
Half of UFS field training rescheduled to September amid heat, says JCS
Col. Lee Sung-jun, spokesperson for South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that out of some 40 planned outdoor drills, around 20 will be moved to September.
"In light of the extreme heat and the need to maintain a balanced readiness posture year-round, South Korea and the United States agreed to adjust some of the drills to September after close consultations," he said.
He stressed that the rescheduling was not a reduction in scope, noting that most of the postponed drills involve battalion-level training, such as airfield defense, recovery and equipment maintenance exercises.
The core components of UFS — including the computer-based command post exercise, field training exercises directly linked to the UFS scenario, and drills involving US augmentation forces — will proceed as originally scheduled.
The adjustment comes amid growing expectations that the Lee Jae Myung administration may seek to soften the tone of military activities within the South Korea-US alliance. On July 28, Unification Minister Chung Dong-young said he would propose to Lee that the combined exercise schedule be modified.
The word "North Korea" was also omitted from the official joint statement announcing the exercise.
A high-ranking official from the Unification Ministry who declined to be named said Thursday: "A modification was made."
The JCS spokesperson, however, dismissed claims that the omission reflected a conciliatory approach toward Pyongyang on the part of the Lee Jae Myung administration, noting that terminology varies every year.
"It was also omitted in the 2022 and 2024 statements. The wording is determined through mutual consultation between South Korea and the US," Lee said, noting that similar cases occurred during the conservative Yoon Suk Yeol administration.
While drills to counter North Korea's missile threats will be held, scenarios involving the North's actual use of nuclear weapons are not part of this year's exercise, he added.
US Forces Korea spokesperson Col. Ryan Donald emphasized that the quality of training is what matters most in building readiness.
"We remain focused on our objectives, which are clear: to maintain peace and security on the Korean Peninsula, ensure our combined forces are ready to respond to a variety of threats — from hybrid and conventional to weapons of mass destruction — and address broader regional challenges," he said.
The exercise will incorporate lessons from the modern battlefield, including drone, cyber and space threats, while also factoring in growing military cooperation between Russia and North Korea.
About 18,000 South Korean troops will take part, similar to last year, along with US forces and United Nations Command members. The Neutral Nations Supervisory Commission will also monitor compliance with the armistice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
10 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Pentagon stresses 'primary' alliance focus on N. Korea, 'shared priorities' over 'broader regional' threats
The "primary" focus of the South Korea-US alliance remains on deterring North Korea, but the allies continue to cooperate to align their "shared defense priorities" to respond to the "broader" regional security environment, a Pentagon press secretary said Friday. Press secretary Kingsley Wilson made the remarks in response to Yonhap News Agency's question over the meaning of joint efforts by Seoul and Washington to "modernize" the alliance at a time when US President Donald Trump's administration prioritizes deterring an increasingly assertive China. "While the primary focus remains on deterring North Korean aggression, we continue to work closely with the Republic of Korea to align our shared defense priorities in response to the broader regional security environment," she said in a statement. She added that the US Defense Department remains committed to a "modern, strategically sustainable" South Korea-US alliance that "can address today's and tomorrow's security challenges." "Alliance modernization includes adapting our combined posture, deepening interoperability and expanding cooperation across domains to ensure credible deterrence on the Korean Peninsula and beyond," she said. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea again postpones decision on Google's map data transfer request amid US pressure
