Kirsten Rhodes, Vice Chair and Client Relationship Development Leader at Deloitte, Named 2025 FWSF Financial Woman of the Year
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Financial Women of San Francisco (FWSF) today named Kirsten Rhodes as the organization's 2025 Financial Woman of the Year. Rhodes is a distinguished leader at Deloitte*, serving as vice chair of client relationship development and a technology, media and telecom principal. With more than 30 years of experience in the finance and tech sector, she's responsible for developing and leading Deloitte's client relationship strategy to drive business growth and deliver solutions to her clients' most complex business challenges.
Kirsten exemplifies the mission of Financial Women of San Francisco—to advance the success of women in finance through mentorship, leadership, and opportunity. Her distinguished career and passion for uplifting women reflect the values we strive to promote
Share
Through her professional leadership and advocacy work, Rhodes' achievements exemplify her dedication to mentoring and empowering professionals in the financial industry. For example, her passion for leadership development served as a springboard for the creation of a Women on Boards program that explores topics relevant to today's board directors. She not only convenes leaders to foster growth, support and development, but also regularly shares insights from her network with a wide LinkedIn audience to exponentially reach more professionals seeking to learn from her experiences, financial acumen, and deep understanding of the C-suite.
Rhodes' commitment to fostering an environment that supports career growth and well-being is reflected in Deloitte's recognition as one of the top 10 best companies for future leaders. A sought-after thought leader, Rhodes is consistently tapped by leading business publications to share her insights and knowledge about strengthening client relationships and cultivating personalized experiences to foster deeper connections.
Inspiring and leading positive change within Deloitte and across the broader business community, Rhodes linked business, innovation, and purpose through her leadership of the Yes SF Challenge upon its launch in 2023, driving collaboration across sectors. Her multifaceted commitment to advancing women in leadership and improving the communities where they work, live and play are among the many reasons Kirsten Rhodes has been named as the FWSF's 2025 Financial Woman of the Year.
'I am deeply honored to receive the Financial Woman of the Year award,' said Rhodes. 'I share this recognition with esteemed past honorees who have paved the way before me and inspired me to be a champion helping more women achieve their fullest potential. It takes a collective commitment to create cultures and communities where everyone has an opportunity to excel, and together, we can make an impact beyond our own workplace and drive meaningful change across broader society.'
In addition to her responsibilities at Deloitte, Rhodes' leadership extends to her involvement in local corporate citizenship strategies and board membership with organizations such as the Bay Area Council and the California Academy of Science, where she contributes to broader community initiatives. She was recognized through the Jefferson Award for public service in 2018 and was named among the San Francisco Business Times Most Influential Women in Business for three consecutive years.
Mona Ahmadi, FWSF's 2025 president and director of FP&A at Earnin, also shared her excitement regarding the FWSF's 2025 honoree: 'Kirsten exemplifies the very mission of Financial Women of San Francisco—to advance the success of women in finance through mentorship, leadership, and opportunity. Her distinguished career, commitment to inclusive leadership, and passion for uplifting women reflect the values we strive to promote. Kirsten's impact reaches far beyond her own accomplishments, inspiring and enabling the progress of countless women across the industry. We are proud to honor her as our 2025 Financial Woman of the Year.'
The Financial Woman of the Year award was established in 1996 to mark the 40th anniversary of FWSF. Created by past FWSF presidents Leslie Miller and Shelly Porges, the honor and related event serve three key purposes: fundraising for FWSF's scholarship program, expanding awareness of FWSF, and recognizing the leadership and achievements of senior financial executives. Over the years, the award has become a platform for trailblazing women to share their insights, inspire the next generation of leaders, and highlight the evolving landscape of finance.
This year, Rhodes joins an esteemed group of past honorees, including Lisa Pantages, CFO of the San Francisco Giants; Teresa Bryce Bazemore, CEO of FHLBank of San Francisco; Nancy Pfund, founder and managing partner of DBL Partners; Jenny Johnson, CEO of Franklin Templeton; Terri Kallsen, chief operating officer at Wealth Enhancement Group; Heidi Roizen, partner at Threshold Ventures; Robin Washington, president and COO of Salesforce and former CFO of Gilead; Debbie Messemer, former managing partner of KPMG's Bay Area Market; Carrie Dolan, CFO of Kraken Digital Asset Exchange; Sarah Friar, CFO of OpenAI and former CEO of NextDoor and CFO of Square; and Pat Yarrington, former CFO of Chevron.
