California Dem proposes decriminalizing welfare fraud
Senate Bill 560 also seeks to axe prosecutions for attempted welfare fraud amounting to less than $950. 'The bill would require a county human services agency to determine whether benefits were authorized as a result of an error in the Statewide Automated Welfare System (CalSAWS) and prohibit the agency from referring a case for criminal action if benefits were authorized in error,' the proposal reads.
' California 's safety net should lift families up, not trap them in poverty,' the lawmaker added in a statement to Fox News Digital . 'Right now, a missed deadline or paperwork mistake can lead to felony charges that tear families apart — even when there's no intent to deceive.'
However, around 8,000 welfare fraud cases are identified in Los Angeles County alone each year, according to the county's Department of Public Services. Of these around 200 are referred for prosecution, with a 95 percent conviction rate. Most of the convicted cases will have a court order to pay the county back.
DailyMail.com has contacted Smallwood-Cuevas for comment. Welfare fraud is among the areas being tackled by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. The Tesla boss previously revealed staggering data showing there are millions of dead Americans still eligible for social security payments.
Musk posted a chart on X showing that there are more than 20 million Americans listed over the age of 100, including 3.9 million in the 130-139 range, more than 3.5 million aged 140-149 and more than 1.3 million in the range 150-159. There was even an 'alive' citizen aged over 360, according to the records. In one shocking case, DOGE said they found someone with a birthday in 2154 who claimed $41,000 in benefits.
Musk shared the findings on his X account, claiming he was so stunned by the numbers it took him multiple times to grasp the information. 'Your tax dollars were going to pay fraudulent unemployment claims for fake people born in the future,' Musk said. 'This is so crazy that I had to read it several times before it sank in.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
4 hours ago
- Channel 4
Can an unprecedented meeting bring peace to Ukraine?
By Anushka Asthana I wasn't due to start my new role as US Editor of Channel 4 News for a few weeks. But in Trump World – nothing seems to go to plan. Luckily, I'd picked up my new White House security pass early, so I was able to hit the ground running for what turned out to be a pretty momentous day. As I wandered down Pebble Beach – the area where journalists line up to report on American presidents – seasoned US reporters described the events as unprecedented and historic. By then five European leaders, the president of the European Commission and secretary general of Nato had arrived to accompany the embattled Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy for a meeting with Donald Trump after he sat down with President Putin. The stakes could not have been higher, nor the pressure on Zelenskyy, as all sides sought to avoid a repeat of February's stomach-churning meeting. Officials familiar with the preparations told me that the Americans were determined to be 'business-like' this time round , with Vice President JD Vance – who clashed with Zelenskyy last time round at the White House – notably quiet. Zelenskyy, too, spoke little as Trump stole the floor, boasting to journalists about his triumphs in securing world peace and law and order in Washington DC. The Ukrainian president knew that it was imperative to maintain a positive tone. In fact, that was why the Europeans were there. As one source familiar with discussions said to me: 'We need to help Zelenskyy keep his cool, keep his calm. Remind him that he is here to listen, that he doesn't have to argue the toss in the moment.' Cue Zelenskyy's effusive gratitude, after being previously berated for failing to say thank you (despite doing just that). In what was an extraordinary series of events – many on camera – including a large part of the wider meeting with all the European leaders – all sides achieved their aim of an amicable mood. But what about the substance? After the sessions drew to a close I saw our Prime Minister Keir Starmer as he headed back to his flight home. He seemed buoyed by the meetings, but the challenges on the two big issues remain huge. Many were cheered by the prospect of US involvement in a security guarantee. But noises of a European peacekeeping force were quickly snubbed by Russia today, which said Nato boots on the ground in Ukraine would be unacceptable. So would Putin really stomach the suggested solution? And as for territory – the Russian president wants more, and Trump is now clear that Zelenskyy will have to concede land for an agreement. I asked Keir Starmer whether he thought President Zelenskyy does accept the principle that the price of peace will involve surrendering land? 'All matters of territory are a question for President Zelenskyy,' he told me. 'That's a very clear principle that I have held that everybody recognises. It's very important to read into the developments today on bilateral and trilateral meetings – that it is a recognition – that Ukraine must be at the table, and ultimately it is a decision for Ukraine.' Russia expert, Professor Mark Galleotti, argued to me that on some points Trump was articulating an uncomfortable truth: that Nato membership is not currently realistic for Ukraine, and that land already taken militarily by Russia is unlikely to be won back. But Putin wants even more – including the rest of Donetsk, something that Ukrainians would strongly oppose. So how could Zelenskky accept that? Galleotti admitted the challenge remains tough. But he also argued this was the most positive moves since the war began in 2022. 'I'm optimistic about the possibility of becoming optimistic,' he said. Suggesting a huge day at the White House represented progress, but the path to peace remains long and winding. This article was first posted on Substack. Subscribe to Channel 4 News.
