Former ANCYL secretary-general's killer gets hefty prison sentence
Ncengwa pleaded guilty under Section 220 of the Criminal Procedure Act on 6 June 2025, admitting to shooting Magaqa in uMzimkhulu on 13 July 2017.
He also confessed to attempting to kill Jabulile Msiya, Nonsikelelo Mafa, and Nceba Mazongolo, damaging vehicles and unlawfully possessing firearms and ammunition.
In his admissions, Ncengwa outlined the events leading to Magaqa's murder and named his co-accused Sbonelo Myeza, Mlungisi Ncalane and Mbulelo Mpofana.
He also revealed the names of the alleged masterminds who planned the assassination.
During sentencing, Advocate Elvis Gcweka presented victim impact statements from Magaqa's brother and a KwaZulu-Natal ANC member.
Magaqa's brother described him as a community leader who had established a soccer team for local youth and was his family's breadwinner.
The ANC statement described Magaqa's death as a loss to the organisation.
The court sentenced Ncengwa to 25 years for conspiracy to commit murder and another 25 years for murder.
He also received five years' imprisonment for each of the three counts of attempted murder. Three years for each of the three counts of malicious injury to property.
For the firearm-related offences, the court sentenced him to five years for unlawful possession of a prohibited firearm.
Another five years for unlawful possession of a firearm, and one year for unlawful possession of ammunition.
The court ordered that these sentences run concurrently, resulting in an effective prison term of 25 years.
KwaZulu-Natal Director of Public Prosecutions Adv Elaine Harrison welcomed the conviction and praised law enforcement partners, especially the Political Killings Task Team.
'We hope sentences like this deter like-minded individuals,' she said.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
It wasn't about power, ‘it was a conversation between two adults', Mbenenge tells hearing
Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge says he believes judges are not subject to labour laws or employee workplace relations regulations. Proceedings at the Judicial Conduct hearing into allegations of sexual harassment against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge were briefly disrupted before lunch on Wednesday, 9 July by placard-waving protesters. They were swiftly removed. The protesters are evidence of the widespread interest and anger surrounding this seminal South African case dealing with modern power relations in the workplace and how these affect unwanted approaches of a personal nature. Explaining the short interruption, tribunal chair, retired Judge Bernard Ngoepe, said while the proceedings were open to anyone from the public, 'you may not perform on this stage'. At the core of this complaint of sexual harassment lodged against the Judge President with the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) by court secretary Andiswa Mengo is whether the unequal power relations in the matter are relevant. Mbenenge has denied the charges and has maintained that the contact with Mengo was consensual. Late on Tuesday evening, during cross-examination by evidence leader advocate Salomé Scheepers, Mbenenge revealed to the panel his view that judges were not subject to the country's labour and workplace employee relations laws. 'I see it my way' In Mbenenge's mind, the fact that he is one of the most senior judges in the division and its head, had no effect on how he moved through life or the world, or how he was perceived by others, he told the tribunal on Wednesday. Judges, he said, were appointed by the President after recommendations by the JSC. Salaries are paid from the National Revenue Fund, which is separate from the Department of Justice. As independent operatives, they were therefore not subject to the ordinary rules of the workplace. However, the tribunal has been reminded, this does not give Mbenenge a status above other citizens of the country, as the Constitution upholds the rights of all. By way of example, Mbenenge set out to explain an occasion when he felt his status had played no role. This was when he had tried to reconcile a court manager who had allegedly insulted the complainant, Mengo. In that instance, he said, he had not acted as a judge, but as a 'social human'. 'Unless there is a theory or a notion that judge presidents should only talk to other JPs, this flies in the face of social reality.' Mbenenge added, 'even if I had been a watchman, I would have intervened in any matter where there was conflict between two people in a workplace.' While it is highly likely that Mbenenge has never been a watchman, it appears his intact self-esteem enabled him to project, into the mind of a 'watchman', a confident and level-headed mediator such as himself. When it came to how Mengo might have read or interpreted Mbenenge's behaviour differently, as suggested by Scheepers, Mbenenge's responses became a pattern through the morning: 'That is your interpretation. I see it my way. Or I see it differently.' In January, Mengo testified that she had to show respect towards Mbenenge – this was after he had first begun WhatsApping her in June 2021 after a personal interaction in the workplace. 'I have to respect him as someone who is also in charge. Even the manner in which I responded to him, I had to be very cautious,' Mengo testified. Scheepers said this, as well as the fact that Mengo had lodged a complaint of sexual harassment (at great personal cost to both parties, it turns out), was evidence of how she perceived the JP's advances differently. Mbenenge replied to Scheepers: 'So be it. What I need to say is simply that she might harbour this understanding, but I never understood it that way. 