Aussie man called out for little-known rubbish bin mistake most of us make
The slip highlighted two types of items that had been incorrectly thrown away — soft plastics and receipts. Receipts are one of the most commonly misunderstood items when it comes to recycling.
Despite their paper appearance, most receipts are coated in chemicals that make them unsuitable for recycling. Also high on the list of frequent mistakes are disposable coffee cups and used paper towels — items many Aussies assume are recyclable but, in most cases, belong in the general waste bin.
The programs were introduced in 2017 beginning with the green waste and FOGO bins. In May, the program was extended to include recycling bins and aims to educate residents on what can and can't be put in those bins.
Each week, streets are selected at random to have their bins inspected by 'waste educators' from the ACT Government or Envirocom Australia.
'They aim to inspect approximately 600 recycling bins and 500 green waste and FOGO bins across various suburbs each week,' an ACT Government spokesperson told Yahoo News.
'The bin inspections are conducted on the morning of bin collection when all bins are presented on the kerbside.'
The program is purely for educational purposes, with officials insisting no fines or penalties will be imposed, and bins will still be collected as normal — unless hazardous material is discovered.
The spokesperson said correct disposal can:
reduce contamination
improve resource recovery
protect our recycling and composting systems.
Yes, the inspectors do open the bins to look at the items inside, but they will only 'observe material on or near the top,' the spokesperson said.
'They may move a few items from the top surface so they can provide accurate feedback.'
The inspectors will only ever look at bins already on the kerb for collection, and carry a letter of authorisation from the government if any resident is unsure of what they are doing.
And it's not just the inspectors that can raise issues with bins.
Rubbish trucks in the ACT are fitted with cameras that allow drivers to monitor the waste being emptied from the bins. The drivers can also place a tag on a bin if they spot a hazardous item or large amounts of contamination.
In rare cases, drivers may refuse to empty the bin of the load is deemed dangerous or overly contaminated.
One final reason for a bin tag is if the bin is damaged or broken. This tag will prompt residents to book a repair or arrange a replacement.
While some Aussies find bin tags to be a welcome bit of education, others find it too intrusive.
Essendon mum Kali told Yahoo last year that she felt the note on her bin was "shaming her" for making a mistake.
She had put reusable shopping bags into her recycling bin, and noticed many bins in the street were tagged.
"It's just a bizarre thing to do," she said. "I thought it was funny that I got bin shamed. I'm sure we're all guilty of [recycling incorrectly], it's an easy mistake.
"Our whole street was embarrassed about it," she added, saying "other neighbours were more offended" than she was.
A 2024 survey from Veolia found Aussies are unsure which bin to use about 40 per cent of them time, and 77 per cent of residents still don't know which bin disposable coffee cups should go in (it's the red one).
Other items leaving residents stumped are bamboo and wood cutlery, which 63 per cent assumed were recyclable, and biodegradable plastic bags, which 58 per cent of people were putting in the wrong bin. Both of these should also go in the general waste bin and then to landfill.
Any residents who are unsure of what can and can't be recycled can download the Recycle Mate app, which allows you to search for any product and it will tell you which bin it belongs in. There is also the option to put in your address and local council to make sure the information is right for your area.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
17 hours ago
- Washington Post
Single-use plastic is a scourge of takeout. Here's how I tried to escape it.
What's in your take-out order? Plastic. Lots of it. Most to-go food comes boxed, bagged or otherwise accompanied by petrochemicals. You ingest this unsavory stew with every bite, before the discarded packaging piles up in landfills. So over the past few months, I tried to eliminate plastic delivered to my door.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aussie dad's fight against invasive threat spreading 'everywhere' in our waterways
Invasive fish like European carp, tilapia and even goldfish are a growing threat in Australia's rivers and freshwater systems. Debate rages over what to do about the ever-spreading issue, including introducing a virus into the water, but wholesale solutions are seemingly far off. In the meantime, one Gold Coast dad is taking matters into his hands and doing something about it. Armed with a $6 Kmart fishing net, Scott Clark is single-handedly scooping up a host of water-based invaders choking water systems from creeks, rivers and even stormwater drains in his local area. They are "everywhere", he told Yahoo News of the growing threat. "It's quite sad." It started out as a hobby for Scott, collecting small fish to feed his pet turtle, but quickly developed into a deeper purpose when videos of his efforts went viral online with millions of views. Sadly, after 15 years exploring Queensland's fresh water, he no longer sees native fish in local water systems — something that experts warn is a direct result of invasive species taking over. "A lot of smaller catchments like storm water retentions and lakes are absolute breeding grounds," he explained. Tilapia, which is native to Africa, South and Central America, Southern India and Sri Lanka, was first introduced into Australia in the 1970s. They're particularly sinister because they compete for resources with native fish, and the effective way they reproduce. The adults carry their eggs and small fry in their mouths, and these can survive for a long time after the adult dies. "We know in South East Queensland, tilapia and carp are significant problems for the environment," Invasive Species Council acting CEO Jack Gough previously told Yahoo News Australia, warning of native extinctions in freshwater systems. 