Home Depot and billionaire Brad Jacobs's QXO go head-to-head in possible hostile bid for GMS
Billionaire Brad Jacobs' new building-products distributor QXO offered to acquire GMS for about $5 billion in cash and said it will proceed with a hostile takeover if the company's management rejects the proposal.
This is Jacobs's second hostile takeover threat in the building sector this year and part of his plan to turn QXO into a $50 billion revenue building-products distributor within a decade.
Home improvement chain Home Depot has also made an offer for GMS, The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter.
Spokespersons for Home Depot and GMS declined to comment on the report.
The Jacobs's offer comes three months after QXO clinched an $11 billion deal to buy Beacon Roofing Supply, ending a prolonged takeover battle for the roofing company and significantly expanding its footprint in the U.S. and Canada.
An acquisition of GMS would expand QXO's market from roofs into house interior materials, including drywall.
QXO's proposal is still technically in the friendly phase, but Jacobs said that if GMS's board did not accept the offer by June 24, QXO was prepared to bypass management.
"If you choose not to engage ... we are prepared to take our offer directly to GMS's shareholders who we're confident will find the offer attractive," Jacobs said in a letter sent to GMS Chief Executive Officer John Turner.
In similar comments made during his takeover offer to Beacon, Jacobs said GMS was poorly managed and could be more profitable to shareholders under his command.
Georgia-based GMS said in a statement on Thursday that it has received an unsolicited proposal from QXO that will be reviewed by its board. It did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
GMS operates a network of more than 300 distribution centers and its product lineup includes wallboard, ceilings, steel framing and gypsum.
Both Beacon and GMS operate primarily in the U.S., with additional presence in Canada.
The U.S. building industry, mostly locally sourced and fairly protected from tariffs, is undergoing consolidation.
QXO said it offered $95.20 per share for all outstanding shares of GMS, a premium of about 17% over the company's closing price on Wednesday.
In the letter, Jacobs disclosed he first approached Turner in June last year, with conversations continuing until at least May 22, when the two CEOs met in New York.
Jacobs added his decision to take the offer public came after GMS's shares rose following market speculation over a potential QXO acquisition. The offer represents a 29% premium over GMS's value on May 22, he said.
On Wednesday, before the offer was made public, shares of GMS hit their highest level in almost five months after the company reported upbeat quarterly results and announced an additional $25 million in annualized cost reductions.
Jacobs said that following the private talks with Turner, he had heard from industry participants that J.P. Morgan and Jefferies bankers had been aggressively trying to find other suitors to buy GMS.
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are acting as financial advisers to QXO. And Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP is acting as legal counsel.
Jacobs has built an empire of multibillion-dollar companies spanning industries from logistics to waste management and equipment rentals by acquiring companies in industries undergoing consolidation, and spinning some of them off at a higher value.
QXO was a relatively small software company until 2023, when Jacobs invested about $1 billion and renamed and repurposed it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
EV owners don't pay gas taxes. In Minnesota next year, they'll pay double or more to register their cars
Starting next year, Minnesota electric vehicle owners will have to pay at least double to register their EVs. Blame the change on their freedom from gas taxes. A provision in the transportation bill that passed earlier this month raises the EV registration surcharge from $75 to at least $150. Drivers of plug-in-hybrids will also have to pay a minimum of $75 to register their vehicles. The new fees, which go into effect in January, will scale up with more expensive vehicles - meaning some drivers could see their annual registration costs hit $200 or more. For years, Minnesota lawmakers have debated how to fill a growing gap in roadway funds as more fuel efficient cars and trucks, as well as more electric vehicles, leads to less revenue from the state's gas tax. "Electric vehicle drivers are going to be paying over the next four years somewhere around $40 million," said Rep. Jon Koznick, the Republican co-chair of the House Transportation Finance and Policy Committee. "That does help offset declining gas tax revenues." Rep. Erin Koegel, Koznick's DFL counterpart on the Transportation Committee, said the new fee structure is far from perfect, but she's glad lawmakers included a sliding scale rather than a flat fee of $200, as originally proposed. Lawmakers said that EV drivers will see reduced registration fees in July 2027, when a public charging station tax takes effect. Under that scheme, owners of certain fast chargers will have to pay 5 cents for every kilowatt hour. Minnesota's transportation bill also created a work group to study electricity as a fuel source and recommend a kilowatt hour tax similar to the gas tax. Republicans and DFLers each hold 67 seats in the House, which left little room for disagreement during the budget negotiations. "This is kind of the best that we could get with the circumstances of divided government and all that," Koegel said. Not everyone was happy with the compromise. "We're actually going against the state's electrification goals by doing this," said Carolyn Berninger, who works on public policy issues for Drive Electric Minnesota, a coalition of clean energy advocacy groups. "It's going to make some prospective EV buyers pretty nervous. Electric vehicles already cost more upfront than a comparable gas car." Berninger said she's especially concerned with the timing of the new fees, which come as Congress considers phasing out federal tax incentives for electric vehicle purchases in this year's budget bill. The bill, backed by President Donald Trump, also includes a new $250 annual fee for electric vehicle drivers. That provision is similarly meant to address declining revenue from gas taxes. Jukka Kukkonen, an electrical engineering instructor at the University of St. Thomas and founder of the Minnesota-based EV consulting firm Shift2Electric, said EV drivers were already paying their fair share in taxes with the $75 annual fee. If someone driving a Toyota Prius hybrid, which gets 45 miles to the gallon, paid the gas tax, their average annual cost would be less than $100, he said. How much Minnesotans pay in gas taxes each year on average is a matter of debate. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics estimates that the average gasoline car gets roughly 25 miles per gallon, while trucks and SUVs get about 17 miles per gallon. Minnesotans drove an average of 13,957 miles in 2022, according to the most recent data made public by the Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration. When put together with Minnesota's gas tax rate, which stands at 31.8 cents per gallon, an average driver in the state pays anywhere from $177 to $246 a year in gas taxes. Others, including DFL Rep. Steve Elkins, have calculated a smaller figure - closer to $132 annually - saying that Minnesotans only drive an average of 11,500 miles per year. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Popular lifestyle retail chain files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
