logo
For Team Trump, winning World War III begins in Iran and ends in Ukraine

For Team Trump, winning World War III begins in Iran and ends in Ukraine

The Hill6 hours ago

Team Trump may be on the verge of understanding that the U.S., NATO and their Pacific allies are being engulfed in a growing global war being waged against them by Russia and China.
Initially, Ukraine was the most logical country in this multiregional war for the West to put its first win on the board against the Axis of Evil.
But now it has become Iran.
For 46 years, Tehran has been waging its own war against the U.S. and its allies, directly and indirectly.
President Trump's call on Tuesday for Iran's unconditional surrender was welcome. So too was his brushing off Russian President Vladimir Putin in a brief conversation they held Tuesday. Putin had made an unserious offer to mediate between the U.S., Israel and Iran over Tehran's nuclear weapons program.
Trump's response? 'I said, 'Do me a favor, mediate your own'' conflict.
Team Moscow clearly was not pleased. Twenty-four hours later, Russia's Foreign Ministry issued a statement 'call[ing] on Israel to stop targeting Tehran's nuclear sites, arguing the ongoing bombardment could lead to global 'nuclear catastrophe.'
Once again, when the Kremlin gets faced with a geo-strategic setback, it resorts to nuclear bluster and fearmongering. The Biden administration — and namely former national security advisor Jake Sullivan — fell for it again and again. Team Trump must not.
Trump's stern pushback on Putin was well-timed and much-needed. For although Israel's war plan against Iran is succeeding spectacularly and running ahead of schedule, Israeli civilians are still being intentionally targeted by Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
Urgency is needed at the White House. Waves of Iranian ballistic barrages are rapidly depleting Israel's supply of Arrow interceptor missiles. The Arrows play a key role in Israel's multitiered air-defense.
To date, Iran has launched more than 400 ballistic missiles and more than 1,000 drones at Israel. Civilian casualties are mounting, with 24 killed in Israel and more than 500 wounded.
Likewise, U.S. allies in the Gulf region, including Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates are exposed and vulnerable — especially their port facilities and oil export infrastructure.
Approximately 20 percent of global petroleum liquids consumption — roughly 20 million barrels per day — transits the strategic Straits of Hormuz. On Wednesday, Iran threatened the U.S. that any involvement in its conflict with Israel would trigger an 'all-out war.'
U.S. military facilities, remote bases and interests are also exposed in Jordan, Iraq, and throughout the region. As a result, the Pentagon is being forced to move naval assets out of Bahrain. According to a report in Newsweek, 'all forward-deployed U.S. Navy vessels' have departed the 'key port' in the Gulf.
The repositioning of military assets is likely an indicator that the President has come to a decision concerning military support for Israel.
That the U.S. is being forced to scramble military assets is, at least temporarily, a win for Moscow at Beijing. Yet, Trump is increasingly likely to change that question by ordering offensive operations against Iran.
If Team Trump is to ensure that the West begins winning World War III, it is not an option to let Fordo — Iran's key underground nuclear facility, buried deep inside a mountain southwest of Tehran — remain operational.
And it appears that Trump will not. The Pentagon has been assembling a vast array of offensive weapons and capabilities in the region. Fighters and air-tankers have been repositioned to Europe and the Middle East over the last several days. Fordo, clearly, is on the White House's radar screen.
Likewise, USS Gerald Ford and the USS Nimitz are steaming toward the Mideast to join the USS Carl Vinson already on station. When they arrive, the U.S. will have three powerful carrier groups to take the fight to Iran and defend against any possible retaliation — and, by extension to demonstrate to Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping that red lines will be enforced.
Iran likely knows what is coming. Team Trump has largely gone silent. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth pointedly refused to divulge to the Senate the exact nature of the options he has presented to the White House. Trump himself has remained coy, warning on Wednesday that , 'I may do it. I may not do it. I mean nobody knows what I'm going to do.'
Radio silence is never a good thing, and Khamenei appears to know it. His official government X account repeatedly posted warnings on Wednesday aimed at Trump, 'Zionists' and Israel. In one of his early posts, Khamenei defiantly exclaimed, 'It isn't wise to tell the Iranian nation to surrender.'
Beijing finally weighed in, too. On Wednesday, China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi 'warned that escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran could spiral out of control, urging all sides to prioritize a ceasefire to prevent the region from sliding into an 'abyss.'
But it's a bit late for that — regime change and loss of China's investment in Iran may now be on the horizon.
Yang hypocritically condemned 'Israel's acts of disregarding international law and international rules.' Of course, he ignored — as Beijing has done since February 2022 — Russia's actual violations of international law in Ukraine, including intentional war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.
Chances are that Trump understands Iran must be defeated, its nuclear program destroyed. Team Trump likely also understands that it cannot stop there in countering Russia's and China's global war against the collective West and its allies in the Pacific.
What remains to be seen after Iran's nuclear threat is eliminated is where Team Trump pivots to next. If it leaves Russia to Europe and focuses exclusively on China — as Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby prefers — that would be a colossal strategic error.
As it is, the commander of U.S. Central Command Gen. Michael Kurilla has reportedly been fending off Colby in order to position U.S. assets in the Middle East, to defend Israel and eliminate the Iranian nuclear threat if so ordered. Colby has already repeatedly lobbied to end military aid to Ukraine and focus on the Indo-Pacific — the new 'priority theater.'
What Colby fails to understand is the connective tissue of it all. The fights in Ukraine, Iran and potentially Taiwan, and other U.S. interests in the Indo-Pacific, are all strategically connected.
Defeating Khamenei in Iran and ensuring Putin's defeat in Ukraine are the best way two things Trump can do now to confront a rapidly expanding Chinese threat.
This is World War III — not Hollywood's dramatic version of it, but rather war by a thousand cuts. Winning it starts in Iran and ends by winning in Ukraine.
Mark Toth writes on national security and foreign policy. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet served 30 years as an Army intelligence officer.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Pledges To Target Democratic Cities With ICE Raids, Social Media Calls Out His Diet Fascism
Trump Pledges To Target Democratic Cities With ICE Raids, Social Media Calls Out His Diet Fascism

