
‘Once again, the west turns away': a new book recounts the fall and rise of the Taliban
'I always want to go back,' said the New Yorker staff writer. 'It gets into your skin. Afghanistan is an incredible place, an incredible society. It's always like time travel to me, and I knew people there that are larger than life. They stay with you … I may return shortly.'
Now 68, Anderson reported from Afghanistan in the 1980s, as Soviet forces lost a 10-year war, and returned in the 2000s, after 9/11 prompted the US to invade. In 2002, Anderson published The Lion's Grave, a well-received book on al-Qaida's assassination of the mujahideen leader Ahmad Shah Massoud two days before the attacks on New York and Washington, and how the US ousted the Taliban.
In the foreword to his new book, Anderson writes of that time: 'The mission of the US and its coalition allies appeared to have been a qualified success. The Taliban had vanished into the hills, as had al-Qaida, and a pliant new pro-western regime had been installed.'
The new book contains reporting on the 20-year US occupation, its chaotic end, and the Taliban's return. So its title is telling: To Lose a War.
One standout chapter comes from 2010. US control had deteriorated. Given no choice, Anderson embedded with a cavalry squadron in Maiwand, in the south. The resulting report, The Day of the Superwadi, is bookended by the deaths of young Americans in IED explosions – an unsparing portrait of military might mired in lethal futility. At the time, Anderson refused to let it be published.
He was 'severely disappointed to see that what had happened in Iraq, which I had witnessed firsthand [the subject of his 2004 book, The Fall of Baghdad] had happened in Afghanistan: the suicide blast walls were up, Kabul itself was behind this strange geometry of walls, westerners were cut off from the Afghans'.
Anderson 'really disliked' embedding. He felt 'incredibly alienated, displaced. It was exactly in the same area I'd reported from back in the late 80s, and yet I was even displaced from that. I left Afghanistan feeling really nonplussed and telling my editor I didn't think I had a story. And he said: 'No, come on. You can write it.' And I did, and I still had this just, dead feeling. I don't know if it's the only story in the New Yorker's history, or one of very few, where an author has asked the editors to kill it, but I did and they honored that. And I said: 'I feel I have to go back, because this story doesn't feel right.' And I did go back.'
In 2011, Anderson embedded again but with Afghan soldiers, too, on the Pakistan border. The result was another powerful essay, Force and Futility.
'I was able to define better what I was seeing,' Anderson said. 'Clearly, I was always a foreigner, an outsider, but I had that experience of being with Afghans.'
More than a decade later, putting together To Lose a War, Anderson finally saw the value of the piece he had killed. He 'realized it had an integrity. It helps fill in the blanks. Ultimately, if I have a critical observation, it's that the United States … I mean all of the west, but really it was always US-led … they never really engaged with Afghanistan. That was what I was feeling. I knew it to be just a terrible thing. [The US effort] was doomed because of that.'
Anderson provides compelling portraits of American soldiers in extremis. Prey to the shifting realities of Afghanistan, Lt Cols Bryan Denny and Stephen Lusky are driven, idealistic and lost.
'They were honorable men,' Anderson said. 'At the point I was seeing them in the war, the chance to win had passed. They never came out and said, 'This is doomed.' They couldn't: they had young, young boys they were trying to keep alive, and they were doing the best they could. But I had this really strong sense that they knew.
'This was their job. It was an honorable thing. And what was interesting, and I guess among some soldiers you do find this, was this sense of idealism. We tend to objectify them: guns and uniforms and so on. But actually the US military includes a hell of a lot of idealists, many more than you tend to meet in your life. They try to believe in what they're doing, because they're dealing with life and death every day. So I try to acknowledge that but also get to the human story.'
Maiwand, where Lt Col Denny served, was home to a physical reminder of Afghanistan's bloody history. About 10 miles (17km) from the US base stood 'a very large, oddly shaped dirt mound … ris[ing] inexplicably up from the flatland'. In 2011, it housed the Afghan national police. It was built thousands of years before, by Alexander the Great.
