logo
Bougainville Takes The Initiative In Independence Mediation

Bougainville Takes The Initiative In Independence Mediation

Scoop22-04-2025

Article – RNZ
While Papua New Guinea and Bougainville continue the mediation process over the region's desire for independence, Bougainville's leaders are separately laying down markers of what they are expecting. Don Wiseman, RNZ Pacific Senior Journalist
In recent weeks, Bougainville has taken the initiative, boldly stating that it expects to be independent by 1 September 2027.
It also expects the PNG parliament to quickly ratify the 2019 referendum, in which an overwhelming majority of Bougainvilleans supported independence.
In a third move, it established a Constitution Commission and included it within the region's autonomous parliament.
To learn more, RNZ Pacific spoke with Australian National University academic Thiago Oppermann, who has spent many years in both Bougainville and PNG.
(The transcript has been edited for brevity and clarity.)
Don Wiseman: We've had five-and-a-half years since the Bougainville referendum, but very suddenly in the last couple of months, it would seem that Bougainville is picking up pace and trying to really make some progress with this march towards independence, as they see it. Are they overplaying their hand?
Thiago Oppermann: I do not believe that they are overplaying their hand. I think that the impression that is apparent of a sudden flurry of activity, arises partly because for the first two years after the referendum, there was a very slow pace.
One of the shortcomings of the Bougainville Peace Agreement (BPA) was that it did not set out a very clear post-referendum path. That part of the process was not as well designed as the parts leading to the referendum, and that left a great deal of uncertainty as to how to structure negotiations, how things should be conducted, and quite substantial differences in the views of the Papua New Guinean government and the ABG (Autonomous Bougainville Government), as to how the referendum result would be processed further.
For instance, how it would it need to be tabled in parliament, what kind of vote would be required for it, would a negotiation between the parties lead to an agreement that then is presented to the parliament, and how would that negotiation work? All these areas, they were not prescriptive, in the BPA.
That led to a period of a good two years in which there was very slow process and then attempts to get some some movement. I would say that in that period, the views of the Bougainvilleans and the Papua New Guineans became quite entrenched in quite different camps, and something I think would have to give eventually.
Why the Bougainvilleans have moved towards this point now, I think that it bears pointing out that there has been a long process that has been unfolding, for more than two years now, of beginning the organic process of developing a Bougainvillean constitutional process with this constitutional development committees across the island doing a lot of work, and that has now borne fruit, is how I would describe it.
It happens at a point where the process has been unblocked by the appointment of Sir Jerry Mataparae, which I think sets a new vigour into the process. It looks now like it's heading towards some form of outcome. And that being the case, the Bougainvilleans have made their position quite clear.
DW: Well, Bougainville, in fact, is saying it will be independent by 1st September 2027. How likely do you think that is?
TO: I think there's a question that comes before that. When Bougainville says that they will be independent by such a date, what we need to first consider is that the process of mediation is still unfolding.
I think that the first thing to consider is, what would that independence look like, and what scope is there within the mediation for finding some compromise that still suits Papua New Guinea. I think that there's a much greater range of outcomes than people realise within this sort of umbrella of independence, the Bougainvilleans themselves, have moved to a position of understanding independence in much more nuanced terms than previously.
You might imagine that in the aftermath of this fairly brutal and bitter civil conflict, the idea of independence at that time was quite a radical cut towards 'full bruk loose' as they say.
But the reality is that for many post colonial and new states since World War Two, there are many different kinds of independence and the degree to which there remains a kind of attachment with or relationship with the so called parent colonial country is variable, I should add.
I do not want to digress too much, but this concept of the parent colonial country is something that I heard quite a lot of when I was studying the referendum itself. Many people would say that the relationship that they had to Papua New Guinea was not one of enmity or of like running away, it was more a question of there being a parent and Bougainville having now grown up to the point where the child, Bougainville, is ready to go off and set up its own house.
Many people thought of it in those terms. Now I think that in concrete terms that can be articulated in many different ways when we think about international law and the status of different sovereign nations around the world.
DW: If we can just look at some of the possibilities in terms of the way in which this independence might be interpreted. My understanding is, for Bougainville it's vital that they have a degree of sovereignty that will allow them to join organisations like the United Nations, but they're not necessarily looking to be fully independent of PNG.
TO: Yes, I think that there would be like a process underway in Bougainville for understanding what that would look like.
There are certainly people who would have a view that is still more firmly towards full independence. And there will be others who understand some type of free association arrangements or something that still retains a closer relationship with Papua New Guinea.
I do not think many people have illusions that Bougainville could, for instance, suddenly break loose of the very deep economic connections it has with Papua New Guinea, not only those of government funding, but the commercial connections which are very, very deep. So suddenly making that disappear is not something people believe it's possible.
