Trump Plans to Impose 100% Tariff on All Movies Produced Outside of the U.S.
Utilizing the resources of the Department of Commerce and the United States Trade Representative, Donald Trump has announced his intention to seek a 100% tariff on all films brought to America from another country. This includes films made by American companies like Netflix overseas in areas with better tax incentives, such as the U.K. and South Africa.
Writing on Truth Social, Trump said, 'The Movie Industry in America is DYING a very fast death. Other Countries are offering all sorts of incentives to draw our filmmakers and studios away from the United States. Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated.'
More from IndieWire
'Rosario' Review: Crispy 'Drag Me to Hell' Riff Gets Swallowed by David Dastmalchian and an Air Fryer
Bruce Springsteen Calls 'Adolescence' Star Stephen Graham 'Amazing' as His Father in 'Deliver Me from Nowhere'
Trump went on to claim that production moving overseas was part of a 'concerted effort' by foreign countries to undermine American business, calling it 'a national security threat.'
'It is, in addition to everything else, messaging and propaganda!' Trump wrote. 'Therefore, I am authorizing the Department of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative, to immediately begin the process of instituting a 100% Tariff on any and all Movies coming into our Country that are produced in Foreign Lands. WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!'
Hollywood has been on the President's hit list from the very start of his second administration. One of his first actions in office was to name Mel Gibson, Sylvester Stallone, and Jon Voight as 'special ambassadors' to help fix an ailing Hollywood. Though not much has been heard from Gibson or Stallone on this effort, Voight has been making the rounds with different union reps and studio executives (as per Deadline). Many were hopeful this might lead to a possible federal tax incentive for production throughout the U.S., but as it's become Trump's new favorite toy, it seems a tariff is what we'll get.
It's unclear whether this tariff will apply to films alone or also include other media such as television, music videos, or commercials, but if so, it may end up doing more damage than good. The stated goal is to incentivize bringing production back to the States and in particular, Hollywood — but this doesn't actually reduce the cost of production in the way federal U.S. Tax incentives would. This just makes production outside the U.S. more expensive. The net result may be that the studios would just reduce production across the board.
As far as tax incentives, in October 2024, California Governor Gavin Newsom put forth a proposal to increase the state's tax program to $750 million, over twice as much as it's doling out currently. Others have offered further increases, suggesting no cap be placed on this figure. Voting for this initiative will take place this summer.
Best of IndieWire
Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See
'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie
The 55 Best LGBTQ Movies and TV Shows Streaming on Netflix Right Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
10 minutes ago
- UPI
G-7 agrees to exclude U.S. companies from 15% minimum tax
Leaders of the G-7 nations pose for a photo in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, on Monday: (from left) Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, U.S. President Donald Trump, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The G-7 announced the U.S. would be excluded from the 15% minimum tax on American companies. Photo via G7/UPI | License Photo June 29 (UPI) -- Group of Seven nations agreed to exempt U.S. companies from a 15% minimum corporate tax rate, the countries said in a joint statement. The nonbinding deal was announced Saturday but still requires approval from the 38-member Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development that established the 2021 agreement on taxing companies. G-7 nations are part of the OECED. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had proposed a "side-by-side solution" for American-headquartered companies that would be exempt from the Income Inclusion Rule and Undertaxed Profits Rule "in recognition of the existing U.S. minimum tax rules to which they are subject." The massive spending bill now being considered in Congress originally included a "revenge tax" that would have imposed a levy of up to 20% on investments from countries that taxed U.S. companies. "I have asked the Senate and House to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill," Bessent wrote in a multi-post thread on X on Thursday. The House has approved the massive legislation and the Senate is considering it. "It is an honorable compromise as it spares us from the automatic retaliations of Section 899 of the Big, Beautiful Bill," Italian Finance Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti told local media. "We are not claiming victory, but we obtained some concessions as the U.S. pledged to engage in OECD negotiations on fair taxation," an unnamed French official told Politico Europe. The official called the "revenge tax" a potentially "huge burden for French companies." Trump has criticized this provision because he said it would limit sovereignty and send U.S. tax revenues to other countries. "The Trump administration remains vigilant against all discriminatory and extraterritorial foreign taxes applied against Americans," Bessent wrote Thursday. Trump has imposed a July 9 deadline for U.S. trading partners to lower taxes on foreign goods, threatening high duties on the worst offenders, including 50% on goods from the 27 European Union members. In April, a baseline tariff was imposed on most U.S. trading partners, with higher rates on certain companies and products. In 2021, nearly 140 countries agreed to tax multinational companies at the 15% minimum, regardless of where they were headquartered. In late April, the European Union, Britain, Japan and Canada agreed to exempt the United States from the 15% minimum tax on companies. "Delivery of a side-by-side system will facilitate further progress to stabilize the international tax system, including a constructive dialogue on the taxation of the digital economy and on preserving the tax sovereignty of all countries," the joint statement read. The agreement, according to the statement, would ensure that any substantial risks identified "with respect to the level playing field, or risks of base erosion and profit shifting, are addressed to preserve the common policy objectives of the side-by-side system." The G-7 includes Britain, France, Germany, Italy in Europe, as well as Canada, Japan and U.S. Before 2014, the group was known as the G-8 until Russia was expelled after annexing the Crimea region of Ukraine. The chairs of the House and Senate committees responsible for tax policy cheered the agreement. "We applaud President Trump and his team for protecting the interests of American workers and businesses after years of congressional Republicans sounding the alarm on the Biden Administration's unilateral global tax surrender under Pillar 2," Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo, chair of the Senate Finance Committee, and Missouri Rep. Jason Smith, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said in a press release. The agreement also, however, has its critics. "The U.S. is trying to exempt itself by arm-twisting others, which would make the tax deal entirely useless," Markus Meinzer, director of policy at the Tax Justice Network, told Politico Europe. "A ship with a U.S.-sized hole in its hull won't float."
