Why Tostitos Chip Recall Was Elevated To FDA's Deadliest Category
For the average snack lover, this might not seem like a big deal. But for people with milk allergies or sensitivities, that missing ingredient on the label can turn a bag of chips into a health risk.
Frito-Lay issued a voluntary recall after discovering a packaging mix-up: fewer than 1,300 bags labeled as Tostitos Cantina Traditional Yellow Corn Tortilla Chips may actually contain nacho cheese tortilla chips, which include milk.
The FDA classified the recall as Class I, which is reserved for situations where there's a reasonable chance that using the product could cause serious health consequences or death.
Here are the key details:
No other flavors, sizes, or Tostitos products are impacted. In a statement from Frito-Lay, 'Unless a consumer has a dairy allergy or sensitivity to milk, this product is safe to consume.'
The FDA doesn't take Class I designations lightly. While recalls can happen for all kinds of reasons—from quality issues to mislabeled packaging—a Class I recall signals something different: risk to health.
In this case, the risk is for people with milk allergies, who could have a severe reaction to a product that doesn't list milk as an ingredient. For them, allergen labeling isn't just about information—it's about safety.
Recalls like this one are a reminder that for millions of Americans living with food allergies, every grocery trip includes a layer of risk. While most people will be unaffected by this issue, it's not just about the chips—it's about trust in the label.
Frito-Lay moved quickly, disclosed the issue to the FDA, and took action to remove affected bags from the market. That's what these recall plans are designed to do—and why they matter.
This isn't about panic. It's about precision.
For most people, this recall won't change anything. But for those who rely on allergen labeling to keep themselves or their loved ones safe, it's a powerful reminder: what's printed on the outside of the bag has to match what's inside.
That's not just good business—it's a basic requirement of trust in the food we eat.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A record-low 54% of U.S. adults say they drink alcohol, new poll shows
Fewer Americans are reporting that they drink alcohol amid a growing belief that even moderate alcohol consumption is a health risk, according to a Gallup poll released Wednesday. The survey finds that 54% of U.S. adults say they drink alcoholic beverages such as liquor, wine or beer — "the lowest by one percentage point in Gallup's nearly 90-year trend," the analytics company says. And a record high percentage of U.S. adults, 53%, now say moderate drinking is bad for their health, up from 28% in 2015. The uptick in doubt about alcohol's benefits is largely driven by young adults — the age group that is most likely to believe drinking "one or two drinks a day" can cause health hazards — but older adults are also now increasingly likely to think moderate drinking carries risks. The findings of the poll, which was conducted in July, indicate that after years of many believing that moderate drinking was harmless — or even beneficial — worries about alcohol consumption are taking hold. According to Gallup's data, even those who consume alcohol are drinking less. The federal government is updating new dietary guidelines, including those around alcohol. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, government data showed U.S. alcohol consumption was trending up. But other government surveys have shown a decline in certain types of drinking, particularly among teenagers and young adults. This comes alongside a new drumbeat of information about alcohol's risks. While moderate drinking was once thought to have benefits for heart health, health professionals in recent years have pointed to overwhelming evidence that alcohol consumption leads to negative health outcomes and is a leading cause of cancer. Additionally, there are other factors contributing to the changing perspectives around alcohol, Willa Bennett, editor-in-chief of Cosmopolitan and Seventeen, said on "CBS Mornings Plus" Wednesday. "We know this generation is increasingly out in the world trying to find real community and camaraderie," Bennett said. People don't seem to need alcohol to go out anymore, she said. Other factors include less stigma around not drinking and the prevalence of social media. "People do want control of their image," Bennett said. "People don't want to give that up. It's scary. What are the long term risks?" Growing skepticism about alcohol's benefits Younger adults have been quicker than older Americans to accept that drinking is harmful, but older adults are coming around to the same view. About two-thirds of 18- to 34-year-olds believe moderate drinking is unhealthy, according to the poll, up from about 4 in 10 in 2015. Older adults are less likely to see alcohol as harmful — about half of Americans age 55 or older believe this — but that's a substantial increase, too. In 2015, only about 