But there are many other options that are on the table. I think what Bougainville is doing by having the announcement of the Independence Day is setting for Papua New Guinea saying, like, 'here is the terms of the debate that we are prepared to consider'. But within that there is still a great deal of giving and taking.
DW: Now within the parliament in PNG, I think Bougainville has felt for some time that there hasn't been a great deal of understanding of what Bougainville has been through, or what it is Bougainville is trying to achieve. There's a very different lineup of MPs to what they were at the turn of the century when the Bougainville Peace Agreement was finalised. So what are they thinking, the MPs from other parts of the country? Are they going to be supportive, or are they just thinking about the impact on their own patch?
TO: I am not entirely sure what the MPs think, and they are a very diverse bunch of people. The sort of concern I think that many have, certainly more senior ones, that they do not want to be the people in charge when this large chunk of the country secedes.
I think that is something that is important, and we do not want to be patronising the Papua New Guineans have a great deal of national pride, and it is not an event of celebration to see what is going on.
For many, it is quite a tragic chain of events. I am not entirely sure what the bulk of MPs believes about this. We have conducted some research, which is non randomised, but it is quite large scale, probing attitudes towards Bougainvillean independence in 2022, around the time of the election.
What we found, which is quite surprising, is that whilst of course, Bougainville has the highest support for independence of any place in Papua New Guinea, there are substantial numbers of people outside Bougainville that are sympathetic to Bougainvillean independence or sympathetic towards implementing the referendum.
I think that would be the wording, I would choose, quite large numbers of people. So, as well as, many people who are very much undecided on the issues. From a Papua New Guinean perspective, the views are much more subtle than you might think are the case. By comparison, if you did a survey in Madrid of how many people support Catalan independence, you would not see figures similar to the ones that we find for Papua New Guinea.
DW: Bougainville is due to go to elections later this year. The ABG has stated that it wants this matter sorted, I think, at the time that the election writs are issued sometime in June. Will it be able to do this do you think?
TO: It's always difficult to predict anything, especially the future. That goes double in Papua New Guinea and Bougainville. I think the reality is that the nature of negotiations here and in Bougainville, there's a great deal of personal connections and toing and froing that will be taking place.
It is very hard to fit that onto a clear timeline. I would describe that as perhaps aspirational, but it would be, it would be good. Whether this is, you know, a question of electoral politics within Bougainville, I think there would be, like, a more or less unanimous view in Bougainville that this needs to move forward as soon as possible. But I don't know that a timeline is realistic.
The concerns that I would have about this, Don, would be not just about sort of questions of capacity and what happens in the negotiations in Bougainville, but we also need to think about what is happening in Papua New Guinea, and this goes for the entire process.
But here, in this case, PNG has its hands full with many other issues as well. There is a set of like LLG [Local Level Government] elections about to happen, so there are a great deal of things for the government to attend to. I wonder how viable it is to come up with a solution in a short time, but they are certainly capable of surprising everybody.
DW: The Prime Minister, James Marape, has said on a number of occasions that Bougainville is not economically ready or it hasn't got the security situation under control. And my understanding is that when this was raised at the last meeting, there was quite a lot of giggling going on, because people were comparing what's happened in Bougainville with what's happening around the rest of the country, including in Southern Highlanbds, the province of Mr Marape.
TO: I think you know for me when I think about this, because I have worked with Bougainvilleans for a long time, and have worked with Papua New Guineans for a long time as well. The sense that I have is really one of quite sadness and a great missed opportunity.
Because if we wind the clock back to 1975, Bougainville declared independence, trying to pre-empt [the establishment of] Papua New Guinea. And that set in train a set of events that drastically reformed the Papua New Guinean Political Constitution. Many of the sort of characteristic institutions we see now in Papua New Guinea, such as provinces, came about partly because of that.
That crisis, that first independence crisis, the first secession crisis, was resolved through deep changes to Papua New Guinea and to Bougainville, in which the country was able to grow and move forward.
What we see now, though, is this sort of view that Bougainville problems must all be solved in Bougainville, but in fact, many of the problems that are said to be Bougainville problems are Papua New Guinea problems, and that would include issues such as the economic difficulties that Bougainville finds itself in.
I mean, there are many ironies with this kind of criticism that Bougainville is not economically viable. One of them being that when Papua New Guinea became independent, it was largely dependent on Bougainville at that time. So Bougainvilleans are aware of this, and don't really welcome that kind of idea.
But I think that more deeply there were some really important lessons I believe that could have been learned from the peace process that might have been very useful in other areas of Papua New Guinea, and because Bougainville has been kind of seen as this place apart, virtually as a foreign nation, those lessons have not, unfortunately, filtered back to Papua New Guinea in a way that might have been very helpful for everybody.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Collins coy over possible Aukus pact review
Collins coy over possible Aukus pact review

