How Chattanooga jury impacted verdict in Tyre Nichols' case
Defense attorneys wanted the change of venue over concerns that an impartial jury couldn't be found near Shelby County because of so much publicity about the Tyre Nichols case.
'There was a motion filed by the defense to change venue, and there was study done in the amount of publicity in the very large cities in Tennessee and it was found that Chattanooga had the lowest amount of pre-trial publicity with regard to this case. And so that's why it was chosen,' said Paul Hagerman, prosecutor in the Tyre Nichols case.
Hamilton County has a population of around 380,000, and 76% are White and 20% are Black.
While we are WREG is not sure about the demographics of the full jury pool that was called for the Tyre Nichols case, the final 12 jurors that decided it were all white.
Jury finds three ex-officers not guilty in Tyre Nichols death trial
'They did not look like Mr. Nichols. They did not not look like the officers that were charged, and we are supposed to be judged by what? People that are our own peers,' said a friend of the Nichols' family.
'But this jury was not reflective of the city of Memphis, and I think that was a big win for the defense, because I think the jurors tend to be more conservative from places like Chattanooga and East Tennessee, other parts of East Tennessee, Knoxville, which they're going to be more friendly to the police, and I think that's what you saw here this week,' said Art Horne, Memphis Attorney.
WREG asked long time attorney Art Horne, who was not involved in the Tyre Nichols trial, if attorneys could have done more to get a diverse set of jurors.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work like that. You get a pool of you get a list of people, and they're randomly selected. And so basically, when they're selected, they have to answer questions.
'I'm sure one of the questions was, had they seen the video in Tyree Nichols' case, and disproportionately, I'm sure, African Americans saw that video more than probably white Americans, and so I think that hampered the ability to get diversity and minorities on that jury,' said Horne.
Tyre Nichols' mother: Verdict a 'devastating blow'
Hamilton County and Chattanooga are worlds apart when it comes to issues facing the communities.
Memphis is in a crime fight, that's become well know around the region. And it even played into defense attorney Martin Zummach's closing arguments as he read crime headlines to the jury.
'CNN Headlines. Memphis Mayor meets with gang members to request a ceasefire,' said Martin Zummach, Justin Smith's attorney.
He stressed what police, like those on trial, face every day.
'Crime has continued to go nuts. It's a matter of public record. It's a matter of your own knowledge in your own head when you come to Shelby County,' said Zummach.
Sen. Brent Taylor calls out D.A. Mulroy after 'not guilty' verdicts in Tyre Nichols case
'Think that really, really had an impact on this jury, who was not from here, and who probably looks a lot of people across the state of Tennessee, as you know, kind of look at Memphis as the armpit of the state, and we're very different,' said Art Horne, Memphis Attorney.
'It was masterful. I think he did a great job for his client. I think he did a great job for his client. I think he knew the audience that he was catering to, and they played right into the hands of those jurors from Hamilton County,' said Horne.
It worked for the defense. Attorney's got the verdicts they wanted from a jury they pushed for, and prosecutors left to deal with the outcome.
'I think it's a testimony to the fairness of our criminal justice center that we bent over backwards to get a jury from another jurisdiction to assure the defendants were given a fair trial. Beyond that, I don't think I should comment,' said Steve Mulroy, Shelby County District Attorney.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump calls on Federal Reserve official to resign after official accuses her of mortgage fraud
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Wednesday called on Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook to resign after a member of his administration accused Cook of committing mortgage fraud, the latest example of the Trump administration's efforts to gain control over the central bank. Bill Pulte, director of the agency that oversees mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, urged the Justice Department to investigate Cook, who was appointed to the Fed's governing board by former president Joe Biden in 2022. She was reappointed the following year to a term that lasts until 2038, the longest remaining term among the seven governors. Pulte, in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, alleged that Cook claimed two homes as her principal residences in 2021 to fraudulently obtain better mortgage lending terms. On June 18 of that year she purchased a home in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and then two weeks later bought a condo in Atlanta, Georgia, the letter said. Pulte also charged that Cook has listed her condo in Atlanta, Georgia, for rent. Mortgages for homes used as principal residences typically carry lower interest rates than properties that are purchased to rent, the letter said. The Federal Reserve declined to comment on the accusation. A Justice Department spokesperson also declined to comment. The allegation represents another front in the Trump administration's attack on the Fed, which has yet to cut its key interest rate as Trump has demanded. If Cook were to step down, then the White House could nominate a replacement. And Trump has said he would only appoint people who would support lower rates. The more members of the Fed's governing board that Trump can appoint, the more control he will be able to assert over the Fed, which has long been considered independent from day-to-day politics. Trump will be able to replace Chair Jerome Powell in May 2026, when Powell's term expires. Yet 12 members of the Fed's interest-rate setting committee have a vote on whether to raise or lower interest rates, so even replacing the Chair doesn't guarantee that Fed policy will shift the way Trump wants. Yet appointing more board members would give Trump more power over the institution. All seven members of the Fed's governing board are able to vote on rate decisions. The other