4-year-old girl with life-threatening illness and her mom granted humanitarian parole for one year
Following a public plea for deportation relief, a young girl with a life-threatening medical condition and her mother will be allowed to remain in the U.S.
Deysi Vargas, the mother of the 4-year-old girl, received a notice Tuesday morning saying that her and her daughter's humanitarian parole had been approved for one year, the family's lawyers said.
In April, the family unexpectedly received notice from the Department of Homeland Security that their parole and work authorization had been terminated.
'If you do not depart the United States immediately you will be subject to potential law enforcement actions that will result in your removal from the United States — unless you have otherwise obtained a lawful basis to remain here,' the notice, which was obtained by NBC News, read.
The family and their attorneys at Public Counsel, the law firm representing them, talked at a news conference last week about what the revocation could mean for the 4-year-old's health.
'If they deport us and take away my daughter's access to her specialized care, she will die,' Vargas said in her native Spanish.
Deysi's daughter, who is being identified only by the initials S.G.V., has short bowel syndrome, which affects the small intestine and causes problems absorbing nutrients from food. As a result, she requires daily treatment to get the proper nutrition, using a portable backpack when she's not home, according to the family and attorneys.
The family's lawyers said S.G.V.'s equipment cannot travel outside of the U.S., with few places outside the country able to administer the treatment in the first place.
Both S.G.V. and her mother were born in Mexico and entered with the girl's father in July 2023 through the CBP One app, after which the family was granted humanitarian parole.
The family's humanitarian parole was set to expire at the end of July, but Vargas was working to get it extended.
After the news conference last week, a senior DHS official told NBC News that the family was not 'actively being deported' and that the family's May 14 application with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services was 'still being considered.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump targeting of Mahmoud Khalil is baseless and has caused extreme psychological harm, lawyers say
NEW YORK — Attorneys for detained Columbia graduate student Mahmoud Khalil in new filings say the Trump administration has damaged his reputation and severely undermined his ability to pursue a career in international diplomacy and human rights 'by baselessly identifying him as a risk to the foreign policy of the United States' based on his advocacy for Palestinians and criticism of Israel, 'marking him and his family as targets for harassment and notoriety.' '(The) longer the determination stands, the more reputational damage it does,' Khalil's legal team wrote. The New Jersey federal court filing came in support of Khalil's motion for a preliminary injunction in his habeas corpus case, which seeks his immediate release from custody. Lawyers are also calling for the vacating of Secretary of State Marco Rubio's determination as to why he should be deported, and — more broadly — an injunction stopping the federal government from enforcing a policy of arresting, detaining, and removing noncitizens who engage in speech supporting Palestinian rights or criticizing Israel. The Trump administration has not alleged Khalil broke any laws. It has sought to revoke his green card and deport him based on a rarely-used provision of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, which empowers Rubio to expel someone from the country if their activities and beliefs are considered adverse to U.S. foreign policy interests, which in Khalil's case, pertains to U.S. support for Israel. Khalil's case in New Jersey challenging the legality of his detention is playing out separately from his immigration case in Louisiana. In April, the immigration judge ordered his deportation in finding the government had met its burden, a decision he intends to appeal. The federal New Jersey judge, Michael Farbiarz, has said he cannot be deported while his habeas corpus matter plays out. Agents from the Department of Homeland Security took Khalil into custody on March 8 as he arrived home to his Columbia-owned apartment with his wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, from an iftar dinner. He was brought to lower Manhattan's 26 Federal Plaza for processing, driven to a facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey, overnight, and transported more than 1,000 miles away to Jena, Louisiana, the next morning, a Sunday, where he has since remained incarcerated at a detention center. In a ruling last week, Farbiarz, who is yet to rule on the legality of Khalil's detention, said the government's reasoning for seeking to deport him is likely unconstitutional. 