AH-Vest offers minority shareholders 55 cents per share to delist from JSE
Image: Supplied
AH-Vest minority shareholders are being offered 55 cents a share in cash as part of plans to delist the company, a price that represents a whopping 1833% premium over the 3 cents market price when the company first cautioned about a possible transaction.
The shares traditionally trade very rarely, and on Tuesday, they were still untraded at 3 cents a share, despite the announcement of the plans to delist via a scheme of arrangement. AH-Vest is a South African food manufacturing company best known for its range of sauces and condiments, including its All Joy brand.
The plan to delist from the JSE's AltX board comes at a time when the JSE has undertaken several initiatives to make it easier and less costly for small and medium-sized businesses to list. These initiatives include establishing the AltX board to support high-growth entrepreneurial businesses that may not yet meet the stringent JSE Main Board requirements, lowering entry requirements, and introducing designated advisors for SMEs.
The company's board said on Tuesday that they had received a firm offer from the parent company, Eastern Trading, to acquire 100% of the shares via a scheme of arrangement, as it already controls 95.7% of the shares. An independent board has been appointed by AH-Vest's board to oversee the process.
Explaining their reasons to delist, AH-Vest's board mentioned that recent changes in Section 10 of the JSE listings requirements regarding ordinary course of business, along with the erratic share price and poor liquidity, have effectively removed the justification for maintaining a listing on the JSE. Recent changes to Section 10 of the JSE listing requirements primarily address related party transaction considerations.
'The resultant cost of compliance due to the low market capitalisation is prohibitive,' AH-Vest's board stated.
They noted that Eastern Trading had not traded in AH-Vest's shares in the six-month period prior to the delivery of the offer to minority shareholders.
'In this circumstance, the proposed transaction is, in the view of the board, worthy of consideration by AH-Vest shareholders as envisaged in terms of the scheme,' the board said.
In the six months to December 31, 2024, AH-Vest reported that its revenue had declined to R100.63 million from R114.45m at the end of the same period the previous year, while headline earnings per share fell to R0.17 compared to R2.60 a year before.
An online search revealed that there were about 14 company delistings from the JSE in 2024, continuing a multi-year trend of a contraction in the number of listed companies.
Visit:www.businessreport.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
11 minutes ago
- IOL News
South Africa unperturbed by US visa policies affecting Zimbabwe
US President Donald Trump continues to disrupt global diplomacy after a recent visa ban imposed on Zimbabwe. Image: Peter Zay / AFP The South African government appears unmoved by the recent visa ban imposed by the US embassy in Harare, Zimbabwe, even as US President Donald Trump continues to disrupt global diplomacy with tariff increases and immigration policies seven months into his second term. The US has suspended all routine immigrant and non-immigrant visa services to Zimbabwe due to concerns about misuse and overstays. However, the issuance of other visa types remains unaffected. Although South Africa was exempt from new Trump visa restrictions on SADC countries, a new policy has been implemented for Malawi and Zambia. Citizens of these nations are now required to pay a bond of $5,000 (R88,656) to $15,000 (R265,967) to travel to the United States. Additionally, the citizens are required to use one of three airports—Boston's Logan International, New York's JFK International, or Dulles International near Washington D.C.—for both arrival and departure. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ When asked whether South African citizens should be worried, Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) spokesperson Chrispin Phiri gave a brief response: "We do not provide commentary on other countries' visa regimes, and this is our general position, it's not specific to the US." A senior government official, however, downplayed the likelihood of South Africans being affected by the US visa restrictions. "Remember Trump is only in our case because of the International Court of Justice case against Israel and our involvement in BRICS. Nothing more and nothing less," the official said. "South Africans visiting the US are mostly professionals who either go for business or a holiday. We seldom have citizens wanting to immigrate to the should have nothing to worry about,' he said. The US embassy explained that the reasons for the restrictions was because the administration was working to prevent visa overstay and misuse as part of national security. "The Trump administration is protecting our nation and citizens by upholding the highest standards of national security and public safety through our visa process," the embassy said. "We are always working to prevent visa overstay and misuse." In June, the US imposed travel bans on citizens from 12 countries, with seven of them located in Africa. Additionally, heightened restrictions were applied to seven other nations, three of which are African. The US has issued a demand to 36 countries, predominantly in Africa, to enhance their traveler vetting procedures. Failure to comply could result in a ban on their citizens visiting the US. International Relations analyst Rejoice Ngwenya said it was unfortunate that the US had an obsession with immigration issues. "All democratic countries must encourage international country movements. However it is incumbent upon citizens that they don't abuse regulations. But one thing to acknowledge in terms of implementation of immigration laws globally is not to interfere and dissuade inter country movements of students because knowledge sharing and education is a universal right,' Ngwenya said.
