
Teacher sacked after criticising ‘two-tier justice' in Lucy Connolly case
In a post on social media, Simon Pearson, 56, who teaches at Preston College said Connolly's online comments were 'obviously wrong' but she ' should not have been jailed '.
But he was dismissed after an internal investigation, prompted by a complaint from a Muslim representative of the National Education Union (NEU) at the school, found his online posts had the potential to bring the college into disrepute.
Mr Pearson told The Telegraph: 'I am appalled by the way I've been treated. I've dedicated my life to education and to supporting students from all walks of life.
'Yet as soon as I was branded 'Islamophobic' for expressing concern about violent crime, I became a marked man. It was clear that I had to be found guilty by the college, it became a witch hunt, and I had to be eliminated no matter what.'
Mr Pearson is an ESOL (English for Speakers of Other Languages) teacher at the further education college in Fulwood.
Connolly was jailed in October last year after posting an online message on the day of the Southport murders, that read: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f---ing hotels full of the b------s for all I care, while you're at it take the treacherous government politicians with them.'
The 42-year-old, who had lost a child of her own, deleted the post fewer than four hours later, but not before it had been viewed 310,000 times.
Critics claimed her 15-month jail sentence was 'a clear example of two-tier justice '.
Lord Young of Acton, founder of the Free Speech Union, said: 'The most striking aspect of this case is that the teacher was sacked at the behest of the NEU.
'Once upon a time, trade unions used to stick up for workers threatened with the sack for speaking out of turn. Now, they side with management and actively try to get workers sacked, including their dues-paying members.'
In a post on Facebook, Mr Pearson described Connolly's comments as 'appalling' and 'obviously wrong'.
He wrote:
In another Facebook post, he discussed the Manchester Airport court case, writing:
After Mr Pearson made the posts on social media, a Muslim representative of the National Education Union at Preston College submitted a formal complaint to the college, alleging that the Facebook posts were 'Islamophobic' and 'racially discriminatory'.
Preston College bosses then launched an investigation. Mr Pearson apologised if he had offended anyone, and says he provided extensive evidence of his support for Muslim students and asylum seekers during this process.
But the investigation concluded that the posts violated Preston College policies, damaged professional relationships, and had the potential to bring the college into disrepute.
Mr Pearson has now started legal action, which has been filed at an employment tribunal, with claims of wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal, harassment, and discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
He argues the posts were expressions of protected philosophical and Christian beliefs, including support for the rule of law, freedom of expression, and equal justice.
Mr Pearson told The Telegraph: 'I cannot allow what has happened to me to go unchallenged. It is a grave injustice that should concern everybody who cares about freedom.
'I am determined to fight for justice and for the freedom to raise legitimate concerns in public and private as part of national debates on extremely serious issues that impact us all.'
'We need to cut their throats'
Ricky Jones, 57, the Labour figure referred to in Mr Pearson's post, is actually a councillor. He was charged with encouraging violent disorder after he made a speech last year about 'disgusting Nazi fascists' and said 'we need to cut their throats and get rid of them'.
Appearing at Snaresbrook Crown Court last September, Mr Jones pleaded not guilty to encouraging violent disorder.
Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 20, was convicted of assaulting PC Lydia Ward, causing actual bodily harm, and the assault of emergency worker PC Ellie Cook at Manchester Airport on July 23 last year after a three-week trial at Liverpool Crown Court.
Mr Pearson's dismissal comes after Christian school administrator Kristie Higgs was sacked from her role at Farmor's School in Fairford, Gloucestershire, in 2019 for sharing Facebook posts criticising teaching about LGBT+ relationships in schools.
In February, she won a Court of Appeal battle related to her dismissal, with three senior judges finding that the decision to sack her for gross misconduct was 'unlawfully discriminatory' and 'unquestionably a disproportionate response'.
The Christian Legal Centre, which is supporting Mr Pearson, says the case raises critical questions about the balance between workplace conduct, personal beliefs, and the right to speak freely on matters of public concern.