Black America Web

time8 minutes ago

  • Black America Web

Trump Pledges To Target Democratic Cities With ICE Raids, Social Media Calls Out His Diet Fascism

President Donald Trump, as usual, raised eyebrows and provoked outrage when he lied his way through a reporter's question about why he has pledged to target Democratic cities with his oppressive, Gestapo-like crackdown on undocumented migrants via U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) during the G7 conference in Canada. 'Why are you ordering ICE to target Democratic inner cities? What's behind that?' the reporter asked, to which the stable genius who is totally not in cognitive decline responded, 'I don't know what you're saying.' 'You did a post last night where you said you want ICE to really target Democrats?' the reporter clarified (despite his straightforward question needing no clarification). That's when Trump began saying things that were certainly words, but served, as usual, to insult his political opponents, bash President Joe Biden, lie about migrants being emptied out of prisons into America, and spread misinformation about Democratic-run cities that he clearly doesn't like. 'Yeah, I want them to focus on the cities, because the cities are where you really have what's called sanctuary cities, and that's where the people are,' Trump said. 'I look at New York. I look at Chicago. I mean, you got a really bad governor in Chicago and a bad mayor, but the governor's probably the worst in the country, Pritzker. But I look at how that city has been overrun by criminals. And, you know, New York and L.A. Look at L.A. Those people weren't from L.A. They weren't from California, most of those people, many of those people, and, yeah, that's the focus. Biden allowed 21 million people to come into our country. Of that, vast numbers of those people were murderers, killers, people from gangs, people from jails. They emptied their jails out into the U.S. Most of those people are in the cities, all blue cities, all Democrat-run cities, and they think they're gonna use them to vote. It's not gonna happen.' In fact, none of that ever did happen. Trump's oft-repeated claim that nations around the globe have emptied their prisons and insane asylums and sent criminals to the U.S. is a factless assertion that Trump, apparently, conjured out of thin air. (Or he got it from whoever told him about the fictional 'white genocide' in South Africa.) As for his claim that the 'vast numbers of those people were murderers' and criminals, the data shows that nearly half of ICE detainees either have no criminal record at all or have only been convicted of minor offenses, including traffic violations. According to Reuters, 'U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention statistics show the number of detainees arrested by ICE with no other criminal charges or convictions rose from about 860 in January to 7,800 this month – a more than 800% increase.' Trump has been bloviating about undocumented migrants causing a rise in crime in the U.S. since the start of his 2024 campaign, completely ignoring the migrant crime data that says the opposite is true, as well as the data that shows violent crime in America has done almost nothing but decline over the last four or five decades. Anyway, the fine folks on X (including some Democratic lawmakers) are calling Trump's targeting of Democratic cities exactly what it appears to be: more of the diet fascist nonsense that the Trump administration passes off as a White House agenda. Some have even insinuated that Trump is just taking revenge on cities that engaged in anti-Trump 'No Kings' protests across the nation over the weekend. (Oh, come on, a sitting president would never be that childish, petty and corrupt, would they?) Check out some of the reactions below. Trump Pledges To Target Democratic Cities With ICE Raids, Social Media Calls Out His Diet Fascism was originally published on Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE

Trump family pulls silent exit from high-stakes venture, cuts 20% stake
Trump family pulls silent exit from high-stakes venture, cuts 20% stake

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump family pulls silent exit from high-stakes venture, cuts 20% stake

Trump family pulls silent exit from high-stakes venture, cuts 20% stake originally appeared on TheStreet. The Trump family has reportedly reduced its stake in its key crypto business venture, World Liberty Financial, Fortune reported on June 19. DT Marks DEFI LLC, one of Trump's companies, has reduced its stake in the crypto venture from 60% to 40% within the last 11 days, the report mentions. Launched in September 2024, World Liberty Financial is a decentralized finance (DeFi) project. As per its official website, President Donald Trump and his sons, Eric, Donald Jr., and Barron, are the co-founders. It claims the president quit the position at the company after assuming office. As per the latest Fortune report, Trump changed the name of DT Tower II LLC, an entity he created in 2016, into DT Marks DEFI LLC. Trump held a 100% stake in DT Tower II LLC. But he reduced his stake to 70% in the new entity, DT Marks DEFI LLC, as his family members — presumably Don Jr., Eric, and Barron — came to assume a 30% stake in it, the report adds. The report also mentions how someone registered three new companies in Delaware in July 2024: DJT Jr DEFI LLC, ET DEFI LLC, and BWT DEFI LLC — all named after the initials of the three sons. While DT Marks DEFI LLC earlier held a 75% stake in World Liberty Financial, it later lowered it to approximately 60%, as previously reported. The crypto venture raised $615 million via the sale of its native WLFI tokens in four rounds, as per ICO Drops. The company has also launched USD1, a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar. As per DeFiLlama, USD1 has a market cap of $2.19 billion and accounts for 0.0086% share of the total stablecoin market cap of $251.73 billion. World Liberty Financial isn't the only crypto venture the Trump family is involved with. Meme coins, crypto exchange-traded funds, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) — there is hardly any crypto business that the First Family hasn't ventured into. Trump's second presidential term has also seen the U.S. administration pursuing an aggressive pro-crypto policy, such as the order to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve and the introduction of bills regarding stablecoin regulation and crypto market structure. Trump's financial relationship to these crypto ventures has raised questions regarding conflicts of interest, with Democrat leaders such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) being the most vocal critics. Trump family pulls silent exit from high-stakes venture, cuts 20% stake first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 19, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 19, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What UK involvement in Iran could look like – and the political questions it raises
What UK involvement in Iran could look like – and the political questions it raises

