4-year-old girl with life-threatening illness and her mom granted humanitarian parole for one year
Deysi Vargas, the mother of the 4-year-old girl, received a notice Tuesday morning saying that her and her daughter's humanitarian parole had been approved for one year, the family's lawyers said.
In April, the family unexpectedly received notice from the Department of Homeland Security that their parole and work authorization had been terminated.
'If you do not depart the United States immediately you will be subject to potential law enforcement actions that will result in your removal from the United States — unless you have otherwise obtained a lawful basis to remain here,' the notice, which was obtained by NBC News, read.
The family and their attorneys at Public Counsel, the law firm representing them, talked at a news conference last week about what the revocation could mean for the 4-year-old's health.
'If they deport us and take away my daughter's access to her specialized care, she will die,' Vargas said in her native Spanish.
Deysi's daughter, who is being identified only by the initials S.G.V., has short bowel syndrome, which affects the small intestine and causes problems absorbing nutrients from food. As a result, she requires daily treatment to get the proper nutrition, using a portable backpack when she's not home, according to the family and attorneys.
The family's lawyers said S.G.V.'s equipment cannot travel outside of the U.S., with few places outside the country able to administer the treatment in the first place.
Both S.G.V. and her mother were born in Mexico and entered with the girl's father in July 2023 through the CBP One app, after which the family was granted humanitarian parole.
The family's humanitarian parole was set to expire at the end of July, but Vargas was working to get it extended.
After the news conference last week, a senior DHS official told NBC News that the family was not 'actively being deported' and that the family's May 14 application with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services was 'still being considered.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's poll numbers on immigration have shifted as he has enacted his agenda
President Donald Trump started his second term with one huge difference compared with his first term: Polls regularly showed majorities of Americans approving of his handling of immigration. In fact, it was his best issue, whereas it had been one of his least popular before. Six months into his second term, it's still among his best issues, but it's no longer as popular. There has been a clear decline in support for Trump's handling of immigration, with his approval rating dropping across a handful of prominent polls. The trend mirrors the downtick in his overall approval rating as the administration has pursued an aggressive set of policies resulting in many arrests but slow progress on deportations of known undocumented immigrants convicted of major crimes, as well as controversial clashes over deportations. While Trump still gets good marks on some specifics, including border security, many of his more aggressive specific immigration policies don't poll well, even as he continues to press on with immigration as a signature issue. Polls do continue to show immigration remaining among Trump's most popular issues. But the trend is clear. While most Trump voters remain satisfied with his handling of immigration and other issues, some have told NBC News that they take issue with his approach. "For one, I think it's immoral," Jorge, 21, an independent from Florida who voted for Trump last year, said in an interview following up on his responses in a previous poll. He criticized the Trump administration for not "taking the time to separate the people who do not need to be here, which are the criminals, illegal criminals and migrants, and separating from the working people that benefit our society," said Jorge, who declined to share his last name while discussing national politics. "It's disappointing. ... He thinks he can just take everyone." Inside the data In poll after poll in his first few weeks in office, Trump's approval rating on immigration regularly eclipsed 50%. Fifty-six percent of registered voters approved of his handling of immigration in a late January survey as part of Morning Consult's "Trump Tracker," which includes his approval rating on a slew of issues. Other polls found similar results: 51% of U.S. citizen adults approved in a mid-February Economist/YouGov poll, 54% of adults approved in a late February CBS/YouGov poll, and 51% of adults approved in an early March CNN poll. But across each of those polls, there has been a clear downward trend as more Americans are souring on Trump's handling of that major issue. Some of the movement is within polls' margins of error, but overall, they consistently show a measure of decline. In CNN's mid-July poll, just 42% of adults approved of Trump's handling of immigration, while 45% of adults said the same in an early July Economist/YouGov poll, as did 41% in a late June Quinnipiac University poll. While narrowly half or more still approved of Trump's handling of the issue in the most recent Morning Consult (51%) and CBS/YouGov (50%) polls from mid-July and late June, respectively, months of surveys by both found the same trend of slightly decreased ratings on immigration. Fox News' poll, however, hasn't changed much. Fox News tested Trump's approval rating on immigration three times, finding it at 47% in April, 46% in June and 48% in July. That having been said, the landscape remains complicated, especially from a partisan political perspective. When Fox News asked this month which party does a better job on immigration, Republicans