
Letters: Dirt bike hoons need to face consequences
Compo conundrum
An article about suggestions of compensation for store owners who had installed ATMs that were capable of cryptocurrency dealing (July 15) quoted Labour MP Duncan Webb as saying: 'I'm gobsmacked that in a cost-of-living crisis they are considering compensating crypto traders.'
This is another classic example of an unconsidered knee-jerk reaction to the Regulatory Standards Bill. It's not the crypto traders that the compensation is being considered for. It's small dairy or petrol station owners who have forked out extra money to buy cryptocurrency-enabled ATMs to offer better service to their customers.
Should they have foreseen the use of their machines by criminals and therefore the need for a law change? Are they guilty of crypto trading (which in itself is not illegal) by association?
Compensation should at least be considered.
Chris Chrystall, Epsom.
Leaders need to act
The obliteration of Gaza tests our willingness to be complicit. At what point will our elected leaders say, 'Stop!' – and take action?
Ordinary civilian life has been smashed.
Hospitals, houses, schools: deliberately targeted.
Journalists, medical staff, aid workers: deliberately killed.
The civilian population: bombed out, ordered to flee, and then to flee again. Then starved. Then gunned down when desperately seeking food.
Please, would our Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs stand up.
Anne Priestley, Remuera.
Up in the air
There has been comment in various columns recently about the greenhouse gas emissions by the airline industry.
It is informative to go to https://www.flightradar24.com/, a real-time tracking system that shows the position of every aircraft presently in the air. The only exceptions are military aircraft that wish to remain anonymous.
At any one time, there are thousands of aircraft in flight. All those aeroplanes delivering all those passengers and freight every day of the year produce just 2.8% of world greenhouse emissions.
Even a massive decrease in flight miles would, therefore, have precious little effect on global warming. Think about that before you flight-shame someone.
David Morris, Hillsborough.
Reasons for social damage
Perhaps people could review their thoughts on Dame Jacinda Ardern's alleged 'social and economic damage' during her tenure as our Prime Minister, versus the current coalition's.
Ardern wasn't responsible for social damage, Covid was. Any less stringent an approach to trying to keep it at bay would have been disastrous.
As for the economic damage, this Government has borrowed more, defunded more, reduced access to healthcare, affordable housing, education and employment. These count more as 'social damage' as they have been introduced under no valid circumstances that demand them.
Blaming the previous Government for anything social or economic, after nearly two years of the current Government being in power, no longer carries any weight or truth.
Jeremy Coleman, Hillpark.
Power for the people
For some time now, there has been much discussion about the integrity and cost of our power network in New Zealand.
It is a matter of concern that power prices continue to rise with no action of consequence from successive Governments.
In fact, our power system has been affected by retrograde action. Our gas generation is about to dry up.
Our coal mining has all but ceased, with expensive imports of coal from overseas, and no further geothermal or hydro stations are planned.
What I do not understand is why our Governments do not seem to have strongly supported the domestic installation of solar panels, which is standard in so many other countries, including Australia and in Europe. Even wind farms would make a difference.
The message we get is that privatisation of part of our basic infrastructure was a mistake. Is it too much to ask that our major parties agree on an appropriate way forward to secure the future of our power generation that is affordable to all?
Bruce Owen, Drury.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
6 hours ago
- Scoop
Andrew Little's Housing Policy Will Further Destroy Wellington
Wellington mayoral candidate Andrew Little has unveiled a Labour Party housing plan that will further destroy Wellington and make the city even more unaffordable for residents. The Labour Party's proposals for housing will not stimulate the local economy, and will see a continuation of high rates that hurt those on fixed incomes, students, pensioners and first home buyers most, and drive residents and businesses to leave. 'In his council housing policy, Andrew Little says Wellington 'simply isn't an affordable place to live' yet he is proposing policies that will only make the problem worse,' Wellington City Councillor and mayoral contender Ray Chung says. 'The most damning aspects of Labour's plan for Wellington are two fold: continuation of the charade that it's ratepayers' responsibility to subsidise new housing and that the city council needs to expand social housing. Both of these are the responsibility of central government and are already paid for by our taxes. Wellington ratepayers should not be paying twice for these.' 'The Labour Party candidates know their policies will cause hardship because they're busy promoting schemes like cheap loans and reverse mortgages to help homeowners pay their rates. That's how bad it's got. The ratepayer assistance scheme is another way to steal your wealth. The council should not be looking at extra ways for ratepayers pay their rates, the council should be lowering the rates take.' Social housing is set to cost Wellington ratepayers $1 billion over the next decade, which is an absolute travesty. People can barely afford to live in the city as it is. If elected mayor, I will get social housing off the council's balance sheet and back to central government, Ray says. Eastern ward candidate for council, Michelle McGuire says, 'the local economy will be stimulated by cutting the financial rates and compliance demands of council, lowering the commercial differential, and streamlining the regulatory process for building (which most councillors agree with but haven't done anything substantive about it since being elected). Wellington's population has stagnated. Until we make Wellington more affordable for residents and businesses, no one will be rushing to move here.' Michelle McGuire is one of the Independent Together candidates along with Paula Muollo (Southern ward), Ken Ah Kuoi (Eastern), Stuart Wong (Lambton) and Guy Nunns and Ray Chung (Western Onslow). These candidates have agreed on a set of pillar policies that include getting a zero rates increase for ratepayers, bringing the council back to core priorities and services, and ensuring that party politics is kept out of council decision making. 'The Independent Together candidates are the only team with policies that will ease the financial burden of ratepayers. Andrew Little's housing policies are more tax and spend. His policies will add to the cost-of-living crisis for Wellingtonians and lead to further population degrowth,' Michelle says. 'It's time to elect people who will put Wellingtonians first, not their political party. It's time to end party politics around the council table.'


NZ Herald
12 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Listen to The Country online: Labour leader Chris Hipkins on a capital gains tax for farming
Today on The Country radio show, host Jamie Mackay catches up with Labour leader Chris Hipkins to ask him what a capital gains tax could mean for farming. Plus, Hipkins explains why he skipped the Covid Royal Commission public hearings. On with the show:

RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Labour ministers refuse to front Covid public hearing
A political commentator says Labour is shutting down all debate on its response to the Covid pandemic. Political analyst Dr Grant Duncan spoke to Tuwhenuaroa Natanahira. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.