A spokesman for the Christian Legal Centre, said: 'This case highlights the dangerous consequences of the vague and weaponised use of the term 'Islamophobia'.
'In a free and democratic society, we must be able to discuss public events and express concern about violence and injustice without fear of losing our livelihoods.
'The definition of Islamophobia is being used to silence legitimate speech and punish those who dare to speak out. We stand firmly behind this teacher and his right to freedom of expression.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘My son left the house like every other day - 18 minutes later he was no longer here'
When Carly Calland remembers her son Jacob, she pictures a boy always busy and on the move. 'He was always dressed, out the door, with his mates all day, come back, eat, sleep, computers. It was like one of those eat, sleep, breathe, repeat kind of things, but for a teenage boy,' she laughed. But on 19 March, Jacob Calland left his family's house in Wythenshawe, Manchester, for the last time. Just 18 minutes after he closed the front door, the 14-year-old was involved in a catastrophic collision. He had been riding as a passenger on the back of his friend's e-scooter, and neither of them had been wearing any protection. Carly never allowed Jacob an e-scooter of his own and often warned him they were ' illegal and dangerous '. But she says a 'split-second decision' to ride on the back of someone else's cost him his life, and is now calling for tighter regulations around the vehicles. 'I was at my mum's house on the afternoon of the crash, and I got a call from my partner,' Carly recalled. 'Honestly, at first I just thought, 'Oh what's he done now?' 'I knew he had been knocked over, but I didn't know - and didn't want to believe - how serious it was.' Carly raced to the scene and found her son already in a coma in the back of an ambulance. As he was taken to the hospital, she followed in what she described as the 'longest' journey. 'I was just thinking, what's he done? Is he alive? How bad is it?' she said. 'I didn't know what had happened at this point. I just knew he was in a coma.' When she arrived, the police were waiting. They explained to her that Jacob had been on the back of an e-scooter that had been involved in a crash. Jacob had been rushed in for scans that revealed he had a large bleed to his brain. Medics decided to keep him in a coma in a bid to prevent his brain from swelling further and give his body a chance to rest. 'It was surreal seeing your baby like that,' Carly said. 'I don't even know how to explain it. It was horrible.' Over the next week, Jacob was kept in intensive care, where he was cared for by doctors around the clock. But eight days after the collision, Jacob died after suffering a cardiac arrest. 'I felt so powerless,' Carly said. 'It's like things are taken out of your control, and there's nothing you can do about it. You feel like you're the mum, you need to protect them. 'I feel like when they told me, everything just got taken away from me. There was nothing I could do but just be there with him, tell him how much I love him, and tell him how much I'm proud of him. I'm proud of the fight that he gave.' Almost five months on from the tragedy, Carly is putting her energy into trying to make sure what happened to Jacob doesn't happen to anyone else. She has launched Jacob's Journey, a campaign aimed at changing the law around e-scooter use and calling for tighter regulations. Jacob's Journey is petitioning the government to ban the sale and use of e-scooters to anyone under 18, as well as making helmets and protection mandatory and prohibiting the carrying of passengers. It is currently illegal to ride a privately owned e-scooter on a public road or pavement, but they are widely found for sale. There is no legal minimum age to purchase a private e-scooter in the UK. 'Jacob's never, ever going to come back for me, so what I'm doing doesn't make any difference to my life,' she continued. 'I'm doing this out of the goodness of my heart to save other people's lives.' As part of the campaign, she released a video telling the devastating story behind Jacob's death. She said she hopes putting her life out there 'in the rawest form' encourages other people to 'stop and think' before they make the same choice. 'He left this front door and 18 minutes later, he was no longer here,' she said. 'He got on the back of that scooter and didn't think twice about the repercussions. 'That's the message I'm trying to get across to people who make a split decision - this can be your outcome. I never thought it was going to happen to me, Jacob never thought it was going to happen to him.' Greater Manchester Police is continuing to appeal for witnesses in connection with the collision, and has issued an appeal to trace the driver of a white 2015 onward Kia Venga who they believe could have 'vital information'. Detective Constable Steve Pennington said: "This was a truly tragic incident that has devastated a young boy's family. Our thoughts remain with Jacob's loved ones, and we continue to support his family as they navigate this unimaginable loss. 'We are very keen to speak to the driver of the white Kia Venga who may have witnessed the moments leading up to the collision. I want to be clear that they are not under suspicion – we believe they could have vital information that may help us understand what happened. If you are that driver, or know who they might be, please get in touch with us as soon as possible.' A Department for Transport spokesperson said: 'Road safety is a top priority. Every death on our roads is a tragedy and our thoughts are with everyone who has lost a loved one in this way. 'The use of private e-scooters is illegal in any public space. Riding rental scooters on the pavement is also illegal and local authorities should have a plan in place to tackle such behaviour.'