'I never imposed myself on her. You don't deal with people from the perspective that 'you know I am a JP'. When I was conversing with the complainant, and remember I am a top lawyer, according to some and the media understanding, when I was chatting with her I was being a social being.' To which Scheepers shot back, 'but you are the Judge President! You do not have to impose that on her. She knew that!' Mbenenge replied, 'I never imposed myself as a JP. The conversation was not between a JP and a junior staff member. I was simply a social being when talking to her in this instance. It was a conversation between two adults…'. Multi-tasking while pummeling Scheepers began her cross-examination late on Tuesday in a pugnacious mood which continued throughout Wednesday as she drilled down into uncomfortable territory. At several points, Mbenenge objected to her 'tone'. This was after complaining earlier in the week about the quality of her work and complaining often that he was being treated as someone 'guilty until proven innocent'. The JP was also angered when he believed that Scheepers was not focusing exclusively on him while he gave evidence or provided replies to questions. He told Judge Ngoepe that he objected to her side consultations with Mengo's counsel, advocate Nasreen Rajab-Budlender. Mbenenge stated he had found this 'disrespectful', at which point Ngoepe intervened, saying that 'advocate Scheepers does not mean disrespect. Perhaps a problem will arise only when she says you need to repeat your answer, then that could be the point. 'But if she feels she can manage to pick up a word or two and still be receptive to your answer, it should not be a problem. The weight of the matter Judge Ngoepe, as chair of the tribunal, has clearly understood the enormous significance of this matter and has tried to navigate this as an older man and retired judge, allowing evidence by gender expert, Lisa Vetten, which Mbenenge's legal team, advocates Musi Sikhakhane and Griffiths Madonsela, had sought to have excluded. When Mbenenge lashed out on Wednesday, saying the matter had rendered him almost a 'pariah' who would never again be invited to give lectures at illustrious universities such as Fort Hare as a result of the stigma, Ngoepe again intervened in even tones to calm him: 'No matter the court of public opinion, in this tribunal there is no point of departure which says the person is guilty, otherwise the proceedings would be a charade. 'Otherwise the outcome would have been determined already. Irrespective of public opinion, irrespective of what everybody thinks… We are going to decide this case on the facts before us and in terms of the law, irrespective of who said what.' Mbenenge said he was not attacking the tribunal. 'I would never do that.' With regard to Scheepers' relentless cross-examination, Judge Ngoepe told Mbenenge that 'you need to understand advocate Scheepers' job, and she is doing her best and she is trying to be as fair as she can possibly be. 'For the rest, this remains with us. We can read and write. That is why we are here. We are going to read every single message and understand it in the way we are capable of understanding.' Whosoever diggeth a pit It has not been pleasant for anyone watching Mbenenge squirm under the weight of deeply intimate and personal details being made public. Under attack is his very worldview, which appears to contain so many halls and mirrors, it has detached him from self-reflection or control. At one point, while searching for a piece of evidence, he looked up and said 'I am lost', which certainly sums up to some extent his foray into his ill-considered advances to Mengo and the Earth-shattering consequences. Mbenenge had told the tribunal of his talent for 'being able to read a room' and that in his interpretation of all the WhatsApps between himself and Mengo, she was a 'willing participant'. This was regardless of initial rebuffs, which were followed by his relentless persistence, which he claimed was 'flirtation' and which he had hoped would become physical. Scheepers shot back that 'you intentionally did not read the room. You read what you wanted to read. You asked her 11 times for photographs, you even begged. And still she did not send any nude pictures.' Scheepers put it to Mbenenge that 'the dominant clause here is you asking for pictures.' The JP shot back angrily, 'No! The dominant clause is the taking of more pictures. She had already sent one [of her WhatsApp profile pictures, according to evidence]. ' He agreed that his messages were sent after hours, a time, he told the tribunal, that was more 'convenient' for him as a busy court head. He said he had been steering 'things in a direction, seeing as I had developed an interest in her'. There were many occasions when it appears Mbenenge's messages were not convenient for Mengo, who would either not respond, or when she did, she would say she was exhausted, or at the gym or cooking, or sleeping, or preparing for work. Scheepers asked Mbenenge why he had not informed or established with the court secretary up front that she might want this intimate relationship. 'I have yet to read a book where when you are interested in a woman, these are the steps you must take. You greet them, go for pleasantries, buy her a chocolate. I have not been charged here for flirting in one manner or another. Were the chats welcome? I say they were.'
