China absorbs massive Brazilian soy shipments in first quarter
Current soy volumes being shipped do not yet reflect the effects of the new trade war, the analysts said. They believe an escalation will direct more Chinese demand to Brazil over time, as was the case in 2018.
Brazilian traders had loaded 22.8 million tons of soybeans onto vessels through March 25, 17.7 million of that going to China, said Eduardo Vanin, an analyst with Agrinvest. He noted both figures "are records" in spite of some logistical bottlenecks and a slow start to Brazil's harvest.
Brazil's first-quarter soy shipments to China reflect advanced purchases for some 33 million tons made by December 2024, when the new crop was not ready and Chinese crushing markets were healthy, Vanin said. This is 7 million tons more than in the previous season at the same time.
Brazilian farmers normally sow soybeans from September and harvest the crop in the first weeks of the new year, depending on the region.
Ports start getting busy from February on.
Andre Pessoa, a partner at agribusiness consultancy Agroconsult, said the trade war has no influence on shipments now, though China's advance buying movement last year suggests Chinese importers were "preparing for a possible Trump victory."
Brazil will reap more than 170 million tons of soy this year, the highest ever.
"I think the influence of the trade war is very small for now," said Luiz Fernando Roque, an analyst at Hedgepoint Global, adding Chinese demand for Brazil's soy has been on the rise for years.
Even so, Roque expects Brazil's soy shipments to China to break last year's record for the first quarter, totaling around 18 million tons in the period, some 2 million tons higher than in the previous year. He added the effects of the trade war tend to be more intense in the second half of the year, when the U.S. generally sells more soy to China.
In January and February, China received 79% of Brazilian soybean exports, compared to 75% in the same period last year, grain exporters' lobby Anec said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Saskatchewan premier to go to China in bid to end canola tariffs
OTTAWA, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Scott Moe, premier of the major grain-growing Canadian province of Saskatchewan, said on Thursday he will travel to China soon for talks to persuade Beijing to drop new tariffs on canola. China hit Canadian canola seed imports with preliminary 75.8% duties last week following an anti-dumping investigation, escalating a year-long trade dispute. China is by far Canada's biggest canola seed market. Canadian Federal Agriculture Minister Heath MacDonald also pledged support for farmers and the industry, which says it employs 200,000 people and produces C$43 billion in economic value. "We're working diligently alongside them," MacDonald said in a phone interview after the meeting ended. Canada, the world's largest exporter of canola, shipped almost C$5 billion ($3.63 billion) of canola products to China in 2024, about 80% of which was seed. The steep duties on canola seed, if they remain in place, would likely all but end those Chinese imports. China objected when Canada imposed 100% tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles a year ago, and launched an anti-dumping investigation into canola seed shortly thereafter. In February, it imposed a tariff on Canadian canola oil and meal, as well as a number of other agricultural products. This month's addition of canola seed to China's tariff targets came shortly after Canada imposed tariffs on steel in July, which also upset Beijing. "Myself will be in China in the next couple of weeks with potentially another opportunity for engagement before the end of the calendar year," Moe told a news conference after a meeting with industry officials and MacDonald. Moe also reiterated a call for federal aid for the industry. MacDonald said it was too early to decide what help farmers might need, but "it could be there some day" if the dispute drags on. He added that it was difficult to assess all of China's motives in the dispute. "You're dealing with a partner that you're not 100% sure all of the time what their prerogatives are. Are they just political, or is it something else?" MacDonald said. ($1 = 1.3905 Canadian dollars)
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US immediately pausing issuance of worker visas for commercial truck drivers, Rubio says
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday that the United States was immediately pausing the issuance of all worker visas for commercial truck drivers. "The increasing number of foreign drivers operating large tractor-trailer trucks on U.S. roads is endangering American lives and undercutting the livelihoods of American truckers," Rubio said in a post on X.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Can investors buy in to Big Law? Burford Capital bets on it