Glasgow Times
4 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
UK ‘agreed to drop' Apple data demand in privacy row, US chief says
Tulsi Gabbard posted on X that the UK has agreed to end the request for the US tech giant after working alongside American president Donald Trump, vice president JD Vance and British counterparts 'over the past few months'. She posted: 'As a result, the UK agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.' Over the past few months, I've been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside @POTUS and @VP, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected. As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for… — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) August 19, 2025 Earlier this year, it was reported the Government had issued a notice under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, asking Apple for the ability to access data from Apple users. This was said to include encrypted data protected by the tech giant's advanced data protection (ADP) tool, an opt-in tool within Apple's iCloud service which only an account holder can access, and is currently out of the reach of even Apple. The iPhone-maker subsequently said it was withdrawing the tool from the UK and brought legal action against the Home Office. Reacting to Ms Gabbard's statement, Conservative MP David Davis said: 'The Government's decision to drop its demands for a backdoor to Apple's encryption are to be welcomed. 'Such a backdoor would only serve to weaken the protection given by encryption to all of us from malicious actors.' The Government's decision to drop its demands for a backdoor to Apple's encryption are to be welcomed. Such a backdoor would only serve to weaken the protection given by encryption to all of us from malicious — David Davis MP (@DavidDavisMP) August 19, 2025 The Government's approach was widely criticised by online privacy campaigners and experts when reports of the request first appeared. However, some online safety charities, as well as police and security services around the world, have long warned of the dangers of end-to-end encrypted services, arguing that they allow offenders such as terrorists and child abusers to hide more easily. On Tuesday, a UK Government spokesperson said: 'We do not comment on operational matters, including confirming or denying the existence of such notices. 'We have long had joint security and intelligence arrangements with the US to tackle the most serious threats such as terrorism and child sexual abuse, including the role played by fast-moving technology in enabling those threats.' They added the agreements have 'long contained' safeguards to protect privacy and sovereignty, including for UK and US citizens. Apple has been contacted for comment.
North Wales Chronicle
4 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK ‘agreed to drop' Apple data demand in privacy row, US chief says
Tulsi Gabbard posted on X that the UK has agreed to end the request for the US tech giant after working alongside American president Donald Trump, vice president JD Vance and British counterparts 'over the past few months'. She posted: 'As a result, the UK agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a 'back door' that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.' Over the past few months, I've been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside @POTUS and @VP, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected. As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for… — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) August 19, 2025 Earlier this year, it was reported the Government had issued a notice under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, asking Apple for the ability to access data from Apple users. This was said to include encrypted data protected by the tech giant's advanced data protection (ADP) tool, an opt-in tool within Apple's iCloud service which only an account holder can access, and is currently out of the reach of even Apple. The iPhone-maker subsequently said it was withdrawing the tool from the UK and brought legal action against the Home Office. Reacting to Ms Gabbard's statement, Conservative MP David Davis said: 'The Government's decision to drop its demands for a backdoor to Apple's encryption are to be welcomed. 'Such a backdoor would only serve to weaken the protection given by encryption to all of us from malicious actors.' The Government's decision to drop its demands for a backdoor to Apple's encryption are to be welcomed. Such a backdoor would only serve to weaken the protection given by encryption to all of us from malicious — David Davis MP (@DavidDavisMP) August 19, 2025 The Government's approach was widely criticised by online privacy campaigners and experts when reports of the request first appeared. However, some online safety charities, as well as police and security services around the world, have long warned of the dangers of end-to-end encrypted services, arguing that they allow offenders such as terrorists and child abusers to hide more easily. On Tuesday, a UK Government spokesperson said: 'We do not comment on operational matters, including confirming or denying the existence of such notices. 'We have long had joint security and intelligence arrangements with the US to tackle the most serious threats such as terrorism and child sexual abuse, including the role played by fast-moving technology in enabling those threats.' They added the agreements have 'long contained' safeguards to protect privacy and sovereignty, including for UK and US citizens. Apple has been contacted for comment.