TimesLIVE
9 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Mamelodi councillor gunned down in drive-by shooting
Gauteng police have opened a murder case after a councillor of Ward 10 in Mamelodi, Thabang Masemola, was gunned down on Tuesday in Mamelodi east. According to the police, unknown suspects driving a white Nissan Almera allegedly shot at him and the motive for the shooting is unknown. Police spokesperson Captain Tintswalo Sibeko said the investigation is under way, and no arrests have been made. The ANC Greater Tshwane region confirmed that Masemola was ambushed by unknown assailants Tuesday afternoon in Mamelodi. 'It is quite disturbing that the spate of killings of councillors is not receding at a quick enough pace, and it is getting more worrisome because many of these cases are never resolved with no successful arrests and convictions made,' said ANC regional spokesperson Bafuze Yabo. 'This killing opens up old wounds of other councillors who fell to the barrel of a gun, councillor Siphiwe Montlha of Soshanguve, councillor Esther Motumane of Winterveldt and councillor Tshepo Motaung of Mabopane,' Yabo said. Yabo said the lack of arrests and successful prosecution of the perpetrators seems to have emboldened the killers to kill even more councillors. The DA's Tshwane caucus chief whip Ofentse Madzebatela condemned the killing and extended condolences to the family. 'These barbaric acts of violence must be condemned unequivocally, as they threaten the very foundations of peace and dignity. Ward councillors are among the most selfless public servants, going beyond the call of duty, sacrificing their private and family time to serve the community,' Madzebatela said. Madzebatela called upon police to act swiftly to bring the perpetrators to book. 'Public trust in the police has been deeply eroded due to years of corruption and unfulfilled promises. Considering the recent allegations of corruption brought by Lt-Gen Mkhwanazi, involving some of the country's top-ranking officials, residents feel even more unsafe. 'We demand justice for the Masemola family. Not only has a young politician been deprived of a promising career, but his family, the council and residents of Mamelodi are poorer for his loss,' he said.
The Citizen
10 hours ago
- The Citizen
Man wanted for Montclair house robbery arrested in Umlazi
ONE of the three suspects wanted in connection with a house robbery in Montclair last month was arrested in Umlazi over the weekend. According to the police, the suspect was among the men who robbed 14 learners during a party at a house in Montclair. Also read: Southlands Sun 11 July 2025 Sergeant Bhekumuzi Dlamini of the Montclair police station said the suspects were armed with firearms when they stormed the house and demanded cellphones and valuables from the victims. 'Eight cellphones, a jacket and pair of sandals were taken. The suspects fled the scene shortly afterward. Learners whose cellphones were not taken managed to report the incident at the Montclair police station. 'We utilised our police intelligence resources to track down the suspects. The investigation led officers to a home in Umlazi where the arrested suspect was found wearing a jacket that had been stolen from the learners. He was charged for house robbery,' said Dlamini. Police are still searching for the two remaining suspects. The suspect appeared at the Durban Magistrate's Court on July 8. The matter was adjourned to next week for the accused to apply for bail. For more Southlands Sun news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok. Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter and get news delivered straight to your inbox. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
