logo
Seven Ukrainian children who witnessed Russians abusing their parents and abducting relatives are brought back from Russian occupation

Seven Ukrainian children who witnessed Russians abusing their parents and abducting relatives are brought back from Russian occupation

Yahoo06-03-2025

Seven Ukrainian children, aged five to sixteen, have been rescued from the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine and Russia.
Source: Bring Kids Back UA and Save Ukraine initiatives
Details: The Save Ukraine non-governmental organisation shared the stories of the rescued children, whose names have been changed for security reasons.
Among them is Stanislav, 16, who openly expressed his pro-Ukrainian stance – removing Russian flags in his city and filling in Russian trenches.
Eleven-year-old Nastia was also brought back to Ukraine after witnessing Russian soldiers abusing her parents.
Quote: "That night, the girl woke up to noise in the next room. Four drunk Russian soldiers stormed into their house, forced her mother and father to kneel and put guns to their heads. This was their form of 'entertainment'."
Details: Albina, 5, was born under occupation and spent her early years there. Throughout this time, her mother searched for ways to escape to Ukrainian-controlled territory, fearing that her daughter might inadvertently reveal her pro-Ukrainian views.
Quote: "Now, the mother is happy that her daughter will attend a Ukrainian school and grow up in a free country."
More details: Erik, 16, and Alla, 10, also managed to leave Russian-occupied territory. Their sister had been abducted by the Russians while attempting to flee the occupied city. She was held in a basement for several days, while her mother was forced to record a video thanking the occupiers for "saving" her daughter.
Read more: Putin's path to The Hague through "filtration" and "rehabilitation": how Russia is abducting Ukrainian сhildren
Seven-year-old Olesia endured bombings, occupation, an escape through Russia and a ban on coming back home. Her mother underwent multiple interrogations and psychological pressure from Russian forces. The family is now safe in Ukraine.
Background: In August 2022, a Russian court ruled to abduct two children from a Kherson orphanage. As a result, Ukraine will prosecute in absentia a Russian Federal Assembly deputy and the wife of the leader of the Just Russia political party, who were involved in the abduction.
Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Knife-wielding maniac breaks into Andrew Tate's Romania home and attacks construction worker — as influencer rips police
Knife-wielding maniac breaks into Andrew Tate's Romania home and attacks construction worker — as influencer rips police

New York Post

time39 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Knife-wielding maniac breaks into Andrew Tate's Romania home and attacks construction worker — as influencer rips police

A knife-wielding maniac broke into influencer Andrew Tate's Romania home Wednesday and attacked a worker as the alleged sex trafficker ripped into the country's police force for not responding fast enough. 'A violent psychopath has been lurking the vicinity of my house recently,' Tate wrote on X Wednesday afternoon. The controversial influencer said one of his construction workers was slashed in the arm by the attacker armed with a blade. Advertisement 4 Andrew Tate arrives at a police station in Voluntari, Romania, on May 21, 2025. AP 'The police are finally getting involved but it took him trying to kill a man before they took action,' he added. The unidentified worker, who was near the compound's garage at the time of the home invasion, received medical attention. Advertisement The unidentified knife-wielder was questioned by police but released after giving a vague statement about 'noise' and a 'trivial conflict,' Romanian outlet Gândul reported. Hours later, the alleged attacker returned to the compound where Tate resides with his younger brother Tristan, but was stopped by security guards. The older Tate, 38, returned to social media to call out the local police, claiming that there was a lack of urgency to confront the 'men with machetes' at his home. 4 Police arrive at the Tate brothers' Romanian compound after the attack on June 18, 2025. @Cobratate/X Advertisement 4 The Tate brothers' compound in Voluntari, Romania. Google Earth 4 Tristan Tate speaks to reporters as older brother, Andrew, looks on outside a police station on May 21, 2025. AP 'The Romanian police will show up to my house fully armed to arrest my brother and I when the British foreign office told them to 'get us off the internet.' But they dont show up when men with machetes arrive with murderous intent,' Tate wrote on X. Police arrested the attacker, who is believed to be a Ukrainian national, the outlet reported. Advertisement Tristan Tate confirmed the break-in and the attacker's nationality. 'He came back to my house. I now can confirm this Ukranian national is not a neighbour of mine but his 'loud construction noises' excuse worked and he was still free until 5 minutes ago. He made a second attempt at whatever he was trying and was violently arrested,' the younger Tate wrote on X. The Tate brothers face a slew of charges including rape, actual bodily harm and human trafficking in both Romania and the United Kingdom.

