Apple to source, produce all its mobile phones in India: Union telecom minister Jyotiraditya Scindia
Union telecom minister Jyotiraditya Scindia on Tuesday said investment in India at present makes economic sense for every original equipment manufacturer, as he cited the example of U.S. smart devices major Apple's decision to source majority of the iPhones sold in the U.S. from the country.
Speaking at the Bharat Telecom event, Scindia said the investment in India at present is not just an act of goodwill alone but it makes economic sense for every OEM (original equipment manufacturer).
"Apple has decided to source and produce all its mobile phones in India in the years to come," Scindia said, adding that "when you invest in India, you are choosing affordability, you are choosing reliability, you are choosing originality."
Apple CEO Tim Cook during the company's recent earnings call announced that the company will source the majority of the iPhones sold in the US from India in the June quarter, while China will produce the vast majority of the devices for other markets amid uncertainty over tax tariffs.
Scindia said the telecom equipment market aided by the government's production-linked incentive scheme has witnessed multifold growth.
"Investment of ₹4,000 crore, half a billion dollars alone, has resulted in sales of ₹80,000 crore, ₹16,000 crore in exports, (and) 25,000 jobs being created. Therefore, the telecom equipment market has also grown manifold in India," Scindia said.
The minister said 4.7 lakh towers have been installed in the country with an investment of ₹4 lakh crore by telecom operators within a span of 21 months for 5G.
"Along with this 5G revolution, today this phenomenal progress that we see in India is not an accident. It is a result of the Prime Minister's vision, the capability to see the future actuated and make it a reality. It is a result of bold reforms, visionary policies, and unwavering ambitions," Scindia said.
He said India at present produces products for the world that are not only made in the country but are designed, developed and delivered from here.
Minister of State for Telecommunications Chandra Sekhar Pemmasani said India from being a large importer of mobile phones, around 2014, India has now become a large producer and exporter of mobile phones.
He said India's mobile phone industry has transformed from making 60 lakh units and importing 21 crore mobile phones in 2014 to a total production of 33 crore mobile phones in 2024 and 5 crore units of exports.
"Further, if you look around the global iPhone output, 15 per cent of that iPhone output today comes from India," Pemmasani said.
According to market research firm IDC, Apple supplied 23.21 crore iPhones across the globe.
Pemmasani said the semiconductor mission is transforming India into a global hub for electronics, system design and manufacturing.
"The establishment of semiconductor fabrication facilities on Indian soil marks a watershed moment in our technological sovereignty," Pemmasani said
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Apple researchers show how popular AI models ‘collapse' at complex problems
A new research paper by a group of people at Apple has said that artificial intelligence (AI) 'reasoning' is not all that it is cracked up to be. Through an analysis of some of the most popular large reasoning models in the market, the paper showed that their accuracy faces a 'complete collapse' beyond a certain complexity threshold. The researchers put to the test models like OpenAI o3-mini (medium and high configurations), DeepSeek-R1, DeepSeek-R1-Qwen-32B, and Claude-3.7- Sonnet (thinking). Their findings showed that the AI industry may be grossly overstating these models' capabilities. They also benchmarked these large reasoning models (LRMs) with large language models (LLMs) with no reasoning capabilities, and found that in some cases, the latter outperformed the former. 'In simpler problems, reasoning models often identify correct solutions early but inefficiently continue exploring incorrect alternatives — an 'overthinking' phenomenon. At moderate complexity, correct solutions emerge only after extensive exploration of incorrect paths. Beyond a certain complexity threshold, models completely fail to find correct solutions,' the paper said, adding that this 'indicates LRMs possess limited self-correction capabilities that, while valuable, reveal fundamental inefficiencies and clear scaling limitations'. For semantics, LLMs are AI models trained on vast text data to generate human-like language, especially in tasks such as translation and content creation. LRMs prioritise logical reasoning and problem-solving, focusing on tasks requiring analysis, like math or coding. LLMs emphasise language fluency, while LRMs focus on structured reasoning. To be sure, the paper's findings are a dampener on the promise of large reasoning models, which many have touted as a frontier breakthrough to understand and assist humans in solving complex problems, in sectors such as health and science. Apple researchers evaluated reasoning capabilities of LRMs through four controllable puzzle environments, which allowed them fine-grained control over complexity and rigorous evaluation of reasoning: Tower of Hanoi: It involves moving n disks between three pegs following specific rules, with complexity determined by the number of disks. Checker Jumping: This requires swapping red and blue checkers on a one-dimensional board, with complexity scaled by the number of checkers. River Crossing: This is a constraint satisfaction puzzle where and actors and n agents must cross a river, controlled by the number of actor/agent pairs and boat capacity. Blocks World: Focuses on rearranging blocks into a target configuration, with complexity managed by the number of blocks. 