'Prime Glasgow gem' hits the market in 'rare opportunity' for buyers
Located at 146–148 Nelson Street in Kinning Park, the "luxury" venue is now listed for sale at £90,000.
Businesses For Sale stated that they are "proud" to present the 'beautifully designed' eatery, which features a 'striking glass frontage' and a luxurious interior.
(Image: BusinessesForSale.com)
READ MORE: Poundland bosses confirm Scottish store will close next month
Sholeh, described in the listing as a 'prime Glasgow gem', can accommodate up to 85 diners and is equipped with two fully fitted commercial kitchens, a private office, and extensive storage facilities.
It also benefits from a dedicated private rear car park — a rarity in a location so close to the city centre.
(Image: BusinessesForSale.com)
READ MORE: Met Office issues yellow weather warning for heavy rain and thunderstorms
The property is offered on a leasehold basis, with the current rent set at £18,000 per annum.
Although the listing does not disclose financial details such as turnover or net profit, it highlights the offering as a 'rare opportunity for an ambitious restaurateur or investor.'
READ MORE: Cat found in minibus engine revealed as 'master escape artist' after this incident
(Image: BusinessesForSale.com)
The business description adds: 'Sholeh is not just a restaurant; it's a complete, premium hospitality setup.
"The current interior and layout would also suit a range of other concepts, from upscale bistro to modern café-bar.
"With a strong local following, glowing reviews, and a fantastic layout, this is an ideal opportunity for a new owner to step in and start trading from day one – or easily rebrand to suit a new concept.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump trade war could still see America come off worse
It is a trade deal that will 'rebalance, but enable trade on both sides,' said Ursula von der Leyen after the EU and US struck a trade deal in Scotland. It was not the most emphatic declaration by the president of the European Commission. The trading partnership between two of the biggest markets in the world is in significantly worse shape than it was before Donald Trump was elected, but this deal is better than nothing. As part of the agreement, European exports to the US will be hit with a 15% tariff. That's better than the 30% the bloc was threatened with but it is a world away from the type of open and free trade European leaders would like. The EU had offered tariff free trade to the US just weeks before the deal was announced. Money latest: Instead, it has accepted a 15% tariff and agreed to ramp up its energy purchases from the US. The EU tariff on US imports will remain close to zero but Europe did get some important exemptions - on aviation, critical raw materials, some chemicals and some medical equipment. That being said, the bloc did not achieve a breakthrough on steel, aluminium or copper, which are still facing a 50% tariff. It means the average tariff on EU exports to the US will now rise from 1.2 % last year to 17%. There is also confusion over the status of pharmaceuticals- an important industry to Europe. Products like Ozempic, which is made in Denmark, have flooded into the US market in recent years and Donald Trump was threatening tariffs as high as 50% on the sector. It appears that pharmaceuticals will fall under the 15% bracket, even though President Trump contradicted official announcements by suggesting a deal had not yet been made on the industry. The risk is that the implementation of the deal could be beset with differences of interpretation, as has been the case with the Japan deal that Trump struck last week. It also risks fracturing solidarity between EU states, all of which have different strategic industries that rely on the US to differing degrees. Germany's BDI federation of industrial groups said: "Even a 15% tariff rate will have immense negative effects on export-oriented German industry." The VCI chemical trade association said rates were still "too high". For German carmakers, including Mercedes and BMW, there was some reprieve from the crippling 27.5% tariff imposed by Trump. The industry is Europe's top exporter to the US but the German trade body, the VDA, warned that a 15% rate would "cost the German automotive industry billions annually". Meanwhile, François Bayrou, the French Prime Minister, described the agreement as a "dark day" for the union, "when an alliance of free peoples, gathered to affirm their values and defend their interests, resolves to submission." While the deal has divided the bloc, the greater certainty it delivers is not to be snubbed at. Markets bounced on the news, even though the deal will ultimately harm economic growth. Analysts at Oxford Economics said: "We don't plan material changes to our eurozone baseline forecast of 1.1% GDP growth this year and 0.8% in 2026 in response to the EU-US trade deal. "While the effective tariff rate will end up at around 15%, a few percentage points higher than in our baseline, lower uncertainty and no EU retaliation are partial offsets." However, economists at Capital Economics, said the economic outlook had now deteriorated, with growth in the bloc likely to drop by 0.2%. Germany and Ireland could be the hardest hit. While the US appears to be the obvious winner in this negotiation, uncertainty still hangs over the US economy. Trump has not achieved his goal of "90 deals in 90 days" and, in the end, American consumers could still bear the cost through higher prices. That of course depends on how businesses share the burden of those higher costs, with the latest data suggesting that inflation is yet to rip through the US economy. While Europe determined on Sunday that a bad deal is better than no deal, some fear that the worst is yet to come for the Americans.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU's $750 Billion Energy Deal With Trump Looks Hard to Reach