Otago Daily Times

time3 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Collins coy over possible Aukus pact review

Defence Minister Judith Collins. Photo: RNZ The Defence Minister says there's no reason for New Zealand to comment on reports the Pentagon is reviewing the Aukus defence alliance. A US defence official told Reuters the review was part of ensuring the security pact was aligned with US President Donald Trump's America First agenda. The strategic pact between the US, UK and Australia had long been a talking point in New Zealand, with consecutive governments pondering whether to join parts of the alliance. Aukus was formed in 2021 to address shared worries about China's growing power. Under the pact, Australia would be armed with nuclear submarines at a cost of $A350 billion ($NZ377 billion). In a statement, Defence Minister Judith Collins said the US review was about Aukus Pillar One, which New Zealand had never been a part of. New Zealand has had ongoing discussions about joining Pillar Two of the alliance, but any decisions on whether to join Pillar Two would be a matter for Cabinet, Collins said. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has not received any reports or advice on what the Trump administration reviewing the Aukus security pact might mean for New Zealand. Luxon told RNZ he was not concerned the review could spell the end for Pillar Two "It's been left very open-ended. We're exploring Pillar Two - it's been to be honest quite slow going. "We are yet to be invited to partipate in Pillar Two." Luxon said the review was for Australia, the US, and the UK to work through. Australia was last week told by US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to significantly boost its defence spending. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would not be dictated to on defence spending. He he noted Australia's defence spending was already set to increase from 2 percent to 2.3 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over the next eight years. Collins has denied any allies have put pressure on the government to up defence spending. Foreign Minister Winston Peters previously said New Zealand's trading partners would judge us if we did not "step up" and play our role by increasing defence spending.

Defence Force's Waiōuru housing project stalls after Ngāti Rangi deal falls over
Defence Force's Waiōuru housing project stalls after Ngāti Rangi deal falls over

NZ Herald

time7 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Defence Force's Waiōuru housing project stalls after Ngāti Rangi deal falls over

