Eurovision plunged into favouritism row after bosses use FAKE applause to cover up audience booing contest
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
EUROVISION was plunged into a favouritism row last night as it emerged bosses used fake applause to cover up boos for Israel.
The song contest's organisers drowned out the crowd during a rehearsal of Yuval Raphael's performance of New Day Will Rise on Friday night.
Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter
Sign up
2
Eurovision bosses used fake applause to cover up boos for Israel
Credit: AFP
2
A pro-Palestinian activist raises a flag while Israeli singer Yuval Raphael rehearses
Credit: AFP
It followed a backlash over the country's inclusion in the contest owing to the conflict in Gaza.
The European Broadcasting Union agreed to have discussions about its participation next year.
One fan wrote on X: 'I have a huge issue with the EBU silencing the booing during Israel's performance and adding fake cheers to make it sound like there's a positive reception from the audience.
'EBU is a public service broadcaster whose purpose is to serve the public, not to silence them.'
Another fan argued: 'Why do you mute the audience's boos and replace them with fake applause effects? Where are your ethical values?'
It came amid strengthened security measures at the St Jakobshalle arena in Basel, Switzerland.
Flags from countries not competing and whistles have been banned.
Protesters with Palestinian flags and whistles interrupted the song by Yuval, 24, at a rehearsal on Thursday.
Before last night's final, a warm-up act urged the audience: 'Cheer for everybody. The Eurovision tribe is one of loving human beings. We do not hate. We just love.'
Host Hazel Brugger added: 'Please give every single performer everything you've got.'
Yesterday afternoon, EBU director Martin Green said it had been preparing for the past year and, when it came to potential disruption, was 'ready for all possibilities'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Putin bombards Ukraine with drone & missile blitz killing at least 3 & injuring 17 after Op Spiderweb ‘revenge' strikes
VLAD ATTACK Putin bombards Ukraine with drone & missile blitz killing at least 3 & injuring 17 after Op Spiderweb 'revenge' strikes Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) VLADIMIR Putin's forces unleashed their biggest drone assault yet on Ukraine's second largest city - killing at least three and injuring 17 others. Kharkiv was rocked overnight as 48 Russian drones, along with two missiles and four gliding bombs, slammed into residential areas, according to the city's mayor. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Smoke billowing from a fire burning in a building after an airstrike in Kharkiv Credit: EPA 3 At least three people were killed and 17 others injured Credit: Getty 3 Firefighters extinguish a fire at a multi-storey residential building following Russian attacks on the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv Credit: AFP 'We have a lot of damage,' Ihor Terekhov said. Three high-rise residential buildings were hit, with dramatic footage showing several storeys of one engulfed in flames. The carnage is a part of a wider Russian revenge blitz that's pummelling cities across Ukraine following its daring Operation Spiderweb. The bold Ukrainian drone raid crippled Russian warplanes at four airbases deep inside enemy territory. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Toddler Trump and Baby Musk reveal how humanity will be saved from populism
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... It was surely the biggest bromance of them all: Elon Musk, the world's richest human, and Donald Trump, the world's most powerful. Together, what couldn't they have achieved? However, just 136 days after they stormed into the White House together, intent on nothing less than a revolution in government, the two men descended into slinging petty insults at each other like toddlers in a sandpit. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Donald Trump and Elon Musk pictured at the White House in March (Picture: Roberto Schmidt) | AFP via Getty Images 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election. Such ingratitude,' declared Baby Musk on his social media foghorn, X, formerly known as Twitter. From his 'Truth Social' trumpet, Toddler Trump declared Musk had been 'wearing thin', so he had asked him to leave. 'I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted... and he just went CRAZY!'