(Bloomberg) -- The European Union's promise to buy $750 billion of American energy imports over three years was pivotal to securing a trade deal with President Donald Trump, but it's a pledge it will struggle to keep. The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy The deal would require annual purchases of $250 billion of natural gas, oil and nuclear technology, including small modular reactors, according to EU officials. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the bloc's estimates were based on the existing plan to shift away from remaining Russian fossil fuel supplies and purchasing 'more affordable and better' liquefied natural gas from US producers. Yet it's hard to see how the EU attains such ambitious flows over such a short time frame. Total energy imports from the US accounted for less than $80 billion last year, far short of the promise made by von der Leyen to Trump. Total US energy exports were just over $330 billion in 2024. The huge figure for energy imports 'is meaningless, as it's unachievable not only because EU demand cannot grow that much, but also because US exporters cannot supply that much either!' said Davide Oneglia, an economist at TS Lombard. The lack of detail underlines that the deal finalized by von der Leyen and Trump in Scotland is a pragmatic, political agreement, rather than a legally binding pact. The EU has yet to provide a breakdown of the figures, and it remains unclear how private companies can be convinced to purchase or sell US oil and gas. There's also uncertainty around how European investment in the US energy sector might count toward the EU's pledge. Deals on nuclear, particularly for so-called small modular reactors, may be one way the EU sees to spur billions of dollars of trade, yet the first ones are not expected to be commercially viable before 2030 at the earliest. Encouraging such investment may also be seen at odds with trying to promote its domestic nuclear industry. 'We believe these numbers are achievable,' Maros Sefcovic, EU trade commissioner, said at a press conference in Brussels, where he also highlighted the 'nuclear renaissance' taking place in Europe. 'That's the offer. We are ready to go for those purchases.' Europe has become a major buyer of US barrels since the region began dialing back its purchases from Russia after the invasion of Ukraine. At times, flows from the US Gulf to the continent have reached more than 2 million barrels a day, about half of total American crude export volumes. Any further increase in purchases could prove problematic for the region's oil refineries which need a mix of supplies to make a enough of the right kind refined fuels like gasoline and diesel. In the first half of 2025, EU countries imported about 1.53 million barrels a day of oil from the US, of which 86% was in the form of crude, according to data from analytics firm Kpler. Those imports were worth about $19 billion. That represented about 14% of total EU oil consumption, which averaged 10.66 million barrels a day last year, according to data from the Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy. EU officials have long seen energy purchases as a way to win favor with the Trump administration, and it's not the first time the EU and the US have made such a commitment. During the height of the EU energy crisis in 2022 following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, von der Leyen agreed with former President Joe Biden to boost short-term supplies of LNG. 'The EU-US agreement on higher energy purchases — including LNG — will make no difference to the market balance unless the US administration decides to sell the LNG itself or unless the EU decided to purchase LNG itself at a higher rate to other market participants in Asia,' Rabobank Energy Strategist Florence Schmit said. Even if this agreement leads to more EU spending on US LNG projects, flows are unlikely to materialize before the end of Trump's term, she said. The 27-nation bloc's own modeling suggests that gas demand will weaken as it accelerates the transition to a greener economy over the course of this decade. The US, already the world's biggest LNG producer, is about to unleash a fresh wave of supply in the next few years. There are further projects being planned and those would need new buyers and financing to materialize, and Trump may be eager to get new deals done even if not all the supply ultimately ends up in Europe. Investment Boost 'What the Trump administration cares the most is new supply agreements with European buyers for supply from new projects, which will help them secure financing,' said Han Wei, an analyst at BloombergNEF. US LNG is also typically destination-free, meaning that even European buyers of the fuel can ship it wherever the best priced market is at any given point. The continent has been the biggest recipient of US LNG since the 2022 crisis, but it would still be competing in a global market against buyers from Asia. A joint purchase platform — designed to aggregate EU demand and match buyers with sellers — has seen only limited buy-in, and the details on what concrete deals have been made as a result of it remain scarce. 