2 in 10 adults age 55 or older thought alcohol was bad for their health. In the past, moderate drinking was thought to have some benefits. That idea came from imperfect studies that largely didn't include younger people and couldn't prove cause and effect. Now the scientific consensus has shifted, and several countries recently lowered their alcohol consumption recommendations. Earlier this year, the outgoing U.S. surgeon general, Vivek Murthy, recommended a label on bottles of beer, wine and liquor that would clearly outline the link between alcohol consumption and cancer. "Alcohol is a well-established, preventable cause of cancer responsible for about 100,000 cases of cancer and 20,000 cancer deaths annually in the United States — greater than the 13,500 alcohol-associated traffic crash fatalities per year in the U.S. — yet the majority of Americans are unaware of this risk," Murthy said in a statement in January. The federal government's current dietary guidelines recommend Americans not drink or, if they do consume alcohol, men should limit themselves to two drinks a day or fewer while women should stick to one or fewer. Gallup's director of U.S. social research, Lydia Saad, said shifting health advice throughout older Americans' lives may be a reason they have been more gradual than young adults to recognize alcohol as harmful. "Older folks may be a little more hardened in terms of the whiplash that they get with recommendations," Saad said. "It may take them a little longer to absorb or accept the information. Whereas, for young folks, this is the environment that they've grown up in ... in many cases, it would be the first thing young adults would have heard as they were coming into adulthood." The government is expected to release new guidelines later this year, under the directive of health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has promised big changes. Kennedy has not hinted at how the alcohol recommendations may shift. Drinking rates fall to decade low Slightly more than half of Americans, 54%, report that they drink alcohol — a low in Gallup's data that is especially pronounced among women and young adults. The previous low was 55%, recorded in 1958. "Declines in alcohol consumption do not appear to be caused by people shifting to other mood-altering substances — in particular, recreational marijuana, which is now legal in about half of U.S. states," Gallup said in a news release. "Although marijuana use is higher today than a decade ago, it has been fairly steady over the past four years and thus doesn't appear to be a factor in people choosing not to drink alcohol." Gallup says it has been tracking Americans' drinking behavior since 1939. Since 2001, it has tracked their views on health implications related to moderate drinking. Young Americans' alcohol consumption has been trending downward for years, accelerating the overall decline in alcohol consumption. In sharp contrast with Gallup's findings two decades ago, when young adults were likeliest to report drinking, young adults' drinking rate is now slightly below middle-aged and older adults. Americans' reported drinking is among the lowest since the question was first asked in 1939. For most of the last few decades, at least 6 in 10 Americans have reported drinking alcoholic beverages, only dipping below that point a few times in the question's history. Americans who drink alcohol are consuming less Even if concerns about health risks aren't causing some adults to give up alcohol entirely, these worries could be influencing how often they drink. The survey found that adults who think moderate drinking is bad for one's health are just as likely as people who don't share those concerns to report that they drink, but fewer of the people with health worries had consumed alcohol recently. About half of those who worry moderate drinking is unhealthy said they had a drink in the previous week, compared with about 7 in 10 who did not think drinking was bad for their health. Overall, only about one-quarter of Americans who drink said they had consumed alcohol in the prior 24 hours, a record low in the survey. Roughly 4 in 10 said that it had been more than a week since they had poured a drink. Trump sounds off on potential security guarantees for Ukraine Putin remains determined to attack, subjugate Ukraine, expert says FBI firings may have been politically motivated, sources say Play Farm Merge Valley
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Americans spend less time reading for fun and more time on screens, study finds
