
New Jersey Is Facing a Possible Transit Strike. Here's What to Know.
Hundreds of thousands of New Jersey commuters may be caught up in the state's first transit strike in more than 40 years as soon as Friday morning.
The engineers who drive New Jersey Transit's commuter trains have threatened to walk out after midnight Thursday if the union that represents them cannot reach an agreement with the agency on a contract that has been under negotiation for many months.
The engineers have said they are seeking parity in pay with engineers at other commuter railroads in the area. The transit agency's chief executive, Kris Kolluri, has repeatedly said that it cannot afford the pay increases the union is demanding.
The two sides met with the National Mediation Board in Washington on Monday in a last-ditch effort to resolve their differences. Mr. Kolluri said the discussion was 'constructive' and that he looked forward to continuing negotiations in good faith.
In the meantime, New Jersey Transit has drawn up a contingency plan. But Mr. Kolluri said that the additional buses it would offer as a substitute in the event of a strike could handle only about 20 percent of the daily train riders.
The agency has asked commuters to make plans to work from home if their presence in the workplace is not essential. Mr. Kolluri has said a strike could last for weeks.
How likely is a strike?
Most threatened transit strikes, like the last one in New Jersey nine years ago, do not materialize.
But the tone of these negotiations has grown harsher as the strike deadline has neared.
Last week, Mr. Kolluri questioned the 'mental health' of Thomas Haas, the general chairman of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, after the union's members overwhelmingly rejected a previous agreement.
Mr. Kolluri and union officials shook hands on a deal that appeared to bridge the impasse more than a month ago. But the union engineers voted it down and sent their negotiator back to the bargaining table.
Mr. Kolluri has refused to increase New Jersey Transit's offer, saying that any extra pay offered to the engineers would have to be paid to all 13 of the agency's other unions.
'This is the deal that was offered, that he shook my hands on, that he negotiated, and now he has to live with his consequences,' Mr. Kolluri said.
Mark Wallace, the national president of the engineers' union, said that Mr. Kolluri was not interested in reaching a deal. 'He's trying to vilify us with the citizens of New Jersey,' Mr. Wallace said.
What are the issues to be resolved?
In most labor negotiations, the two sides disagree on a number of work rules, such as schedules and staffing levels. But this dispute is now just about money.
Mr. Haas said last week that the union had agreed to 95 percent of New Jersey Transit's demands.
'The only sticking point we have are wages,' he said. 'Every other part of this contract is resolved.'
But the gap between the union's pay demands and what the agency is offering is very wide.
Mr. Kolluri said the offer the union voted down in March would have raised the average annual pay of full-time engineers to $172,000 from $135,000. But Mr. Haas said those figures were inflated. The union, he said, would happily accept a contract that raised engineers' annual pay to $173,000.
In essence, New Jersey Transit insists that the 450 engineers represented by the union accept the same contract terms that all of the agency's other unions accepted. Just last week, the agency announced a contract deal with its biggest union, which represents 5,500 employees of its bus network.
But the engineers say they should be paid on a par with the drivers of trains at the region's other commuter railroads, including the Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad. They say those railroads pay their engineers about $10 an hour more than New Jersey Transit pays.
What will happen if there is a strike?
Most commuters do not remember the last transit strike in New Jersey, which happened in 1983 and lasted about three weeks. Another strike loomed in 2016 but was averted a day before it would have begun.
But the contingency plan New Jersey Transit has created is similar to the one used 42 years ago. It involves chartered buses running from four satellite lots around the state to the Port Authority Bus Terminal in Midtown Manhattan or to stations of the PATH train in North Jersey, starting on May 19. There would be no chartered buses on the first day of the strike.
Each bus carries about 100 passengers, compared with as many as 1,000 on a full train, Mr. Kolluri said. The buses will accommodate only about 20 percent of the 70,000 commuters who take trains into the city, he said.
Some displaced commuters are likely to try to switch to existing bus routes operated by New Jersey Transit and private carriers. Others are likely to drive at least part of the way to the city, adding traffic to already congested roads, transportation experts said.
'If the strike does happen, even with a contingency plan in place, this is going to be incredibly disruptive to the region,' said Zoe Baldwin, vice president for state programs at the Regional Plan Association. 'No matter what mode you're on, you're going to have a more difficult commute than usual.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
10 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump on border czar arresting Newsom: ‘I would do it'
Politics Trump on border czar arresting Newsom: 'I would do it' June 9, 2025 | 8:47 PM GMT President Donald Trump on June 9 said he would support the arrest of California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) for obstructing ICE sweeps in Los Angeles.


