‘Help me get back into my home': Hillsborough residents give input on spending $709M in storm recovery funds
The county held the first of nine public meetings on Wednesday night. $709 million of federal funding is available to help with recovery and mitigation efforts related to Hurricanes Idalia, Debby, Helene, and Milton.
The money comes from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery.
Many hurricane victims are at different stages of recovery. Barbara Yarborough is back in her West Park home after having four feet of water on the inside.
'I walked in the front door and nothing was in the same place,' said Yarborough. 'It was dirty sewer water, that's what bothered me.'
Yarborough couldn't make it to the meeting on Wednesday, but said she had been encouraging her neighbors to go, as she says they've never seen flooding like what they saw last fall.
Evelyn Igbinosun lives in Lake Magdalene and said three feet of water rushed into her house.
'I'm still not in my house,' said Igbinosun. 'If I didn't have a relative, I would be out on the street.'
These women, and other residents, called on Hillsborough County to make some changes.
The county proposes putting $35 million toward administration, $5 million for planning, $360 million for housing, $107 million for infrastructure, $180 million toward the economy, and $12 million for public services.
'We want this to be fair and accessible to all who qualify,' said the moderator of the public hearing.
Residents said they felt $709 million isn't enough money to help.
'$10 million for flood mitigation wouldn't even cover this area,' said one resident.
'These public dollars should prioritize long-term community resilience, not corporate profit,' said another resident.
They also mentioned the backed-up canals and drainage systems they feel make storms even worse.
'Our ditches in the Town and Country area are horrible,' said one woman.
'It rained the other day and I went into a panic. I said 'Oh my gosh, I hope it's not going to rain too much,'' said Yarborough. 'I want them to redo the gutters and that canal there. Stormwater and drainage, after all, that's why we're here. Florida, we're known for that, so we need to take care of it. And I thought our taxes went to take care of things.'
Igbinosun said she doesn't think the county was prepared for these storms and wants them to act now.
'Help me get back into my home. I would love that because my husband is in a nursing home. We use to go and get him and bring him home for the day. We can't even do that anymore,' said Igbinosun. 'Drainage would be the most important thing to me and then helping people like me get back into their homes and function day to day in their own surroundings.'
The county has six years to use these funds. If the plan is approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the county can implement the program later this fall.
If you want to send Marilyn Parker a news tip about this story or other newsworthy events, fill out the form below!
Submit a form.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
35 minutes ago
- CNBC
States brace for less disaster relief aid as Trump administration reshapes FEMA
The Trump administration is quickly reshaping the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, in ways that carry vast implications for state and local governments. "We're going to give out less money. We're going to give it out directly. It'll be from the president's office," President Donald Trump said at a press conference June 11. The agency is responsible for coordinating response and recovery in disasters that range from floods to wildfires to terrorist attacks. The agency reported a total budget authority of $60 billion in fiscal year 2025. Federal spending on disaster relief often draws supplemental appropriations from Congress. Critics of FEMA say the agency is slow to pay out victims and provide guidance for communities in the process of rebuilding. "We've recommended for years that they work on streamlining their recovery programs, that they better coordinate their programs so communities and survivors don't have to navigate multiple federal bureaucratic programs. And honestly, they just have not been able to do it," Chris Currie, a director at the Government Accountability Office, said in an interview with CNBC. FEMA is currently managing more than 600 open disaster declarations, some of which date back almost 20 years, according to a Government Accountability Office report published in March. The spending, according to FEMA, includes $80 million in fiscal year 2025 for recovery from Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma, which devastated huge swaths of the Gulf Coast in 2005. Cuts in federal funding for disaster relief would put the burden on state and local governments in areas affected by disasters. When Hurricane Helene hit the U.S. in late September 2024, it caused $59.6 billion in damage in North Carolina, according to the Governor's Recovery Office for Western North Carolina. As of May 2025, the federal government had provided about $3.7 billion in recovery funds — approximately 6.2% of the total cost of the damage, according to Democratic Gov. Josh Stein's office. A FEMA spokesperson said in a statement to CNBC, "FEMA's principles for emergency management assert that disasters are best managed when they're federally supported, state managed and locally executed." Much work remains nearly a year after Helene damaged many parts of western North Carolina. More than 73,000 homes were damaged, according to an April report from Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-N.C. Major roadways were also damaged, including a stretch of I-40, and the state needs additional federal funds to cover the cost of road repairs, Edwards' report said. The average income in the disaster area ranges from $35,809 to $55,607, depending on the county, Edwards' report said. "To not have FEMA means that now local governments will have to deal with disaster, and it's always bigger than the revenues of the local government," said