was handed a reported $113 million sign-on package last August to replace embattled CEO Laxman Narasimhan. Shares soared 25 per cent on the news, adding $21 billion in market value. READ MORE [ Corporate tax receipts drop 30% as Trump's tariffs bite Opens in new window ] Since then, Starbucks has slashed head office jobs, trimmed menus and promised a return to its coffeehouse roots. But the results remain bitter. Margins and profits are down. Competition remains fierce in China. The stock tanked after last month's earnings miss and has now given up almost all of its Niccol bump. Niccol may yet prove his worth – his turnaround of Chipotle is textbook stuff – but the caffeine hit investors got from his arrival has faded fast. O'Leary, never one to miss a jab, might well look at Starbucks and say: at least I had to do something to get my millions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store