had a 6-point lead (52%-46%). While that's down from the double-digit Republican advantage the poll found in 2022 and 2023, Democrats had the edge when Fox tested the question during the first three years of Trump's first term. What has sparked the public reaction A possible reason Trump's broader numbers on immigration have fallen could lie in the administration's policies itself. Even when Trump's numbers on the issue were higher, the harder-edged parts of his immigration policy — the ones the administration has trumpeted in recent months — have always polled worse than his overall numbers on the issue. Then, once Trump started acting on those policies, they drove news coverage and perceptions of the administration. The Wall Street Journal poll conducted in mid-January, before Trump returned to office, provides a clear example of the pre-inauguration warning signs on an issue that was once a strength. Almost three-quarters of registered voters (74%) said they supported detaining and deporting only undocumented immigrants who had been convicted of crimes. It was the second-most-popular immigration proposal tested, behind creating a pathway to citizenship for "undocumented immigrants who have been in the U.S. for many years and pass a background check," which 79% supported. A majority of registered voters also favored increasing the level of legal immigration and the number of H1-B visas available for high-skilled workers. The public was narrowly in favor of a plan to "detain and deport millions of undocumented immigrants" (52% in favor); noting that businesses could face worker shortages because of the plan made it slightly less popular. A majority (53%) also backed building a wall along the Mexican border. By contrast, only 38% favored a plan to detain and deport undocumented immigrants with American citizen children, 31% favored a call to end birthright citizenship, and 26% favored deporting "undocumented immigrants even if they have lived in the U.S. for 10 or more years, pay taxes on earnings, and have no criminal record." Fox News found a similar thing when it polled voters' views on illegal immigration shortly before Trump returned to office and in late July. Both times, 59% said their views hewed closest to "deport only those illegal immigrants who have been charged with crimes but allow others to remain in the U.S. and eventually qualify for citizenship." Twenty-nine percent said they backed deporting all illegal immigrants, and 11% backed allowing all to remain in the country. In other words, there's broader support for general promises of deportations or plans focused on removing criminals than there is support for specifically deporting people who haven't committed crimes outside of coming to the United States illegally or people who have American citizen children. Other, more recent polls have mirrored those findings. A May NPR/Ipsos poll on immigration found near-majority support (48%) for "quickly deporting alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798," and pluralities also supported a border wall and allowing local law enforcement to detain immigrants without legal status. But a near-majority, 46%, backed giving "legal status to immigrants without legal status brought to the U.S. as children," and a majority (53%) opposed ending birthright citizenship, which Trump has tried to do by an executive order that has been challenged in court. And the public was almost evenly divided on support for the "mass deportation of everyone who is in the country without legal status." This week, the Wall Street Journal poll found registered voters close to evenly split on their approval of Trump's handling of immigration — 48% approved, 51% disapproved — and with similar marks for his handling of illegal immigration specifically — 51% approved, 49% approved. But as in many other recent polls, some specific pieces of the administration's policy poll better than others. Sixty-two percent approve of "deporting undocumented immigrants," while 36% oppose. But 58% oppose deporting people "believed to be here illegally without them ever seeing a judge or getting a hearing." And 53% say the "Trump administration is crossing the line" with its deportation efforts, while 45% say it is "doing what is necessary." The sentiment reflects what Latino Trump voters said last month during focus groups observed by NBC News as part of the 2025 Deciders series, produced by Syracuse University and the research firms Engagious and Sago. Most of the swing-state voters who participated still supported Trump and his broad actions on deportations, but a handful of participants criticized the administration's widespread deportations. They said Trump and the government should be prioritizing undocumented immigrants who committed additional crimes over those who have followed the rules since they came to the country illegally. 'He was going to deport people that were criminals and have backgrounds,' Ruby L., a focus group participant who was born in Colombia and lives in Georgia, said last month. 'But I see that he's deporting people that work hard and have been in this country. I think he should find a way to help them stay and get a citizenship or something.' This article was originally published on
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Gary bishop to migrant workers: ‘We love you and will continue to pray for you'
