logo
Legal case a 'seismic confrontation' between players and Fifa

Legal case a 'seismic confrontation' between players and Fifa

BBC Newsa day ago
"A seismic legal confrontation between players and Fifa."The view of former Fulham midfielder-turned-lawyer Udo Onwere when asked to assess the significance of the compensation claim launched against Fifa this week on behalf of current and former professional footballers over transfer rules.On Monday, Dutch foundation Justice for Players (JFP) said it had started a class action lawsuit against the sport's world governing body, along with the football associations of France, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and Denmark.It argues that 100,000 footballers playing in Europe since 2002 could have lost income as a result of "unlawful" Fifa regulations, and that "preliminary analysis" shows that damages could amount to several billion pounds.The case is the result of last year's ruling by the highest European court that Fifa regulations over some football transfers broke EU laws.In October, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) found in favour of former Chelsea and Arsenal midfielder Lassana Diarra after he argued some of the rules restricted his freedom of movement and breached competition law, and sued Fifa."This class action could rewrite the rules governing player mobility across the global football industry" says Onwere, who is now a partner at law firm Bray and Krais."What distinguishes this case from previous skirmishes with the governing body is its sheer scale and complexity... The outcome of this litigation could usher in a new era of transfer regulations and governance - one where contractual stability is balanced with player autonomy."It could prove to be as transformational as the landmark 1995 Bosman ruling."Such a comparison is notable, because JFP is being advised by Diarra's Belgian lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont, who also won the landmark 1995 case at the CJEU on behalf of ex-player Jean-Marc Bosman.That ruling dramatically changed the sport, meaning footballers could choose to run down their contracts and move clubs on a free transfer, with teams no longer able to demand compensation for out-of-contract players.Thirty years on, some now believe this latest case could result in players being able to terminate their own contracts, without paying compensation, before those deals come to an end.BBC Sport has been told that Fifa has until the start of September to respond to the threat of legal action.
Background
Last year, the CJEU said that, by refusing to provide Diarra with an international transfer certificate (ITC) for a proposed move to Belgian club Charleroi in 2015 after he was found to have breached his contract with Lokomotiv Moscow (for which he was ordered to pay £8.4m to the Russian club and suspended), Fifa showed that its rules "impede the free movement of professional footballers wishing to develop their activity by going to work for a new club".Diarra's lawyers contested the Fifa rule which makes a club wishing to sign a player jointly liable for compensation to a player's old club, and at risk of sporting sanctions, in cases where the player's previous contract was terminated without just cause.They also challenged a rule which allows the national association of a player's former club to withhold an ITC where there was a dispute, which they said also hindered the move.The court ruled that Fifa should not be able to use the ITC system to prevent players who have breached a contract from moving and working where they choose.At the time Fifa said it had been "continuously improving" the transfer system "for the benefit of players, clubs, leagues and member associations, to ensure that players can train, be developed and have stability, while safeguarding the integrity of competitions by implementing a robust regulatory framework for the international transfer system".It then adapted its transfer regulations on an interim basis, but accepted they could be open to challenge. JFP claims that affected professional footballers have earned approximately 8% less over the course of their career as a result of Fifa's rules, and its litigation could mean players can terminate their own contracts.
'A huge hit'
Lucia Melcherts, the chair of JFP, said: "All professional football players have lost a significant amount of earnings due to the unlawful Fifa regulations. In any other profession, people are allowed to change jobs voluntarily. The same should be true in football, particularly as the average career span of a professional footballer according to a FIFPro study is only eight years long.""FIFA will find it difficult to put forward a robust defence to these claims in the face of a clear decision by the CJEU in the Diarra case that there was anti-competitive behaviour over several years", says Daniel Gore, an arbitration lawyer at Withers."The anticipated floodgate of claims has commenced, and Fifa's finances could take a huge hit at a time they are flying high after the expanded Club World Cup this year and World Cup in 2026."In a statement, the European division of global players' union Fifpro, which backed Diarra's case, said the action "represents the anticipated practical response" to the CJEU ruling, "effectively centralising advocacy for affected players' interests that have broad implications for the football industry".It said it would "thoroughly assess" the foundation's move, adding it "will always support fair compensation for affected players whose rights were breached, while driving meaningful reform towards inclusive governance structures in international football."This approach aims to shield past, current and future generations of players from unilateral and arbitrary decision-making processes that undermine or harm fundamental workers' rights and fair competition."Fifa has been approached for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mercedes-Benz Confirms EV Pricing Cut Ahead of US Production Pause
Mercedes-Benz Confirms EV Pricing Cut Ahead of US Production Pause