ABOUT FINANCIAL WOMEN OF SAN FRANCISCO
Financial Women of San Francisco advances the success of women in finance in the Bay Area. Formerly known as 'The Financial Women's Association of San Francisco,' the organization is an essential source of insight and inspiration to more than 300 financial women throughout the Bay Area. Members are executive and managerial-level women who work in finance or financial services. Many are CEOs, CFOs, corporate treasurers, CPAs, and attorneys. FWSF also welcomes commercial and private bankers, investment advisors, fund managers, securities analysts, administrators, financial planners, consultants, recruiters, marketers, and other professionals who work in financial services. It's membership represents all generations and cultural backgrounds. In addition to the FWSF's professional organization focused on advancing women, since 1985, the FWSF Scholarship Fund (a 501(c)3 organization) has awarded more than $3 million in scholarship grants to more than 355 Bay Area women. Beyond financial support, FWSF scholarship recipients are mentored by FWSF members, become members of the organization, and attend career development and networking events. Learn more at www.financialwomensf.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Gross. I Got A Little Throw Up In My Mouth Now' — Man Tells Dave Ramsey He Bought An $11,000 Engagement Ring With 0% Interest Credit Card
Getting engaged is one of life's most exciting moments — unless your future bride ends up sharing the spotlight with a Bank of America balance transfer. That's what happened when a young man called into "The Ramsey Show" to share the "smart" way he bought an $11,000 engagement ring: with a 0% introductory credit card offer. On paper, it looked brilliant. In practice, Dave Ramsey called it what it was: financial fantasy. "You did a sweet and good thing," Ramsey told him. "A dumb and bad way." Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart & Target – The caller explained that he had $25,000 sitting in a high-yield savings account but chose to finance the ring using a 0% interest promo — because, hey, free money, right? Wrong. "Write a check today and pay off the card and place scissors across it and cut it up. Tada. That's it." Ramsey didn't hold back. He mocked the man's mental gymnastics for trying to game the system to earn a little interest on the side. "Do you know how much money you made in 60 days on this? Enough to buy a biscuit." And that's being generous. When the caller tried to justify the decision by citing his 4% interest rate on savings, Ramsey did the math out loud. "What's 4% of $10,000? That's $400 a year. Divide that by 12... you can't buy a pizza. Not in New York." Trending: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . But the real gut-punch came when Dave took it personal — wedding style. "You don't want to be putting that ring on her finger and be going, 'Thank you, Bank of America.' Gross. That makes me... I got a little throw up in my mouth right now." Why was Ramsey so fired up? Because he knows the trap. "This is what Bank of America counts on. Once they've got your head in the noose, they pull the rope." And he's not wrong. While 0% introductory APR offers can sound like a loophole worth exploiting, they come with fine print most people ignore. According to Bankrate, those offers typically expire in 15 to 21 months — and after that, the average APR on credit cards can spike to anywhere between 18.99% and 28.49%, depending on the issuer. One late payment can accelerate the switch, and suddenly, your "free" money turns into a high-interest balance with credit experts agree that it's not always worth the risk. Experian notes that while 0% interest promotions can work if you're extremely disciplined, any misstep can lead to big interest charges, and they're often used by banks to bait overconfident spenders into long-term debt. So, moral of the story? If you're going to propose, do it with love — not a line of credit. As Ramsey puts it, "Do not play with these snakes. They will bite you." Congratulations on the engagement... now go pay off the ring. Read Next:'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article 'Gross. I Got A Little Throw Up In My Mouth Now' — Man Tells Dave Ramsey He Bought An $11,000 Engagement Ring With 0% Interest Credit Card originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Sign in to access your portfolio
Entrepreneur
2 hours ago
- Entrepreneur
Consumers Won't Buy Green Products Unless Brands Do This One Thing
Sustainability was once the hottest word in business. As consumers demanded eco-consciousness, brands raced to prove their green credentials. Then everything went a little flat. The data shows it: In a September 2024 Deloitte global survey, 67% of consumers said they view climate change as an emergency — and about half (46%) of them, across 23 countries, bought at least one sustainable good or service in the month of the survey. That's remained steady since 2022, but was down from 56% in 2021.
