Amid Polarization, Civics Education Enjoys Bipartisan Support, Survey Finds
The increases, while modest, are being driven by Republicans. Greater percentages of GOP voters say they want students to study social safety net programs like welfare and Medicaid. While there's still a partisan divide on such topics, 51% of Republicans support students learning about income inequality, compared to 46% in 2021. Support among Democrats held steady at 87%.
'People are supportive of schools teaching about controversial topics from multiple perspectives,' said Morgan Polikoff, a University of Southern California education professor and co-author of the study, drawn from a sample of 4,200 adults, including almost half with school-age children. 'They don't want teachers to be putting their thumb on the scale in terms of one perspective being better than the other.'
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
The shift comes even as Americans of all political stripes give schools low marks on preparing students to be good citizens, with just 29% offering them an A or B grade.
But the increasing support among Republicans for teaching issues frequently labelled divisive surprised researchers, suggesting that many conservatives don't necessarily want to limit what children learn in school — a frequent criticism lodged by critics on the left. Most red states have either banned or considered legislation outlawing the teaching of what Republicans consider divisive concepts. Critics say the mandates have silenced teachers interested in presenting a full account of American history, including its darker chapters.
Related
The survey also shows Republicans want more attention paid to current events, such as the benefits and challenges of Medicare and Social Security (69%, up from 62% in 2021). The share of Republicans who believe schools should teach about racism also increased, from 54% to 58%.
'Contrary to the conventional wisdom, there are still plenty of educational issues that garner bipartisan support in this polarized era,' said David Houston, an assistant education professor at George Mason University. 'Finding these points of convergence is an important and necessary step toward building broad and durable support for public education in both red and blue communities and from one presidential administration to the next.'
Jonathan Butcher, a senior research fellow at the right-wing Heritage Foundation, said he prefers a 'more conservative approach' to civics that would focus on the Constitution and structures like the electoral college. But he said it's also 'certainly justifiable' for schools to teach students how to interpret the news of the day — like why Democrats held up signs reading 'Save Medicaid' during President Donald Trump's speech to Congress Tuesday night.
'As we teach students about civics, they should understand how Medicaid came to be, what the relationship is between taxpayers and Medicaid,' he said. 'Students should have enough background knowledge and an understanding of how policies have been formed that they can understand what was happening.'
Related
Florida is among the red states that prohibit teachers from discussing topics like institutional prejudice or gender equity. The state's law bans educators from teaching that someone might be 'inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive.'
The law is 'commonly known for restricting instruction,' said Stephen Masyada, director of the Florida Joint Center for Citizenship at the University of Central Florida. But he thinks that characterization ignores that the legislation also requires students to learn about 'the ramifications of prejudice, racism and stereotyping on individual freedoms.'
The state mandates lessons, for example, on the Ocoee Election Day Massacre in 1920, when a white mob killed dozens of Black citizens and ran hundreds more out of town in a violent attempt to keep them from voting.
Many conservatives want schools to address those topics 'with nuance,' Masyada said, and to connect 'the promises of the founding era' to overcoming oppression and bias.
Some current examples of civics education remain too liberal for many Republicans. 'We the People: Civics that Empower All Students,' a training program for teachers in grades four through eight, was among the programs eliminated in the U.S. Department of Education's sweeping cancellations of teacher preparation grants last month. The program equips teachers to focus on topics like the Bill of Rights, but also encourages civic engagement. Some conservatives argue that such projects emphasize liberal causes like abortion rights or climate activism. The department said grantees 'were using taxpayer funds to train teachers and education agencies on divisive ideologies.'
Related
The USC survey shows that the percentages of Republicans saying schools should teach the contributions of women and minorities throughout history — topics that could be construed as promoting diversity, equity and inclusion — were relatively flat or saw a small decline. Among Democrats, however, there were increases.
'Everybody likes civic education, but they like it for different reasons,' said Marcie Taylor-Thoma, director of the Maryland Council for Civic and History and a former social studies coordinator for the state. Democrats, she said, think students should learn about their civil rights and 'critically analyze what's going on in our country.' But Republicans' view of civics is 'very nationalistic' she said.
There's little disagreement, however, over teaching students about the U.S. Constitution. Ninety-three percent of Democrats and 95% of Republicans said it's important for any civics curriculum to cover the rights and principles outlined in the founding document. It's a cause that many chapters of Moms for Liberty, a conservative advocacy group, have taken up in recent years, and a Trump executive order calls for schools to recognize Constitution Day annually on Sept. 17.
There was scant support in the survey for students participating in protests during school hours — only 24% liked the idea — but the largest partisan split was over reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. Forty-four percent of Democrats support that tradition, compared with 84% of Republicans. Debates over requiring students to recite the pledge have erupted in recent years in Maryland and Vermont.
