logo
Wife of Suspected Minnesota Lawmaker Shooter Speaks Out: 'Completely Blindsided'

Wife of Suspected Minnesota Lawmaker Shooter Speaks Out: 'Completely Blindsided'

Yahoo4 days ago

Jenny Boelter, the wife of suspected Minnesota lawmaker shooter, Vance Boelter, is speaking out for the first time
"We are absolutely shocked, heartbroken and completely blindsided,' Jenny said in a statement shared through her legal team on Thursday, June 26
Her husband is accused of fatally shooting State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, and wounding Democratic Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, on June 14The wife of suspected Minnesota lawmaker shooter Vance Boelter is speaking out for the first time since the tragedy, saying her family was "completely blindsided' by the violence.
'On behalf of my children and myself, I want to express our deepest sympathies to the Hortman and Hoffman families. Our condolences are with all who are grieving during this unimaginably difficult time, and we are praying daily for them,' Jenny Boelter said in a statement released through her legal team at Halberg Criminal Defense on Thursday, June 26.
Vance, 57, is accused of fatally shooting State Rep. Melissa Hortman, 55, the former Democratic Speaker of the House, and her husband, Mark, in their home in Brooklyn Park, Minn., on June 14. He is also accused of shooting Democratic Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, in their home nearby, but both of them survived the assassination attempt.
The suspect allegedly impersonated a law enforcement officer and went to the lawmakers' homes in an act that was described as a "politically motivated assassination" by Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz.
'We are absolutely shocked, heartbroken and completely blindsided,' Jenny's statement continued. 'This violence does not at all align with our beliefs as a family. It is a betrayal of everything we hold true as tenets of our Christian faith. We are appalled and horrified by what occurred and our hearts are incredibly heavy for the victims of this unfathomable tragedy.'
Jenny also says her family has "fully cooperated with investigators and responded to their every request" since the beginning of the investigation and clarifies details about her detainment by police on the day of the shootings.
"On the morning of June 14, 2025, I received a call from law enforcement and immediately drove to meet agents at a nearby gas station," she explained. "We were not pulled over; we parked and waited until they arrived. When they did, we voluntarily agreed to meet with them, answer their questions, provide all items they requested, and cooperate with all searches."
During the search of Jenny's car, authorities recovered a gun, passports and about $10,000 in cash, ABC News reported, citing an affidavit.
Jenny's statement concluded, "We are grateful for the diligent and professional efforts of the authorities to fully investigate these crimes. We thank law enforcement for apprehending Vance and protecting others from further harm."
After briefly exchanging gunfire with police at Hortman's house and allegedly fleeing the scene, Vance was arrested in the woods near his home in Green Isle, Minn., on June 15, officials confirmed, per CBS News. The arrest came after a nearly two-day manhunt that Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley called the "largest" in the state's history at a press conference.
While on the run, the suspected shooter allegedly sent haunting texts to members of his family.
"Dad went to war last night ... I don't wanna say more because I don't want to implicate anybody," read one of the texts allegedly sent by Vance, per a police affidavit obtained by ABC News.
Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up for for breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases.
He then also texted his wife: "Words are not gonna explain how sorry I am for this situation ... there's gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger-happy and I don't want you guys around," the outlet reported.
Before Vance's arrest, police revealed that they had discovered a "manifesto" featuring a "list of names" inside a vehicle that they believe the suspect had been driving.
Vance has been charged with two counts of second-degree murder and two counts of second-degree attempted murder, Reuters reported, citing a criminal complaint.
Since then, the Hennepin County Attorney's Office said in a statement that prosecutors will seek first-degree murder charges against Vance. He's also facing federal charges, including stalking, and is expected to a make a federal court appearance on June 27.
Read the original article on People

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate kicks off marathon voting session on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Senate kicks off marathon voting session on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