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What UK involvement in Iran could look like – and the political questions it raises

At the time of writing, US President Donald Trump is deliberating over whether to join Israel's air campaign to destroy Iran's suspected nuclear weapons programme. This is already a contentious issue within Washington DC and the Trump administration. But if the president decides to take the US into a war with Iran, it will have significant implications for the US's allies, not least the UK. As the recent strategic defence review emphasises, the US is Britain's main ally, an essential partner in defence and intelligence. However, the Trump administration has made clear to its European allies that it no longer regards the defence of the continent as a US national security priority. And the president's commitment to Nato is uncertain. It is possible that Britain and other European allies could be publicly pressured by Trump to support any intervention on Israel's side. The US may expect this in return for the US's continued involvement in Nato and its readiness to honour article 5 (the collective defence principle, which obliges collective retaliation to aggression against one member) for its allies. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. Given the importance of American military power in deterring wider Russian aggression in Europe – and Trump's transactional character – this would present Keir Starmer with a particularly stark dilemma. A purely US air campaign against Iran is feasible. The US Navy will soon have two carrier strike groups in the Middle East region. And the US Air Force's B2 strategic bombers can launch raids across the globe from bases in the continental US. The US also has several military bases in the region. However, as was the case with the 1991 and 2003 wars with Iraq, Washington DC will need permission from Gulf Arab allies to use them. Nonetheless, the Trump administration could request authorisation from the UK's Labour government to use US airbases in the UK and its overseas territories to support an air campaign against Iran. This would not involve the UK deploying forces, but would require the UK to approve the use of the airbases. The Diego Garcia airbase in the Indian Ocean would be a useful asset in this case. But its employment would reopen the controversy over its establishment in the 1960s. It could also call into question the diplomatic deal the UK made with Mauritius last month to cede sovereignty of the Chagos Islands, while keeping this base open. The Mauritians are likely to oppose US airstrikes on Iran. Britain also has options for direct participation. RAF Typhoon jets stationed at Britain's airbase in Akrotiri, Cyprus provided air defence support for Israel during the Iranian missile and drone strikes in April and October 2024. They could conduct similar missions now. But from the Royal Navy's perspective, it would be difficult to divert the aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales from its deployment to the Indo-Pacific, partly because the task group it sails with is a multinational one. Given that the British armed forces are already overstretched, it is difficult to see whether the UK could provide more than basing rights and air support to the Israelis (if requested). A discreet commitment of UK special forces (the 22nd Special Air Service regiment and the Special Boat Service) on the ground is conceivable. This can be – and indeed has been – authorised by previous governments without parliamentary debate. But any further British military commitment is likely to cause a political row. The key question for Starmer and his ministers will not be whether Britain could back a US war against Iran but whether it should. After the debacle of the Iraq war and the ensuing Chilcot inquiry, it is difficult to see how any government – let alone a Labour one – can take Britain into a major interstate conflict on this scale without firm parliamentary support and a solid case in international law. To this end, the Attorney General Richard Hermer has reportedly questioned the legality of Israel's preemptive attack on Iran, and has argued that any British military intervention should be limited to the defence of its allies. We should not forget that Starmer was a human rights lawyer and the head of the Crown Prosecution Service before he became a politician. Another legacy of Iraq is that it is customary (though not a legal requirement) for prime ministers to seek parliamentary approval for any major military operation. David Cameron lost a vote in the House of Commons to approve airstrikes against Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria in August 2013. But he gained parliamentary support for Britain's commitment to the fight against Islamic State in 2015. A similar debate now is unlikely to lead to approval of British military intervention in this case. Within the Labour party, there is already widespread condemnation of Israeli tactics and Palestinian civilian casualties in Gaza. There is little popular appetite for sending British sailors and airmen into a war with Iran. And, given the US vice-president's own dismissive comments about the military experiences of European allies, the public is also entitled to ask why British servicemen should die or risk breaching international law for an administration that probably will not appreciate their sacrifice. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Geraint Hughes does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store