Tennessee tries to boost awareness of 988 mental health hotline
Why it matters: Suicide is one of the leading causes of death in Tennessee, and the suicide rate here is about 20% higher than the national average, according to state data.
Driving the news: The new Promise to Call campaign encourages people to write down the name of a friend or supportive resource. Then participants promise to call if they ever have thoughts of suicide.
Advocates also suggest adding 988 to your phone contacts as a backstop in times of crisis.
What they're saying:"It is our belief that if someone makes a promise prior to a suicide crisis, it can save a life," said Commissioner Marie Williams, who oversees the Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services.
Threat level: In 2023, the most recent full year of statistics, 1,279 Tennesseans died by suicide.
Men and white Tennesseans have died by suicide at particularly high rates, according to state-specific data.
The big picture: The 988 hotline launched in 2022 to help confront the national mental health crisis. But there is significant room for growth.
According to a recent analysis, last year's nationwide 988 contact rate was less than half the rate of adult emergency room visits related to mental health, despite ERs' cost and access issues.
By the numbers: Calls and texts to 988 in Tennessee have steadily increased.
During fiscal year 2024, which ran from July 1, 2023-June 30, 2024, Tennessee logged 48,847 calls and 21,446 texts and web chats to 988.
The state is already exceeding those figures this year. At the end of May, 11 months into the fiscal year, Tennessee had logged 53,656 calls and a whopping 32,674 texts and web chats.
Zoom out: The Trump administration recently announced it would stop connecting LGBTQ+ youth in crisis who call 988 to the Trevor Project suicide hotline.
This will limit callers' access to counselors trained in helping LGBTQ+ youth, as President Trump targets the group that is more than four times as likely to attempt suicide than peers.
The Oasis Center, a Middle Tennessee youth support organization, offers tailored mental health resources for young LGBTQ+ people. Their 24/7 crisis line is 615-327-4455.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
43 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP senators urge White House to release delayed NIH funding
Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) and 13 other Senate Republicans are urging the Trump administration to release National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding that has been held up for months. The GOP senators warned in a letter to White House budget chief Russell Vought that the 'slow disbursement of funds' that Congress appropriated in March 'risks undermining critical research and the thousands of American jobs it supports.' 'Suspension of these appropriated funds — whether formally withheld or functionally delayed — could threaten Americans' ability to access better treatments and limit our nation's leadership in biomedical science,' the senators warned. 'It also risks inadvertently severing ongoing NIH-funded research prior to actionable results,' they wrote. The Trump administration suspended or cut many NIH research grants earlier this year in order to undertake a thorough review to ensure they complied with Trump's orders to end federal support for diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs. A database set up by a Harvard University researcher estimated that by the end of May more than 2,100 NIH grants worth more than $9 billion had been cancelled. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya told senators in March at his confirmation hearing that his agency would restart grant reviews but an analysis by STAT, a health care news site, last month found that NIH had made little progress in narrowing the funding gap created by the freeze on grant approvals. Now Republican senators are trying to ramp up pressure on the Office of Management and Budget. They told Vought that they share his commitment to ensuring NIH funds are 'used responsibly and not diverted to ideological or unaccountable programs.' But they also argued that starving the NIH of funding could inadvertently undermine trust in the agency. 'Withholding or suspending these funds would jeopardize that trust and hinder progress on critical health challenges facing our nation. Ultimately, this is about finding cures and seeing them through to fruition,' the senators wrote. 'We respectfully request that you ensure the timely release of all FY25 NIH appropriations in accordance with congressional intent,' they added. The other GOP signatories were Sens. John Boozman (Ark.), Shelley Moore Capito ( Bill Cassidy (La.), Susan Collins (Maine), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), David McCormick (Pa.), Mitch McConnell (Ky.), Jerry Moran (Kansas), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Thom Tillis (N.C.), Todd Young (Ind.), Dan Sullivan (Alaska) and Tim Scott (S.C.).