'Our law asks about an 'ordinary person.' Would he know that [the rarely-used provision] could be used against him based on his speech inside the United States, however odious it might allegedly have been — speech that has not been affirmatively determined by the Secretary to have an impact on U.S. relations with other countries? The Court's answer is no,' Farbiarz wrote. In Khalil's parallel immigration case, the judge, Jamee Comans, last month heard testimony from the student activist and several experts who said his deportation could result in his kidnapping, torture, or even death due to his prominent criticism of Israel. Comans denied a renewed motion to end the deportation proceedings based on agents' failure to provide a warrant upon his arrest, The New York Times reported, and reserved issuing a decision on his bid for asylum. In the filings made public Thursday, Khalil's lawyers asked for permission to file under seal an expert declaration outlining the extreme psychological harm he's endured from the 'shock of unjust arrest and continued detention and family separation,' which they say 'will inevitably severely worsen absent release.' A judge gave government lawyers until Friday to object to filing the assessment under seal. 'These harms include the loss of Mr. Khalil's liberty; the chilling of his First Amendment protected activities; the separation from his family, particularly his wife and newborn child; and psychological harm specific to his arrest and detention,' Khalil's lawyers wrote. A Palestinian who was raised in a refugee camp in Syria, Khalil came to the U.S. in December 2022 on a student visa, married Abdalla, who's from the Midwest, in November 2023, and became a lawful permanent resident in 2024. He completed his Master's degree at Columbia's School of International and Public Affairs in December and would have graduated last month. Abdalla accepted his diploma on his behalf a month after giving birth to their first child, a baby boy. With experience working for a British embassy and interning with the United Nations in New York, Khalil was selected to play the role of a mediator and negotiator between the university's administration and students during campus protests last year against Israel's war on Gaza and Columbia's ties to the Israeli regime. Donald Trump and his Cabinet members have repeatedly characterized Khalil's advocacy and criticism of Israel in general as antisemitic and inherently supportive of Hamas. The Trump administration has since targeted hundreds of international students for their advocacy for Gazans and criticism of Israeli military activity. Khalil has denounced antisemitism, and in his public-facing role speaking to media on behalf of protesters before his arrest, he repeatedly maintained that the movement should advocate for justice and equality for all groups, telling CNN in April 2024, 'As a Palestinian student, I believe that the liberation of the Palestinian people and the Jewish people are intertwined and go hand-by-hand and you cannot achieve one without the other.' _____
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump suggests Elon Musk is suffering from ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome'
Shortly after Elon Musk officially left his White House office, he apparently felt free to share some candid thoughts about the Republican Party's domestic policy megabill, the inaptly named 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' Evidently, the billionaire wasn't impressed. Just one day after a joint appearance with Donald Trump in the Oval Office, during which the president rewarded his top campaign donor with praise and a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia, Musk condemned Trump's proposal in striking terms, writing on the social platform he owns, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk added soon after, apparently referring to lawmakers who voted for the GOP reconciliation package, 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' On Wednesday, he went further, launching an online 'KILL the BILL' effort. Those expecting the president to return rhetorical fire with over-the-top online missives of his own were disappointed: Trump didn't say a word. On Thursday, however, just a few days after singing Musk's praises, the Republican had quite a bit to say. NBC News reported: 'I've always liked Elon,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office during a bilateral meeting with [German Chancellor Friedrich Merz], but he said he was 'very surprised' by Musk's comments denouncing the legislation. 'You saw the words he had for me. He hasn't said anything about me that's bad. I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill, because the bill is incredible,' the president said. Putting aside the obvious fact that the legislation is far from 'incredible' — see the latest findings from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, for example — the president didn't just offer a vague defense of the far-right reconciliation package. On the contrary, Trump actually focused most of his comments on Musk specifically. 'Elon is upset because we took the EV mandate — which was a lot of money for electric vehicles — and they're having a hard time,' the president said, referring to a 'mandate' that does not exist while implying that Musk only opposes the GOP legislation because it'll affect his car company's profits. Trump went on to suggest, in reference to former NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman, whom Musk lobbied for, that 'I didn't think it was appropriate.' Of course, that raises the related question of why the president nominated him in the first place if this was inappropriate. That paved the way for the pièce de résistance: the president suggesting that his former DOGE chief is suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome.' 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' the Republican concluded. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' For his part, the GOP megadonor responded to Trump's claim that he 'knew the inner workings of the bill' as it came together, saying, 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' He also discounted the idea that the electric vehicle provisions of the package have anything to do with his opposition. I don't imagine we've heard the last of this. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Tries to Blame the Colorado Attack on ‘Open Border' Policies