CNN

time13 minutes ago

  • CNN

Senate kicks off marathon voting session on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Senate has kicked off its marathon voting session on President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill after a weekend of negotiations and delays. As Senate Majority Leader John Thune went to the floor Monday morning, he told reporters that 'hopefully we'll know soon enough' if Republicans' have the votes to pass the bill. 'This may take a little while,' he noted. The vote-a-rama – an open-ended, hourslong series of votes on amendments, some political, some substantive – provides an opportunity for Republicans to make any eleventh-hour adjustments to the package and Democrats to push on GOP weak points in the bill and put their colleagues on the spot. Those politically tough votes are likely to provide fodder for campaign ads down the line. Trump's multitrillion-dollar bill would lower federal taxes and infuse more money into the Pentagon and border security agencies, while downsizing government safety-net programs including Medicaid. Democrats are expected to zero in on Medicaid and other safety-net programs as they message against the president's agenda. Monday's exercise in stamina comes after Senate Democrats employed a major delay tactic over the weekend that forced clerks to spend more than a dozen hours reading aloud the entire bill. Senators then debated the bill into the early hours Monday before adjourning and returning to the chamber at 9 a.m. ET to begin offering amendments. Lawmakers are up against an extremely tight timeline to pass the legislation. The president has demanded Congress deliver the bill to his desk by the Fourth of July, but the measure must still go back to the House if it passes the Senate. A number of Republicans are closely watching any changes made to Medicaid provisions in the bill. The Senate version of the megabill would leave 11.8 million more people without health insurance in 2034, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis released over the weekend. That's more than the 10.9 million more people projected to be left uninsured by the House-passed version of the bill. Both chambers are calling for historic spending cuts to Medicaid, which provides coverage to more than 71 million low-income Americans, including children, senior citizens, people with disabilities and other adults. The package would also enact changes to the Affordable Care Act that are projected to reduce enrollment in the landmark health reform law that Trump and Republicans have long sought to dismantle. But the Senate version calls for even deeper cuts to the Medicaid, leading to the larger estimate. It would slash federal support for Medicaid by $930 billion over a decade, Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, said over the weekend, citing a CBO estimate. The House version is projected to reduce federal spending on the program by about $800 billion, according to the CBO. Both chambers would require certain able-bodied adults ages 19-64 to work to maintain their Medicaid benefits for the first time in the program's 60-year history. But the Senate version would impose the work requirement on parents of children ages 14 and older, while the House version would exempt parents of dependent children. The Senate version would also lower the cap on the taxes that states levy on health care providers to help fund the program and increase reimbursement rates for providers. However, that provision would apply only to the 40 states and the District of Columbia that have expanded Medicaid to low-income adults. The House bill would put a moratorium on the states' existing provider taxes. The first vote taken by senators Monday dealt with a procedural argument over the so-called current policy baseline and how to calculate the costs of the bill. While it may seem dry, Republicans' use of current policy baseline in their calculations will set a precedent allowing both parties to be much more generous when calculating costs of tax bills going forward. Trump and some GOP leaders, including Senate Finance Chairman Mike Crapo, pushed the alternative 'current policy baseline' scoring method, which seemingly greatly minimizes the deficit impact of the bill because it would not include the cost of extending the expiring 2017 tax provisions. The CBO, however, calculated the cost of the bill using its traditional scoring method, known as 'current law baseline,' which assumed the expiring provisions of the 2017 Trump tax cuts lapse as scheduled at the end of the year. It projected the Senate's bill would also cost far more than the House-approved bill, adding nearly $3.3 trillion to the deficit over a decade. The Senate version is costlier in large part because it contains bigger tax cuts, while shrinking some of the spending cuts and revenue raisers, said Marc Goldwein, senior policy director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a watchdog group. For instance, the Senate bill would make permanent three corporate tax breaks that were part of the 2017 law and would lessen the cuts to the food stamp program. 'They expand the giveaways and shrink the takeaways,' Goldwein told CNN. Using the current policy baseline, the Senate version would cost roughly $508 billion over the next decade, according to a separate CBO estimate released Saturday night.