But on Wednesday the Government said: 'Discussions regarding Waiōuru are ongoing and progressing well, as part of a wider Treaty Settlement.' Asked what the talks were about, Associate Defence Minister Chris Penk's office said: 'We don't have anything further to add outside of our existing statements currently.' The Waiōuru Military Camp pictured in 2021. Photo / Bevan Conley NZDF did not address what the new discussions were about either. It did not respond when asked what had happened to the project and any contract. RNZ understands its deal with Ngāti Rangi, that underpinned the housing project, fell over at the last minute. Ngāti Rangi is hosting the National Hautapu Ceremony for Matariki next week at Tirorangi Marae. The iwi referred RNZ's questions to the NZDF. It said in 2021: 'Housing is on the top of our priority list. As part of our settlement we have an arrangement with the New Zealand Defence Force out at Waiōuru to build 50 homes. That project we're still working on with NZDF.' Associate Defence Minister Chris Penk. Photo / RNZ, Samuel Rillstone Penk told Cabinet colleagues last year NZDF's widespread 'dilapidated' housing was harming military output. Defence has vacancy rates of about 30% and '10% of personnel leave the NZDF predominantly due to the unsatisfactory working, training and living environments', he said. Budget 2025 signalled the start of $9 billion in promised new defence spending by 2029, containing about $3b for 15 projects, mostly to do with weapons or IT systems. However, the Budget provided just a fraction over the next four years to address the billion-dollar backlog in maintenance and renewals that is outstanding; past Cabinet papers gave this figure, and NZDF confirmed on Tuesday its spending on defence regeneration was half a billion dollars behind what the 2019 plan demanded. In August 2024, Penk expressed shock after seeing photos of black mould in Waiōuru families' homes. 'No family should have to live like that, let alone the families of those who sacrifice so much to serve their country,' he said. The temperature low in Waiōuru over the past 30 days has been under 1C on 17 days. Some housing 'poses potential health risks and can cause housing-related stress to ... personnel and their families', and was linked to health conditions like asthma, a Cabinet minute in 2023 said. The 50-house project was announced as settled a year ago, under the Te Tiriti settlement with Ngāti Rangi seven years ago. Ruapehu District Mayor Weston Kirton and his council celebrated the deal 11 months ago. 'I don't have any detail, only to say that it seems to be stalled in some shape or form,' Kirton told RNZ on Wednesday. No building appeared to have taken place – a playground and community park were in the tender, too – and the council was not privy to why, or to Defence talks with iwi. 'The minister should give us an update on what progress there is on the Defence presence in the Waiōuru community,' Kirton said. NZDF had earlier threatened to shut up shop entirely at the central North Island settlement and head south, so he had been delighted when the settlement secured the army's training area and the housing deal began to firm up. 'It was all go,' Kirton told RNZ. 'They were very excited, they wanted to retain the training area at Waiōuru. 'We were excited, the fact that they were going to put resources back into Waiōuru.' Ruapehu Mayor Weston Kirton. Photo / RNZ, Angus Dreaver On Wednesday, Penk initially made no comment at all about Waiōuru, then, when prompted again by RNZ, provided a single line about the 'discussions'. Shortly before that, in a longer statement, he had said: 'The Government is improving accommodation for our sailors, soldiers and aviators by addressing decades of underinvestment, which has left Defence housing stock in poor condition.' Penk referred in that statement to projects in Devonport, Trentham and Manawatū, but not Waiōuru, even though Waiōuru had the lion's share of Budget 2023's tranche one funding for housing upgrades. 'The Waiōuru New Build Housing is one of the first projects implemented under the Homes for Families Programme,' said its tender. Two months ago on Facebook, Penk posted – next to a headline '$12 billion for a stronger NZ' cheering the defence capability plan released in April – that: 'This Government is rebuilding the Defence Force after decades of underfunding.' 'Defence housing, messing and dining spaces are going to benefit from fresh investment. 'Our military personnel deserve healthy and modern spaces to live and rest in while they serve our country.' The 50-house Waiōuru deal was designed to signal the starter's gun on a half-billion-dollar upgrade of the army camp over the next 25 years, and of an overall $3 billion overhaul of 1600 defence houses countrywide. Most of those required 'upgrading urgently', past Cabinet papers said. Penk a year ago told a Cabinet committee the estate was a 'critical enabler of military effect; providing the working, training and living environments required for generating and maintaining defence outputs'. 'The dilapidated condition of the NZDF estate is evident everywhere, but mainly in the living and training environments, and with utilities such as power, water supply and sanitation.' A 2024 estimate put deferred maintenance at $480m across the estate, which includes houses and other facilities. Some 'critical' defence assets were so poor in some places that a 'wholesale shutdown of operations at that location may be needed', Penk stated. The NZDF's annual report a year earlier had said 99% of its houses met Healthy Homes standards. Asked how that was possible given what Cabinet had been told, NZDF told RNZ: 'Healthy Homes compliance does not address the state of NZDF's barracks or working accommodation and does not necessarily address whether a home is aged, fit for purpose and or in an accelerated state of deterioration.' Penk had said in August 2024 that funding was constrained but the Government was looking at options for improving the housing. Earlier, Budget 2024 funded 35 leased homes at Devonport Naval Base. New initiatives in Budget 2025 funded just $4m of capital and $16m for housing over four years. More would be added 'once the business case is approved by Cabinet', NZDF said. The business case related to a revision of its 2019 estate regeneration plan to fit a 2024-2040 timeline. This had to be revised, in part, to 'address consequences of insufficient funding since the 2019 business case', official papers said. 'The business case is still being drafted and Cabinet's decision on it will be released when that occurs in the next couple of months,' it told RNZ. NZDF mentioned about $30m for upgrades at Devonport Naval base, but this does not appear to be for housing. Budget 2025 also had $120m for depreciated funding of estate assets. It put $26m into deferred maintenance this year, and $104m over four years, against the $480m backlog. Penk said in his statement three construction contracts and a future lease agreement had been signed for 61 new homes with Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei on Auckland's North Shore, and to lease additional houses in Sunnybrae. A new tender signalled 'more housing solutions will be sought this year, including at Trentham and in the Manawatū', he said. Budgets 2023 and 2024 provided $75.4m capital and a total $17.1m over four years, Defence said. This included a renovation pilot for 13 properties at Burnham, Linton and Ohakea. - RNZ

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store