Aug 21 (Reuters) - (Billable Hours is Reuters' weekly report on lawyers and money. Please send tips or suggestions to opens new tab.) What would it take for outside investors to own a stake in a major U.S. law firm's business? It's a question that's gaining new urgency, after litigation finance giant Burford Capital (BURF.L), opens new tab revealed it is in talks to take such a step. Publicly traded Burford is already among the largest third-party backers of individual lawsuits or litigation portfolios, which it funds in return for a share of potential settlements or judgments. Now, according to Burford chief development officer Travis Lenkner, it is in "meaningful discussions" with U.S. firms to partner with them more directly. Burford is exploring two paths, Lenkner said: Investing in firms through Arizona's alternative business structure (ABS) program and backing firms via managed service organizations (MSOs), a model that legal ethics experts and deal advisors said has been gaining traction. "This is law firms seeing what's happening in other jurisdictions, in other professions, and responding to the competitive challenges in their own market, and looking for a solution to the otherwise inefficiency of the partnership structure," Lenkner said. He said Burford has fielded interest from firms of different sizes and expects to deploy capital "relatively soon," though he did not name specific firms or provide a timeline for its U.S. plans. Outside the United States, Burford in 2020 acquired a 32% stake in a U.K.-based litigation firm. Ethical rules in nearly every U.S. state prohibit non-lawyers from owning U.S. law firms or receiving a percentage of their fees. Arizona in 2020 became the first U.S. state to implement a workaround, creating an ABS program to allow co-ownership with court approval. Earlier this year, KPMG became the first of the Big Four accounting firms to win approval from Arizona's Supreme Court to launch a law firm in the state. Under a managed service organization model, a law firm's back-office operations—billing, IT, marketing—are spun off into a separate MSO entity. That entity, funded by outside investors, provides services to the law firm for a fee. The MSO doesn't share in the firm's profits, sidestepping the provisions against non-lawyers owning law firms or receiving a cut of legal fees. "It has the promise of modernizing the practice of law in a really material way,' said Trisha Rich, a partner at Holland & Knight who is advising both law firms and investors on MSOs. Rich said such arrangements can help lawyers shift time from administrative tasks to their practices. She said she's currently working on 10 such transactions and has closed others, though she declined to name clients. Lucian Pera, a partner at Adams & Reese and legal ethics expert who has advised on both MSOs and ABS arrangements, said interest in MSOs is 'exploding.' While most deals involve a single MSO serving a single firm, there's room for other structures, he added. Despite the appeal, MSOs face constraints. Existing ethics rules mean an MSO could not charge law firms a percentage of their revenue or profits as a fee, said Paul Haskel, a Crowell & Moring partner. Lawyers also can't sign non-compete agreements, Rich said, meaning investors must accept that key talent can walk away at any time. While not specific to MSOs, some attorneys have balked at efforts to expand the financial stakes of non-lawyers in the legal profession. Programs like Arizona's have stalled or been rejected in California and other states after critics warned that client interests could be harmed by the influence of investors or corporations that are not bound by attorney ethics rules. Ethics aside, some experts said law firm partners might resist an arrangement like an MSO for business reasons. Bruce MacEwen and Janet Stanton of law firm consultancy Adam Smith Esq predicted "the great majority will reject the notion of an MSO for their firm for (misplaced) fear of its diluting their control of the law firm as a business." "We see no reason an MSO interest would taint or dilute zealous client representation," they said in an email, since the MSO would not dictate management of the firm. These structures have been used in other professions, such as healthcare and public accounting, Burford's Lenkner said. He said law practice traditionally didn't require significant upfront investment, but that has changed with the pace of technological change and heightened competition for talent. 'It's not clear why law has been left for last, but it is clear why firms are now realizing the need for these structures,' Lenkner said. – The Justice Department's bankruptcy watchdog has asked a federal judge to set a trial date in its case challenging legal fees awarded to law firm Jackson Walker by a former bankruptcy judge David Jones, whose undisclosed romantic relationship with one of the firm's partners sparked an ethics scandal and cast uncertainty over the firm's fees in dozens of cases. The Office of the U.S. Trustee's request was included in a Friday filing in opposition to an individual settlement reached by Jackson Walker with a bankruptcy client whose case was overseen by Jones. The U.S. Trustee said the proposed settlement with Seadrill Partners would "prematurely and improperly short circuit" its effort to hold the firm accountable. Five similar proposed settlements totaling more than $2.3 million are now pending before U.S. District Judge Alia Moses, who is overseeing a legal effort by the U.S. Trustee to force Jackson Walker to disgorge all of the fees it was awarded by Jones. Instead of weighing those individual deals and others that are in the works, Moses should schedule the matter for trial, the Trustee said. "A full trial is necessary to ensure the Court can consider all evidence and remedies within a single proceeding," the U.S. Trustee said. – A U.S. judge in Alabama this week approved more than $759 million in legal fees and expenses for lawyers at 38 firms who secured a $2.8 billion antitrust settlement with Blue Cross Blue Shield on behalf of a class of health care providers. Chief U.S. District Judge R. David Proctor on Tuesday granted the request for $657.1 million in fees and at least $102 million in expenses as part of the settlement, which resolved claims that hospitals, physicians and other health professionals were underpaid for reimbursements. Read more: US legal jobs are rising again, but gains are mixed Optum picks new fight to kick law firm Motley Rice off opioids case Lawyers face objections to multimillion-dollar fees after no-cash settlement with Schwab