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
MP refuses to apologise for wrongly calling charity rowers ‘illegal migrants'
Rupert Lowe, an independent MP for Great Yarmouth, mistakenly identified a charity rowing boat as a vessel carrying illegal migrants off the Norfolk coast. Lowe posted on social media, expressing concern about "dinghies coming into Great Yarmouth" and vowing to ensure their deportation if they were illegal migrants. The vessel was, in fact, the ROW4MND team, rowing from Land's End to John O'Groats to raise money for motor neurone disease. The charity rowers were contacted by HM Coastguard and police due to Lowe's post, but clarified their identity and purpose. Upon realising his error, Lowe pledged £1,000 to the ROW4MND fundraiser but stated he would not apologise for being vigilant for his constituents.


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rees-Mogg clashes with Price Andrew biographer over ‘salacious gossip' behind new book
The author of a new biography about the Duke and Duchess of York has clashed with Jacob Rees-Mogg over the book, which the GB News host branded as 'salacious gossip'. The book, called Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, written by Andrew Lownie, has made claims about the disgraced duke's life. It includes accusations of affairs, fights with Prince Harry and of being ' unbelievably cruel ' to royal staff. But the author was confronted by Mr Rees-Mogg over the sources he used in the joint biography, which has been serialised in the Daily Mail. When asked at the beginning of the interview why he had written the book, Mr Lownie said: "There was a strong story there, especially with Andrew being in the news over [Jeffrey] Epstein — but what really interested me was how they leveraged their royal status for private gain, and the damage that did to the monarchy." But the author was then questioned on the reliability of his sources, with Mr Rees-Mogg accusing him of predominantly using newspaper reports. During the interview, Mr Rees-Mogg asked Mr Lownie about a claim made in his book regarding the duke allegedly hiring an escort. He asked the author if his source, quoted as 'the comedian Katy Brand has a story from a friend', was sound. "Sometimes, that is all we have," Lownie said, to which Mr Rees-Mogg replied: That's my point. You've got salacious gossip, starting with an unfounded allegation against Prince Philip. Would you have written it while he was alive and could have sued you for libel? You're making sleazy claims without solid evidence." The author defended his sources, highlighting that he had interviewed 300 people, including on-the-record diplomats, naval personnel, and special royal representatives. At the end of the heated exchange, Mr Rees-Mogg thanked the author for his 'hatchet job'. Extracts of the book have grabbed headlines in recent days, with a series of claims made about the duke and duchess and their relationships to the royal family. The book has claimed Prince Andrew called a staff member in the Royal Household a 'f***ing imbecile' for not referring to the Queen Mother by her full title in 2005. According to the book, Prince Andrew's catchphrase when dealing with royal staff was 'I want this done and I want this done now. Do it!' Mr Lownie also claims in his book that the relationship between the Duke of York and his younger nephews, William and Harry, was 'problematic'. The Duke of York is alleged to have accused Prince Harry of going 'bonkers' for marrying Megan Markle. However, a spokesperson for the Duke of Sussex told The Daily Telegraph that Prince Andrew did not 'ever make the comments he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry'. The spokesperson also denied the book's claim that the pair had ever gotten into a physical fight.