Time Magazine
2 hours ago
- Time Magazine
The ‘Big Beautiful Bill' May Lead to More Fatal Overdoses
The sweeping tax and spending package that President Donald Trump signed into law earlier this month could cause thousands of people to lose access to treatment for opioid use disorder, leading to roughly 1,000 additional overdose deaths each year, researchers estimate. Fatal overdoses have been on the decline since they reached a record high in 2022. Drug policy and health experts have widely credited the drop to public health measures, such as investing in treatments, expanding therapies, and decreasing stigma. But now, they fear that Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' will undo that progress. The day before the bill passed the House, a group of researchers sent a memo to House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, estimating that the package would cause about 156,000 people to lose access to treatment for opioid use disorder. The next day, the bill cleared the House, and the day after, Trump signed it into law. 'I'm angry,' says Dr. Benjamin Linas, the lead researcher behind the memo and a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Boston University. 'I think it's a terrible policy. I think it's doing nothing but making America unhealthy and increasing misery.' The bill's provisions targeting Medicaid are expected to leave about 7.8 million people without health insurance in 2034 due to loss of coverage under the program, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Using that estimate, Linas and his colleagues projected, based on previous data about the proportion of people on Medicaid who receive medications for opioid use disorder, how many of those people will likely lose access to treatments. They then used simulation modeling to estimate how many additional fatal overdoses would occur in one year. Linas called the findings 'upsetting,' adding that the 1,000 additional deaths researchers projected was likely an underestimate because he and his colleagues only accounted for people not being able to access their medications for opioid use disorder—not for any other health complications that could worsen after losing access to health insurance, such as infections, heart attack, or cancer. Researchers also didn't account for the possibility that Medicaid cuts could cause some people to lose access to their preferred medication, forcing them to use a different option, which could cause 'misery and suffering and death,' Linas says. 'It's well-known and documented that when people can't get the treatment that's effective for them or that they would choose, the treatments are less effective and they fall out of care,' Linas says. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) President Dr. Stephen Taylor, who was not involved in writing the memo, says that while the impacts of the bill will vary from state to state, he found the researchers' findings to be reasonable. He notes that the bill has some provisions for people with substance use disorder, including exempting them from work requirements. 'Our focus at ASAM is just to try to mitigate some of the harms from the bill [and] make sure that these exemptions … will be implemented in as expansive and as generous a way as possible,' Taylor says. 'We want to prevent people from losing the coverage that they need; otherwise, those exemptions will be meaningless.' But Linas also points out that many people who are struggling with addiction are not diagnosed, which could make it difficult for them to access such exemptions. Overdose deaths declined by nearly 27% in the U.S. from 2023 to 2024, according to data released by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in May. That comes out to about 81 lives saved each day, the CDC estimated. The number of overdose deaths specifically involving opioids plummeted from roughly 83,140 in 2023 to 54,743 in 2024, according to the CDC. In a statement, the CDC said the federal government has increased efforts to tackle the issue since Trump declared the opioid epidemic a public health emergency in October 2017, months into his first term. Since Trump returned to office in January, however, his second Administration has proposed sweeping cuts to programs dedicated to addiction treatment and research, while its efforts to address the crisis have focused on combatting drug trafficking from other countries. Many public health and addiction experts have criticized the aggressive strategy, saying that it doesn't effectively address the drug crisis. Linas says to attribute the decline in overdose deaths to cracking down on drug dealers and the border is 'completely false;' instead, he says, the credit should go to bolstering public health measures. The damage the tax and spending package is projected to wreak in opioid treatment, he says, exemplifies broader problems in how the Trump Administration is governing. 'After working so hard and seeing progress, to take such a step back is really depressing,' Linas says. 'It's also a microcosm of the total chaos that this Administration imposes on all of us. Because as recently as a year ago, we were investing a lot of federal dollars to reverse the course of this overdose epidemic and starting to see results, and now we're just going to pick up a 180 and reverse it—it's pretty miserable.'
Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
What to know about civil commitment, Trump's new policy for homelessness
President Trump 's new executive order to combat homelessness encourages local governments to revive civil commitment, a process to place people with mental health issues in treatment facilities without their consent. Why it matters: Involuntary civil commitment has historically been used as a preventative method to confine people before they harm themselves or others, and most frequently affects vulnerable groups such as LGBTQ+, people of color and people with disabilities, according to several studies. Context: The order Trump signed Thursday calls for shifting homeless individuals into "long-term" institutions for "humane treatment" which the administration says will "restore public order." The order directs officials to determine if federal resources can be used to ensure that those "with serious mental illness" are not released back into the public solely because government facilities lack enough beds to hold them. The order also requires the Justice Department to evaluate homeless people arrested for federal crimes to determine if they are "sexually dangerous persons." The other side: Critics say the order won't help people afford homes and that previous attempts at mass institutionalization frequently violated Fourteenth Amendment due process rights. "These executive orders ignore decades of evidence-based housing and support services in practice," Donald Whitehead, Jr., executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless, said in a statement. He added that the orders "represent a punitive approach that has consistently failed to resolve homelessness and instead exacerbates the challenges faced by vulnerable individuals." Here's what you need to know about Trump's new executive order: What is civil commitment? Involuntary civil commitment is the process in which a judge, or someone else acting in judicial capacity, orders a person be admitted to a psychiatric hospital or a supervised outpatient treatment facility without their consent. The specific criteria that a person needs to exhibit to be confined varies in every state, but the guidelines usually mention those with mental illness, developmental disabilities and substance abuse issues that pose a danger to themselves or others. Modern day commitment proceedings have to follow due process laws under state and federal law. How was civil commitment previously used? Before the late 1960's, people with mental health issues were often thrown into jails for vagrancy alongside criminals, according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The standards that states had to follow to commit someone had little legal oversight. Since then, there's been a push to orient facilities towards mental health treatment rather than incarceration. More than 500,000 people were committed to mental health treatment facilities in the 1950s, according to a 2010 study. That number fell to 30,000 by the 1990s with a shift in focus on treatment. The Supreme Court has also stepped in to define the boundaries of civil commitment. In a case out of Florida in 1975, the court ruled that an individual must pose a danger to themselves or others to be held against their will. The court ruled in a separate case in 1979 that a "clear and convincing" standard of proof is necessary for involuntary civil commitment. Who was most likely to be affected by civil commitment? The American Psychiatric Association classified"homosexuality" as a mental disorder until 1973, making it easy for states to send LGBTQ+ people to institutions because of their sexuality. Having a "mental abnormality" is typically a requirement for admission to a facility, according to the Prison Policy Initiative, which researches the effects of mass incarceration. The group argues that having a definition that broad would imply that all people who are civilly committed are disabled, which made it hard to accurately determine the number of disabled people in the population studied. Patients of color are more likely than white patients to be committed to involuntary psychiatric hospitalization, according to a 2022 report from the American Psychiatric Association.