New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump says Republicans could miss July 4 deadline to pass ‘big beautiful' spending bill
President Trump is unsure whether Republicans will get his marquee One Big Beautiful Bill Act to his desk by the self-imposed Fourth of July deadline. 'I don't know. I mean, I can't tell you that,' Trump told Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' in a pre-taped interview when asked about the timing of the bill's passage. 'I'd like to say, yes. But the problem is if we're two days late or five days late, everybody says, 'Oh, you had a tremendous failure.'' 'It's very important. If we don't have it, there's a 68% tax increase. If we have don't it, you know, the debt ceiling extension is very important,' he added. Trump revealed Sunday he's unsure if the 'big, beautiful bill' will be passed by July 4th. AP The One Big Beautiful Bill Act features Trump's legislative agenda, including the extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, bolstered border security, beefed-up defense spending, energy policy reforms, spending cuts and more. All of that is stuffed into one reconciliation bill to sidestep the 60-vote threshold needed to break a Democratic filibuster. The massive bill also increases the debt limit, ahead of the projected August to September debt ceiling deadline in which the US would run the risk of default. GOP leadership had publicly planned to put the megabill on Trump's desk by Independence Day. On Saturday evening, Senate Republicans advanced the mammoth agenda bill, kicking off the time-consuming procedural process to pass it. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) has vowed to keep the upper chamber in town through the Fourth of July if needed to get the spending bill across the finish line. Despite starting the process, sharp divisions within the Senate GOP remain. Once it clears the Senate, it will then have to go through the House again before it can reach Trump's desk. One of the core divisions is over how much spending Republicans should cut. 'You also have to get elected. When you do cutting, you have to be a little bit careful, because people don't like necessarily cutting if they get used to something,' Trump said of the fiscal hawks demanding deeper cuts. 'And what I wanna do is do it through growth. We're gonna have growth like we've never seen before.' Despite starting the process, sharp divisions within the Senate GOP remain. REUTERS During his wide-ranging interview, Trump also spoke of how he plans to handle the $9 trillion US debt burden that is set to mature this year and faulted Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for not lowering rates. 'We're going turn it short term because we have a stupid person at the Fed if he would lower the rates,' Trump said of the looming debt obligation. 'But I don't want to have to pay for 10 years debt at a higher rate. 'And then we're to get somebody into the Fed who's going to be able to lower the rate.'
Politico
14 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump continues to project optimism that strikes on Iran ‘obliterated' its nuclear program
President Donald Trump is insisting that his strikes on Iran last week left the country's nuclear program 'obliterated like nobody's ever seen before,' even as the United Nations nuclear watchdog says Tehran could resume uranium enrichment 'in a matter of months.' Trump told Fox News host Maria Bartiromo he doesn't think the satellite images of trucks at two of the nuclear sites later hit by American pilots mean the country smuggled out much of its enriched uranium. 'No, I think,' he told Bartiromo in a pre-recorded interview that aired on 'Sunday Morning Futures.' 'First of all, it's very hard to do, it's very dangerous to do. It's very heavy, very very heavy. It's a very hard thing to do. Plus, we didn't give them much notice because they didn't know we were coming until just, you know, then. And nobody thought we'd go after that site because everybody said that site is impenetrable.' The White House has continued to promote its attacks on Iran's nuclear program as a complete victory. But the administration has not been able to provide convincing evidence, as experts caution that a definitive assessment on the strikes' impact could take weeks or even longer. In an interview that aired Sunday on CBS' 'Face the Nation,' the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said the damage to Iranian facilities wrought by the attacks was 'not total.' And without clarification about the whereabouts of the enriched uranium, 'this will continue to be hanging, you know, over our heads as a potential problem,' he said. But the president is projecting confidence. 'You know what they moved? Themselves,' Trump told Bartiromo. 'They were all trying to live. They didn't move anything. They didn't think it was going to be actually doable, what we did.' And Trump doesn't think Iran has any incentive to rebuild its beleaguered nuclear program as the country contemplates its future following a damaging war with Israel and a tentative ceasefire. 'The last thing they want to do right now is think about nuclear,' he said. 'They have to put themselves back into condition, in shape.' Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has long supported aggressive American action against Iran. But though he called the strikes on Iran 'a tremendous military success,' he said Sunday it was 'too early to tell' if Iran would ultimately abandon its ambitions to become a nuclear power. 'The question for the world: Does the regime still desire to make a nuclear weapon? The answer is yes. Do they still desire to destroy Israel and come after us? The answer is yes,' he said on ABC's 'This Week.'
