logo
Employee-owned Post Office model ‘unlikely to be considered until 2030'

Employee-owned Post Office model ‘unlikely to be considered until 2030'

Rhyl Journal14-07-2025
The current level of taxpayer funding for the Government-owned postal service is unsustainable, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) said in a new Green Paper on the organisation's future.
This sets out its views on how the Post Office should be run in the future, including possible changes to its ownership structure.
The DBT said turning the organisation into a 'mutual', whereby it is collectively owned by its members, was a possible long-term option.
One version of this structure could see membership limited to postmasters and franchisees, or it could also include customers, employees and communities.
But the Government said the Post Office 'should be financially and operationally stable before mutualisation can be considered', meaning it would need to be profitable and cash-generative.
It is also in the process of working to replace its Horizon IT system following the scandal, in which about 1,000 people are thought to have been wrongly prosecuted and convicted over shortfalls in their branches caused by faulty software.
This means the earliest date to consider mutualisation is thought to be around 2030, the DBT said.
It could then take a further three years to implement, with it being a 'complex, time consuming and potentially expensive process', the Green Paper read.
The Government said another long-term option for the ownership structure is a charter model, similar to the BBC and universities, which sets out an organisation's public purpose and rules for how it operates.
Meanwhile, the paper found that the Post Office's requirement to run at least 11,500 branches across the UK had become 'more challenging and costly' due to rising labour costs against declining visitors across the network.
This has resulted in it requiring more subsidies from the Government in recent years, it said.
The DBT said one option for the future of the Post Office network was to scrap the minimum branch requirement, meaning it could address loss-making branches and focus on bigger, full-service sites.
But it would still have to ensure that at least 99% of the population stay within three miles of a full-service branch under this option.
The Government stressed that its current level of funding to the Post Office is 'unsustainable' in the long-term and that the organisation should be able to self-fund investment in its network and postmasters.
Alongside the Green Paper, the DBT said it had launched a three-month consultation period, giving customers and postmasters the opportunity to have a say in how the service is run.
Post Office minister Gareth Thomas said: 'Post Offices continue to be a central part of our high streets and communities across the country.
'However, after 15 years without a proper review, and in the aftermath of the Horizon scandal, it's clear we need a fresh vision for its future.
'This Green Paper marks the start of an honest conversation about what people want and need from their Post Office in the years ahead.'
Neil Brocklehurst, Post Office's chief executive, said: 'We now have a once-in-a-decade opportunity to have a national conversation about the future of our post offices and their role in supporting communities across the UK.
'This Government consultation is a vital part of shaping what the future of Post Office could, and should, look like.'
Dave Ward, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union (CWU), criticised the Green Paper for 'prioritising further cost-cutting and offering no vision for its future'.
'Successive governments have failed the Post Office, its workers and customers – choosing to use government subsidies for planned redundancies, closures and so-called transformation plans that are nothing more than managed decline,' he said.
Mr Ward said the CWU was advocating a 'joint venture ownership model' that would bring the Post Office and Royal Mail back together and give postmasters greater say over the governance and direction of the company.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Heathrow delivers 'urgent' £49 billion third runway expansion plan to Government
Heathrow delivers 'urgent' £49 billion third runway expansion plan to Government

Evening Standard

time20 minutes ago

  • Evening Standard

Heathrow delivers 'urgent' £49 billion third runway expansion plan to Government

Munira Wilson, the Liberal Democrat MP for Twickenham, said: 'The Government claims that Heathrow expansion will deliver growth. Yet the less than 0.5% growth it would add to GDP is miniscule compared to the 4% wiped off the UK's GDP by Brexit. There are also serious questions around how on earth a debt-laden Heathrow can actually finance the massive costs, and how much will end up coming from taxpayers' pockets.

We're backing Scotland with billions in investment, says Reeves ahead of visit
We're backing Scotland with billions in investment, says Reeves ahead of visit