After the firebomb attack in Colorado that injured 12 people on Sunday, President Donald Trump blamed his predecessor's 'ridiculous Open Border Policy' for allowing the entry of Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the Egyptian national now charged with a federal hate crime. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller denounced 'suicidal' U.S. immigration policies, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced that Soliman's wife and five children had been taken into immigration custody and would be swiftly deported. The attack, for Trump and his top aides, quickly became an opportunity to convert an act of anti-Semitic violence into a justification for the president's mass-deportation campaign; they depicted the incident as another example of American lives threatened by permissive immigration policies. But the reality of Soliman's arrival to the United States and his immigration status—based on what has been publicly revealed by the administration so far—isn't as straightforward as Trump officials have made it sound. The administration's labeling of Soliman as an 'illegal alien' is a mischaracterization of the gray area he inhabited in the U.S. asylum system, in which applicants can spend years in legal limbo waiting for their case to be decided. He arrived in 2022 not over the southern border, as Trump suggested, but on a visa that was also widely given out to Egyptian nationals during Trump's first term. The administration has not said what exactly it believes the Biden administration failed to catch in vetting Soliman's visa application. Trump cited the Colorado attack yesterday when he announced a ban on travelers from 12 countries—a list that did not include Egypt. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,' Trump said in a video message. 'We don't want them.' [Bruce Hoffman: The Boulder attack didn't come out of nowhere] Months before the Boulder attack, Trump had already ordered U.S. consulates to intensify screening of visa applicants, including scouring their social-media accounts, for evidence of anti-Semitism and 'anti-American' beliefs or opinions, citing the threat of acts like the one Soliman is accused of committing against a group of demonstrators marching in support of Israeli hostages. Whether Soliman arrived with hateful views or adopted them during his time in the United States will be part of the investigation. After he was taken into custody—shirtless, ranting, and reeking of gasoline—Soliman told FBI agents that he'd been wanting to carry out the attack for a year but waited until his daughter graduated high school. Soliman, 45, entered the United States on a B-2 visa—typically for tourism or family visits—then promptly applied for asylum with his wife and children, according to the Department of Homeland Security. With a pending claim in U.S. immigration court, Soliman received U.S. work authorization, joining millions of others who entered the United States during the record migration influx of President Joe Biden's first three years in office. (Camilo Montoya-Galvez of CBS News reported on Tuesday that the Trump administration is now considering blocking asylum seekers from getting work permits.) The number of visitor visas issued by the State Department at the time was still low relative to pre-pandemic levels and building back up from its nadir in 2021. The United States issued 52,400 nonimmigrant visas to Egyptian nationals during the 2022 fiscal year, government records show, fewer than the roughly 62,000 a year granted during the pre-pandemic years of Trump's first term. The year Soliman arrived, it was relatively easy for Egyptian applicants to secure a visitor visa. About 23 percent of Egyptian applications for nonimmigration B visas were rejected in 2022, lower than the roughly 32 to 34 percent average during the pre-pandemic years of Trump's term. That changed over the course of Biden's term, and by the 2024 fiscal year, the rejection rate for Egyptian applications was 40 percent. When a foreign visitor arrives with a short-term visa such as the B-2 and fails to depart, the State Department counts it as an overstay. The overstay rate for Egyptians has been about 2 to 4 percent annually, State Department records show. That rate jumped to 8 percent in 2022, the year Soliman arrived—amid a broader surge in visa overstays that year—then returned to 4 percent in 2023. Noem ordered an 'urgent crackdown' yesterday on overstays of visas issued during the Biden administration, declaring in a statement that this was an effort to remove 'the rest of the world's terrorist sympathizers.' Soliman and his family lived in Kuwait for 17 years prior to his arrival, and it's not clear whether he applied for a visa as an Egyptian or a Kuwaiti. Kuwait is a far more prosperous and stable country than Egypt, and the overstay rate for Kuwaiti nationals is only about 1 percent. DHS officials did not respond to questions seeking additional information about Soliman's immigration record. Soliman's work-authorization document expired in March, according to DHS, and it's not clear why he failed to renew it. The lapse meant that it would have been illegal for Soliman to work, but the change would not have affected his immigration status, which was tied to his pending asylum claim and not to the work document, according to Paul Hunker, the former lead counsel for ICE in Dallas. Hunker told us that someone like Soliman, with a pending asylum claim, would not have been a priority for ICE during previous administrations, including Trump's first term, absent a separate criminal arrest. 