Fewer Americans are opening a book for fun each day, with reading for pleasure in the United States down 40% over the past 20 years, a new study finds. Researchers from University College London and the University of Florida analyzed surveys from more than 230,000 Americans aged 15 and older between 2003 and 2023, tracking their daily reading habits. Results, published in the journal iScience on Wednesday, showed the share of people who picked up a book, magazine or e-reader every day dropped about 3% per year. Reading with children was also rare, the study found, with only 2% of adults reporting doing so on average every day. MORE: How phonics is making a comeback as millions of kids struggle to read However, those who did read spent more time doing so, averaging more than 90 minutes daily. "For me, one of the most important takeaways of this study is awareness of how little reading for children is happening," Jill Sonke, one of the study's lead authors as well as director of research initiatives and a research professor at the University of Florida Center for Arts in Medicine, told ABC News. "As a mother, reading to my children was a really important time for bonding as well as for relaxation and for stimulating my children's interest in reading and their imagination and creativity." The study also found that reading declined more sharply among Black Americans, those with less education or lower incomes, and people in rural areas, with gaps widening over the 20-year study period. The researchers speculated that the drop is likely tied to the rise of digital media, including social platforms, streaming and online browsing. "There's a correlation between time spent on digital media and reductions in reading time," Sonke said. "It does seem logical that the ways in which digital media compete for our time would be a factor in these declines in reading." The authors cautioned that less reading could affect health, well-being and literacy. Reading has been linked to stronger language skills, reasoning and empathy, they said. "I think it's important for people to understand that reading for pleasure is actually a health promoting activity," Sonke said. "We know that participating in the arts is a health behavior because it statistically results in improved health outcomes including well-being, social cohesion, mental health." MORE: Many students have still not regained pandemic-era losses in reading, math: Report The study authors say that national strategies often focus mainly on children. The authors suggested that adult reading habits also deserve attention, especially given their impact on health and well-being. The National Literacy Trust, an independent charity based in London that promotes literacy, advises setting aside 10 minutes before bed, carrying a book or e-reader during commutes and making reading a shared family activity. Even small changes can help bring reading back into daily life, the group notes. Raihan El-Naas, MD is a board-certified internal medicine physician and current endocrinology fellow at Weill Cornell Medical Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and a member of the ABC News Medical Unit. Play Farm Merge Valley
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Vanda seeks FDA Commissioner review of Hetlioz generic ruling
Vanda Pharmaceuticals (VNDA) announced that it has asked Martin Makary, the Commissioner of the U.S. FDA, to review the decision made by Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, the departing director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, days before her retirement that upholds an Office of Generic Drugs decision to approve two generic versions of Hetlioz. In 2023, Vanda filed citizen petitions challenging the FDA's approval of two generic versions of Vanda's drug Hetlioz. Vanda argued that each was improperly approved in light of significant flaws in the studies and data presented. In July 2025, outgoing CDER director Corrigan-Curay issued a decision siding with the prior FDA decision to approve these generic versions, seemingly agreeing that generic drug manufacturers need only conduct small studies that include only Indian male subjects to establish bioequivalence for use in the general US population. Further, in the case of one generic version, Corrigan-Curay accepted that significant inexplicable data inconsistencies measuring a drug's exposure levels in the blood could be justified by the supposedly different 'psychological state' of participants at different times and that it was of no concern that one of the generic versions showed exposure levels more than double those Vanda has obtained for Hetlioz. This decision reflects the FDA's unacceptable culture of bias toward approving generic drugs regardless of whether they meet the requisite legal and evidentiary standards, endangering the well-being of American citizens. Katherine Eban extensively exposed this serious flaw in her 2019 book Bottle of Lies: The Inside Story of the Generic Drug Boom, but it appears to remain entrenched at the FDA. Vanda is now asking Commissioner Makary to review this decision. Unfortunately, FDA bureaucrats have suggested that the Office of the Commissioner (not the Commissioner) will take two months to decide whether the Office of the Commissioner will review the merits of this decision. It is time that the rule of law return to the FDA under Dr. Makary's leadership. Agency personnel must abide by the law and Commissioner priorities. Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