Given the negative attitudes of many respondents toward the role schools play in preparing students for civic life, researchers thought support would be higher for a common political proving ground: student government. But less than three-fourths of respondents favor student participation in school elections, like voting for student council leaders.
That finding was unexpected, said Anna Saavedra, lead author and a research scientist at USC's Center for Applied Research in Education.
'Having a class president is a pretty standard part of most schools,' she said. 'Seeing such low support was a little surprising. It's a way for kids to practice voting, running a platform and participating in a democratic process.'
Polikoff said it's not surprising that there are differences of opinion over activities like requiring community service as part of classwork (73% of Republicans compared with 80% of Democrats) or honoring veterans and military service (92% of Republicans and 78% of Democrats). Local context, he said, will continue to influence how deep teachers can take classroom discussions on potentially controversial topics.
'I don't think that we would expect that the civics curriculum is going to look exactly the same in rural Republican Wisconsin as it's going to look in Oakland Unified [in California],' he said. 'In both places, there is room for diverse perspectives. The reality is, every classroom is purple to at least some extent.'
Some educators, however, still tiptoe around topics in the news.
'It's been a challenge to teach lately,' said Jenny Morgan, a veteran eighth grade U.S. History teacher in the West Salem, Wisconsin, district, which she described as 'very, very Republican.'
She's tried to avoid discussing President Donald Trump's and Elon Musk's makeover of the executive branch, but she did recently teach a lesson on tariffs, which Trump is charging Canada, China and Mexico.
The discussion prompted a recent debate between two students on opposite sides of the political spectrum.
'The Democratic student was trying to explain why tariffs aren't good and talked about how prices are going to go up. The other kid was saying 'Oh no, they won't go up,' ' Morgan said. 'It was just an interesting conversation between the two eighth grade boys. You could tell they were getting current events at home.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
Daily Briefing: Trump calls Putin
Good morning!🙋🏼♀️ I'm Nicole Fallert. Welcome to the Daily Briefing, "Shiny Bug Edition." Trump urged Putin to arrange meeting with Zelenskyy President Donald Trump called Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday to urge him to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the latest effort to end hostilities between the two warring nations. European leaders to Zelenskyy to Trump to Putin: The call capped a day filled with meetings at the White House among leaders of Ukraine, Great Britian, France, Germany, Italy, Finland, NATO and the European Union. Meanwhile, Ukrainian officials said Russia attacked the central city of Kremenchuk with drones overnight. What does fierce Hurricane Erin mean for the rest of the season? Hurricane Erin briefly attained Category 5 status over the weekend as it intensified in the Atlantic. Category 5 hurricanes are the rarest of storms, with only a small fraction of all tropical cyclones reaching that intense wind speed of 157 mph or more. But experts told USA TODAY that Erin's Cat 5 status doesn't affect the forecast for the rest of the season overall. The most recent Colorado State University forecast, released earlier in August, calls for a total of eight hurricanes in 2025, of which three are predicted to be major. Here's how ocean temperatures can contribute to storm strength. More news to know now What's the weather today? Check your local forecast here. Texas Democrats return home Democrats in the Texas House of Representatives returned to Austin on Monday after leaving the state two weeks ago in protest of a Republican plan to redraw congressional maps to help the party gain seats in 2026. The protest temporarily blocked House Republicans from having a quorum to move the redistricting plan forward and drew national attention to President Trump's effort to avoid losing the Republican majority in Congress next year. But the lawmakers laid out conditions for their return to work: Republicans must adjourn a first special session in the state House and California must move forward with a retaliatory plan to redraw its own maps in favor of Democrats. Is America done with clean energy? New wind and solar power installations, and the cheap, clean energy they provide to America, may not survive the Trump administration. Building on public concerns and his own dislike of "ugly," "disgusting" wind turbines and "ridiculous" solar farms, President Donald Trump has issued a blizzard of directives and executive orders limiting new solar and wind projects across the county. In at least one case, the administration yanked back an already-issued permit. Instead, the administration is promoting energy production from oil, natural gas and coal, which the Biden administration had made more expensive through regulations Trump is now dismantling. Meanwhile, power demands are at an all-time high and rising. Today's talkers She went viral during Bama Rush. Now she's stepping away. Nearly four years and more than a million followers after her own rush experience, Kylan Darnell has become the face of 'Rush Tok,' the nickname for the corner of the internet documenting sorority recruitment. But behind the brand deals, designer outfits and elaborate costumes, the process was taking a toll. Over the years, she's figured out ways to manage the pressure. But this year, some of the online negativity she faced crossed the line. In an Aug. 11 video, Darnell shared with her followers that she was taking a break from the recruitment process to focus on her mental health. The has video sparked a wider conversation about the intensity of the rush experience at some schools. Photo of the day: Could that be ... Monday Night Football?! Yes. This is real. Monday Night Football returned last night with the Washington Commanders defeating the Cincinnati Bengals 31-17. USA TODAY Sports analyzed what the game means (in Week 2 of the NFL preseason). Nicole Fallert is a newsletter writer at USA TODAY, sign up for the email here. Want to send Nicole a note? Shoot her an email at NFallert@