'ICE could try to deport the person, but they could go to immigration court and assert protection, and a judge would make the decision,' Hunker said. Hunker added that it is unusual for ICE to arrest an offender's spouse and children in response to a crime and to threaten immediate deportation. The agency cannot use its fast-track deportation authority known as 'expedited removal' to remove those who entered the United States with a visa, he said. DHS did not respond to questions about its plans to deport Soliman's wife and children. The October 7, 2023, terrorist attack by Hamas—and the devastation of Gaza by the Israeli response—occurred after Soliman had reached the United States and sought asylum. Since then, Jewish Americans have faced a surge of anti-Semitic rhetoric and a recent series of violent attacks. Prosecutors have not said whether they've found social-media posts by Soliman threatening violence, and investigators say that he was not on the radar of local police. On Sunday, Soliman disguised himself as a gardener to approach his victims, they said, and had fashioned crude firebombs using glass jars and garden tools that included a pump sprayer filled with gasoline. As Trump and his aides assessed what to say and do after the Boulder attack, they decided to use the incident to push the administration's case for an aggressive mass-deportation campaign, White House officials told us. In recent weeks, Trump's poll numbers on immigration—arguably his signature issue—have slipped, as courts blocked some of his policies and many Americans deemed his administration's in-your-face tactics, including sending migrants to a hellish megaprison in El Salvador, too extreme. Trump has been frustrated that deportations are not on pace to set records, as he'd promised. Miller, the architect of his immigration crackdown, has ordered ICE to increase arrests more than fourfold, to a minimum of 3,000 people a day. [Read: We're about to find out what mass deportation really looks like] Trump was updated on the Colorado attack in real time, much like he was on two other high-profile recent incidents of anti-Semitic violence, according to two White House officials. But his public reaction was strikingly different when the alleged perpetrator was an immigrant. Shortly after the shooting of the two Israeli-embassy staffers near the Capital Jewish Museum last month, Trump took to Truth Social to extend condolences to the victims' families and condemn the attack, writing, 'These horrible D.C. killings, based obviously on antisemitism, must end, NOW! Hatred and Radicalism have no place in the USA.' A month before that, after an arson attack at the Pennsylvania governor's mansion on the first night of Passover, Trump's response was delayed and muted. He made no Truth Social post, waited a week to call Governor Josh Shapiro—a Democrat angling to be one of the party's leading Trump critics–—and dismissed the suspect as 'probably just a whack job' without assigning any sort of blame. That response was not atypical for Trump, who has been slow to denounce political violence against Democrats (such as the attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband, an assault that Trump later turned into a punch line at his rallies) or committed in his name (the January 6 insurrection). After the Colorado incident, he waited until the following morning to post on Truth Social and, instead of focusing on the apparent anti-Semitism behind the attack, opted to return to his favorite political hobbyhorse, immigration. The choice was revealing: Throughout his political career, Trump has cited the dangers posed by migrants to argue for closed borders and hard-line policies. [Juliette Kayyem: The deadly virus of anti-Semitic terrorism] A White House official and an outside political adviser told us that Trump is not concerned about being criticized for not showing sufficient sympathy for fearful Jewish Americans. He believes that he has already proved his strong support of Israel, even though cracks in his relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have grown evident in recent months. They claim that Trump has the political winds at his back again; his poll numbers are recovering from their trade-war-driven decline and Republicans in the House of Representatives have passed a sweeping budget bill. With Soliman's family in custody on Tuesday evening, the White House posted on X: 'Six One-Way Tickets for Mohamed's Wife and Five Kids. Final Boarding Call Coming Soon.' Yesterday, in Colorado, U.S. District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher blocked the Trump administration from immediately deporting Soliman's wife, Hayam El Gamal, and their children, ordering ICE to follow standard due process. Gallagher, a Biden appointee, has scheduled a hearing for June 13. ICE records show that El Gamal and her children are being held at a family-detention center in Dilley, Texas. Article originally published at The Atlantic