ITV News

time20 minutes ago

  • ITV News

We're backing Scotland with billions in investment, says Reeves ahead of visit

The UK Government is backing Scotland with billions in investment to grow the economy and create jobs, the Chancellor has said ahead of her visit to the country. Rachel Reeves said Labour is 'seizing the huge potential and opportunities that Scotland has to offer' in defence and energy. She will visit RAF Lossiemouth in Moray and the St Fergus gas plant in Aberdeenshire on Friday, exactly a week after she toured the Rolls-Royce factory near Glasgow Airport. The Chancellor will meet 200 Boeing staff at the military site where three new E-7 Wedgetail aircraft are being made. Whether it's in defence to keep the UK safe, or clean energy to power all corners of the country, this Government is backing Scotland with billions of pounds of investment to grow the economy and create jobs Rachel Reeves The UK Government said its plans to increase defence spending to 2.6% will raise Britain's GDP by around 0.3%, while adding 26,100 jobs to the Scottish economy. It also pointed to its £200 million investment for Aberdeenshire's Acorn carbon capture project, which could create 15,000 new jobs while safeguarding 18,000 more. A final investment decision for the project is yet to be made. Ms Reeves said: 'We're seizing the huge potential and opportunities that Scotland has on offer. 'Whether it's in defence to keep the UK safe, or clean energy to power all corners of the country, this Government is backing Scotland with billions of pounds of investment to grow the economy and create jobs.' Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the Government is investing in defence to 'ensure Britain's security and deter our adversaries and drive economic growth'. He added: 'This investment is a massive jobs opportunity for Scotland – this 'defence dividend' is good news for Scotland, where it will help create skilled jobs, drive economic growth, and help tackle the critical skills gaps facing the country in sectors such as nuclear, construction, maritime and project management.' Maria Laine, Boeing's UK president, said: 'Boeing has a long-standing presence in Scotland including at RAF Lossiemouth, the home to the UK's P-8 Poseidon fleet and where the E-7 Wedgetail will be based when it enters service. 'As a key partner of the UK Armed Forces, Boeing welcomes the defence spending increase and has seen first-hand how defence infrastructure investments, such as the £100 million Atlantic Building and new E-7 facilities at RAF Lossiemouth, can deliver for local jobs, suppliers and UK national security.' Michelle Ferguson, director of CBI Scotland, added: 'Scotland's energy and defence sectors are vital to our economy, driving investment and supporting thousands of skilled jobs. 'The Chancellor's announcement of £200 million for the Acorn energy project is very encouraging, but businesses are eager for final approval to unlock its full potential and secure North Sea jobs. 'Increased defence spending will further boost Scotland's skilled workforce and create growth opportunities across key supply-chain. 'Close collaboration between the Scottish and UK governments will be essential to fully realise these benefits, driving forward national security and Scotland's transition to a resilient, low-carbon economy.' Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce urged the Chancellor to drop the energy profits levy (EPL), the so-called 'windfall tax' on oil and gas companies, which has a headline rate of 78%. Chief executive Russell Borthwick said: 'If we stick to course on the accelerated decline of the North Sea, then we'll only have a few short years and not prosperous decades of future oil and gas from our own waters. 'Instead, we'll import more, pay more and suffer further consequences of jobs and businesses lost, just at the time we need them to support the energy transition. 'We know the Chancellor needs to find growth from somewhere within the UK economy. With oil and gas, there's no need to start from scratch or build out a nascent industry. 'Simply by removing the confiscatory EPL, letting investment flow into projects and stimulating activity in a sector which has been hammered by policy for too long, we can unlock significant growth in the UK economy.'

Councils warn new funding formula will ‘devastate' children's services
Councils warn new funding formula will ‘devastate' children's services

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Councils warn new funding formula will ‘devastate' children's services

Planned changes to the way funding allocations for children's services are calculated would have a 'devastating impact' on key services in London and beyond, councils have warned. They say the new approach, which is part of adjustments to the process of setting authorities' overall annual core funding, risks 'dramatically underestimating levels of need' across the country. The Government is consulting on plans to alter the way the distribution of core council funding is set from 2026/27. A key element of this is the use of a new formula which determines funding levels for individual councils' children's services using various measures, with the aim of distributing funding based on relative needs. The children's services formula alone would cover about a quarter of the overall £30 billion that would be distributed using the new overall approach. Modelling of the impact of the changes by London Councils, which represents 32 boroughs and the City of London, found £1.5 billion would be redistributed away from the capital's boroughs over three years if the children's services formula was the only change. The analysis showed that if all planned financial protections and overall changes to formulae, some of which benefit London authorities, come into effect, councils in the capital would lose £700 million over the period. Research by the National Children's Bureau found the new 'unique' formula for children's services 'has questionable overall robustness and accuracy' because of a lack of testing and metrics that 'are not correlated with need'. The study concluded that the proposed data sources to be used do not include housing costs, which are particularly high in London, resulting in funding allocations being skewed. It also said that the proposed measure of child health is 'subjective' and a more 'objective' measure, such as figures on special educational needs and disability, would capture a broader range of need. The proposed metrics relating to housing occupation and parents' level of education were also identified as problematic measures. The new formula is also said to assume London's demand for children's services has decreased by nearly 40%, despite a collective overspend of budgets by more than £150 million in each of the previous two years. London boroughs claimed the children's formula has been developed 'behind closed doors' with insufficient scrutiny or testing. Claire Holland, the newly elected chairwoman of London Councils and Labour leader of Lambeth Council, said: 'We welcome the Government's intention to reform council funding since this is long overdue, and it is critical that funding is distributed fairly and efficiently on the basis of need. 'However, it's clear there are serious issues with the proposed children's services formula, which risks dramatically underestimating levels of need in London and other parts of the country. This would have a devastating impact on our ability to deliver vital local services, particularly for our most vulnerable children and young people. 'A more accurate approach to assessing local levels of need is in everyone's interests. It will help create a funding system that is robust, provides councils with the resources they need and, following 14 years of structural underfunding, restores long-term financial stability to boroughs and the wider local government sector. 'The consultation is an essential opportunity to re-examine the formula, and we are keen to work with the Government to develop a model that is accurate and robust.' James Shutkever, social care programme lead at the National Children's Bureau, added: 'At a time of increased pressure on children's services departments across the country the relative needs formula is a crucial tool for fair distribution of funding to ensure that children, young people and their families get the support that they need and deserve. 'However, our research raises significant concerns about the robustness of the Government's proposed methodology for the funding formula. 'We urge the Government to consider the recommendations set out in the report and refine its proposals. This will help to ensure that the formula lives up to its name and is based on need.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store