'Most of our experiments are conducted on reasoning models and their non-thinking counterparts, such as Claude 3.7 Sonnet (thinking/non-thinking) and DeepSeek-R1/V3. We chose these models because they allow access to the thinking tokens, unlike models such as OpenAI's o-series. For experiments focused solely on final accuracy, we also report results on the o-series models,' the researchers said. The researchers found that as problem complexity increased, the accuracy of reasoning models progressively declined. Eventually, their performance reached a complete collapse (zero accuracy) beyond a specific, model-dependent complexity threshold. Initially, reasoning models increased their thinking tokens proportionally with problem complexity. This indicates that they exerted more reasoning effort for more difficult problems. However, upon approaching a critical threshold (which closely corresponded to their accuracy collapse point), these models counter-intuitively began to reduce their reasoning effort (measured by inference-time tokens), despite the increasing problem difficulty. Their work also found that in cases where problem complexity is low, non-thinking models (LLMs) were capable to obtain performance comparable to, or even better than thinking models with more token-efficient inference. With medium complexity, the advantage of reasoning models capable of generating long chain-of-thought began to manifest, and the performance gap between LLMs and LRMs increased. But, where problem complexity is higher, the performance of both models collapsed to zero. 'Results show that while thinking models delay this collapse, they also ultimately encounter the same fundamental limitations as their non-thinking counterparts,' the paper said. It is worth noting though that the researchers have acknowledged their work could have limitations: 'While our puzzle environments enable controlled experimentation with fine-grained control over problem complexity, they represent a narrow slice of reasoning tasks and may not capture the diversity of real-world or knowledge-intensive reasoning problems.' Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
AI-native startups edge out SaaS in investor playbooks as tech shift accelerates
India's venture capital ecosystem is undergoing a pivotal shift in 2025, with investors increasingly backing artificial intelligence (AI)-native startups over traditional software-as-a-service (SaaS) players. Between January and 4 June, AI-focused startups raised $454 million across 65 deals, slightly surpassing SaaS firms, which drew $432 million over 52 deals, according to data from Venture Intelligence. While some overlap exists as SaaS companies adopt AI features, the trend points to a deeper reset in investor priorities. 'AI-led startups are commanding 3–4x valuation premiums over traditional SaaS businesses, thanks to their potential for faster scalability and deeper, more transformative use cases," said Abhinav Chaturvedi, partner at Accel. Also read: 10 Indian AI startups and products to watch out for Blurring boundaries However, to stay competitive with pure-play AI startups, many SaaS companies are now streamlining operations and aggressively investing in artificial intelligence, according to multiple industry executives. This trend is pushing established SaaS companies to retool quickly. 'If SaaS companies don't integrate AI, they are unlikely to survive the next 2–3 years," said Nitin Bhatia, managing director at DC Advisory. 'We're seeing the switch happen where pure-play SaaS startups don't exist anymore. AI is becoming a fundamental part of what they offer—whether it's to enhance customer experience or product capabilities." This transition is also shaping the investment strategies of venture capital firms such as Stellaris Venture Partners, Bessemer Venture Partners, and Accel, who see the convergence of AI and SaaS playing out across their portfolios. Accel's Chaturvedi pointed to SaaS portfolio companies like Chargebee, which is exploring newer monetisation models like usage-based pricing, and BrowserStack and Testsigma, which are embedding AI to automate testing—showing how legacy players are not just adapting but helping shape this transformation. Some of the largest AI-linked fundraises this year include Netradyne's $90 million, SpotDraft's $54 million, and Infinite Uptime's $35 million rounds, according to Venture Intelligence data. The narrowing gap between AI and SaaS deal volumes underscores growing investor appetite for pure-play AI models. Deal data reflects this shift: in 2024, there were 193 SaaS deals versus 145 AI deals. A year earlier, SaaS saw 159 deals compared to just 96 in AI. While SaaS still leads in terms of overall capital raised, AI startups are quickly gaining ground with more focused, domain-specific solutions. Also read: Meta in talks to invest nearly $10 billion in artificial intelligence startup Scale AI Even within traditional SaaS portfolios, companies are recalibrating. 'Our existing SaaS portfolio companies are investing aggressively in AI capabilities. From Whatfix in the digital adoption space to Factors in marketing automation, most of our portfolio companies are already using AI to add features, increase convenience and reduce cost for their customers," said Ritesh Banglani, founding partner at Stellaris Venture Partners. According to Banglani, more than 80% of Stellaris' B2B SaaS deal flow is now led by AI-centric solutions. 