Auto Blog

time12 minutes ago

  • Auto Blog

Mercedes-Benz Confirms EV Pricing Cut Ahead of US Production Pause

By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Demons beware, this 2022 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Hennessey Exorcist Convertible has come to slay you. For sale now on Exotic Car Trader, this very example could be yours. Finally, after years of enthusiasts begging for one, we finally got a Forester hybrid. Is it worth the hype? Here's what I think after driving one. Mercedes EVs will get several thousands of dollars cheaper before the automaker breaks on EV production Mercedes-Benz brought the EQS to market in 2021. Since then, it's been plagued by lukewarm critical reception and less-than-remarkable sales figures. The vehicle was the Stuttgart-based automaker's first foray into mainstream EVs. More importantly, its arrival harkened Benz's dramatic shift towards electrifying all the things. Both decisions might have been a bit premature, and fast-forwarding to today, we see the pendulum swinging the other way. Not only are Mercedes EQ vehicles getting a lot less pricey, but they're also going on a brief vacation. First, pricing. Information originally leaked via a dealer employee on TikTok. Still, it was later confirmed by the automaker via Motor1 that almost anything with an EQ badge is getting a hefty price cut for the 2026 model year. The 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQE sedan is now available starting at $66,100, a $9,950 reduction. The EQS sedan sees a decidedly less dramatic trim, shedding $4,150 and still starting just over six figures. Meanwhile, electrified SUVs see substantial slashes. The 2026 EQE SUV drops by $12,950, now commanding $66,100, and the range-topping EQS SUV sees the most significant drop of all. Its new MSRP of $91,100 is a tremendous $15,300 less than what the 2025 model year vehicle retailed for. The only Mercedes-Benz EQ vehicle left unscathed is the compact EQB SUV, which was already the entry-level model at $53,050. By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. Price cuts come around the same time that Mercedes is closing the EQ order banks for US customers While price cuts are good news for anyone who's been in the market for an EQ and holding out, there's a bit more to the story. Mercedes-Benz has confirmed to InsideEVs that EQ production will come to a halt in the US on September 1st. In fact, order banks have already closed for US customers, according to the automaker. That means if you are in the market, you're likely stuck with whatever the dealer has on the lot or is about to arrive. Of course, US EV tax rebates are set to expire at the end of September, and frankly, we don't believe in a coincidence at that scale. The sad and ironic thing is that, aside from EV rebates, the EQ lineup becomes immediately much more competitive with a price drop. At around $90,000, the EQS SUV is a direct rival to the lauded BMW iX, offering a similar range, slightly less power, and more standard luxury features, including ventilated seats and rear seat pillows. The EQE Sedan now costs less than its direct competitor, the BMW i5. Simultaneously, the base car offers more torque and range than the standard i5. If Merc manages to keep the production pause short, we could start to see sales rise. Of course, all this is likely to tank prices on the secondhand market even further, so you might do even better there. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Final thoughts While most Mercedes EQ models aren't particularly loved — blame their bulbous styling and overreliance on technology — a price drop might be just what the cars needed to get their footing in the market. It's unfortunate that it comes at a time when the path forward for electrification is murkier than ever. Assuming the EV market doesn't completely evaporate with the tax incentives, we can see the car selling better into 2026 as Mercedes supplements its electrified lineup with cars like the EV GLC and CLA. About the Author Steven Paul View Profile

Sales of Novo Nordisk's diabetes drugs including Ozempic slow sharply
Sales of Novo Nordisk's diabetes drugs including Ozempic slow sharply

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Sales of Novo Nordisk's diabetes drugs including Ozempic slow sharply