English university students must face 'shocking' ideas in a drive to protect free speech on campus

timean hour ago

English university students must face 'shocking' ideas in a drive to protect free speech on campus

LONDON -- Students at English universities must prepare to confront ideas they find uncomfortable and shocking, the national regulator for higher education said as it released new guidelines governing free speech on campuses across the country. The Office for Students said Thursday that freedom of speech and academic freedom are crucial to higher education, so the guidelines are designed to ensure that universities don't stifle any form of legal speech on their campuses or in their classrooms. Students must be allowed to freely share their opinions and be prepared to hear a range of views during their studies, Arif Ahmed, free speech director for the regulator, said in a statement. 'This includes things that they may find uncomfortable or shocking,' he said. 'By being exposed to a diversity of academic thought, students will develop their analytical and critical thinking skills.' The guidance comes as concern grows that British universities had gone too far in silencing professors and students who expressed ideas some people found offensive. In particular, gender-critical academics and pro-Israeli groups say they have been targeted by university officials and students who disagree with their ideas. In 2021, professor Kathleen Stock resigned from her position at the University of Sussex after a group of students who identified as queer, trans and nonbinary demanded that she be fired for expressing the belief that there are two immutable sexes, male and female. Earlier this year, the Office for Students fined the university 585,000 pounds ($785,000) for failing to uphold freedom of speech. The guidance released on Thursday is designed to implement legislation protecting freedom of speech on university campuses that was passed by the previous government in 2023. The regulator stressed that unlawful speech, including speech that violates anti-terror, equality or public order laws, is not protected by the legislation. Universities also have the right to regulate time, place and manner of lawful speech so that that it doesn't interfere with research, teaching and learning. While the guidance is a good first step, universities will still have a difficult time balancing all the interests on their campuses, Julian Sladdin, a partner at the law firm Pinsent Masons, told the Guardian newspaper. 'The difficulty which remains in practical terms is the fact that institutions are still subject to dealing day-to-day with extremely complex and often polarizing issues on campus and where the bounds of what may be lawful free speech are constantly being tested,' he was quoted as saying.

For Team Trump, winning World War III begins in Iran and ends in Ukraine
For Team Trump, winning World War III begins in Iran and ends in Ukraine