'This shift will transform every process within an enterprise from marketing and sales to accounting and finance," he added. A generational shift Industry veterans believe the shift marks a generational reset for Indian software startups. SaaS inflows have dried up, Zoho founder Sridhar Vembu said last week, attributing it to rising investor appetite for AI and growing profitability pressure on SaaS firms. He noted that artificial intelligence is now superseding traditional SaaS models in funding priority. Still, the broader outlook for SaaS remains strong—with a caveat. In August, Bessemer Venture Partners projected that the Indian SaaS market could generate three times more revenue by 2030 compared to today, driven in large part by the infusion of AI. In 2025, Indian SaaS is expected to clock $25 billion in annual recurring revenue. Bessemer also expects India to see a similar shift as the global SaaS wave of the late 2010s—with AI software exports playing a bigger role in the $400 billion global services market. As the Indian startup ecosystem matures, the once-clear boundaries between SaaS and AI are dissolving—with capital, innovation and talent increasingly flowing toward platforms that can do both. Also read: Boom in AI fuels a flurry of startups
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Tata Sons' FY25 revenue is likely to be lower despite record dividends
MUMBAI : Tata Sons, the privately held parent company of the Tata group, will likely see its revenues shrink in 2024-25 despite receiving record dividend income from the group companies. The reason: Last fiscal's one-off income from the sale of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) Ltd shares. The company's dividend income from 11 listed companies surpassed the ₹35,000-crore mark in 2024-25, which is the highest ever, showed data compiled by Mint. However, since Tata Sons sold TCS shares worth approximately ₹9,000 crore in the open market in 2023-24, its income is likely to see a decline in the latest fiscal. Also Read: Borrowed time: Investors bullish on near-term upside increase leveraged bets on Tata Motors, SBI, HAL, Jio Financial Dividends and share buybacks from group companies account for nearly all of Tata Sons' top line. While the conglomerate has 26 listed companies, the 11 companies used in this analysis account for over 95% of dividend income of the holding firm. The company received a dividend income of ₹21,529 crore in 2023-24, according to its annual report. In addition, it received ₹10,548 crore from a TCS share buyback, taking its total payout from group companies to ₹32,077 crore. Adding revenue from other sources like Tata brand usage feeds and the sale of TCS shares took Tata Sons' 2023-24 revenue to ₹43,893 crore. Tata Sons did not respond to Mint's queries. Reaping dividends TCS, where Tata Sons holds a 71.74% stake, led the pack with a dividend of ₹32,184 crore in 2024-25. In fact, a 12% increase in the payout from TCS is the reason why the dividend income of Tata Sons has hit a fresh record in 2024-25 despite a dip in dividends from three other companies. Tata Steel and Tata Motors were the next two highest dividend returning units of Tata Sons, with a payout of ₹1,427 crore and ₹947 crore. Also Read: N. Chandrasekaran changed Tata Capital. Now, the company is prepping for an IPO 'The reason for growth in dividends is because of the improving profitability of most large Tata group companies and likely the lack of suitable reinvestment opportunities for those companies," said Shriram Subramanian, the managing director of proxy advisory firm InGovern Research Services. For instance, TCS generates the highest free cash flow within the group. The company will need to payout the cash as dividends due to a slowdown in the IT services sector leaving it with few investment opportunities, Subramanian added. Tata Sons also needs these dividends as the company has to invest in fledgling businesses like Air India and Tata Electronics, which take up a lot of capital, he added. Air India is the privately held aviation business of the Tata group while Tata Electronics, which is also private, assembles iPhones for Apple Inc. on a contract basis and is setting up semiconductor manufacturing fabs. The Chandra factor The dividend income of Tata Sons has surged sharply during the tenure of chairman N. Chandrasekaran who took over the reins on 21 February 2017. The 2024-25 dividend income is up five-fold since 2016-17. Seven of the 11 listed Tata group companies analyzed returned dividend in excess of ₹100 crore to Tata Sons. Only three of these companies had paid the parent over ₹100 crore dividend in 2016-17. 'The Tata group of companies is a very large group, and one person alone cannot be responsible for its performance or the lack of it," Subramanian said. Also Read: Tata Motors, JLR flag EV supply chain as a separate business risk. They don't name China, but its imprint is all over. 'However, Mr. Chandrasekaran has, in the past eight years, brought some dynamism and tried to consolidate businesses," he added. Chandrasekaran joined the board of Tata Sons in October 2016 and took over as the chairman in February 2017. He also chairs the boards of Tata Steel Ltd, Tata Motors Ltd, Tata Power Co. Ltd, Air India Ltd, TCS and several group operating companies. He worked in TCS for 30 years, including eight years as its chief executive until 2017.