Surrounded by corn stalks and soybeans, priests and parish members throughout Northwest Indiana gathered at Herr Farms in Lowell to bring an outdoor mass to the migrant workers who are employed on the farm during the summer months. Bishop Robert J. McClory presided over the Mass for Migrant Farm Workers, which was primarily in Spanish on Sunday afternoon, with Father Eduardo Malagon and Father Ivan Alatorre. The gathering marked the return of a longstanding tradition for the Diocese of Gary that goes back 15 years. 'We're together today because we are family. Families support each other, especially in times of fear. We trust in God to care for us,' McClory said in Spanish to the crowd. 'We thank you for your work, which gives us food to eat. We love you and will continue to pray for you.' The communion table included a basket of vegetables picked from the farm to symbolize the fruits of the farm worker's labor. Musicians from various churches came together to play Spanish worship songs throughout the service. Congregation members brought tables full of food for a potluck after mass. Diocese of Gary volunteer Mona Enriquez said she has worked with the Diocese of Gary's migrant ministry since its origin. She said when they first started the outdoor masses at farms, the workers would sit far away in the back during service. She said little by little, they have moved to the front rows and have become more a part of the services. 'We try to show them family, that this is the church,' Enriquez said. 'That's our goal. That they get to know God through us, and they can feel they have a family here, too, even if they're far from home and loved ones. They have children. One of them recently had grandchildren born, twins, and he was able to go visit them and come back. They work hard to help their families in Mexico. When they see people who care, it touches their hearts.' Enriquez said her mother and her siblings came to the U.S. with their parents, who were migrant workers. She said they all slept on the floor and didn't have air conditioning or heating while housed at the farms they worked. '(Migrant workers) go through a lot, but they do it for the love of their family,' Enrqiuez said. 'My mom saw that, she knows the struggle. That's why she donated a washing machine to them. Especially with what's happening in the country right now, compassion makes a difference.' Intercultural Ministry Coordinator Dr. Claudia Sadowski said that the migrant workers are people from Mexico who are legally hired as cohorts to work in U.S. farms during certain months, and then return to their home country at the end of the harvesting season. Immigrants who come to the U.S. to work seasonally are protected by entities such as the U.S. Department of Labor and the National Immigration Center. Through The Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, immigrant workers have rights to minimum wage, overtime, union participation, protection from discrimination and a safe workplace. The Diocese of Gary has had a ministry group geared toward helping migrant workers for 15 years. Herr Farms is one of four farms that the Diocese of Gary is ministering to. 'We are blessed by the work of these migrant farm workers,' McClory said. 'They work long hours and hard days in the heat, and in difficult conditions.' Each farm has appointed 'padrinos,' which are church members who ensure the needs of the workers are communicated to the Diocese. Richard Serna, a padrino, led the Hispanic ministry at St. John the Evangelist and he currently works with other parishes in the Diocese of Gary to support migrant workers. Serna helps coordinate donations of toiletries, food, clothing and other items to the workers. Volunteers also help the migrant workers with transportation and tasks like opening bank accounts or shopping. 'It's a very touching experience to bring the Lord to those in need,' Serna said. 'It's important to recognize the work they do. And not just the migrant workers here, but all through the country. I'm very supportive, naturally, of people who came here the right way. However, for those who came in a different format, they might be facing more difficult circumstances. Should they be treated like people? Should they be treated with grace? Should they be given compassion? Yes, they should. They're people with feelings. They're people with families.' Serna is a first-generation American, his parents were immigrants who came to America seeking a better life. 'My family, my aunts, my uncles, they left everything at home to start fresh, and we are truly sensitive to that,' Serna said. 'My wife's grandparents were farm workers.' The men work more than 12 hours a day outdoors and send the majority of their earnings back home to their families, Serna said. 'They're here to send money back home for their children, their parents, their grandchildren,' Serna said. 'Helping them with basic things helps them to do that.' The Diocese of Gary serves several minority groups across Northwest Indiana, including Vietnamese, Filipino, Polish, Lithuanian and Croatian communities. According to data the Diocese of Gary collected, every Catholic Church in Northwest Indiana has a Hispanic presence and 14 parishes are predominantly Hispanic, Sadowski said. Adeline Torres served for 25 years as the director of cultural ministry for the Diocese and is considered the 'godmother' of the migrant workers ministry. Looking at several tables' worth of food, clothes and toiletries presented to the migrant workers, Torres said, 'This is nothing' compared to the larger picture of what the congregations have collected to donate. Torres said some congregation members are also sponsoring immigrant families, which is a legal process that allows for protection of their children, belongings and assets should anything happen to the parents. Torres said they do this to prevent the government from putting the children into the system and taking the family's possessions and money. 'It's our gospel, being about 'the other,'' Torres said. 'Jesus said to love your brothers and sisters, and that's what we're doing.'