🦠 Aussie MP says it's 'time to release the virus' as carp take over 🐟 Sinister haul pulled from major Aussie river 🍣 Major problem in bold plan to eradicate $1.5 billion invasive threat Biosecurity Queensland has previously encouraged anglers to target tilapia, but once caught they must be either buried above the high-water mark of the place of capture or placed in a nearby bin. In order to reduce any value being associated with the species, fishers are banned from eating the species, using it as bait or returning it to the water dead or alive. It's not a rule that Scott agrees with, arguing that in countries like the Philippines, where tilapia is also invasive, citizens are allowed to eat the species. "They eat it by the bucketload," he said, having recently returned from the country. Scott explained he visits a number of locations around his local area, with impressive results. "If I find a place fully infested, I'll attack it multiple times until it's under control," he said. One particular creek in the Gold Coast used to have "thousands" of tilapia in it and now when he visits, he only gets a "handful", suggesting his efforts appear to be making a big difference. What's more, people who watch his videos are starting to get out into nature and do the same. "I'll go out now and six other people will be there and say hello," he said. He encourages other families to get out there and give it a go. "I don't buy expensive products," he said. "I buy everything I need from Kmart." Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fight to save 100-year-old 'landmark' behind derelict property
Towering above a graffiti-covered timber fence and a grim, boarded-up house is a natural 'landmark' a small Aussie community doesn't want to lose. They're determined to fight a plan to axe two towering eucalyptus trees that can be seen from almost anywhere in the increasingly urbanised Melbourne suburb of Thornbury. Local woman Rebecca Hart has been working to save the twin sugar gums, which are estimated to have grown on the corner block for over a century. 'They're majestic. Looking at them takes you somewhere else. These landmarks have stood tall regardless of all the development that's happened here,' she told Yahoo News. Trees of this size are increasingly rare in Australia. And Hart is concerned that approval to axe these two giants could create a precedent which could result in her suburb becoming increasingly denuded of nature. Looking generally at large tree removal in urban centres, public safety is often a concern, with councils fearing they'll drop branches on cars or pedestrians. Other times, it's the residents themselves who want the trees gone – across Sydney's extravagant waterfront suburbs, there's a problem with people illegally poisoning them to reap the benefits of an improved view of the ocean. But in the case of the Thornbury trees, it's a development plan that's putting the trees' future in doubt. Darebin Council confirmed with Yahoo that it has 'recently' received an application to remove them and that it's aware of 'significant community interest' in the trees. Related: 🌳 Toorak resident's $100k tree complaint to council The block has sat derelict for years, so it's understandable that its recent sale has resulted in a plan to revamp the site. Anyone wishing to live there could argue they're concerned about the size of the trees on such a small block. Eucalyptus trees are known to drop branches, and living underneath them can be scary when they sway in the wind. In an email, council CEO, Michael Tudball, said the full assessment process required to determine the future of the trees is not yet complete, and decisions normally take eight to 12 weeks. 'We want to emphasise that removal of significant trees is only ever granted as a last resort where other mitigations aren't possible,' he added. Hart would like to see her council introduce a register of significant trees, as was proposed back in 2013. However council maintains one isn't needed because local laws give trees added protection when they are over 8 metres high and have a circumference of more than 100cm at 1.4 metres above the ground. The two tree trunks have a diameter of approximately 3.7 metres and 3.9 metres at their base and reach higher than 8 metres, meaning they qualify under local laws as significant trees, but this doesn't ensure they will be spared. Looking generally at council guidelines, a case can be made to remove significant trees if they pose an immediate danger to people or property, and there's a replacement landscaping proposal that's deemed acceptable. 🥺 Rare colour footage of extinct Australian animal seen again after 90 years ❄️ Australia's sky could change forever after winter ends 🍽️ Major menu change for Aussie diners Hart says the removal of the trees would not only alter the face of her suburb, local wildlife will be robbed of somewhere to live. In Melbourne, hollow-bearing trees are a rarity, and that's led to localised extinctions of species you regularly see in other cities like the kookaburra. The Thurnbury trees are known to have several hollows, and their branches provide shelter for native birds and mammals including ring-tail possums, wood ducks, lorikeets, magpies, butcherbirds, and bees. 'In Thornbury, if you're looking west they are the most significant part of the skyline,' Hart said. 'Last night, the trees were silhouetted with a crescent moon behind them. They're the biggest, most beautiful thing you can see.' Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.