E&E News
15 minutes ago
- E&E News
Interior revokes Biden-era encouragement of LGBTQ+ Pride participation
New guidance from the Interior Department is discouraging National Park Service employees from participating in LQBTQ+ Pride month activities or posting about them on official social media. In a May 30 memo, the Interior Department's Civil Rights Office revoked guidance from Interior Secretary Deb Haaland last year encouraging bureaus to allow staff to participate ind 'special emphasis months.' The Haaland memo had cleared the way for park rangers to wear their uniforms during Pride parades and other events. She issued the guidance after a top NPS official in May 2024 sent a memo telling staffers that agency policies barred them from attending events in uniform supporting a 'particular issue, position or political party.' Subsequent guidance made clear that included representing NPS at Pride events. Advertisement Acting director of the Office of Civil Rights, Shayan Modarres, eliminated Haaland's guidance in the May 30 memo. The memo also disbanded a committee created during the Obama administration to guide agency participation in 'special emphasis' months, which has included LGBTQ+ Pride month in June. 'The Department of Interior renews its commitment to implement any Special Emphasis Programs in a manner that does not discriminate based on race, sex, color, religion, or national origin in any program,' Modarres wrote in the brief directive. 'This memorandum supersedes all previous Directives on this subject.' The National Park Service did not respond to requests for comment for this story. The new direction from the Trump administration doesn't explicitly discourage Pride participation for park rangers or other Interior employees, but it's been interpreted that way by many park staffers, according to internal emails and messages viewed by POLITICO's E&E News. Some park rangers say the guidance has discouraged them from participating in Pride festivities in their local communities or posting about Pride on their park's social media sites, as they've done in previous years. 'Everyone is extremely on edge,' said one transgender park ranger who was granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the press. 'There's definitely an atmosphere of fear and control.' As with the rest of the federal government, the Trump administration has taken aim at the National Park Service's diversity, equity and inclusion programs. Under directives from the White House, NPS has also begun to change its telling of U.S. history. Earlier this year, the National Park Service heavily edited or eliminated webpages run by the agency that talked about transgender people, after President Donald Trump issued an executive order making it the position of the U.S. government to only acknowledge two genders. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum also recently ordered new signs to go up at national parks encouraging visitors to report 'negative' depictions of U.S. history, a mandate that former park leaders say could pressure park rangers to change depictions of Indigenous, Black and LGBTQ+ history. The Trump administration's efforts have trickled down to other park decisions as well. NPS attempted to close Dupont Circle, a storied gathering point in Washington's gay rights history, during this weekend's WorldPride D.C. parade due to concerns about damage to park facilities, citing a recent executive order from Trump to increase law enforcement in the district. NPS reversed its position following community pushback, only fencing off the park's historic fountain. The new memo on special emphasis months pivots NPS to a potentially more conservative approach, one that discourages park officials from discussing subjects not directly related to their park's history. A June 3 email sent to NPS public information officers on the West Coast shared guidance from Aaron Roth, the Intermountain associate regional regional director for NPS, to limit social media posts and uniformed participation in special emphasis month events. The email noted that additional guidance from leadership, beyond the May 30 memo, is not expected. 'Without more detail, we recommend official/uniformed participation in celebratory activities, including social media posts, to be kept to events that relate closely to your park's specific mission [purpose],' the email states. Additionally, the email states 'There should be no official participation in parades associated with special emphasis months.' Park superintendents are granted discretion on whether a park should participate in an event, the email says, noting also that official participation in parades for national holidays is permitted. At a June 4 all-hands call with the service's communication staffers, employees were told they can continue to use social media to post about special emphasis months, as they have in previous years, according to one NPS staffer who was on that call. But the call has been interpreted slightly differently among NPS staffers. Following that call, a regional interpretations manager sent an email to NPS staffers in the South, explaining that 'monthly messaging themes still exist and are relevant for many parks, but there is no longer a broader mandate to communicate the monthly messaging.' They added: 'We are certainly not prohibited from discussing these topics IF they are directly relevant to our park significance, stories and documents.' The internal communications don't explicitly say the new guidance refers to Pride celebrations, but some staff are interpreting the guidance as directed at LGBTQ+ events because of the timing ahead of the start of Pride month. 'We've been told we can't make posts about quote, unquote, special emphasis months, but they didn't send that email out during Black History Month. So we know it's certainly for Pride Month,' the transgender NPS employee said. 'I'm assuming that marching in Pride parades is going to be a no-go.' Pride participation has been a flashpoint at the park service during both Democratic and Republican administrations. Last year, NPS Deputy Director Frank Lands effectively told park rangers not to march in Pride parades while in uniform, sparking pushback from park staff. Haaland intervened soon after, explicitly directing bureaus to decide when staff can wear their uniforms to special emphasis month events, including those celebrating LGBTQ+ people. Haaland ordered 'Bureau leaders or their designated officials to determine how and when bureaus should participate in these externally organized events. This could include marching units in parades, booths at parades, events etc. This would allow employees to participate in uniform representing their respective bureau.' The Trump administration memo revokes that guidance from Haaland. Jonathan Jarvis, who served as director of the NPS during the Obama administration, said questions about participating in Pride reprise with each change in administration. Jarvis said he strongly supports uniformed park rangers marching in parades 'when the event commemorates some component of American history related to park units such as the Civil Rights movement.' One NPS employee in the District of Columbia region, granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the press, noted that the question of how park rangers can celebrate Pride was 'much more of a kerfuffle' during the Biden administration, after Land's directive went out. Now the Trump administration's approach appears to be more about making life harder for employees of the federal government, that park staffer said, pointing to the administration's aggressive efforts to shrink the workforce. 'It seems honestly like less of an anti-Pride/anti-queer magnifying glass than just another part of the strategy of making employees feel scared and not providing them clear information, and degrading quality of life for federal employees,' the employee said. The staffer said the ultimate impact is a chilling effect on anyone wanting to participate in Pride events, celebrate it or post about it in official channels. 'It's a lot out of fear,' they said. 'There's mixed messages going around.'


E&E News
15 minutes ago
- E&E News
Conservation group hires new chief operating officer
The conservation group Defenders of Wildlife has hired Alicia Washkevich as its new chief operating officer, the organization announced Monday. Washkevich joins the group from her most recent position as chief operating officer at the group New Politics and after spending more than a decade at the Sierra Club, including serving as that organization's deputy chief operating officer. At Defenders, Washkevich will oversee the group's operations and help 'drive the strategic direction of the organization's mission to protect, preserve and restore imperiled wildlife and their habitats,' the conservation group said in a statement. Advertisement Andrew Bowman, Defenders' president and CEO, welcomed Washkevich's 'wealth of cross-sector operational and leadership experience' and said he expects hers to be a 'critical voice in the organization as we plan for the future.'