five voters include the president of the Fed's New York branch and a rotating group of four of the presidents of the Fed's other 11 regional branches. Trump appointed two members of the Fed's board in his first term, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman. Both dissented July 30 from the central bank's decision to keep its rate unchanged, in favor of a rate cut. Another Fed governor, Adriana Kugler, stepped down unexpectedly Aug. 1, and Trump has appointed one of his economic advisers, Stephen Miran, to fill out the remainder of her term until January. If Trump is able to replace Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's board, as well as Kugler, that would give him a clear majority on the board of governors. If Powell leaves the board when his term as chair ends next May, then Trump will be able to fill a fifth spot. However, Powell could stay on the board until early 2028 after finishing his term as chair. The presidents of the regional Federal Reserve banks are selected by the boards of directors of those banks, but are subject to the approval of the Fed's board of governors. The terms of all 12 of the regional Fed presidents end next February. Trump has for months demanded that the Federal Reserve reduce the short-term interest rate it controls, which currently stands at about 4.3%. He has also repeatedly insulted Powell, who has said that the Fed would like to see more evidence of how the economy evolves in response to Trump's sweeping tariffs before making any moves. Powell has also said the duties threaten to raise inflation and slow growth. Trump says that a lower rate would reduce the government's borrowing costs on $37 trillion in debt and boost the housing market by reducing mortgage rates. Yet mortgage borrowing costs do not always follow the Fed's rate decisions. The Trump administration has made similar claims of mortgage fraud against Democrats that Trump has attacked, including California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
If the races were reversed, would you be as outraged about the downtown brawl?
The footage from Fourth and Elm wasn't just another late-night brawl. It spread wildly across the country because it struck a raw American wound: race. A group of Black people beating a white man, a white woman knocked unconscious − those images tap our inherited fears and our learned biases. Pretending otherwise is dishonest. And dishonesty is exactly how we keep ending up here, talking past each other in different languages instead of moving with a shared purpose rooted in our common humanity and love for this city. Cincinnati − and America − still handles race like a hot stove: quick touches, lots of flinching, and no real repair. We swap slogans, not truth. We all suffer from racial battle fatigue. That's why moments like this fracture our community. We default to competing storylines designed to vindicate our side rather than illuminate what happened and what it means. We still don't know how the July 26 confrontation began. What sparked the initial beef between the men involved? Those details may surface in court. But even with incomplete facts, one thing is clear: Race is not a footnote in this incident. It's a live wire running through it. More: What started fight in Cincinnati? City is focus after brawl videos go viral. What we know Why Cincinnati brawl clip went viral If the races were reversed − white people pummeling a Black man − the video would still make national news. It just might be circulated 24/7 by MSNBC instead of Fox News, and the tone would almost certainly be different, shaped by America's brutal history of racial violence against Black people. White residents who say the reaction among some would've changed aren't imagining things. They're noticing how history shapes our headlines and our hearts. That admission doesn't diminish what happened here; it helps explain why it detonated online and on cable news. The video wasn't just violence; it was symbolism. A quick, convenient story has taken off: That white people were attacked simply for being white and downtown. That may comfort certain political arguments, but it flattens reality. What we do know is that a white man used a racial slur during the chaos. Many believe that the act poured gasoline on an already hot situation. Here are two truths grown-ups should be able to hold at once: Using a slur never justifies a mob beating. And hurling a slur at Black people in 2025 − given the history and the temperature of our times − rarely leads anywhere good. Acknowledging the latter is not "victim-blaming;" it's a sober account of how inflammatory language can escalate danger, especially when alcohol is involved. We can condemn the violence without excusing the slur. We can condemn the slur without excusing the violence. Accountability is not a one-lane street. Letter: The Cincinnati brawl exposed more than violence. It exposed our values Everyone involved must be called out for what they chose to do, not for what we want them to symbolize in some broader culture war. That includes those who threw punches and kicks − and the man who slapped another person and hurled a word that has been used to degrade and dehumanize for centuries. A Hamilton County assistant prosecutor noted last week that unreleased video shows the slapper himself being harassed before everything went down. That may matter in court, but outside the courtroom, we can still say plainly that none of this conduct is acceptable. Equal dignity demands that we speak against all of it − the violence, the slurs and the escalating provocation − because each choice poured fuel on a fire that has burned our entire city. And it's not just about those directly involved. The rest of us − neighbors, leaders, and media alike − have a responsibility to resist the urge to excuse "our side" and instead call wrong what is wrong, no matter who commits it. Check your outrage We each owe ourselves a hard question: If the races were different, would my outrage be the same? If your answer is no, ask why. Bias doesn't just live in people we dislike; it lives in the mirrors hanging in our own homes. The test of principle is whether it survives a change in the players involved. Some Cincinnatians are processing the "brawl" against a backdrop of broader anxiety about crime in Downtown and Over-the-Rhine. The perception is that violent