Axios
2 minutes ago
- Axios
Joe Jones' endorsement at risk after explosive report
Members of the Cuyahoga County Democratic Party Executive Committee will convene this weekend to reconsider the party's endorsement of Cleveland City Councilman Joe Jones in Ward 1. State of play: The party endorsed Jones' reelection campaign earlier this month. But party chair Dave Brock is calling for a new vote after an investigative report released last week found that Jones threatened to kill a City Hall staffer and violated a no-contact order with another employee. Catch up quick: Jones had already been reprimanded earlier this year for workplace misconduct in 2024 and is barred from participating in council committee meetings through the end of his term. What they're saying: "When members previously voted on August 5th, the information now available in the public report was not before them," Brock said in a news release. "They have the right to evaluate these allegations in relation to their decision to endorse." The other side: In a letter reported by Cleveland Urban News, Jones accused Brock of subverting party bylaws to throw his weight behind Jones' main opponent, state Rep. Juanita Brent, who also serves as the party's vice chair. "If you do this Mr. Chairman, the Democratic Party will become just like the Republicans, showing no regard for the rule of law or history," Jones wrote. Brock responded in a letter, obtained by Axios, that rejects Jones' criticism and argues that "extraordinary circumstances" demanded reconsideration by party members. He said that his decision was consistent with the guidance of the party's legal counsel and that he specifically excluded Brent in all deliberations on the matter. "My decision was made solely in the best interests of the party." How it works: The vote will take place via Zoom at 10am Saturday and will be livestreamed on YouTube. By the numbers: Under the party's rules, Jones must receive at least 60% of members' votes to retain the endorsement.


Vox
3 minutes ago
- Vox
Republicans are making a very simple, unforced mistake with Latino voters
is a correspondent at Vox, where he covers the Democratic Party. He joined Vox in 2022 after reporting on national and international politics for the Atlantic's politics, global, and ideas teams, including the role of Latino voters in the 2020 election. A boy holds a flag a peaceful protest and vigil where six workers were taken by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement on June 18, 2025, in Pasadena, all the talk of a new, lasting multiracial coalition that helped elect Donald Trump, there are clues that this support may be wavering, particularly among Latino voters. Polls show the president's approval rating with this group has plummeted since the last election, and a third of Latinos who voted for him say they are unlikely to back a Republican candidate in the next one. This collapse happened for a few reasons. Latino voters are not only souring on the president generally, but also on his handling of key issues like immigration and the economy — the very topics that boosted his support with them initially. And curiously, this decline in support for the president isn't translating into a surge for Democrats. Instead, many Latino voters express dissatisfaction with both parties. Today, Explained Understand the world with a daily explainer, plus the most compelling stories of the day. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. This shifting dynamic suggests that both parties have been operating on flawed assumptions over the last few years. Democrats made the mistake of treating Latinos as a monolithic group, focusing on social justice issues while failing to address economic concerns that were pushing these voters toward the GOP. Now, Republicans may be poised to make a similar mistake. They have largely viewed these voters as Republicans-in-waiting, banking on a rightward drift that they assume extends to the most extreme parts of the conservative social agenda. This approach risks alienating a large segment of the Latino electorate. Ultimately, both parties are learning a crucial lesson: Demographics aren't destiny, and they need a more nuanced understanding of this diverse and rapidly changing group of voters. The Democrats' shrinking Latino majority Over the last decade, Trump has remade the American electorate with the help of Latino voters. Back in 2016, his highly racialized and polarizing election victory resulted in one of the worst performances with Latino voters in modern history, winning fewer than three in 10 Hispanic and Latino voters, well below average for Republican candidates. But splits began to develop among Latino communities in the US over the next few years. Working class, non-college educated, and male Latinos, as well as those from Florida and the Southwest, began to drift away from Democrats, particularly at the national level. They were more intrigued by Republican pitches centered around the economy, small business growth, and affordability. At the same time, Democrats were hesitant to admit they had an issue with the Latino population, quibbling over messaging and campaign investments while missing the plot. By the time of the 2020 election, Trump had managed to not just recover his party's losses in 2016, but expand on them, shrinking the Democratic advantage with Latinos by nearly 20 points. Democrats, it turns out, misread Latino voters' priorities and beliefs, gradually losing support from the peak they had from 2012 to 2016 (when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton enjoyed 40-point margins). The party largely approached Latinos as 'voters of color,' marginalized minorities who could be mobilized through appeals to identity, immigrant solidarity, and social justice. For some time, this