Supreme Court will take up Republican challenge to campaign finance restrictions
Supreme Court will take up Republican challenge to campaign finance restrictions

Axios

time19 minutes ago

  • Axios

Supreme Court will take up Republican challenge to campaign finance restrictions

The Supreme Court will take up a challenge brought by Republicans that aims to strike limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with individual candidates. Why it matters: The case gives the high court an opening to further chip away at campaign finance restrictions erected decades ago. The law's supporters argue without the restrictions, large donors could sidestep individual contribution caps. Driving the news: The justices said Monday they would review a ruling from an appeals court that upheld a decades-old federal election law provision on coordinated party expenditures, one that the Supreme Court itself affirmed in 2001. The justices will hear oral arguments in the case in the fall. Coordinated party expenditure limits vary depending on a state's voting age population and the office sought. By the numbers: In 2025, the expenditure limits range from $127,200 to $3,946,100 for Senate nominees. For House races, the caps are $127,200 in states with only one representative and $63,600 in all other states. Catch up quick: The National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Committee filed the lawsuit in 2022, joined by then-Sen. JD Vance and former Rep. Steve Chabot, another Ohio Republican. An appeals court upheld the provision, citing the Supreme Court's 2001 ruling in the FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee case. Zoom out: The Trump administration noted to the court in a May brief that while the Justice Department has "a longstanding policy of defending challenged federal statutes," it believes this is "the rare case that warrants an exception to that general approach."

Nebraska Republican Rep. Don Bacon cites political dysfunction in deciding not to seek reelection
Nebraska Republican Rep. Don Bacon cites political dysfunction in deciding not to seek reelection

Washington Post

time25 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Nebraska Republican Rep. Don Bacon cites political dysfunction in deciding not to seek reelection

OMAHA, Neb. — U.S. Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican from Nebraska, announced Monday he will not seek reelection next year amid an increasingly polarized political climate. Bacon, 61, said at a news conference at Omaha's airport that he would not seek a sixth term representing Nebraska's second district with its so-called blue dot that includes many progressive voters around Omaha. Bacon has had to navigate an ever-thinning line between staying in his party's and President Donald Trump's good graces without alienating his increasingly Democratic district. In May at an Omaha roundtable with business leaders to discuss Congress' recent tax bill, Bacon said he would decide 'by this summer' whether he would run again, citing a desire to spend more time with his family, including his eight grandchildren. When pressed, he acknowledged that the dysfunction in Washington contributed to his decision. 'It's one thing when you have the opposing party fighting you, but when you have divisions in your own party, you know — it makes it harder,' he said. An Air Force veteran first elected in 2016, he won reelection in 2024 . He serves on the House Armed Services Committee and has been at the center of many debates in Congress. He has also been chairman of the conservative-centrist Republican Main Street Caucus in the House. Bacon has earned a reputation as a centrist — an increasingly rare designation among Republicans as the party has moved farther to the right. But he has long acknowledged that moderation is a necessary attribute for anyone seeking to represent the Omaha-centered district, which is closely divided between Republican and Democratic voters. Nebraska is one of two states that doesn't follow a winner-take-all system of awarding Electoral College votes. Instead, Nebraska and Maine allow presidential electoral votes to be split by congressional district. Bacon's district has seen its elector vote go to a Democratic presidential candidate three times — to Barack Obama in 2008, to Joe Biden in 2020 and to Kamala Harris in 2024 . The political climate is rapidly changing in Omaha, where voters recently rejected a fourth term for Republican Mayor Jean Stothert in favor of her Democratic opponent, John Ewing. Seeing an opportunity to flip a vulnerable seat, several Democrats have already announced their candidacy. The most widely recognized is John Cavanaugh, a state senator from Omaha who's father, John J. Cavanaugh III, represented the 2nd District in Congress from 1977 to 1981. Bacon has managed to survive the district's swing to the left by staying squarely in the middle. In his most recent campaigns, he touted his bipartisan credentials in political ads and cited his willingness to buck his party to support measures such as the Biden administration's popular 2021 infrastructure investment bill. Despite Bacon's willingness to rebuke both his party and the Trump administration, he has consistently voted with most of their agenda. But his criticism of Trump has been enough to draw the growing ire of his party. Bacon faced a primary challenger in 2024 who was endorsed by the Nebraska Republican Party, which is led by Trump loyalists. Even so, Bacon has grown more vocal in his criticism of the Trump administration. That includes the president's chaotic tariff policies, with Bacon going so far as to introduce a bill to return authority to issue tariffs to Congress. On Sunday, Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina also decided to not seek reelection next year. He had held to his opposition of President Donald Trump's tax breaks and spending cuts package because of its reductions to health care programs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store