'I have a hard time seeing this as a victory for the EU,' said Jean-Christian Heintz, a former energy-trading executive who is now an independent consultant at Wideangle LNG. 'It will remain each state's decision to move on with Trump.' Energy commissioner Dan Jorgensen has said that the EU is willing to work with the Trump administration and US energy suppliers to help them conform to the bloc's strict rules on methane emissions, but any tweaks are likely to be technical in nature. The EU's ambition to scale up nuclear energy as part of its 2050 climate neutrality goal will cost €241 billion ($280 billion). Von der Leyen's deal with Trump includes so-called SMRs that are still under development in both the US and Europe. --With assistance from Elena Mazneva, Ewa Krukowska, Eamon Akil Farhat and Sherry Su. (Updates with comment from Sefcovic in seventh paragraph) Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme Scottish Wind Farms Show How to Counter Nimby Opposition ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Accounts receivable: From neglected function to strategic imperative
Accounts receivable (AR) is a business-critical function that ensures organisations get paid, yet it is consistently undervalued and underappreciated. This oversight creates significant risks and missed opportunities for companies, especially in today's uncertain economic climate where visibility of their cashflow management is vital to their survival. AR teams are not just back-office processors – they're at the frontline of payment patterns. They see in real time how quickly customers pay, who is always on time or late, and where broader economic pressures are impacting financial confidence and payment habits. This unique look into payment trends provides businesses with a strategic edge they can and should leverage. However, the challenges facing AR teams are mounting. The critical insight they can offer often remains untapped because the function remains pigeonholed as merely being able to send invoices and chase payments. And pressure on AR professionals has grown steadily, driven significantly by a rapid increase in payment requests as the number of active businesses in the UK hit an all-time high of 5.6 million this year. But despite this growing demand, AR remains low on the list of investment priorities for many finance leaders. The result of decades-long under-investment Many AR teams operate with outdated systems, some installed as far back as the late 1990s to handle the Y2K issue. This manual reality means that the human touch, which is crucial for sensitive customer interactions like negotiating payment plans or chasing overdue invoices, is bogged down by inefficient processes. But the human element in AR is indispensable. Accounts receivable is about relationships, not just transactions. Payment conversations require emotional intelligence, and done right, the AR experience can significantly aid customer satisfaction, loyalty, and recommendation. While AI and machine learning can help flag invoices for follow-up and automate reconciliation, the job will always need a human touch due to the bespoke nature of many processes and the importance of customer relationships. Therefore, simply automating processes won't solve the core issues; businesses must modernise not just their tools but also their approach to how AR is valued and supported. Clinging to legacy systems also carries significant data risks. AR systems house some of the most sensitive data, including customer bank details and billing history. Legacy platforms, often receiving little maintenance, are prime targets for cybercriminals. High-profile incidents, such as those impacting major UK retailers, demonstrate how vulnerabilities in ageing platforms can lead to severe operational disruption and financial losses. The hesitation to migrate this data, while understandable, actually poses a greater risk than a strategic modernisation. Evolving AR from neglected to critical To recognise AR as a strategic business asset, it needs the right tools and investment, whether this is supporting with reconciliation, securing sensitive data through encryption and tokenisation, or ways to offload risk and improve compliance. The invisible cost of not making the most of your AR team is significant. Businesses don't just lose money from inefficient collections; they miss out on the benefits that better forecasting and tighter cash flow control could bring to operations. In an economy that is increasingly fragile and uncertain, businesses that continue to sideline AR run the risk of turning a low-profile operational gap into a critical point of failure. Investing in modernising AR is a strategic necessity, and it's time for business leaders to take this seriously. Leaders must enable AR teams to provide critical insights, enhance security, and drive business resilience, transforming them from an overlooked back-office function into an indispensable strategic asset. Kush Shah is Director Product Management - PTX, Bottomline "Accounts receivable: From neglected function to strategic imperative" was originally created and published by Electronic Payments International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
