China absorbs massive Brazilian soy shipments in first quarter
SAO PAULO, March 28 (Reuters) - Brazilian soybean traders are poised to ship record volumes in the first quarter, driven by strong demand from the world's largest importer, China, which is currently involved in a trade war with the U.S., three analysts said, citing shipping data.
Current soy volumes being shipped do not yet reflect the effects of the new trade war, the analysts said. They believe an escalation will direct more Chinese demand to Brazil over time, as was the case in 2018.
Brazilian traders had loaded 22.8 million tons of soybeans onto vessels through March 25, 17.7 million of that going to China, said Eduardo Vanin, an analyst with Agrinvest. He noted both figures "are records" in spite of some logistical bottlenecks and a slow start to Brazil's harvest.
Brazil's first-quarter soy shipments to China reflect advanced purchases for some 33 million tons made by December 2024, when the new crop was not ready and Chinese crushing markets were healthy, Vanin said. This is 7 million tons more than in the previous season at the same time.
Brazilian farmers normally sow soybeans from September and harvest the crop in the first weeks of the new year, depending on the region.
Ports start getting busy from February on.
Andre Pessoa, a partner at agribusiness consultancy Agroconsult, said the trade war has no influence on shipments now, though China's advance buying movement last year suggests Chinese importers were "preparing for a possible Trump victory."
Brazil will reap more than 170 million tons of soy this year, the highest ever.
"I think the influence of the trade war is very small for now," said Luiz Fernando Roque, an analyst at Hedgepoint Global, adding Chinese demand for Brazil's soy has been on the rise for years.
Even so, Roque expects Brazil's soy shipments to China to break last year's record for the first quarter, totaling around 18 million tons in the period, some 2 million tons higher than in the previous year. He added the effects of the trade war tend to be more intense in the second half of the year, when the U.S. generally sells more soy to China.
In January and February, China received 79% of Brazilian soybean exports, compared to 75% in the same period last year, grain exporters' lobby Anec said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Will analysts break their 10-year streak on US soybean acres?
NAPERVILLE, Illinois, June 25 (Reuters) - The U.S. Department of Agriculture next Monday will publish one of its most important surveys of the year, which also happens to be among the more difficult to forecast. But amid all the noise the June acreage report can create, there has been one constant for ten years running: the trade overestimating soybean acres. New-crop Chicago soybean futures last Friday were less than 2 cents per bushel away from inking new yearly highs, though they have since tumbled 5%. Meanwhile, December corn futures notched contract lows on Wednesday, settling 12% off their February high. To boot, the next few weeks are a seasonally heavy period for U.S. corn futures and Corn Belt weather forecasts are looking decent for now. This means that a much larger-than-usual report shock may be needed on Monday for the corn or bean market to consider a change of course. That's not the most likely outcome, but history suggests it's not impossible. The upcoming numbers are not easy to predict. U.S. corn and soybean plantings have landed outside the pre-report range of estimates in four of the last six Junes, though not necessarily in the same years. Soybean acres have come in below the average trade estimate for the last 10 Junes, while corn acres landed above it in seven of the last 10 years, including the latest four. On average, analysts expect U.S. corn plantings at 95.35 million acres in Monday's report, up very slightly from the March figure of 95.326 million. Ten of the 24 estimates pegged corn acres declining from the March survey, interesting given that whisper numbers back in the spring exceeded 96 million acres. The average trade guess reflects the typical lean as June corn acres have been higher than in March in 15 of the last 20 years. The latest two instances where June acres were lower happened in 2019 and 2020, featuring one of the wettest Midwestern springs and then the pandemic. The trend on whether soybean acres rise or fall from March to June is perfectly split over the last two decades. But recently, the bias is for June soybean acres to be smaller than the March ones, having occurred in five of the last six years (not 2020). That makes this year's expectations interesting as analysts peg soybean acres at 83.655 million acres, up slightly from 83.495 million in March. Fourteen of the 24 analysts voted for a larger June bean acreage versus March. The sentiment shift away from corn and toward beans since March likely comes as super wet conditions in eastern areas delayed corn planting, potentially favoring soybeans. But nationally, corn planting was average to faster than average for the entire spring. However, it should be noted that while corn profitability had been significantly better than that of soybeans since last fall, corn prices by themselves were not exactly attractive. This could keep a lid on any corn acreage gains on Monday. The analyst estimate ranges on corn and soybean acres are wider than in the past couple years, reducing but not eliminating the chance of a complete miss. Karen Braun is a market analyst for Reuters. Views expressed above are her own. Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis of everything from swap rates to soybeans. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Labour's new vow to British businesses amid flood of cheap foreign competition
The Government is sending out the message that it will stand out for UK companies in the face of unfair tactics by rivals, including possible quotas on cheap Chinese steel Labour has vowed to "protect" UK firms from cheap and unfair foreign competition. In a marked change of tone from previous governments, it will champion a back British message in its new Trade Strategy. Others see the plan as a bid to further remove trade barriers with the EU, potentially angering Brexit-backing voters. Business and Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds will say: 'We will not sit by idly while cheap imports threaten to undercut UK industry.' Trade Minister Douglas Alexander called it 'pragmatic patriotism'. He added: 'In this changed and challenging world, we will promote what we can and protect what we must to advance the UK's national interest.' Sources insist the pivot is not akin to US President Donald Trump 's protectionist policies. But it is a recognition that UK companies have been at a disadvantage compared to those in many other countries, with the aim of levelling the playing field. Examples could include quotas to prevent the 'dumping' of cheap state-subsidised Chinese steel given a global over-supply and fears for UK producers. Labour has also pledged to cut energy costs for UK manufacturers through its Industrial Strategy, unveiled earlier this week. Shevaun Haviland, director general of the British Chambers of Commerce, says the government can do its part through its huge spending power. She will tell the BCC's annual conference on Thursday, at which Mr Reynolds is due to speak: 'Government must use the power of its purse. It must buy British. We need government to keep its promise to boost British businesses through its infrastructure strategy, and to apply these rules to all areas of government procurement. Ministers say 'trade defences' will be toughened up with new tools and safeguards to 'better protect vital industries from global threats'. As well as trying to combat unfair imports, they will also vow to unlock £5billion worth of opportunities for UK exporters through a new fund. It comes against what the government will say is a backdrop of turbulent economic times, 'resurgent protectionism' elsewhere and unfair trading practices creating 'significant challenges for businesses and industries across the whole of the UK'. Mr Reynolds said: 'The UK is an open trading nation but we must reconcile this with a new geopolitical reality and work in our own national interest . Our Trade Strategy will sharpen our trade defence so we can ensure British businesses are protected from harm, while also relentlessly pursuing every opportunity to sell to more markets under better terms than before.' Prime Minister Keir Starmer, said: 'What works for business, works for Britain. It means more jobs, more opportunities, and more money in people's pockets.' TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said: 'This is an important step forward to a trade agenda with workers' rights and good jobs at its heart - and it represents a marked departure from the Conservative approach of treating trade deals as mere PR exercises. t's right that the government is focusing on removing barriers to trade with our largest trading partner - the EU - on which thousands of quality jobs depend, and it's vital that the government continues to show ambition in its trading reset with the bloc.' Naomi Smith, Chief Executive of Best for Britain, which campaigns for closer trade ties with the EU, said: This plan correctly identifies the importance of restoring frictionless access to reliable EU markets for British farmers, but the gamechanger will be doing the same for all British industries, which independent analysis shows is the best way to significantly boost the UK economy and bring down prices for British consumers.' Alongside the Trade Strategy, the government also published a six-week consultation for views from across the steel supply chain to ensure continued protection for UK steel producers, jobs, and supply chains beyond the expiry of current World Trade Organisation safeguards in June next year.
Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
TRADING DAY Whirlwind fades, calm returns
ORLANDO, Florida, June 25 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist After two days of strong gains in world stocks amid the widespread relief over cooling Middle East tensions, relative stability was the hallmark of trading on Wednesday, with major asset classes moving in much narrower ranges. In my column today I look at U.S. foreign direct investment - was the sharp decline in the first quarter an anomaly, or a warning of what's to come in the brave new tariff world? More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. Today's Key Market Moves Whirlwind fades, calm returns The MSCI All Country index and Nasdaq 100 touched new record highs for a second session, and Asian and emerging market stocks posted solid gains earlier in the day. But the Dow, U.S. small caps and benchmark European indexes all fell. The euro's march higher is taking its toll, and European stocks have underperformed since the brief Israel-Iran war broke out on June 13. The euro on Wednesday rose for a fifth straight day to $1.1665, its highest since October 2021. Sterling hit its highest since February 2022 at $1.3670, and Britain's FTSE 100 slipped to its lowest this month. Bank of England policymakers may be secretly cheering the pound's rally, however, if it helps tame inflation pressures. The latest Citi/YouGov survey of UK consumers' inflation expectations on Wednesday showed that long-term inflation expectations among the British public rose to the highest since September 2022. One sector faring better in Europe on Wednesday, though, was defense, after NATO leaders agreed big increases in defense spending, especially from Europe. U.S. defense stocks have moved in the other direction this week following the Iran-Israel ceasefire. On the policy and macro front, Fed Chair Jerome Powell's second day of congressional testimony passed off without fireworks, although there were sparks in his exchanges with some lawmakers. He reiterated his view that the central bank is right to wait and see what the impact is from tariffs before considering further rate cuts. U.S. foreign investment slump - anomaly or warning? Much of the 'de-dollarization' debate has focused on foreign exposure to U.S. securities like stocks and bonds. But investors shouldn't ignore foreign direct investment flows, the traditionally sticky capital that may also be sending out warning signals. Foreign direct investment typically involves an overseas entity acquiring the assets of a company in another country or increasing its holdings, often via the purchase of machinery, plants or a controlling stake. FDI is therefore considered a longer-term investment compared to portfolio flows, which can be more volatile. U.S. President Donald Trump says he has attracted record foreign investment into the country. Indeed, the White House has a page on its website with a "non-comprehensive running list of new U.S.-based investments" since Trump's second term began. The running total is in the trillions of dollars and includes pledges from several foreign countries. Included are more than $4 trillion in U.S.-bound investments pledged by the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Japan and Saudi Arabia. During Trump's trip to the Middle East last month, he said the U.S. is on track to receive $12-$13 trillion of investments from countries around the globe, which includes "projects mostly announced ... and some to be announced very shortly." These flows may emerge in full, in time. But official figures on Tuesday showed that FDI in the first quarter actually fell to $52.8 billion, the lowest total since the fourth quarter of 2022. That's well below the quarterly averages of the past 10 and 20 years. The Commerce Department figures also showed that the U.S. current account deficit widened to a record $450.2 billion in the quarter, or 6% of U.S. GDP, meaning FDI inflows barely covered 10% of that shortfall. Should the Trump administration be worried? The short answer is probably not, at least not yet. FDI flows are typically far smaller than portfolio flows into equity and fixed income securities, so from the perspective of funding the current account deficit, the drop in FDI is not as pressing a concern. On the other hand, if foreign investors are also buying fewer U.S. securities, capital from elsewhere will be needed to fund that deficit. Additionally, America's balance of payments data in the first quarter was hugely distorted by domestic consumers and businesses front-running Trump's tariffs, loading up on imports before the duties kick in later this year. Trump's bet is that the deficit will shrink this year and beyond as his 'America First' policies spur more "onshoring" from domestic firms as they bring production back home and the weakening dollar helps U.S. manufacturing by making exports more competitive. The subsequent boom will attract investment from companies and governments overseas. In theory. However, these dynamics work both ways. For example, the European Union is by far the largest provider of U.S. FDI, accounting for 45% of the total in 2023, according to Citi. The combination of the continent's German-led fiscal splurge, U.S. tariffs and 'de-dollarization' concerns could easily crimp that flow, perhaps significantly. Another potential risk to U.S.-bound FDI is 'Section 899' - the possible tax of up to 20% on foreigners' U.S. income that could be part of Trump's budget plans. A Tax Foundation report in May found that Section 899 would "hit inbound investment from countries that make up more than 80 percent of the U.S. inbound FDI stock." Industry pushback may water down Section 899, but it remains a cloud on the U.S. investment horizon. The U.S. is the world's biggest recipient of FDI, with a 25% share of global volumes in 2023, up from around 15% before the pandemic, according to Citi. Its economy is the largest in the world, a thriving hub of innovation, pioneering technology, artificial intelligence and money-making potential. That will always attract FDI. Whether it attracts as much in this new environment remains to be seen. What could move markets tomorrow? Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here. Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