worked, but Latinos weren't behaving like a monolithic group. Instead, Latinos would fracture and become more dissimilar during this time, with various kinds of evangelicals, border residents, naturalized immigrants, and working class Latinos remaining or becoming more conservative as the Democratic Party and its white, college-educated base became more progressive. Particularly on issues like crime, immigration and the border, and gender roles and identity, the liberal positions that Democrats took — or were portrayed to take — were out of step with the views of many conservative and moderate Latinos from 2020 to 2024. In 2021, the Pew Research Center found that the most liberal, educated, and politically engaged Democrats exerted outsized influence on their party. By the 2024 election, this created an opening for Republicans, as Latino voters expressed greater openness to Trump and the GOP's stances on the economy, immigration, and abortion. By then, their votes had begun to follow some of their beliefs. Republican gains came quickly As Democrats stumbled, Republicans stuck to a different approach: treating Latinos as a new kind of white voter. They doubled down on a hawkish and xenophobic immigration message that seemed to resonate with a large minority of Latinos, spoke of the border as an issue of crime and public safety, and talked nonstop about prices and affordability to exploit the lack of trust in Democrats' stewardship of the economy. Republicans sought to make the old Reagan line that, 'Hispanics are conservatives, [but] they just don't know it yet,' come true by hammering home the idea that Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party were too radical and out of touch. This approach worked. Latinos concerned with immigration and the economy shifted to Republicans, and Trump posted a double-digit boost in support among Latinos, shrinking the Democratic advantage another 20 points. Continued Latino support is not a given An array of data suggest that this advantage is looking more short-lived, largely because Republicans aren't taking into account the nuances of Latino voters. The GOP still did not win a majority of Latinos last year — and much of the boost was from disaffected Democrats or more moderate, disengaged Latinos who don't have the same strong ideological leanings as the primarily white MAGA base. Latino voters are rapidly changing, existing as both a racial minority and an assimilating, formerly immigrant generation. The most recent evidence for this divergence comes from two research projects undertaken by the Democratic-aligned Equis Research group. In the spring, they tracked growing dissatisfaction among Latino voters with Trump's handling of the economy, cost of living, and immigration. Even among what Equis calls 'Biden defectors,' those former Democrats who switched to supporting Trump in 2024, a slight majority were beginning to turn on Trump's economic policies. This dynamic extended to immigration, where an overwhelming majority of all Latino voters thought the administration's actions were 'going too far and targeting the types of immigrants who strengthen our nation.' Some 36 percent of Trump-voting Latinos said the same thing, and a majority of Biden defectors, some 64 percent, felt the same way. This suggests some degree of remaining immigrant solidarity among these swingier, evolving segments of the Latino electorate and disapproval over how mass deportations and aggressive anti-immigrant policies will affect law-abiding immigrants and their families. Nearly two-thirds of Latinos in Equis' polling believe that the Trump administration's actions 'will make it difficult for hardworking Latinos to feel safe, by increasing racial profiling and harassing all Latinos regardless of immigration status.' In other words, there is a limit to what various kinds of Latino voters are willing to stomach. The same dynamic is becoming more clear with regards to the economy, where Latino voters, and new Trump voters specifically, are unhappy with the state of the economy. Biden defectors, Equis finds, are net negative on Trump's economic policies: -6 percent of support in May and -8 percent in July. Whether this dynamic not only hurts the GOP but also helps Democrats is unclear. Although many Latino voters still believe Republicans favor the wealthy over the working class, this long-standing sentiment is no longer pushing them toward the Democratic Party. Instead, they increasingly distrust both parties on this question. But together, these signs suggest that the GOP is going too far with their policy and ideological mission in Trump's second term, turning off the new converts they won to their coalition over the last 10 years. Where the parties go from here The two major parties are making errors with Latino voters. Both have to moderate their policy and ideological approaches while bringing more nuance to how they campaign. Latinos do have some things that bind them together, and they are not just like white voters who can ignore discrimination and scapegoating and uprooting of their extended community's lives (as immigration enforcement is showing). At the same time, they need to be talked to with more nuance. Democrats tried to do this in 2024, moderating on immigration, dropping the usage of the term 'Latinx,' and investing in hyper-specific, hyper-local campaigning with various kinds of Mexican Americans, Cuban Americans, Puerto Ricans, and others. But there was only so much campaigning they could do when facing a wave of anti-Biden, anti-incumbent electoral sentiment. Republicans, meanwhile, toned down immigration talk and zeroed in on subgroups of the Latino electorate in battleground states in 2020. They appealed to religious and ideological conservatives — Cuban, South American, and Puerto Rican communities in Florida, as well as border communities in Arizona, Nevada, and Texas. Some of this nuanced campaigning did carry over to 2024, but it focused more on young and male Latinos in general. And 2024 saw a return to a kind of dog-whistle, racialized, and anti-immigrant scapegoating, which helped the anti-incumbent tide.