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Return of the bag man: NIL clearinghouse could revive paying college athletes under table
A few weeks ago, as the House settlement was dragging its feet through the final approval process, I was chatting with a power conference athletic director about whether it would actually work as intended. Athletic departments throughout the country have been gearing up for the $20.5 million in annual revenue sharing, which is the most notable piece of the $2.8 billion agreement. But among coaches and administrators, there is particular interest in the settlement's newly created enforcement arm intended to stamp out the pay-for-play deals that have dominated the name, image and likeness era of college sports. Advertisement It's a critical piece of the settlement for the NCAA and power conferences, considering the NCAA's inability to enforce its own NIL rules, yet there remains a deep skepticism among many in the industry that this new enforcement will be any more effective. One reason? A familiar character in college sports could return to the forefront: the bag man. The new enforcement terms under the House settlement instruct college athletes to declare any third-party NIL deals worth at least $600 into a clearinghouse database. The idea is that the clearinghouse, dubbed 'NIL Go' and managed by the accounting firm Deloitte, will serve as a restrictor plate on NIL collectives and pay-for-play, flagging deals that do not reflect a valid business purpose or fall within a reasonable range of compensation. Yahoo Sports reported that at the recent ACC spring meetings, Deloitte officials shared that 70 percent of past deals from NIL collectives would be denied under the new clearinghouse. But in candid conversations, coaches and recruiting staffers have serious doubts that athletes will declare those deals, or do so accurately. Some have suggested that players are being encouraged not to declare deals at all, but to simply take the money and keep quiet rather than risk the clearinghouse flagging it. And if that's the case, where do we suspect that money might be coming from? 'I guess it would just be the same as the way things used to work,' lamented the athletic director, frustrated by those already angling to undermine the settlement. 'We'd be right back where we started.' Before NIL, 'bag men' were the not-so-invisible hands of big-time college sports, boosters who secretly funneled cash to top players and recruits. It was cheating in the same way that driving over the speed limit is a crime: If it wasn't flagrant or egregious, you probably weren't getting caught. Advertisement 'Though of course not every player at every level is paid for, this is the arrangement in high-stakes college football,' is how writer Steven Godfrey described it in his 2014 deep dive into the clandestine world of bag men. 'Providing cash and benefits to players is not a scandal or a scheme, merely a function. And when you start listening to the stories, you understand the function can never be stopped.' It's true. The bag man didn't disappear in the NIL era — he was legitimized. The emergence of NIL collectives expanded the pool of bag men (and bag women!) by allowing boosters and even everyday fans to fund their favorite team's roster without fear of ignominy or recruiting violations. It was a modern-day Frank Abagnale story, the bag man coming out of the shadows, from delinquent to deputy. Without guardrails or the threat of punishment, NIL spending mushroomed. Ohio State football won a national championship last season with a $20 million roster. Top players in football and basketball command seven-figure payments. And as the House settlement loomed, the richest collectives front-loaded their deals in recent months to pre-empt the clearinghouse, which is how you have reports of Texas football spending as much as $40 million on its 2025 roster, including forthcoming revenue sharing. The settlement is designed to rein in that Wild West culture of NIL, with annual caps on revenue share and constraints on third-party NIL meant to instill some competitive balance. In theory. But $20.5 million won't be enough for the schools at the top of the power conferences, especially when those funds are spread across an entire athletic department. We've already had $20 million rosters in football and $10 million in men's basketball, and some in the industry believe $40 million-$50 million football rosters are inevitable. The oversight and enforcement arm, named the College Sports Commission, is supposed to combat that, armed with more efficiency and punitive power than the NCAA currently wields. But history suggests that power-thirsty boosters paying athletes under the table is a tough thing to police — particularly after collectives spent the past few years streamlining the art of bag dropping. Now, instead of an envelope of cash in a player's locker, it's a direct deposit into their bank account. (The IRS might complicate that process under the House settlement, but that's what payment apps are for.) 'If some donor wants to wire a player $25,000 a month, who's keeping track of that?' one power conference administrator said. Advertisement Money wires aside, the system of boosters paying players is much more sophisticated and far less frowned upon, and it's going to be impossible to put that infrastructure back into the tube. One of the main objectives of the House settlement for the NCAA and power conference defendants was to neutralize NIL collectives. But those collectives aren't going away. Several states have NIL laws that contradict the settlement and could provide legal workarounds. And if not, collectives can just go back into the shadows, out of sight but still pulling the strings. Maybe the enforcement piece of the settlement will work, or at least be a more effective deterrent than previously existed. Maybe the scrutiny and punishments will be unpleasant enough to curb bag dropping or strike fear in coaches beyond their plausible deniability. Maybe the clearinghouse, over time, will force collectives to wither and players to sign legitimate NIL deals that pass muster. But for as long as college sports have existed, there have always been folks looking for an edge, a way to beat the system. And the best ones have always found it. 'Maybe you're trying to do it the right way, but there are always going to be those schools and actors that are trying to do something else,' another power conference administrator said. The House settlement is going to change the future of college sports. It might revive a bit of its past, too.
