
NATO shifts focus as US retreats from leading role on Ukraine
All 32 NATO allies are meeting in The Hague for the annual leaders summit where NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte told reporters that Russia remains "the most significant and direct threat facing the alliance."
But in contrast to last year, the focus on Russia's full scale invasion of Ukraine is notably diminished from formal discussions.
Instead, the summit is pursuing a narrower ambition of pushing for allies to commit to spending 5% of GDP on defence.
"We know that the position of the United States has changed and therefore also here at the NATO Summit", Dutch Defence minister Ruben Brekelmans told Euronews.
"The main topic, of course, is the 5% is a new, this historic step for our defence. But Ukraine remains equally important to us", he said.
Ukrainian President Zelensky is attending the dinner the Netherlands' King Willem-Alexander alongside leaders, and is also expected to meet with President Trump on the side-lines of the summit.
However, this year he won't be present at the North Atlantic Council of heads of state and government.
In contrast, at last year's NATO summit under the Biden administration Ukraine was given "irreversible" assurances of a path to membership. Allies assured Kyiv that it was on an "indestructible bridge" to join the alliance.
"Trump signalled he wanted the indestructible bridge off the table from the start," Jason Israel, former member of the Biden administration's National Security Council and senior director for defence, told Euronews.
"If I was Ukraine, of course I'd be nervous about how this is playing out at the moment," he said.
There's a growing acceptance that the US - although still providing Ukraine with vital intelligence - will no longer provide Ukraine with lethal weapons similar to that donated by the Biden administration.
"The real issue, is that the US does not see Ukrainian security as essential to European security, and our European allies do so," said Kurt Volker, former US representative to Ukraine in the last Trump administration.
Europe "feels that if Putin is allowed to prevail in Ukraine, or if Ukraine does not survive as a sovereign, independent state, they are at risk, and that is a big security threat for Europe and NATO," he said ahead of the summit at an event organised by the Centre for European Policy Analysis (CEPA).
Europe sees "the need to support Ukraine as integral to our security through NATO, the US simply doesn't see it that way," said Volker.
At the same time, NATO officials warn Russia is continuing to make gains around Sumy Oblast and Eastern Ukraine, although their assessment doesn't predict Ukraine will be encircled.
Instead a high attrition rate and a slow, protracted conflict is expected to continue.
This is despite the remarkably high casualty rate – NATO says Russia's troop losses have surpassed one million since the start of the full scale invasion.
Russia is currently "taking" 1,100 daily casualties, "down from peak in January of 1,500," they said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Trump's opposition faces another adversary: The 'rally around the flag' phenomenon
On Wednesday, June 18, three days before bombing Iran, Donald Trump had two gigantic American flags planted at the White House. One stood on the South Lawn, and the other on the North side. The banners, hoisted on 30-meter poles like those seen at car dealerships, were unveiled during an inauguration ceremony. The president praised the poles as "the most magnificent poles ever made" – "tall, tapered, rust proof," he added, before turning to the workers and asking if they were undocumented immigrants. Trump has always professed an excessive love for the flag. At his campaign rallies, he sometimes even hugs the Stars and Stripes placed on stage. And since his re-election, he has not only reshaped the executive branch but has also sought to transform the White House itself, unafraid to give the modest 1,800 monument the feel of a Potomac Mar-a-Lago. Next on his list: a ballroom. On June 18, as he inaugurated his new flags, the 47 th president faced headwinds: His popularity had begun to decline again. More than half of Americans (52%) disapprove of his actions, compared with 46%, according to the average compiled by Nate Silver. Even when accounting for his supposed strongholds – economy, immigration – his approval ratings do not exceed 50%, well below those of his predecessors after six months in office.


Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Iran nuclear programme only setback by months
A new US intelligence report found that Iran's nuclear programme has only been set back a few months after US strikes targeted three of the country's nuclear sites last week. The report released by the US Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) – intelligence arm of the Pentagon – contradicts statements made by US President Donald Trump on Saturday night immediately following the conclusion of what he called a 'targeted and precise' operation. Trump said in a televised press conference along with his Vice President JD Vance, State Secretary Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth that Washington's strikes had 'completely and fully obliterated' Iran's nuclear sites. Trump stated that Iran's Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities were dealt damage that sets them back years. The sites were attacked by the US' 30,000 pound (13,600 kg) 'bunker buster' bombs. While satellite imagery showed significant damage to the sites, the report suggests that most of the damage was contained to above ground structures. At the Fordo uranium enrichment facility, Iran's most well-protected site, located deep underground, the entrance has collapsed and the infrastructure has sustained damage, necessitating time for repairs. However, the underground infrastructure remains intact, as stated by an official familiar with the situation. The report's findings also showed that some of Iran's highly enriched uranium was moved out of multiple sites before the US strikes began and survived. The report asserted that Tehran had moved the uranium to other secret nuclear facilities it maintains. The DIA also found that most of Iran's centrifuges are largely intact. The White House strongly pushed back on the assessment, calling it 'flat-out wrong.' 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration,' she added. Trump has said in comments and posts on social media in recent days, including Tuesday, that the strikes left the sites in Iran 'totally destroyed' and that Iran will never rebuild its nuclear facilities. Netanyahu said in a televised statement on Tuesday that, 'For dozens of years I promised you that Iran would not have nuclear weapons and indeed ... we brought to ruin Iran's nuclear programme." Netanyahu, speaking a day after Trump announced a US, Qatari-brokered ceasefire between the two nations, claimed that their 12-day campaign on Iran was a 'historic victory'. 'We removed two imminent existential threats – the annihilation threat by nuclear bombs and the annihilation threat with 20 thousand ballistic missiles.' Iran said on Tuesday that it was ready to return to the negotiating table with the United States. Tehran however asserted that it will always continue to defend its 'legitimate rights' and will respond to any Israeli breach of the current truce.


France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Trump plays deft hand with Iran-Israel ceasefire but doubts remain
Israel, Iran and Trump himself all declared victory after 12 days of conflict that culminated Saturday in the United States bombing Iran's key nuclear sites. After facing criticism -- even within his base -- for breaking his campaign promises against military intervention abroad, Trump was able to show a quick way out, and to portray himself, despite the bombing, as a peacemaker. "I don't think the Israeli government was able to sustain a long-term war, but I think the main factor here was President Trump. He did not want to see a new war in the region break out under his watch," said Will Todman, a senior fellow at the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "That is what changed the calculation for Israel and for Iran as well." Trump startled even close aides and allies by announcing the ceasefire on social media late Monday -- the middle of the night in the Middle East -- just after Iran fired missiles at a US base in Qatar, in what appeared to be a choreographed response as the rockets were easily shot down. Trump chose not to retaliate against Iran and on Tuesday, returned to his electronic bully pulpit to urge Israel to abort new attacks on Iran. Iran needed an off-ramp as it suffered its worst assault since the 1980-88 war with Iraq. Trump also appeared to offer incentives to sanctions-bound Iran by suggesting an easing of US pressure on China to stop buying Iranian oil. Israel's military, while proving itself to be the region's strongest, has been stretched by campaigns in Gaza, Syria and Lebanon, and with Iranian strikes this month, the Israeli population endured the most prolonged, deadly air attacks seen in decades. After Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed Trump's intervention, the president's warning Tuesday likely also showed him the limits to US support, Todman said. What was achieved? Trump hailed his intervention as a monumental success, although critics have long warned that an attack could make Iran rush, more clandestinely, to a nuclear bomb. While Trump claimed Iran's nuclear program was "obliterated," a classified report found that the US bombing did not destroy the core parts of the three nuclear sites, according to CNN and The New York Times. Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, said it's too early to know if the ceasefire would hold, either. He said that Gulf Arab powers, led by well-connected Qatar, did the hard work of quiet diplomacy as they sought a return to calm in their region. "Trump vocally used his troll power to try to restrain the actions of Israel and Iran, but that matters less compared with the role that these countries continuously play," Katulis said of Gulf Arab states. Katulis, who worked on the Middle East for former president Bill Clinton, said the Trump administration's tactical military operations, combined with "a heavy dose of strategic communications" confused Americans and global actors alike "about what it is we're actually trying to get done." Showing heft at home One area where Trump's diplomacy had clear -- if short-term -- benefits was at home. A prolonged US military campaign "had the potential to really fracture President Trump's own base of support," said Jonathan Panikoff, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. But now, "my guess is the majority of his MAGA and other Republican base will stay relatively unified, even if they were unthrilled in some quarters," he said. While traditional hawks of Trump's Republican Party largely cheered the Iran strikes, they were widely but not universally denounced by rival Democrats. Annelle Sheline, who resigned from the State Department to protest policies under former president Joe Biden and is now at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said it was critical for Trump to enforce the ceasefire. She noted Israel has bombed Lebanon and Gaza during truces, saying Netanyahu believed he enjoyed "America's unconditional support." "Trump demonstrated that he can rein in Israel when he chooses to do so. Now he must do the same to insist on a ceasefire in Gaza," she said.