Sales of Novo Nordisk's injectable diabetes drugs including Ozempic have slowed sharply amid fierce competition and the threat of US tariffs, prompting it to cut costs and sharpen its commercial focus. The Danish drugmaker, whose booming sales of GLP-1 diabetes and obesity drugs in recent years had turned it into Europe's most valuable company, has lost nearly $100bn (£75bn) in market value since cutting its full-year sales forecast last week, when its share price slid 30% in its worst week in more than two decades. It fell a further 3% on Wednesday. On Wednesday, Novo Nordisk said sales of medications such as Ozempic – which mimic the GLP-1 gut hormone that regulates blood sugar levels and appetite – grew by 8% in the first half of the year, down from 21% last year. Sales of obesity drugs including Wegovy increased by 56%, taking total sales 16% higher to 155bn Danish kroner (£18bn). Profit before tax climbed by 24% to 70.8bn kroner. The company has lost market share to its US rival Eli Lilly's Mounjaro, which studies have shown to be more effective, as well as cheaper versions made by generic drugmakers. It has also been hit by 'compounding' in the US, where pharmacies make up medications from ingredients, even though the US regulator declared an end to the practice recently. Novo Nordisk's outgoing chief executive, Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen, said that the copycat market had 'equal size to our business' and that compounded versions of Wegovy were sold at a 'much lower price point'. Its finance chief, Karsten Munk Knudsen, said the company was pursuing various strategies, including lawsuits against compounding pharmacies and expanding its US direct-to-consumer platform, NovoCare, launched in March. The company might also pursue 'cash sales' directly to patients elsewhere. Jørgensen said Novo Nordisk was taking measures to 'sharpen our commercial execution further, and ensure efficiencies in our cost base while continuing to invest in future growth'. He said it would probably not be able to avoid layoffs, but that no decision had been made. He said it would be up to Maziar Mike Doustdar, who takes over as CEO on Thursday, to make such a decision. The company is now expecting sales growth of between 8% and 14% at constant exchange rates in 2025, down sharply from its previous estimate of 13% to 21%. Novo Nordisk also disclosed that it had ditched several weight-loss drugs in development, including one that has just completed an intermediate (phase II) clinical study, 'due to portfolio considerations'. The company faces a class action lawsuit in the US from investors, who claim that it misled them with optimistic growth forecasts in the lucrative weight loss market. The UBS analyst Matthew Weston said: 'We expect GLP-1 compounders to remain in the US, which limits cash-pay uptake and leaves an uncertain outlook for US Wegovy. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion 'President Trump's proposal to reimburse GLP-1 obesity in Medicare could add significant volume uplift, but most-favoured-nation demands to offer US cash sales at European prices could significantly reduce value.' Derren Nathan, the head of equity research at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Tariffs and drug pricing policy are another threat Mike Doustdar will need to tackle head-on if one of Denmark's greatest success stories is to regain its crown as Europe's most valuable company. 'The 15% blanket rate on EU imports is not necessarily the end of the story as Donald Trump dangles the prospect of levies of up to 250% on pharmaceutical imports under a separate section 232 investigation.'

Future of chain Claire's on UK high streets uncertain after US parent firm files for bankruptcy
Future of chain Claire's on UK high streets uncertain after US parent firm files for bankruptcy

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Future of chain Claire's on UK high streets uncertain after US parent firm files for bankruptcy

FASHION accessories chain Claire's is facing an uncertain future on UK high streets, after its US parent firm filed for bankruptcy. It is the second time the ear-piercing favourite has declared itself bust, after previously filing for bankruptcy in 2018. 1 Its finances are now under pressure from weak consumer demand and supply chain uncertainty. The filings showed that the parent business reported liabilities of up to $10billion (£7billion) and owed between 25,000 and 50,000 creditors. Claire's operates 2,750 stores worldwide, including 280 in the UK. While British stores remain unaffected for now, the UK arm has lost £25million over the past three years and is at risk of collapsing into administration later this month. It has been working with advisers to explore a sale or restructuring. However, potential buyers, such as Hilco Capital, are understood to have walked away. Retail experts say Claire's is struggling to stay relevant. Julie Palmer, from Begbies Traynor, said: 'Claire's low-price offering is clearly not strong enough to win over its core customers — teens and young adults — as they now have access to a vast array of affordable and convenient products online through platforms like Amazon and Temu.' Claire's boss Chris Cramer said: 'We remain in active discussions with potential strategic and financial partners and are committed to completing our review of strategic alternatives.' Nostalgic 90's retailer files for bankruptcy after chain misses rent payments for June and July 'CORE BLIMEY! MINING giant Glenciore has decided to stick with its London stock listing, scrapping plans to shift to New York, in a win for the City. It has been listed on the FTSE since 2011, when it was valued at £37billion — at the time the exchange's largest float. However, the Swiss-based firm has announced plans to slash £753million in costs by 2026, including job cuts across its 150,000-strong workforce. METRO BANK ON THE UP METRO BANK has bounced back, posting a £43.1million pre-tax profit for the first half of 2025 — up from a £33.5million loss reported in the same period last year. The lender doubled new corporate and small business loans to £1billion, and cut 8 per cent from its costs by axing a third of its workforce and reducing branch hours. Boss Daniel Frumkin said: 'Our strong performance reflects the decisive actions we have taken.' Elsewhere, Sabadell shareholders have approved the £2.65billion sale of TSB to Santander.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store