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
DeSantis says all Alligator Alcatraz detainees have removal orders. Is that true?
In press conferences and on TV, top Florida officials have repeatedly said that everyone detained at Alligator Alcatraz has been ordered by a judge to be removed from the country. 'Everybody in this facility is on a final removal order,' Kevin Guthrie, the head of the Florida Division of Emergency Management, which oversees operations at the detention center, told reporters on Friday. But attorneys representing immigrants detained at the center say that's not true. Anna Weiser, immigration attorney at Smith and Eulo Law, said she has only had one client at Alligator Alcatraz with a final removal order so far — he was sent to the Bahamas a few days after his arrival at the facility. Three others, including one who's mentioned in a lawsuit against the state and the Department of Homeland Security for a lack of attorney access at the site, do not. One Weiser client has an immigration hearing scheduled for 2026. Another has a student visa, and was detained after he was charged with selling marijuana to a minor. The one mentioned in the lawsuit, Gonzalo Valdez, has a green card — he came to the U.S. from Cuba legally when he was six. He was on a routine probation visit after being convicted of racketeering when he was detained. None have had a final removal order stamped by an immigration judge, Weiser said. 'We have checked,' Weiser said. 'That's part of our strategy. If somebody has a final order of removal, we're going to handle the case differently than people who do not.' The Florida Division of Emergency Management did not respond to questions about Guthrie and DeSantis' comments, nor did it comment on attorneys' statements about their clients' immigration status. A final order of deportation is issued by a judge after a finding that an immigrant does not have a legal right to remain in the United States. The order directs immigration officials to remove the immigrant, though it can be appealed. It's not uncommon for a person with a final deportation order to remain in the country for months, or even years. During a Friday press conference at the facility, Gov. Ron DeSantis and Guthrie firmly doubled down on the idea that all detainees have removal orders. Republican officials like Florida House Speaker Danny Perez and newly appointed CFO Blaise Ingoglia have repeated the same. The assertions by DeSantis officials and lawmakers come as lawyers say the DeSantis administration and Trump's Department of Homeland Security are holding immigrants at the detention camp without access to the federal courts system. Magdalena Cuprys, who says only two of her seven clients at the site have final orders of removal, said the DeSantis administration could be trying to get ahead of complaints about access to legal services and the lack of an immigration court. Reopening a closed immigration case requires an attorney to file with the court that ruled on it, not with the detention center's immigration court, she said. 'If they say that everyone has a final deportation order, in theory, they have no right to a bond hearing,' Cuprys said. 'And there's no need for a court.' Three out of the four plaintiffs who are detainees in the attorney access lawsuit do not have final removal orders, said Eunice Cho, senior counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, which is representing those plaintiffs. One has a pending green card petition, one has a pending asylum case and one is a Cuban national appealing a rejection of adjusting his citizenship under the Cuban Adjustment Act. The statements that every person taken to Alligator Alcatraz has a final removal order are false, Cho said. 'It's very surprising that the government is making that significant of a misrepresentation about who's being held at the facility,' Cho said.