The high-end fashion retail sector has faced economic challenges since the Covid-19 pandemic temporarily shut down the industry in 2020, and it hasn't fully recovered from the retail downturn. Financial distress forced luxury department stores, high-end fashion retailers, luxury brands, and retail chains to file for bankruptcy. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Luxury department store Lord & Taylor, high-end retailer Neiman Marcus, luxury apparel chain Brooks Brothers, and designer brand manufacturer Centric Brands all filed for Chapter 11 protection in 2020. Related: Popular restaurant chain franchisee files Chapter 11 bankruptcy When the pandemic subsided, rising labor and product costs driven by inflation, higher interest rates on debt, and consumers' changing attitudes toward spending based on financial uncertainties put new pressure on revenue Luxury retailers continued filing for bankruptcy, as last year, Anne Fontaine USA, the U.S. affiliate of the Paris-based boutique chain, in January 2024 filed for Chapter 11 Subchapter V bankruptcy protection to reorganize in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting that the company has not been able to recover from financial distress caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. Luxury apparel chain Ted Baker Canada, which operated 31 Ted Baker stores in the U.S., nine in Canada, eight Brooks Brothers Canada shops, and seven Lucky Brand Canada stores, filed for restructuring under Canada's Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act and for Chapter 15 bankruptcy in the U.S. on April 24, 2024, to liquidate and close all 56 of the North American stores. The retailer's owner Authentic Brands Group in August 2024 reached an agreement with United Legwear & Apparel Co. to relaunch e-commerce retail operations for Ted Baker in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and Europe. Fashion retail brand Sash Group Inc., which markets and sells The Sash Bag crossbody handbags and accessories, on March 25, 2025, filed for Chapter 11 protection to reorganize its business, facing significant tax obligations and unsecured creditor debt. Finally, the parent company of high-end specialty retail chain Karma and Luck filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy to restructure its debt. Related: Major nationwide trucking company files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Las Vegas-based company Zama & Zama Inc., whose retail chain sells spiritual and good fortune-themed merchandise for men and women, filed its petition in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada, listing $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities. More bankruptcy: Iconic auto repair chain franchise files Chapter 11 bankruptcyPopular beer brand closes down and files Chapter 7 bankruptcyPopular vodka and gin brand files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Its largest creditors include $2.56 million owed to Settle Inc., $498,000 owed to American Express, over $231,000 owed to landlord IMI Miracle Mile, over $83,000 owed to landlord New WTC Retail Owner and other mall operators. The debtor, founded in 2015 by Vladi Bergman, operates 12 brick-and-mortar high-end retail locations in Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Houston, Florida, and New York. The retailer operates in several high-profile buildings, including at the World Trade Center and Grand Central Terminal in New York, Houston Galleria, Fashion Show Mall in Las Vegas, and the Mall at Miami International. Karma and Luck's merchandise includes women's bracelets, necklaces, rings, earrings, charms, anklets, lifestyle items like pillow and blanket sets; men's bracelets, necklaces, and charms; and home decor. The company's merchandise is also available through major department store retailers, such as Macy's and Nordstrom, and it offers e-commerce transactions on its website. Related: Popular smoothie chain franchisee files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Aflac finds suspicious activity on US network that may impact Social Security numbers, other data
Aflac says that it has identified suspicious activity on its network in the U.S. that may impact Social Security numbers and other personal information, calling the incident part of a cybercrime campaign against the insurance industry. The company said Friday that the intrusion was stopped within hours. 'We continue to serve our customers as we respond to this incident and can underwrite policies, review claims, and otherwise service our customers as usual,' Aflac said in a statement. The company said that it's in the early stages of a review of the incident, and so far is unable to determine the total number of affected individuals. Aflac Inc. said potentially impacted files contain claims information, health information, Social Security numbers, and other personal information, related to customers, beneficiaries, employees, agents, and other individuals in its U.S. business. The Columbus, Georgia-based company said that it will offer free credit monitoring and identity theft protection and Medical Shield for 24 months to anyone that calls its call center. Aflac is not the only company to deal with an incident recently. A string of recent cyberattacks and data breaches involving the systems of major retailers have started affecting shoppers. United Natural Foods, a wholesale distributor that supplies Whole Foods and other grocers, said earlier this month that a breach of its systems was disrupting its ability to fulfill orders — leaving many stores without certain items. In the U.K., consumers could not order from the website of Marks & Spencer for more than six weeks — and found fewer in-store options after hackers targeted the British clothing, home goods and food retailer. A cyberattack on Co-op, a U.K. grocery chain, also led to empty shelves in some stores. A security breach detected by Victoria's Secret last month led the popular lingerie seller to shut down its U.S. shopping site for nearly four days, as well as to halt some in-store services. Victoria's Secret later disclosed that its corporate systems also were affected, too, causing the company to delay the release of its first quarter earnings. The North Face said that it discovered a 'small-scale credential stuffing attack' on its website in April. The company reported that no credit card data was compromised and said the incident, which impacted 1,500 consumers, was 'quickly contained.' Meanwhile, Adidas disclosed last month that an 'unauthorized external party' obtained some data, which was mostly contact information, through a third-party customer service provider.