The Americans stayed for 20. Combat operations ended in 2014, under Barack Obama, but the last troops left in 2021, Joe Biden overseeing a withdrawal initiated by Donald Trump. The result was bloody chaos: 13 Americans and at least 170 Afghans killed by a suicide bomber, the Taliban surging back to power, civilians scrambling to get out.
Anderson helped Afghans escape. He also went back to report, 'with the central question that we all had, which was: 'Is this the old Taliban or the new Taliban?' We didn't really know.
'In the first missives out of there, we saw our colleagues interviewing guys dressed in the usual Kandahar shalwar kameez [traditional tunic and trousers], and also another group of Taliban dressed up in American special forces uniforms,' he continued. 'And we saw that they no longer were prohibited to deal with the graven image, because they had smartphones. So there was this kind of hope that they were different.
'And so most of my foray involved trying to get in front of Taliban officials, whoever I could, and guys in the field, and ascertain where their heads were at and whether they were, in fact, the new warm and fuzzy or the old astringent and cruel Taliban.
'I came away, especially from the leadership, with apprehension. I didn't feel that they dealt with me honestly … whether it was the guy in Bamiyan or the foreign minister designate or the information minister in Kabul. And so that remains unresolved.'
Anderson seems more certain about the fate of Afghan women.
'Pretty much every woman I met who was able to talk with me on their own asked me for help to get out of the country,' Anderson said. 'Not just women. Pretty much everyone I met who was not with the Taliban asked me, whether it was a civil servant, an assistant in the ministries, stewardesses on an airplane.
'I met this group of women I talked to at length, and I followed up with some of them, and they knew what was coming. I don't say it in the book, but I remained in touch with one. She managed to get her family out. First in Mexico, now in the States. I don't know if they're deportable [by Trump] or not.
'One woman said: 'I know what's coming. I know what they're going to do.' And she was right. It's even worse than what one would have expected four years ago. Women have been formally prevented from speaking outside their homes, which are like fortresses. They can't travel without a male companion from their family. I don't even know what they're doing about maternity wards in hospitals now.'
Anderson sees few signs for optimism.
'There are factions within the Taliban,' he said of the perennial struggle for power. 'It's not over. Will this come to blows? It could.'
Among warring parties is an Islamic State offshoot Anderson called 'Frankenstein's Isis, Isis Khorasan, which is just a more extreme version of the Taliban.
'Afghanistan has never gone to a new stage without spilling blood,' he continued. 'There's a few countries like that. This conceit we have in the west, that you can only get to the next threshold of history through peace negotiations or some kind of civic compact … it doesn't happen in the old world. It doesn't happen in this place. The new stages are always reached through bloodshed.
'And I don't know how you break that dynamic, but this group in power now has not broken it, nor will they break it. They're seeking it with new injustices that will need to be redeemed or avenged. And that's just the way it is.
'And once again, the west turns away, because Afghanistan is a place of shame and failure. But it's still there. Just like it was for the Soviets, just like it was for us, and so on back through time.'