Sarah Wells Rolland, founder and owner of the Village Potters Clay Center in Asheville, North Carolina. "For the funding to be taken away I think is a colossal disaster." Wells Rolland said her business operated in Asheville's River Arts District for 13 years before Hurricane Helene passed through town. The business was destroyed by more than 24 feet of flood waters, according to NOAA. The Village Potters Clay Center, which generated about $743,000 in annual revenues in 2023, documented almost $200,000 in equipment losses, according to Wells Rolland. The business had flood insurance through FEMA's National Flood Insurance Policy and received a payment of $165,000, according to Wells Rolland. She plans to reopen this fall in a new location on higher ground. "We're an economic driver for tourism, hospitality, restaurants, regional development, you know, so we're an essential part of our economic community," said Jeffrey Burroughs, president of the River Arts District Association. "If we can't take on another loan, how do we get the funding to help sustain us so that we can stay open?" Watch the video above to see how FEMA could evolve in the coming years.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
How hurricanes, fires, and floods put drugs and medical supplies at risk
Advertisement These threats are especially pressing as the Trump administration makes a push to ramp up US drug manufacturing, say the authors of the new research. As part of a broader effort to increase US pharmaceutical factories, President Donald Trump has threatened to impose tariffs on imported medicines, a move that could make the country more reliant on domestically produced supplies. Roughly 40% of finished medications and 80% of active pharmaceutical ingredient components come from abroad, according to US Food and Drug Administration estimates. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Climate change-driven extreme weather events impose new threats to established vulnerabilities in the US drug supply,' the study's authors wrote. 'Those threats must be examined to be appropriately mitigated.' The analysis used FDA and Federal Emergency Management Agency databases to find drug production facilities in counties with major fire, hurricane, storm, tornado and flood events between 2019 and 2024. California, Florida and North Carolina were home to the largest numbers of facilities in counties with presidential disaster declarations. Advertisement Hurricanes were the most common of the climate-related disasters in areas with pharmaceutical facilities, according to the research. In 2017, Hurricane Maria hit Puerto Rico and disrupted Baxter's saline solution manufacturing facility there. Baxter is a major manufacturer of the sterile salt water widely used in hospitals to deliver medications and keep patients hydrated. The company didn't have backup facilities manufacturing smaller bags of the saline solution, which compounded pre-existing supply issues. Baxter has said it's learned from Maria and now has a more resilient supply chain, citing manufacturing investments and FDA clearance to produce saline outside of the US if needed. Even resilient supply chains are prone to climate shocks, though. Helene flooded Baxter's North Carolina facility, which made 60% of the IV fluid bags used in US hospitals for various functions, including to deliver medicine. Baxter reported earlier this year that the North Carolina plant was back at pre-hurricane production levels, and the FDA said this month that the shortages had resolved. Sarah Ryan, a spokesperson for pharmaceutical industry group PhRMA, says that the industry works with government regulators to avoid shortages. The new research did not determine how often such disasters result in shortages, saying that data wasn't readily available. ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Axios
8 hours ago
- Axios
Georgia electricity costs rise amid data center boom
Electricity costs are rising in Georgia and across the country — and could get even higher for some amid the explosion in data centers powering AI and more. Why it matters: Surging power bills could further stress many Americans' budgets as pretty much everything else gets more expensive, too. By the numbers: Georgia's average retail residential price for 1 kilowatt-hour of electricity rose from 14.93 cents to 15 cents between May 2024 and May 2025, per the latest available data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, a gain of about 0.5%. That statistic includes all utilities, not just Georgia Power, which provides electricity to 2.8 million ratepayers, mostly in metro Atlanta. Context: Georgia Power residential customers using more than 1,000 kilowatt-hours of electricity are paying roughly $43 more monthly to turn on their lights compared with 2023, Georgia Recorder reports. That increase has helped pay for Plant Vogtle's two new over-budget nuclear reactors and fuel costs. Add a July with record-high temperatures and it becomes clearer why some customers saw their electricity bills double or triple. Caveat: In July, the Georgia Public Service Commission approved a plan to keep Georgia Power rates stable through 2028. However, the utility next year will ask the regulators to pass clean-up costs related to Hurricane Helene and other storms on to customers. Zoom in: Georgia Power wants to add 9,000 megawatts of capacity by 2031 to handle a (potentially overestimated) data center boom, according to Georgia Recorder. 80% of that new electricity would be consumed by data centers and generated mostly using fossil fuels. The intrigue: In January, the PSC approved a rule change that the utility regulator says would protect residential ratepayers from surges in demand from data centers. A bill to codify that policy, which consumer advocates say could provide ratepayers with greater protections, passed out of committee during the most recent Georgia General Assembly but did not receive a full vote. The bottom line: Many of us are paying for the AI boom, whether we use the tech or not.