The South Korean government on Friday delayed its decision on Google's request to export high-precision map data overseas, the transport ministry said, amid pressure from Washington to resolve the issue, calling it a non-tariff barrier. In February, the US tech giant submitted an application to the state-run National Geographic Information Institute under the ministry, seeking approval for the transfer of 1:5,000-scale high-precision map data to its data centers abroad. The review panel extended the deadline for the decision by 60 days during its May meeting, citing the need for further discussions on national security and the potential impact on domestic industries, and was supposed to reach a decision by Monday. But it decided to extend the deadline by another 60 days, according to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. The review panel is composed of officials from major ministries, including the defense, foreign affairs, industry and science ministries, as well as the National Intelligence Service. Officials said the latest decision was made upon Google's request, as the company sought more time to review ways to address national security concerns related to the data exports. But the Seoul government seems to be cautious on the matter, as reaching a conclusion ahead of possible discussions on the matter at a future South Korea–U.S. summit could be sensitive and influence other agenda items to be discussed during the summit. Consultations are under way between Seoul and Washington to set a date for a summit between President Lee Jae Myung and U.S. President Donald Trump. Some reports have said that the summit will likely take place around Aug. 25. Currently, Google provides South Korean maps using publicly available lower-resolution 1:25,000-scale map data combined with aerial and satellite imagery. The United States has cited the issue as a key non-tariff barrier, though it was excluded from the recent tariff agreement between the two nations under which the U.S. imposes a 15 percent tariff on South Korean imports in exchange for South Korea's pledge to invest US$350 billion in the U.S. It was not known if the data transfer issue will be on the table at the upcoming summit. Google previously made similar requests for the transfer of high-precision map data overseas in 2007 and 2016, but Seoul rejected them due to national security concerns, citing the potential exposure of military bases and other sensitive facilities. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul's bid for leniency on binding plastic cuts in UN treaty faces scrutiny
Despite President Lee Jae-myung's pledge to 'de-plastic' by the end of 2025, South Korea is drawing scrutiny for proposing softer language for a key provision in UN-led treaty negotiations aimed at reducing plastic waste. The South Korean government submitted amendments in tandem with Brazil to a draft provision mandating countries to reduce hazardous plastic products during the resumed fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee tasked with finalizing a legally binding international treaty on plastic pollution. The INC-5.2 began Tuesday in Geneva and will continue until Thursday. The second part of the INC-5 was launched as participating country representatives failed to reach a full consensus on what should and should not be included in a binding agreement against plastic pollution during the first INC-5 at Busan in December 2024. The original text, proposed jointly by Switzerland and Mexico, stated that each supporting state 'shall reduce' harmful plastic products with legally binding force. The definition of harmful plastics included plastics that risk leaking into the environment or human bodies, contain chemicals with potential health or environmental impacts, cannot be feasibly recycled or reused at scale or significantly obstruct circular economy efforts. A total of 77 countries — including all 27 EU member states and 14 Pacific Island nations formally backed the proposal, according to the UN Environment Program. However, the proposal submitted by South Korea and Brazil sought to revise the text to a more suggestive tone — requiring parties to 'take appropriate measures to address, manage, reduce or prohibit' harmful plastic products. In the proposal, two countries also suggested taking each country's 'circumstances, capacities and socioeconomic factors' into consideration when determining what constitutes an 'appropriate measure' to counter plastic waste. This is not the first time Seoul has aligned with Brazil in global plastic negotiations. A similar proposal was made during the first INC-5 meeting last year under the previous Yoon Suk Yeol administration. Local climate advocacy groups sharply criticized the Korean government's stance throughout talks held so far at INC-5.2. 'President Lee made de-plasticization one of his core pledges during his presidential campaign and even promised to come up with a roadmap by the end of this year to combat plastic waste. Introducing a watered-down language during the treaty talks goes directly against that commitment,' said Solutions for Our Climate through an official statement issued Friday. Claiming that a legitimate response to the climate crisis is 'fundamental reduction, the group added that 'managing or addressing plastic pollution is not enough.' 'Korea must step up and lead on real solutions, not backtrack,' the group added. In response to mounting criticism, the Ministry of Environment denied claims that Korea was attempting to block plastic reduction efforts. 'We're not opposed to the reduction of harmful plastics,' a ministry official told The Korea Herald. 'From our knowledge, several countries have expressed difficulty in accepting the proposal presented by Switzerland and Mexico in its current form. Korea's intention was to facilitate dialogue by introducing alternative language that could help break the deadlock.'