crime is out of control. There is also a perception − fueled by daily news reports showing mostly Black suspects in handcuffs or standing before a judge − that the face of crime is Black. The statistics don't help: The majority of people charged with murder in Hamilton County are Black, and most gun violence in our city is perpetrated on Black people. So when a white or Black Cincinnatian closes their eyes and envisions "a criminal," odds are they see a Black face. Letter: I'm a white woman who feels safe in downtown Cincinnati despite the hysteria For law-abiding Black citizens, that stereotype stings. Too often, Black people are lumped in with the worst among us, judged not as individuals but by the crimes of those who share our skin color. I reject that. Most Black people I know follow the law and, in many cases, are the very victims of the crimes that others fear. Black residents probably call the police just as much, if not more, than anybody. That's why we must resist the temptation to paint an entire race with a broad brush. And that caution cuts both ways − Blacks stereotyping whites is no more just or accurate. This incident was politicized and racialized from the start. That's not an accident. Bad actors on the left and right rush in to monetize outrage and build followers. Hate groups − from the Ku Klux Klan to neo-Nazis − circulate flyers and posts to recruit from our pain. Criminals benefit when communities spiral into mutual suspicion; it means fewer witnesses, thinner trust, and more space to operate. Meanwhile, Cincinnati suffers because too many of us would rather win the argument than win each other. What honesty demands now Honesty asks something harder than choosing sides. We must name race without weaponizing it. Say out loud that this video struck a nerve because race matters in America − and in Cincinnati. Not to excuse anything, but to explain why it feels like a five-alarm fire. We must also reject narrative spinning. Don't turn a slur into a defense for assault. Don't turn a brutal beating into proof that every downtown resident is a target. Both moves are dishonest − and both make tomorrow more dangerous. We must hold facts and empathy together. We need both: what happened, and what it felt like to those involved and watching. Opinion: What happened downtown was racial violence, and we must say it We must also practice civility and moral courage. Listen to people you'd rather silence. Sit in rooms where you'll hear things you don't like. Ask a sincere follow-up instead of assuming the worst. That's not weakness; it's how we heal. To avoid repeating our mistakes, we must learn to speak together in a language that centers equal dignity and shared stakes. That means making space for uncomfortable facts: race influenced how this started, how it spiraled, how it was covered, and how we reacted. It also means choosing a different path forward. We must demand principled leadership, not performative threats. We need solutions that reduce harm and restore trust − credible prosecutions, transparent communication, and concrete prevention strategies − rather than grandstanding that treats Cincinnati like a political prop. And we must measure our success by the repair. In other words, if our "wins" leave us more divided, they aren't wins. Real success looks like fewer viral videos, fewer opportunists feasting on our anger, and more neighbors who can disagree without dehumanizing each other. We can be honest about the role race played here without turning this city into a permanent battlefield. We can hold people accountable without surrendering to the cheapest storylines. And we can insist that Cincinnati is worth more than the clicks, the clout, and the chaos that others hope to wring out of our pain. The fight at Fourth and Elm is a test. Not just of what we believe about race and justice, but of whether we love this city enough to tell each other the truth − and to stay in the room long enough to do something about it. Opinion and Engagement Editor Kevin S. Aldridge can be reached at kaldridge@ On X: @kevaldrid. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: The Cincinnati brawl went viral because race still matters | Opinion
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown
Deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller on Wednesday railed against what he called 'stupid white hippies' who were protesting the federal crackdown on crime in the nation's capital and argued they did not represent the citizens of Washington, D.C. Miller, Vice President Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited Union Station on Wednesday, where National Guard troops have been stationed outside for days in a show of force near the transportation hub. 'We are not going to let the communists destroy a great American city, let alone the nation's capital,' Miller told the crowd near Shake Shack inside Union Station. 'And let's just also address another thing. All these demonstrators you've seen out here in recent days, all these elderly white hippies, they're not part of the city and never have been. And by the way, most of the citizens who live in Washington, D.C., are Black.' 'So we're going to ignore these stupid white hippies that all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old,' he added. 'And we're going to get back to the business of protecting the American people and the citizens of Washington, D.C.' The Trump administration earlier this month began surging federal law enforcement across parts of the district to crack down on what the White House said was an unacceptable level of crime, despite statistics showing violent crime has declined in the city. Last week, Trump took federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department and deployed hundreds of National Guard troops across the city to further the crack down on crime. The White House has said officers across the district have made more than 550 arrests since the surge in federal resources began on Aug. 7. But local residents have largely expressed disapproval with the aggressive moves from the federal government. A Washington Post-Schar School poll of 604 D.C. residents published Wednesday found 65 percent do not think Trump's actions will make the city safer. Roughly 80 percent of residents said they opposed Trump's executive order to federalize the city's police department.