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Owen Jones: The UK media has ignored this hugely revealing scandal
And yet Benjamin Netanyahu – the Israeli prime minister subject to an International Criminal Court arrest warrant – has been accused of forging this alliance by the Israeli political class. And yet – once again – the Westminster media has overwhelmingly failed to cover this latest profoundly revealing scandal. Avigdor Lieberman is a far-right opposition leader who once served as Netanyahu's deputy prime minister, foreign minister and defence minister. This week, he publicly announced: 'The Israeli government is giving weapons to a group of criminals and felons, identified with Islamic State, at the direction of the prime minister.' Did Netanyahu come out swinging, accusing his opponent of antisemitism, as he did when another opposition leader, former Israeli general Yair Golan, declared that Israel was killing babies as a hobby? READ MORE: Patrick Harvie: Increased UK defence spending only makes war more likely He did not. Instead, Netanyahu bragged that 'Israel is working to defeat Hamas in various ways, on the recommendation of all heads of the security establishment'. In a video message, he clarified that Israel had 'activated clans in Gaza that oppose Hamas', shamelessly calling it 'a good thing' which was saving the lives of Israeli soldiers. 'What's wrong with that?' We're talking here about a militia headed by a man named Yasser Abu Shabab. He styles his faction as the 'Anti Terror Service', but it is a criminal gang operating in an area of Rafah firmly under Israeli military control. His own family has not only disowned him, but backed his execution. According to Palestinian analyst Muhammad Shehada, his militia is composed of 300 'drug dealers and criminals.' And here's the important detail. To justify imposing a total siege on Gaza, Israel claimed that Hamas was stealing humanitarian food. Among those pointing out this wasn't true was Cindy McCain, widow of the late hawkish Republican senator John McCain, and now director of the World Food Programme. But we do know that Shabab's Israel-backed gang has been stealing aid. As ever with the Israeli authorities: every accusation is a confession. This is just another plank of Israel's starvation policy. But again, the Western media has overwhelmingly failed to clearly spell out what Israel is actually doing. Having imposed a total siege on Gaza since March 2, Israel set up a US-backed shadow entity named the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to explicitly supplant the UN. It hasn't just been rejected by every aid agency – even the US marine who heads it resigned on the basis it contradicted the basic principles of humanitarianism. The Foundation set three aid checkpoints in the south in an effort to concentrate Gaza's entire population into a confined area – a concentration camp. Too little aid was delivered, much of it unusable given the siege on cooking materials. But in any case, the Israeli military repeatedly fired on starving Palestinians. In the words of Tory MP Kit Malthouse, the UN system had been replaced with a 'shooting range, an abattoir'. But when the Israeli military massacred dozens of starving Palestinians, they deployed their usual strategy: deceive, deflect, deny, distort. Even though the shootings happened in an Israeli military zone, and despite the overwhelming evidence of Israeli lies, the Western media indulged Israeli claims that Hamas was responsible as if they were credible. CNN belatedly published a clear rebuttal of Israeli lies, but attention had already moved on. As ever, the Western media overall fail to allow Israeli responsibility for atrocities to stick. And yet now, even as Yair Lapid – the main opposition leader – states Netanyahu is 'giving weapons to organisations close to ISIS in Gaza', this latest plank of Israel's starvation strategy barely gets any coverage. This is despite Israel's 'Hamas is ISIS' campaign long being used to justify the genocide. This all fits a classic pattern, of course. Israel encouraged the rise of Hamas in the 1980s in order to undermine its public enemy number one at the time, Yasser Arafat's Fatah. More recently, Netanyahu worked with Qatar to transfer money to prop up Hamas – with the hope of dividing the Palestinian nation and movement so an independent state was impossible. Remember too how the West armed and backed the Mujahideen against the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980s, playing a crucial role in creating the global Islamist fundamentalist movement. You would think the Western media might take an interest given the precedents. It is true that there is a shift taking place. Israeli spokespeople are suddenly being taken apart on mainstream television. Sky News is demanding the Prime Minister answer if genocide is taking place. But the media narrative still has not clearly shifted to reality – that is, a crime of historic proportions is being facilitated by Western governments, which means questions should be focused on 'how can this crime be stopped, and perpetrators held to justice' rather than 'is Israel doing something very bad here?' The latter is an improvement on where the narrative was stuck for so long – which was essentially 'Israel is waging a war of self-defence', with a side debate about whether the 'response' was 'proportionate'. What is clear is that an understanding is creeping into the political and media elites that a reckoning is coming, where those who facilitated this abomination will be forced to answer for what they did and what they didn't do. Time is running out.