The Citizen
41 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Here's why employers can't use NDAs to hide harassment in the workplace
NDAs are generally enforceable under South African contract law, provided they are reasonable in scope and duration, and do not violate public policy. Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) have been criticised for silencing victims of workplace harassment in several jurisdictions. However, unlike most countries, South Africa's legal framework provides protection against workplace harassment. If an NDA is found to be used to cover harassment, the employer could remain liable, regardless of the existence of the agreement. An NDA is a legally binding contract that ensures confidential information shared between parties remains private. This agreement is important for protecting trade secrets, business plans and other confidential data. Dhevarsha Ramjettan, partner at Webber Wentzel law firm, says NDAs are generally enforceable under South African contract law, provided they are reasonable in scope and duration, and do not violate public policy. ALSO READ: Can you get fired for being racist? Here is what employers and employees need to know Acts protecting employees The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA), the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 (EEA), and the Protected Disclosures Act 26 of 2000 (PDA) offer protections to employees who report harassment or discrimination. 'While the EEA does not expressly prohibit NDAs, any agreement that silences victims of harassment or discrimination arguably undermines the purpose of the EEA,' says Ramjettan. 'Section 6 of the EEA prohibits unfair discrimination and harassment. Victims may not be prevented from reporting such conduct to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), Labour Court or Equity Court.' Harassment in a workplace She says the Code of Good Practice on the Prevention and Elimination of Harassment in the Workplace (Harassment Code), issued under the EEA, aims to eradicate all forms of workplace harassment. It provides a formal mechanism for reporting discrimination or harassment. 'The Harassment Code also holds employers vicariously liable for employees' conduct unless they can demonstrate that reasonable steps were taken to prevent and address such behaviour. 'These provisions arguably prohibit the use of NDAs to silence complainants or avoid accountability.' ALSO READ: Corporate Mental Health Week: Is your boss a narcissist or a psychopath? Act that overrides NDAs Kanyiso Kezile, trainee attorney at Webber Wentzel, says section 2 of the PDA provides that any clause in a contract of employment or other agreement that seeks to exclude or waive rights under the PDA is void. This includes agreements preventing the institution or continuation of proceedings under the PDA. This statutory override invalidates any NDA (or other contractual term) that seeks to silence whistleblowers. 'Notably, the PDA defines disclosure broadly as any disclosure of information about the conduct of an employer or employee, made by a person who reasonably believes that the information shows, among other things, unfair discrimination as contemplated in the EEA or the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 (PEPUDA).' Mental health of employees He adds that under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993 (OHSA), employers are obligated to provide a working environment that is safe and without risk to employees' health, which includes the mental health of employees. 'If employers rely on NDAs to conceal harassment rather than address the underlying issues, they may fail to meet this obligation. As a result, contracts attempting to circumvent these responsibilities may be rendered unenforceable.' It is advisable that employers carefully review settlement agreements to ensure compliance with statutory obligations under the relevant legislation. 'Any clauses that prevent employees from reporting harassment or discrimination to regulatory bodies such as the CCMA, Labour Court, or Equity Court should be avoided, as these are likely to be deemed unenforceable and contrary to public policy.' NOW READ: Can a company to be held liable for employee's suicide?
Eyewitness News
42 minutes ago
- Eyewitness News
Tau confirms revised trade offer made to US
JOHANNESBURG - Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau said that a revised trade offer has been tabled to the US, as South African officials make concessions to Washington's calls to balance trade. The resolution was made at a Cabinet meeting last week. Tau said the new offer substantively responds to the issues the US has raised in the 2025 national trade estimates report. In a shake-up to address trade deficits, the US imposed 30% tariffs on imports from South Africa, the highest duty charged on goods from any sub-Saharan nation. The new offer submitted to US trade officials on Tuesday builds on the previous offer submitted in May.
