
Indian national found guilty in US for faking abuse claim to get immigration benefit
An Indian national has been convicted in the US for submitting a fraudulent immigration application under the Violence Against Women Act (
VAWA
), following an investigation that involved assistance from the
US Citizenship and Immigration Services
(
USCIS
).
#Operation Sindoor
India responds to Pak's ceasefire violation; All that happened
India-Pakistan ceasefire reactions: Who said what
Punjab's hopes for normalcy dimmed by fresh violations
Nasir Hussain
was found guilty and sentenced to time already served for making a false material statement in support of an I-360 VAWA self-petition. The development was announced by the US Attorney's Office in Vermont.
Court documents and trial evidence showed that Hussain traveled to Connecticut in October 2021 to enter a marriage with a US citizen for immigration purposes. He never met the woman before or after the wedding.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
0:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
default
, selected
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
To create the appearance of a real marriage, Hussain purchased insurance policies, magazine subscriptions, and ordered products in his wife's name, all addressed to his residence in Orlando, Florida. He later visited a medical clinic and falsely claimed that he had been abused by his wife. These claims, along with the manufactured evidence, were submitted to USCIS to support his VAWA petition.
(Join our
ETNRI WhatsApp channel
for all the latest updates)
Testimonies presented in court, including those from the woman and former roommates, confirmed that the woman never lived in Florida. This directly contradicted Hussain's claims that he had been abused while living with her in Orlando.
Live Events
If his application had been accepted, Hussain could have received a VAWA visa and potentially gained lawful permanent residency in the US.
Hussain has been in federal custody since May 2023 in connection with a separate wire fraud conspiracy case. Although a jury found him guilty in October 2024, the court later overturned the verdict. The US government has filed an appeal, which is currently pending.
The investigation was led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation with support from USCIS.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Massajog sarpanch case: Court schedules June 17 for hearing on Valmik Karad's plea challenging invoking of MCOCA against him
Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: The special MCOCA court in Beed district has scheduled June 17 for deciding on the plea of Valmik Karad, the key accused in the murder of sarpanch Santosh Deshmukh, challenging the invoking of sections of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against him. After attending the hearing on Tuesday morning, special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam , who is representing the state in this case, said, "Valmik Karad's lawyers have moved an application challenging the applicability of MCOCA against him. The court has scheduled June 17 as the next date for hearing the arguments on this application. Also, on behalf of the state, we moved an application for confiscating all the movable and immovable assets belonging to Valmik Karad. The lawyers representing him have submitted replies regarding our application before the court today. The argument on our application, too, will be taken up on the next date of hearing." Nikam urged the court to frame charges in the case, stating that there was sufficient evidence against the accused. One of the key issues under consideration is whether the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) can be applied to prime accused Karad. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The court is expected to deliver its decision on the applicability of MCOCA on June 17 after hearing arguments from both prosecution and defence. In a parallel development, the prosecution has moved an application seeking seizure of Karad's movable and immovable properties. Karad's lawyers submitted their response on the matter, which has been scheduled for hearing on June 17. Karad filed a discharge application seeking exemption from charges under MCOCA. His defence team requested the court to prioritise the hearing on the application. The prosecution did not oppose the request, and the court listed the matter for hearing on June 17. Nikam confirmed that Karad is the only accused who filed such a discharge plea. Defence lawyers Vikas Khade and Mohan Yadav told newsprsons after the hearing that the prosecution was yet to share the digital evidence with them. The prosecution, however, informed the court that the electronic evidence would be submitted in a sealed format, after which discussions could be held. While the hearing on the discharge plea was expected on Tuesday, it did not take place. Instead, arguments were heard on several procedural and ancillary applications. The court observed that before addressing the discharge plea, other pending applications should be disposed of. Khade noted that the hearing lasted for nearly 50 minutes. He added that the prosecution has filed applications related to property seizure, and the court has scheduled a consolidated hearing on all pending matters, including the discharge plea and digital evidence, for June 17. Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar: The special MCOCA court in Beed district has scheduled June 17 for deciding on the plea of Valmik Karad, the key accused in the murder of sarpanch Santosh Deshmukh, challenging the invoking of sections of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against him. After attending the hearing on Tuesday morning, special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam, who is representing the state in this case, said, "Valmik Karad's lawyers have moved an application challenging the applicability of MCOCA against him. The court has scheduled June 17 as the next date for hearing the arguments on this application. Also, on behalf of the state, we moved an application for confiscating all the movable and immovable assets belonging to Valmik Karad. The lawyers representing him have submitted replies regarding our application before the court today. The argument on our application, too, will be taken up on the next date of hearing." Nikam urged the court to frame charges in the case, stating that there was sufficient evidence against the accused. One of the key issues under consideration is whether the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) can be applied to prime accused Karad. The court is expected to deliver its decision on the applicability of MCOCA on June 17 after hearing arguments from both prosecution and defence. In a parallel development, the prosecution has moved an application seeking seizure of Karad's movable and immovable properties. Karad's lawyers submitted their response on the matter, which has been scheduled for hearing on June 17. Karad filed a discharge application seeking exemption from charges under MCOCA. His defence team requested the court to prioritise the hearing on the application. The prosecution did not oppose the request, and the court listed the matter for hearing on June 17. Nikam confirmed that Karad is the only accused who filed such a discharge plea. Defence lawyers Vikas Khade and Mohan Yadav told newsprsons after the hearing that the prosecution was yet to share the digital evidence with them. The prosecution, however, informed the court that the electronic evidence would be submitted in a sealed format, after which discussions could be held. While the hearing on the discharge plea was expected on Tuesday, it did not take place. Instead, arguments were heard on several procedural and ancillary applications. The court observed that before addressing the discharge plea, other pending applications should be disposed of. Khade noted that the hearing lasted for nearly 50 minutes. He added that the prosecution has filed applications related to property seizure, and the court has scheduled a consolidated hearing on all pending matters, including the discharge plea and digital evidence, for June 17.


Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Pak wanted India on its knees in 48 hrs, folded up in 8 hrs to talk: CDS
Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan said Tuesday that Pakistan wanted to bring India 'to its knees in 48 hours' with Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos on May 10, but the attacks 'folded up in 8 hours' after which Pakistan 'picked up the telephone and said they wanted to talk'. He made these remarks while delivering a lecture on 'Future Wars and Warfare' at the Savitribai Phule Pune University. Detailing the Pakistani response to Operation Sindoor, General Chauhan said Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos was 'launched by Pakistan on 10th of May at about 1 am' and 'its aim was to get India down to its knees in 48 hours. Multiple attacks were launched'. He said although India had actually hit only terror targets, the Pakistanis 'escalated this conflict… into the military domain'. Stating that armed forces are the most rational actors in conflict situations, he explained why Pakistan called India. 'I think that the rationale behind this… realisation coming in… stemmed from two facts. One is that they must have assumed that if they continued this mode, they are likely to lose much more. Hence, they picked up the telephone. And second, since they had struck us at multiple fronts, they still did not have the benefit of understanding what they had struck. So, they must have thought they must have struck and, hence, they would like to talk now. And if they don't, they will tend to lose more.' Later, after a couple of days, Pakistan must have realised that their attacks had failed, he said. 'So, these were the two factors which would have made them think. But it's only after, say, one or two days, they would have realised that all… the kind of attacks they had launched against us were not fortified and they had all kind of failed.' Responding to a student's question on the losses faced by Pakistan during the hostilities, General Chauhan said, 'When I was asked about losses on our side, I said these are not important. The results and how you act are important. So it would not be very correct to talk about the losses, numbers etc.' 'You see, in a match, suppose you go into a football match and you win 3-2… that's an even-sided match. But suppose you go into a cricket Test match and win by an innings, then there is no question of how many wickets and how many balls and how many players. It's an innings (victory),' he said. 'But since there is always this inquisitiveness as to the results of your strikes… At some point of time, we will take out this particular data, and share it, to answer the queries and inquisitiveness of people… who keep asking 'How many aircraft did we destroy? How many radars did we destroy?' We will make a rough assessment of that and come out with that shortly,' he said. He said the government's objective behind Operation Sindoor was not retribution but to draw the limits of tolerance with Pakistan. 'Let me talk about reason… Operation Sindoor, as far as the government is concerned, was not about retribution. I think it was about drawing these limits of tolerance… This state-sponsored terrorism from Pakistan had to stop, and Pakistan should not be able to hold India hostage to terror activities.' Another point made by the operation was that India was not going to live under the shadow of terror and nuclear blackmail, he said. He also spoke about the emotions of India's citizens. 'The emotion… among the people of India was revenge and retribution… and to get the perpetrators to justice. That I think was playing in everyone's mind, that is the kind of emotion and public sentiment that was happening. And at the end of it, there was probably some sort of satisfaction, (and also) anxiety. Anxiety during the operation.' On the risks involved during military operations, he said, 'You can't be 100 per cent prepared for every kind of contingency and you can't have 100 per cent of the information about that. So you are always groping a bit in the dark when you are carrying out military operations. In every military operation, there is an element of risk involved. The only thing is that it should be a calculated kind of a risk.' 'In a war, even if there are setbacks, we have to adapt, understand what went wrong and go out again.' He said as an organisation, one must have an offensive spirit. 'That's why I said in a couple of my interviews that losses are not important, the outcome is,' he said. He reiterated that Operation Sindoor was not over and that there was only temporary cessation of operations. Soham is a Correspondent with the Indian Express in Pune. A journalism graduate, he was a fact-checker before joining the Express. Soham currently covers education and is also interested in civic issues, health, human rights, and politics. ... Read More


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pakistan: Another top Jaish ultra dies a mysterious death
NEW DELHI: Maulana Abdul Aziz Esar, a top Jaish-e-Muhammed commander and a fierce proponent of the doctrine of Ghazwa-e-Hind, was found dead under mysterious circumstances in Pakistan's Bahawalpur on June 2. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now His burial was held at the markaz of JeM headquarters in Bahawalpur, indicating the place he held in the terror outfit. The markazi was among the hardest hit targets during . Over a dozen significant terror strikes in India, including 2019 , were planned here. The messages floated by the Jaish cadre on Telegram claimed Abdul suffered a sudden heart attack. However, there was no official word on the cause of death from Pakistan police. A resident of Ashrafwala in Pakistan's Punjab province, Abdul frequently threatened to break India into pieces and spewed venom against 'kafirs'. Just last month at a rally, he had threatened to snatch Kashmir from India. Enraged since Operation Sindoor, he was spotted on a video threatening infiltration of terrorists into India. "Mujahideen are coming, if you can handle it, then handle it, govt of Hindustan... otherwise, Mujahideen will snatch Kashmir from your jaws... Mujahideen have set out," said the rabble rouser maulana. At a recent rally, he threatened that India would meet the fate of Soviet Union and called upon Mujahideen to keep the flames of 'Ghazwa-e-Hind' burning.