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

For Team Trump, winning World War III begins in Iran and ends in Ukraine

Team Trump may be on the verge of understanding that the U.S., NATO and their Pacific allies are being engulfed in a growing global war being waged against them by Russia and China. Initially, Ukraine was the most logical country in this multiregional war for the West to put its first win on the board against the Axis of Evil. But now it has become Iran. For 46 years, Tehran has been waging its own war against the U.S. and its allies, directly and indirectly. President Trump's call on Tuesday for Iran's unconditional surrender was welcome. So too was his brushing off Russian President Vladimir Putin in a brief conversation they held Tuesday. Putin had made an unserious offer to mediate between the U.S., Israel and Iran over Tehran's nuclear weapons program. Trump's response? 'I said, 'Do me a favor, mediate your own'' conflict. Team Moscow clearly was not pleased. Twenty-four hours later, Russia's Foreign Ministry issued a statement 'call[ing] on Israel to stop targeting Tehran's nuclear sites, arguing the ongoing bombardment could lead to global 'nuclear catastrophe.' Once again, when the Kremlin gets faced with a geo-strategic setback, it resorts to nuclear bluster and fearmongering. The Biden administration — and namely former national security advisor Jake Sullivan — fell for it again and again. Team Trump must not. Trump's stern pushback on Putin was well-timed and much-needed. For although Israel's war plan against Iran is succeeding spectacularly and running ahead of schedule, Israeli civilians are still being intentionally targeted by Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Urgency is needed at the White House. Waves of Iranian ballistic barrages are rapidly depleting Israel's supply of Arrow interceptor missiles. The Arrows play a key role in Israel's multitiered air-defense. To date, Iran has launched more than 400 ballistic missiles and more than 1,000 drones at Israel. Civilian casualties are mounting, with 24 killed in Israel and more than 500 wounded. Likewise, U.S. allies in the Gulf region, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are exposed and vulnerable — especially their port facilities and oil export infrastructure. Approximately 20 percent of global petroleum liquids consumption — roughly 20 million barrels per day — transits the strategic Straits of Hormuz. On Wednesday, Iran threatened the U.S. that any involvement in its conflict with Israel would trigger an 'all-out war.' U.S. military facilities, remote bases and interests are also exposed in Jordan, Iraq, and throughout the region. As a result, the Pentagon is being forced to move naval assets out of Bahrain. According to a report in Newsweek, 'all forward-deployed U.S. Navy vessels' have departed the 'key port' in the Gulf. The repositioning of military assets is likely an indicator that the President has come to a decision concerning military support for Israel. That the U.S. is being forced to scramble military assets is, at least temporarily, a win for Moscow at Beijing. Yet, Trump is increasingly likely to change that question by ordering offensive operations against Iran. If Team Trump is to ensure that the West begins winning World War III, it is not an option to let Fordo — Iran's key underground nuclear facility, buried deep inside a mountain southwest of Tehran — remain operational. And it appears that Trump will not. The Pentagon has been assembling a vast array of offensive weapons and capabilities in the region. Fighters and air-tankers have been repositioned to Europe and the Middle East over the last several days. Fordo, clearly, is on the White House's radar screen. Likewise, USS Gerald Ford and the USS Nimitz are steaming toward the Mideast to join the USS Carl Vinson already on station. When they arrive, the U.S. will have three powerful carrier groups to take the fight to Iran and defend against any possible retaliation — and, by extension to demonstrate to Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping that red lines will be enforced. Iran likely knows what is coming. Team Trump has largely gone silent. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth pointedly refused to divulge to the Senate the exact nature of the options he has presented to the White House. Trump himself has remained coy, warning on Wednesday that , 'I may do it. I may not do it. I mean nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Radio silence is never a good thing, and Khamenei appears to know it. His official government X account repeatedly posted warnings on Wednesday aimed at Trump, 'Zionists' and Israel. In one of his early posts, Khamenei defiantly exclaimed, 'It isn't wise to tell the Iranian nation to surrender.' Beijing finally weighed in, too. On Wednesday, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi 'warned that escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran could spiral out of control, urging all sides to prioritize a ceasefire to prevent the region from sliding into an 'abyss.' But it's a bit late for that — regime change and loss of China's investment in Iran may now be on the horizon. Yang hypocritically condemned 'Israel's acts of disregarding international law and international rules.' Of course, he ignored — as Beijing has done since February 2022 — Russia's actual violations of international law in Ukraine, including intentional war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Chances are that Trump understands Iran must be defeated, its nuclear program destroyed. Team Trump likely also understands that it cannot stop there in countering Russia's and China's global war against the collective West and its allies in the Pacific. What remains to be seen after Iran's nuclear threat is eliminated is where Team Trump pivots to next. If it leaves Russia to Europe and focuses exclusively on China — as Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby prefers — that would be a colossal strategic error. As it is, the commander of U.S. Central Command Gen. Michael Kurilla has reportedly been fending off Colby in order to position U.S. assets in the Middle East, to defend Israel and eliminate the Iranian nuclear threat if so ordered. Colby has already repeatedly lobbied to end military aid to Ukraine and focus on the Indo-Pacific — the new 'priority theater.' What Colby fails to understand is the connective tissue of it all. The fights in Ukraine, Iran and potentially Taiwan, and other U.S. interests in the Indo-Pacific, are all strategically connected. Defeating Khamenei in Iran and ensuring Putin's defeat in Ukraine are the best way two things Trump can do now to confront a rapidly expanding Chinese threat. This is World War III — not Hollywood's dramatic version of it, but rather war by a thousand cuts. Winning it starts in Iran and ends by winning in Ukraine. Mark Toth writes on national security and foreign policy. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet served 30 years as an Army intelligence officer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store