To Lose a War is out on Penguin Press on 12 August

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Increasing the danger: Journalist killing in Gaza sends a chilling message
Israel 's targeted killing of an Al Jazeera correspondent in Gaza over the weekend was noteworthy even for a conflict remarkably blood-soaked for journalists, leaving some experts to marvel that any news at all emerges from the territory. An Al Jazeera executive said Monday that it won't back down from covering what is going on there and called for news organizations to step up and recruit more journalists. A total of 184 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed by Israel in the Gaza war since its start in October 2023, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists. That compares to the 18 journalists and media workers killed so far in the Russia- Ukraine war, CPJ said. Aside from rare guided tours, Israel has barred international media from covering the 22-month war in Gaza. News organizations instead rely largely on Palestinian Gaza residents and ingenuity to show the world what is happening there. Israel often questions the affiliations and biases of Palestinian journalists but doesn't permit others in. 'You simply are in awe when stories show up,' said Jane Ferguson, a veteran war correspondent and founder of Noosphere, an independent platform for journalists. She can't recall a conflict that has been more difficult for reporters to cover, and she's reported from South Sudan, Syria and Afghanistan. Correspondent Anas al-Sharif knew he was a target, and left behind a message to be delivered upon his death. He and seven other people — six of them journalists — were killed in an air strike outside of Gaza City's largest hospital complex on Sunday. Israel swiftly claimed responsibility, saying without producing evidence that al-Sharif had led a Hamas cell. It was a claim the news organization and al-Sharif had denied. The toll of journalists in Gaza has been high Agence France-Presse, The Associated Press, BBC News and Reuters are among the organizations regularly reporting from Gaza. An Aug. 7 AP dispatch vividly described the hunger faced by many in Gaza: 'A single bowl of eggplant stewed in watery tomato juice must sustain Sally Muzhed's family of six for the day. She calls it moussaka, but it's a pale echo of the fragrant, lawyered, meat-and-vegetable dish that once filled Gaza's kitchens with its aroma.' Other recent AP reports carried images and text reporting from the aftermath of an Israeli strike on Gaza's only Catholic church, and a profile of an 18-year-old aspiring doctor now trying to survive sheltered in a tent. Journalists from The Washington Post and the Guardian recently accompanied a Jordanian relief mission and took images of Gaza from the air, despite some restrictions from Israel. The Guardian's Lorenzo Tondo wrote: 'Seen from the air, Gaza looks like the ruins of an ancient civilization, brought to light after centuries of darkness.' None of the organizations match the power and immediacy of Al Jazeera, however, in part because their correspondents have been in front of cameras. They've also paid the heaviest price: CPJ estimates that 11 journalists and media workers affiliated with AJ have been killed in the Gaza conflict, more than any other single organization. In a social media post written in June to be sent if he was killed, al-Sharif wrote that 'I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification — so that Allah may bear witness against those who stayed silent.' In another posting on X on Aug. 10, the day that he was killed, al-Sharif wrote of the challenges covering the aftermath of one attack. He said he lost his strength and ability to express himself when he arrived at the scene. 'Body parts and blood were all around us, and corpses were scattered on top of each other,' he wrote. 'Tell me what words and phrases could help any journalist describe this horrific image. When I told you on air that it was an 'indescribable scene,' I was truly helpless in the face of this horrific sight.' Al Jazeera calls for other news organizations to come forward Salah Negm, news director at Al Jazeera English, said Monday it is very difficult to get people in to Gaza. But it is full of educated people and those with training in journalism who can help get stories out. He called on other news organizations to step up. 'We get the news from several sources on the ground in Gaza — not only journalists but also doctors, hospitals, civil servants, aid workers,' Negm said. 'A lot of people in Gaza talk to us.' Many of the journalists working in Gaza are facing the same struggles to find food, for themselves and their families, as the people they are covering. Noosphere's Ferguson said she's never before had to ask a reporter whether she had enough food for herself and her child. In an interview in May on 'Democracy Now!,' 22-year-old journalist Abubaker Abed described the difficult decision he made to leave Gaza to pursue his education in Ireland. Not only was he suffering from malnutrition, he said, but his mother was concerned that his work as a journalist would make him and his family targets. 'If I stayed, I would die,' he said. Jodie Ginsberg, CEO of the Committee to Protect Journalists, said she's concerned about the implications for journalists in future conflicts if what is happening in Gaza is allowed to continue without international condemnation that has real teeth. 'They're essentially admitting in public to what amounts to a war crime,' Ginsberg said, 'and they can do that because none of the other attacks on journalists have had any consequences. not in this war and not prior. It's not surprising that it can act with this level of impunity because no international government has really taken it to task.' Given all that they face, 'to me, the most remarkable thing is that journalists are continuing to cover (Gaza) at all,' she said. ___ Laurie Kellman and Danica Kirk in London, Samy Magdy in Cairo and Sam Metz in Jerusalem contributed to this report. David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and


Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nat Barr's tough message to Anthony Albanese after Australia's landmark decision to recognise the state of Palestine
Nat Barr has suggested Hamas may have 'partly got what they want' after Australia's landmark decision to recognise the state of Palestine. In an interview with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, the Sunrise host challenged him over the decision, citing the October 7 Hamas terror attacks on Israel, which killed more than 1,200 people, and asked whether recognising Palestine could be seen as rewarding militant violence. 'Two years later, they have got partly what they want - they've got their own state?' Albanese rejected the suggestion, insisting Hamas would be 'totally opposed' to the decision and could have 'no role whatsoever' in a future Palestinian state. 'Hamas do not want this. Hamas don't want two states. Hamas wants to destroy Israel, which is why Hamas can have no role whatsoever in a future Palestinian state. 'This is about isolating Hamas… and finding a way forward for peace and security for both Palestinians and Israel.' The Prime Minister said the recognition, which will be formalised at the United Nations in September alongside countries such as the UK, France and Canada, sent a clear message to the international community that 'enough is enough' after 77 years of conflict. Albanese said the plan was for a demilitarised Palestinian state living 'side by side' with Israel in peace, adding that military action alone was not a long-term solution. Earlier in the interview, Barr had pressed Albanese on whether the recognition would make any tangible difference to people in Gaza. 'The international community is saying, enough is enough. This is a conflict that has gone on now for 77 years,' he said. 'We need to find a solution that promotes security for the state of Israel but also recognises the political aspirations of the Palestinian people for their own state. 'You can't just keep doing the same thing over and over again and expect a different outcome. 'One in which the states around Israel recognise its right to exist, and one which sees a demilitarised state of Palestine - allowing Palestinians to live. To continue to do the same thing is not enough.' Albanese also revealed he had spoken directly with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week, warning that military operations without a political pathway could not deliver lasting peace. 'You can't just continue to do what he is saying, which is to continue the military operation without any political solution,' he said. 'There's been too much innocent loss of life.' The crisis in Gaza began after Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and taking about 250 more hostage. Israel's response has since killed more than 61,000 people, according to Gaza's health authorities, and UN sources project more than two million people are facing high levels of acute food insecurity.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Sudan's Rapid Support Forces kill 40 people in North Darfur displacement camp attack
Sudan 's paramilitary Rapid Support Forces launched attacks Monday in a famine-stricken displacement camp outside of el-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur province, killing 40 people, local rights groups said. The Emergency Response Rooms group working at the Abu Shouk displacement camp said in a statement on Facebook that the RSF — which is at war with the Sudanese military — raided parts of the camp targeting citizens inside their homes. The community activist group, which provides assistance across Sudan, said at least 19 people were also injured. The Abu Shouk displacement camp outside of el-Fasher, which houses around 450,000 displaced people, has been repeatedly attacked over the course of the war. The Sudanese military has control over el-Fasher despite frequent strikes by the RSF. Meanwhile, the Resistance Committees in el-Fasher confirmed the attacks, saying on Facebook that the scene 'reflected the extent of the horrific violations committed against innocent, defenseless people.' The Resistance Committees are a group of local citizens from the community that includes human rights activists. The civil war in Sudan erupted in April 2023 in the capital Khartoum before spreading across the country following simmering tensions between the RSF and the army. The fighting has killed over 40,000 people, displaced as many as 12 million and pushed many to the brink of famine. The Abu Shouk camp is one of two camps with strong famine conditions, according to humanitarians. The Sudanese army said it clashed with RSF fighters on Monday in el-Fasher beginning at around 6 a.m. and ending in the afternoon. It claimed it defeated the paramilitary group, according to its posts on social media. 'Our forces repelled a large-scale attack from several axes by the terrorist militia and inflicted heavy losses on the enemy in lives and equipment, as more than 16 combat vehicles were destroyed and burned and 34 vehicles, including armored cars, were captured,' the army claimed in a statement. There was no mention of the fight on the RSF's Telegram channel. Darfur Gov. Mini Arko Minawi said on Facebook that el-Fasher 'triumphed over those who betrayed their land' in an apparent reference to the RSF in Monday's fight. Meanwhile, in North Kordofan province the RSF has been accused of displacing over 3,000 families from 66 villages due to fighting since early August, according to the Sudan Doctors Network. The group also said the RSF looted the properties of those people and stole their money and livestock. Those displaced ended up arriving at Khartoum and White Nile provinces last week.